literacy, improving the competitiveness of American companies, and real-time embedded systems. Page 25.1441.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Using Stories to Promote Technological LiteracyAbstractTechnologies are all around us; they exist in many different forms; and have numerous diversefunctions. Today’s society, in general, would have a difficult time living or functioning withoutmost of these modern conveniences. Yet people take our modern technologies for granted. Thatis, people use them but in almost every case do not really understand them, know how they work,or
arts. He has recently developed and team-taught with an engineering faculty member, a new interdisciplinary course ”Energy: How Much is Enough?” Page 25.476.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Do We Control Technology or Does Technology Control Us?Abstract: William Wulf has suggested that the use of tools, i.e. technology, is what defines us ashuman. Might technology also be a genie that once released cannot be returned to its bottle?This paper describes a course for a mixed group of first-year engineering and liberal artsstudents, designed to explore the history
National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two- strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Ms. Catherine Anne Hubka, University of New Mexico Catherine (Cat) Hubka, MFA, holds dual appointments at the University of New Mexico in the Depart- ments of Chemical and Biological Engineering (CBE) and Department of English. For CBE, she is em- bedded in the 300 and 400 labs where she supports
; society program in the De- partment of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. He is also the co-leader of the ’Nano and the City’ thematic research cluster for the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University. Rider is a Research Collaborator with the Sustainability Science Education program at the Biodesign Institute. His research focuses on wicked problems that arise at the intersection of society and technology. Rider holds a Ph.D. in Sustainability from Arizona State University
concepts in this paper, to allow for ambiguity about the extent to which these modesare psychologically “real” versus useful categories for analysis. Crucially, we do not assume thatan ideological mode observed by a student or by a group will characterize the student or group ina different context.We note that mindsets and “the culture of disengagement” prevalent in engineering andengineering education are cultural constructions that have ideological character. The ideology-in-pieces theoretical framework provides us with theoretical and analytical tools for making senseof engineering students’ reasoning in ways that allow us to begin building a bridge fromstudents’ contextualized, often tacit ideological assumptions to the grand “mindsets” and
PhD in Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology from the Indian Institute of Technology. Arthur is a recipient of the EPA’s Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Award and has served as a faculty in the Chemical Engineering Summer School. Arthur is actively involved in engineering education research with particular emphasis on teaching engineering to non-engineers, and including industry practices in university education. Arthur is a member of American Society for Engineering Education.Dr. Igor Kourkine Page 24.103.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014A Sequence
- bosses.html (last accessed Jan 12 2012)5. International Technology Education Association. Standards for Technological Literacy, International Technology Education Association, Reston, VA (2000/2002/2007). (last accessed March 15, 2011).6. Libros, Randy “Improving technological literacy through the use of news articles”, Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2011). American Society for Engineering Education7. Brooks, Robert M., Jyothsna K S, Amithraj Amavasai , ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY FOR NON- ENGINERING AND NON-SCIENCE MAJORS, Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2011). American
research focus has been on the history and social relations of technology. He has worked as an electronics engineer for the Department of Defense, and he has held teaching and research positions relating to the social study of technology at M.I.T., Harvard, and Yale University, including a stint as Assistant Collections Manager/Curator at Harvard’s Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology.John Vardalas, IEEE Outreach Historian IEEE History Center Page 22.1622.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A proposal for using history of technology to promote an
-Hulman Office of Learning and Technology offers a paid summer course developmentworkshop for faculty who are designing online or hybrid courses. One focus of the workshop isto help faculty members create accessible courses using Universal Design for Learning (UDL)principles. In this paper, we describe the transition of our required writing course, Technical andProfessional Communication (Tech Comm), into online and hybrid formats. Specifically, wefocus on how UDL principles helped us rethink our classroom pedagogies and createdopportunities for us to develop new, more accessible course materials. Our course, like manytechnical writing courses, includes students from multiple disciplines who are often resistant totaking a required course offered
received his Ph.D. from Princeton University in 1989 and his present interests include structural dynamics, structural health monitoring, and undergraduate engineering education. Dr. Cornwell has received an SAE Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award in 1992, and the Dean’s Outstanding Teacher award at Rose-Hulman in 2000 and the Rose-Hulman Board of Trustee’s Outstanding Scholar Award in 2001. He was one of the developers of the Rose-Hulman Sophomore Engineering Curriculum, the Dynamics Concept Inventory, and he is a co-author of Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Dynamics, by Beer, Johnston, Cornwell, and Self.James Mayhew, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology James Mayhew is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose
College of Engineering. The Engineering Education Transformations Institute at UGA is an innovative approach that fuses high quality engineering education research with systematic educational innovation to transform the educational practices and cultures of engineering. Dr. Walther’s research group, the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic in- terdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineer- ing, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research methodologies in engineering
quoted in this paper, is that engineers are human beings, and that the study of theHumanities reminds us of this fact, the practical consequence of which is that we do not“confound” (Ibid.) our disciplinary activities, our contributions to technology, with the whole ofwhat matters to human society (and beyond).Most recently, the TUEE: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering Phase 1Workshop Report indirectly states the need for HSSEE in terms of the industry’s perspective onwhat is lacking in today’s engineering graduates: “an international and global perspective,” alongwith “decision-making [and] communication” (among other skills). [13, p. 4] This observationties in strongly with Mitra et al.’s interpretation that engineering
participation in engineering and providing international experiences and perspectives to undergraduate students.Dr. Andre Millard, University of Alabama at Birmingham PhD from Emory University in economic history Editor of the Thomas Edison papers publications include ”Edison and the Business of Innovation” (Johns Hopkins university press), ”America on Record: A His- tory of Recorded Sound (Cambridge) Historian of technology, technology & culture, American studies. teach at the University of Alabama at Birmingham c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Reclaiming General Education: History for EngineersAbstractUS institutions generally take a broad view of higher education
AC 2011-1369: USING BOUNDARY NEGOTIATING ARTIFACTS TO IN-VESTIGATE INTERDISCIPLINARY AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMSKacey Beddoes, Virginia Tech Kacey Beddoes is a Ph.D. student in Science and Technology Studies at Virginia Tech. Her current research interests are interdisciplinary studies of gender and engineering education and international en- gineering education. She serves as Managing Editor of Engineering Studies. She is also co-editor of What is Global Engineering Education For? The Making of International Educators, and Assistant Editor of the Global Engineering series from Morgan & Claypool publishers.Maura J. Borrego, Virginia Tech Maura Borrego is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering
, citing thecriticisms of employers of engineering graduates who lacked communication skills, businessacumen, and “an understanding of men.” [sic]1Sir Eric Ashy writes in 1959 that he sees a higher purpose to a humanistic education, not just intaking specific courses, but in making sense of the technology the engineer employs in itswholeness, what he calls the essence of “technological humanism.”2Samuel Florman in 1968 provides five reasons for studying the liberal arts in the introductorychapter “The Civilized Engineer” of his book Engineering and the Liberal Arts. Three of thereasons are for the personal benefit for the engineer, including an appreciation of beauty,enhancing the imagination, and the development of leadership characteristics. Two
AC 2012-4619: WORKFORCE COMMUNICATION INSTRUCTION: PRE-LIMINARY INTER-RATER RELIABILITY DATA FOR AN EXECUTIVE-BASED ORAL COMMUNICATION RUBRICDr. Tristan T. Utschig, Georgia Institute of Technology Tristan Utschig is a Senior Academic Professional in the Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning and Assistant Director for the Scholarship and Assessment of Teaching and Learning at the Georgia Institute of Technology. In this role, he consults with faculty about planning and assessing edu- cational innovation in the classroom. He also serves as an evaluator on educational research grants. For- merly, he was tenured Associate Professor of engineering physics at Lewis-Clark State College. Utschig has regularly
faculty surveyed were impressed by the presentation skills and the technicalknowledge of the presenters. They were also inspired by the presentation strategies andideas presented. At the same time, the students in the audience personally identified withthe presenters and were encouraged by seeing “students just like us” presenting socompetently. These results will help us capitalize on the educational value of thecompetition as well as provide directions for future research.What is Presentation Idol?Presentation Idol is held every spring at the institute’s main campus. Students in anyengineering discipline – degree or diploma program – can register to compete for $3,300in prizes. Participation in Idol is voluntary and not connected to any courses
AC 2011-1415: AVOIDING INFERIORITY: GLOBAL ENGINEERING ED-UCATION ACROSS JAPANGary Lee Downey, Virginia Tech Gary Downey is Alumni Distinguished Professor in Science and Technology Studies and affiliated Profes- sor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. A mechanical engineer (Lehigh) and cultural anthropolo- gist (University of Chicago), he is co-editor of What Is Global Engineering Education For?: The Making of International Educators (Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2010). Author of The Machine in Me: An Anthropologist Sits Among Computer Engineers, he is Editor of The Engineering Studies Series at MIT Press and Global Engineering series at Morgan & Claypool, as well as the Engineering Studies journal
President of the Michigan Tech ASEE chapter.Anahita Pakzad, Michigan Technological UniversityRenee Oats, Michigan Technological University Renee Oats is a PhD student studying civil engineering at Michigan Tech. Page 22.642.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Ethical and Societal Implications of Internet Based Engineering Education: Faculty and Student PerspectivesIntroductionInternet-based engineering education has been in existence since the early 1990s inseveral forms. Through internet-based learning students are able to pace themselves,interact with instructors and
particular of 1st yearstudents, who apparently have difficulty in building their engineering identity and opt-out toother non-engineering area, while students from other disciplines very rarely transfer toengineering.The key motivation in initiating the proposed study is thus a quest for new educational solutionsthat will help explaining in appealing terms what engineers do and how they contribute to thewell-being of society in the short term, and that will, in the long term encourage potentialstudents to take on engineering careers.Declining engineering enrollment trends are directly related to the public understanding ofscience (PUS), technology and engineering (although that relation is far from simple). PUStrends are closely monitored by a
Integrated CurriculumIntroduction and BackgroundThere have for many years been efforts to bridge the gap between educational experiences inengineering and the liberal arts and sciences. Such efforts typically take the form of coursesdesigned to promote technological literacy for liberal arts majors, or courses designed toencourage engineering or science majors to consider the social and political implications of theirprofessions.Technological literacy for non-technology majors has been addressed in a variety of ways. Onevery popular version is to provide a course for students, early in their collegiate career, to learnan engineering application that has direct relevance to their lives. This approach has been used atYale University in the course
Paper ID #9522Final Results of Reliability Testing for the Norback-Utschig Presentation Scor-ing System and Implications for InstructionDr. Judith Shaul Norback, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Tristan T. Utschig, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Tristan T. Utschig is a Senior Academic Professional in the Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning and is Assistant Director for the Scholarship and Assessment of Teaching and Learning at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Formerly, he was a tenured Associate Professor of Engineering Physics at Lewis-Clark State College. Dr. Utschig consults with faculty across
were unanimous intheir belief that an appreciation and understanding of the historic role of engineering in societywould produce better engineers. They reiterated the interest in a course covering all fields ofengineering and technology, which they felt would be particularly useful for first-yearengineering students. They also reiterated the concern that a course offered by a singleassociation might be biased towards that association’s fields of interest.At the same time, they were sanguine about student interest in history, and suggested that such acourse should be required, but there is no longer any space in the curriculum. Having such acourse also fulfill the university’s general education requirement was proposed as a solution.On the
Lafayette Amy S. Van Epps is an associate professor of Library Science and Engineering Librarian at Purdue Uni- versity. She has extensive experience providing instruction for engineering and technology students, including Purdue’s first-year engineering program. Her research interests include finding effective meth- ods for integrating information literacy knowledge into the undergraduate engineering curriculum. Prof. Van Epps has a BA in engineering science from Lafayette College, her MSLS from Catholic University of America, a M.Eng. in Industrial Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and is currently working on her PhD in Engineering Education at Purdue.Dr. Michael Thomas SmithDr. Sorin Adam Matei
Paper ID #10385Exploring Student Sustainability Knowledge using the Structure of ObservedLearning Outcomes (SOLO) TaxonomyDr. Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel Dr. Mary Katherine Watson is currently an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. Prior to joining the faculty at The Citadel, Dr. Watson earned her PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering from The Georgia Institute of Technology. She also has BS and MS degrees in Biosystems Engineering from Clemson University. Dr. Watson’s research interests are in the areas of engineering education and biological waste treatment. Specifically
technology and science writer for Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Jared earned a BA in English and creative writing from Colby College, and an MA in literature from Boston College. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Use of Metaphor in Presenting Prototypes to a Technical and Non-Technical Public AudienceAbstractIn undergraduate technical courses, instructors commonly infuse their teaching with metaphors,analogies, and similes to connect new concepts with students’ existing knowledge base. Thispedagogical approach has been shown to be effective in a variety of fields, includingengineering. Similarly, professional engineers translate complex technical
Engineering Education Benefits From Interactive E-Learning and the HumanitiesBy: Katarina Larsen and Johan GärdeboKTH – Royal Institute of TechnologyDivision of History of Science, Technology and EnvironmentThis paper engages with how to construct tools for student activation,using analytical models, web-based feedback and critical reflectioninengineering education. Learning requires different levels ofunderstanding and means to appropriate and formulate knowledge.However, peer instruction and student participation require a degree offacilitation, which is a role the teacher needs to analyse and developbefore students can be demanded to demonstrate increased participationin course content, feedback and
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The MIT Lewis Survey: Creating a Cold War Blueprint for a Technological University, 1947-1949Amidst the structural changes and the “reengineering” of higher education, historical perspectivecan provide us with a vantage point from which to reflect upon the many changes we are seeingtoday. In my talk, I approach this opportunity through a study of MIT’s Committee onEducational Survey, or the “Lewis Survey,” whose 1949 report is regarded by many as the ColdWar “blueprint” for MIT. Rooted in conversations that originated within our society, MITfaculty members embraced the notion of a broader and more fundamental approach toengineering education, even as they
Abdullah, 59.10 Meier, 384.11 Brown, T., & Brown, K. (2014). Rocket Mail: Using Historic Articles as Case Studies in Physics and Engineering. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(2), 64–69.12 Brown and Brown, 64.13 Brown and Brown, 64.14 Brown and Brown, 65.15 Delatte, N. (2013). Student Projects in Engineering History and Heritage. American Society for Engineering Education Conference Proceedings. Retrieved December 15, 2015, from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/6443/view16 Rose, A. (2015). Using a Former Governor’s Archives as a Source of Scholarship in Engineering Technology. American Society for Engineering Education Conference Proceedings. Retrieved December 15, 2015, from
Downtown, Dr. Campbell was the Associate Vice Chancellor for Develop- mental Education at City Colleges of Chicago. She has published articles and text books on developmental mathematics, technical communications and strategies for improving student success. Page 22.1504.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 The Teamwork Conundrum: What Should be Taught and How Can We Assess Team Learning in Engineering Technology?Abstract A reoccurring theme in national surveys of employers, including a 2005 survey sponsored by theAssociation of American