include biomedical engineering, condition monitoring, and machine fault diagnosis.Prof. Patrick Linke Dr. Patrick Linke is a Professor of Chemical Engineering and the Chair of the Chemical Engineering Program at Texas A&M University at Qatar. Dr. Linke also serves as the Executive Director of the Office of Graduate Studies. He is the holder of the QatMary Queen, Texas A&M University, Qatar ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work In Progress: Towards a Transformative Collaboration – Technical Writing, Engineering, IndustryAbstractThis paper reports on a work in progress collaboration between Engineering and English facultyat an American university in the Middle
Paper ID #38584Transdisciplinary Approaches in Canadian Engineering Education:Convergences and ChallengesDr. Kari Zacharias, University of Manitoba Kari Zacharias is an Assistant Professor in the Centre for Engineering Professional Practice and Engi- neering Education at the University of Manitoba. She studies intersections and meeting points between engineering ways of knowing, being, and making, and other ways of understanding the world.Dr. Jillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba Dr. Jillian Seniuk Cicek is an Assistant Professor in the Centre for Engineering Professional Practice and Engineering Education at the
affected in these situations, especially after being taught about QPR and stuff, and then how you as an RA can get the resources that you need.Being emotionally mature, recognizing and setting appropriate boundaries, and having professorswho are informed of their students’ circumstances are all advantageous to engineering education.First, emotional maturity helps students to manage stress, collaborate better, and communicatemore effectively. It also enables them to regulate their emotions and maintain a positive outlook,both of which are important to problem-solving and innovation. Recognizing boundaries is alsoimportant in engineering education because it helps students to understand and respect ethicaland professional norms. This includes
Paper ID #39243Transgender and Nonbinary Computing and Engineering Education: AWorkshop Experience ReportStacey SextonAmanda Menier, SageFox Consulting GroupRebecca Zarch, SageFox Consulting Group Rebecca Zarch is an evaluator and a director of SageFox Consulting Group. She has spent almost 20 years evaluating and researching STEM education projects from K-12 through graduate programs. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Transgender and Nonbinary Computing and Engineering Education: A Workshop Experience ReportExisting gender diversity Broadening
Paper ID #39174Applying STS to Engineering Education: A Comparative Study of STS Mi-norsProf. MC Forelle, University of Virginia MC Forelle is an assistant professor, teaching track, in Engineering & Society at the University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science. Their work examines the intersection of law, technology, and culture, with particular interests in materiality, sustainability, and practices of resistance and change. Currently, they are developing a a book project that studies the technological challenges faced by users, tinkerers, and repair communities working to repair, maintain, and
Paper ID #39306Characterizing student argument justifications in small groupsociotechnical discussionsDr. Chelsea Joy Andrews, Tufts University Chelsea Andrews is a Research Assistant Professor at Tufts University, at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO).Ms. Fatima Rahman, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach STEM Education graduate student at Tufts University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Characterizing student arguments against a technology in small group sociotechnical discussionsIntroductionUniversities across the
Paper ID #44381Project DECIDE: A K12 Civics and Engineering Education Curricular Partnership(Works in Progress)Dr. Tamecia R. Jones, North Carolina State University Tamecia Jones is an assistant professor in the Technology, Engineering, and Design Program of the STEM Education Department at North Carolina State University College of Education with a research focus on K-12 engineering education, assessment, and informal and formal learning environments. She has a BS in Biomedical Engineering from Johns Hopkins University, a MA in Learning, Design, and Technology from Stanford University, a MDiv from Boston University, and a PhD
Paper ID #38637Worker Safety in Offshore Wind as a Door for Sociotechnical EngineeringEducationDr. Desen Sevi Ozkan, Tufts University Desen is a postdoctoral researcher at Tufts University in the Center for Engineering Education Outreach and the Institute for Research on Learning and Instruction Tech. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Virginia Tech and a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Tufts University.Samantha FriedBeth J. Rosenberg ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Worker Safety in Offshore Wind as a Door for SociotechnicalEngineering EducationABSTRACT. While touched on
literature review (ScLR) conducted toelucidate the current landscape, trends, methods, and potential gaps in the literature surroundingequitable design pedagogy in engineering education. The ScLR follows the methodologypresented by Arksey and O’Malley (2005), which breaks the process into five stages: (1)identifying the research questions, (2) identifying the relevant studies, (3) study selection, (4)charting the data, and (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. These stages wereperformed iteratively, which allowed for reflection and study team collaboration along eachstage. The study was grounded in four central inclusion criteria: (1) equitable design, (2)engineering education, (3) engineering course, and (4) secondary education
Paper ID #42821From Mind Full to Mindful: Proposing Mindfulness as a Proactive Strategyfor Safeguarding Mental Health in Engineering Education.Vanessa Tran, Utah State University Vanessa Tran is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Utah State University (USU). She earned a Bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Architecture (UAH) and a Master’s in Global Production Engineering and Management from the Vietnamese-German University (VGU) in Vietnam. Her research interest lies in enhancing the well-being of engineering students and educators. She is currently working on an NSF-funded project
modifying the culture of engineering education to improve mental health among underrepresented STEM studentscaused by nothing. And like, it hurts to do everything, to just exist”. Esperanza came to understandthrough our collaboration how her physical disabilities affected other health problems and her mentalhealth as well. “Like even, I think that goes with anxiety, too, and asthma and all that. Like, it's all kind oftied together”.Another consistent finding from all three participants was the invisibility of economic differencesbetween students and particularly the invisible labor that low-income students exert to pay for theireducation and expenses. This issue was particularly salient for Esperanza, who shared how
Paper ID #38608Work in progress: Coloring Outside the Lines - Exploring the Potentialfor Integrating Creative Evaluation in Engineering EducationDr. Cherie D. Edwards, Virginia Commonwealth UniversityDr. Bryanne PetersonDr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri, ThatStatsGirl Dr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri is an Engineering Educator and People Research Scientist. Sreyoshi’s expertise lies at the intersection of workforce development, AI and emerging technology, and engineering education. As a Research Scientist in the tech industry, Sreyoshi leverages AI for mixed-methods research on and for people at work, ensuring that organizations intentionally center
Paper ID #40074The Person behind the Mann Report: Charles Riborg Mann as an Influentialbut Elusive Figure in Engineering EducationDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She has served twice as chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and is co-director of the Communication Across Divisions initiative. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Person Behind the Mann
teaches advanced undergraduate laboratory courses and manages the senior capstone program in the Micron School. He ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Building a Communication-Integrated Curriculum in Materials ScienceAbstractWith the need to meet ABET outcomes around professional skills, such as communication andteamwork, engineering programs have long explored approaches to ensure their graduates areable to participate in the workplace in ways that employers demand. While approaches vary andsuccess depends on a number of factors, research demonstrates that an integrated approach toprofessional skill development is the most impactful for student learning. How can anengineering program build an
Paper ID #38205Engineering Is Personal: Interpersonal Communication for the21st-Century EngineerDr. Joanna G Burchfield, University of South FloridaApril A. Kedrowicz, North Carolina State University, Raleigh ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering is Personal: Interpersonal Communication for the 21st Century EngineerAbstractIn 1996, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) adopted EngineeringCriteria 2000 (EC2000). EC2000 was revolutionary for its time and its implications forengineering education paradigms rocked engineering programs around the United
) identity and culture. Program design andeffectiveness dominate the discourse of both divisions, suggesting that the two groups facesimilar challenges. Areas of apparent divergence include more concern with mindsets andinnovativeness in ENT and more emphasis on team skills and mentorship in LEAD. Thesefindings present opportunities for collaboration that could benefit all “Engineering and …”divisions and help overcome the inertia that characterizes engineering education. The permeationof topics across ASEE and the convergence of themes across divisions also suggest that forminga new division might perpetuate disciplinary siloes, rather than support knowledge integrationacross the “Engineering and . . .” divisions
Paper ID #38069Story-Driven Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature ReviewDr. Ariana Turner, Georgia Institute of TechnologyHye Yeon Lee, Georgia Institute of TechnologyProf. Joseph M LeDoux, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems Joe Le Doux is the Executive Director for Learning and Training in the Department of Biomedical En- gineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University. Dr. Le Doux’s research interests include narrative and inclusive pedagogies and practices. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
show a wideapplicability of STEM concepts to different problems helps students find goal fit with why theyare studying STEM and how they prefer to learn STEM (e.g., independently, collaboratively,competitively). Fletcher and Everly offer a host of recommendations for supporting LGBTQpeople in the workplace [42], many of which are applicable to the STEM learning environmentas well.Researching Authenticity in STEMViewing the experiences of LGBTQ STEM students through a framework of network homophilyand authenticity leads to potential new directions for engineering education research as well. Onepromising direction for research then to better understand LGBTQ participation in engineering issocial network analysis [43], which helps demonstrate the
Paper ID #37848Minoritization Processes in Structural Engineering Diversity WorkDr. Lara K. Schubert, UCLA; Cal State Los Angeles; Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo Lara K. Schubert is a research affiliate at the UCLA Center for the Study of Women. She is a former full-time structural engineer who works in feminist studies of science and technology, teaching on these topics at California State University, Los Angeles and California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Minoritization Processes in Structural Engineering Diversity
from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor in April 2021; her thesis included both technical and educational research. She also holds an M.S.E. in aerospace engineering from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor and a B.S.E. in civil engineering from Case Western Reserve University, both in the areas of structural engineering and solid mechanics. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work-In-Progress: Re-Engineering Engineering: A Collaborative Inquiry Toward a Solidarity Engineering-Focused Future Stephen Fernandez, Sarah Aileen Brownell, Ankita Kumar, Bailey Bond-Trittipo, Zoii Arrianna Henry, and Corin L. BowenAbstractWhat is the purpose of engineering? Who
University Channel Islands and Virginia tech he explores community empowerment for environmental justice, global engineering ethics, critical pedagogy coupled to STS, He specializes in sustainable technology, social movements, and community engagement stemming from a background in Science and Technology Studies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Cultivating “global competency” in a divided world Cultivating “global competency” in a divided world: A collaborative autoethnography of the cross-border, dialogue-based curriculum designINTRODUCTIONBACKGROUNDAmid the pandemic and geopolitical conflicts, the world and local communities are facingsupply chain
knowledge.Megan Kenny Feister, CSUCI Megan Kenny Feister is an Assistant Professor of Organizational Communication at California State Uni- versity Channel Islands. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023COLLABORATION PRACTICES AROUND TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE Abstract This paper examines collaborative work involving complex technological infrastructure,and contrasts this setting with other contexts of technologically-mediated collaboration. In doingso, we center the role of problem-solving practices as one of the key determinants of successfulcollaborative work. Data from interviews and observations with scientists indicated that whilethe complexity of
collaborative efforts between engineers, industry, the government, and others.As much as innovative forms of pedagogies are needed in engineering education, it has beenrough and fiery processes to define, configure, refigure, and reformulate hybrid pedagogiesamong participating actors. Drawing on about a decade-long years of experience in hybridforms of teaching and learning environment in an engineering department, the paper followsthe trajectory of a contested epistemic and pragmatic space, where the topography ofengineering practice and education must be reconfigured and remapped. Combiningdocumentary analysis, participation, and in-depth dialogue with engineers, I provide insideand reflexive accounts of what aspects of engineering have been
Tech.Jan DeWaters, Clarkson University Dr. Jan DeWaters is an Associate Professor in the Institute for STEM Education with a joint appointment in the School of Engineering at Clarkson University, and teaches classes in both areas. Her research focuses on developing and assessing effective, inclusive teaching and learning in a variety of settings. An environmental engineer by training, Dr. DeWaters’ work typically integrates environmental topics such as energy and climate into STEM settings.Lucas Adams, Clarkson University Current Senior at Clarkson University in Potsdam, NY majoring in Applied Mathematics and Statistics ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
Paper ID #42551An Ecosystem Analysis of Engineering Thriving with Emergent Properties atthe Micro, Meso, and Macro LevelsDr. Julianna Gesun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Julianna Gesun, Ph.D., is currently a postdoctoral research scholar at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Her research broadly focuses on understanding and supporting the process by which engineering programs facilitate the environments for students to develop optimal functioning in undergraduate engineering programs. Her research interests intersect the fields of positive psychology, engineering education, and human development to understand
Paper ID #43601Left on their Own: Confronting Absences of AI Ethics Training among EngineeringMaster’s StudentsElana Goldenkoff, University of MichiganDr. Erin A. Cech, University of Michigan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Left on their Own: Confronting Absences of AI Ethics Training amongEngineering Master’s StudentsAbstractAlthough development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies has been underway fordecades, the acceleration of AI capabilities and rapid expansion of user access in the past fewyears has elicited public excitement as well as alarm. Leaders in government and academia, aswell as members of the
Paper ID #41641Engineering Identity Development Among International Students in UK FoundationYearDr. Madeline Polmear, King’s College London Madeline Polmear is a lecturer (assistant professor) in engineering education at King’s College London. Her research interests relate to engineering ethics education and the development of societal responsibility and professional competence through formal and informal learning. Madeline received her Bachelor’s in environmental engineering, Master’s in civil engineering, and PhD in civil engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder, USA. Prior to joining KCL, she was a Marie
, the system should be seen as a sociotechnical system” [5]. From the sociotechnicalcharacter of AI systems emerges the need to understand them holistically, in dialogue with societal systems. Thepace of development of these technologies and the ethical challenges that come with them are also generating a needfor new learning goals [4].When geared toward engineers, education about AI has the potential to connect practicingprofessionals to the collective and mutually dependent fields related to AI. Educating problem-solvers to exchangeinspiration and insight in collaborative conversations in society is also a crucial training for what they need toaccomplish in their work [6]. When engineers collaborate to understand the contexts that only
Paper ID #43207Pathways from Engineering Programs to Labor UnionsDr. Joey Valle, Purdue University Joseph ’Joey’ Valle is a queer Latine Ashkenazi Jew employed as a postdoctoral worker in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Valle received a Ph.D in Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor. They were awarded an NSF STEMEdIPRF Postdoctoral Fellowship: Advancing Engineering Education in Universities on Labor and Unions to study intersections of engineering and labor.Lazlo Stepback, Purdue University Lazlo Stepback is a PhD student in Engineering Education at
attention to diverse stakeholders, • creating more reflexive and ethical engineers, and • preparing engineers to collaborate better across disciplinary and cultural differences.Interest in these promises often derives from sociopolitical critiques of engineering, whichrespond to engineering’s close alignment with contemporary configurations of capital andmilitarism [10, 11, 12], interrogate the distribution of agency and responsibility withinengineering [13, 14], and produce engineering educational spaces that can reproduce inequitieswhile purportedly operating as “unbiased,” “apolitical,” and “rigorous” [15]—all while animatedby particular environmental, social, and technical conditions constraining the world in whichengineers hope to