usually a combination of entrepreneurship and other businesscourses, such as accounting and marketing. On another note, one of the barriers to attractingstudents from across campus into entrepreneurship courses can be pre-requisites. Almost all ofBelmont’s courses are experiential in nature in the sense that their students work on projectsdirectly related to their businesses, their ideas for businesses, or from their area of interest, suchas music, art, health sciences, history, English.At Belmont, entrepreneurship programs reach students across campus by offering specializedlectures and even specific courses within various programs. Their professors often integrateassignments in their classes around the entrepreneurship topics covered in these
, Pasadena, CA and an Invited Professor at INRIA Rhone-Alpes, Monbonnot, France. Research interests include computer vision, mobile robotics, intelligent vehicles, entrepreneurship, and education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Flipping the Design Class using “Off-the-shelf” Content: Can it work?ABSTRACTThe benefits and challenges of flipping classrooms have been demonstrated in many recentpapers, including several presented in the Mechanical Engineering Division at AmericanSociety for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition. This,combined with very negative student reviews of the current textbook, convinced the authorat Ohio Northern University (ONU) to experiment with a
afoundations course to develop and deliver engineering lessons to fourth or fifth graders. Studentsin comparison engineering classes worked on a team project focused on experimental design fora small satellite system. The purpose of this study was to determine if participating in theEd+gineering collaboration had a positive effect on teamwork effectiveness and satisfactionwhen compared to the comparison class. In both team projects, the five dimensions of theComprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME) system were used as aquantitative assessment. The five dimensions of CATME Behaviorally Anchored Ratings Scale(BARS) (contribution to the team’s work, interacting with teammates, keeping the team on track,expecting quality, and having
Paper ID #28248Design of Instructional Tools to Facilitate Understanding of FluidViscous Dampers in A Vibration and Controls Class and Course AssessmentDr. Yucheng Liu P.E., Mississippi State University Dr. Yucheng Liu is the Jack Hatcher Chair Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering (ME) at Mississippi State University (MSU) and he currently serves as Graduate Coordinator in that depart- ment. Prior to joining MSU in 2014, Dr. Liu was the Assistant Professor of the ME Department at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette (UL Lafayette). Dr. Liu received his PhD degree from the University of Louisville in
University of Illinois at Chicago, a publicuniversity in an urban setting, and it is taught as a design studio which is both project- and team-based. It is a required class for Mechanical, Civil, and Industrial engineering students and it isopen to other engineering majors as an elective. There are typically forty students per classsection, and in recent years four to six sections of the class are offered in each term, taught bytwo to four faculty members. The total enrollment has been growing and is close to 400 for thecurrent academic year. Despite being offered as a first-year course, ME 250’s enrollmenttypically includes students from all years. Students are placed in teams of four to complete twoor three projects, including the final project
property requirements of sponsors, and confidentiality issues. Page 22.1518.3Newer trends in capstone design included collaborative efforts between different engineeringdepartments at separate universities within the US, the use of international collaborative projects,and establishing design partnerships between engineering, business and health science students.6The same conference was recently held (June 2010) for the second time in Boulder, Colorado.Topics ranged from assessment, grading, team selection and dynamics, communication andtechnical writing, innovation, entrepreneurship and commercialization, globalization, industrypartnerships and
took the course in an effort to better understand intellectual property in case I find myself inan entrepreneurship position down the line. Today, I feel confident in my understanding of"why" we have intellectual property, "what" can be protected, as well as the "law" that mightplay out in a courtroom. However, I would have preferred a class geared more towards appliedIP with a greater focus on "how" to obtain protection, rather than how to defend it in a courtroom (though we did cover it all lightly). That is, the class provided me with more of the "law"understanding than I think I need at this time, and not quite enough of the steps towardsobtaining protection.I wouldn't expect the professor to change the course in any way because it's
engineering content, as this is covered in regularclass sessions, but it does include instruction in “+ X” content (in this project, entrepreneurship)which would not be covered in class sessions. Scenario/* Hands0On* Team* Homework* Story* Lab* Discussion* Decision:Making* Page 24.996.5 Figure'2'*'Scenario"Based!Learning!pedagogical!elementsThe second and third steps of this process are what distinguish this curriculum from previouscase study curricula because it involves a “social world” hands-on experiences (in the form of alab) that
students. From student-led design and construction teamsthrough surveys of recent alumni, the methods and results of this single case study can serve as atemplate for development and evaluation of new maker spaces to review as they plan andimplement their own spaces to foster design, innovation, and entrepreneurship skills inundergraduate engineering students.2 Overview of the Design StudioThe Design Studio is a 5,500 square foot student-run space consisting of several interconnectedrooms on the ground floor of a building primarily used to house the mechanical engineeringdepartment offices and labs (Figure 1). It began in 2012 with just one room that was previouslybeing used as a large storage space, and grew strategically as departmental needs
engineering skills needed in the workforce. Bothengineering research and very applied and hands-on engineering are needed within industry (asshown by survey data reported later in this paper). In addition, a critical need to reestablishworld-class manufacturing in a number of industries within the U.S. points to a growing need fora redefined and larger mechanical engineering technology educational venue.The reasons for re-thinking engineering education are compelling. Mechanical engineering andmechanical engineering technology program content and attendant populations have to respondto future workforce needs, either by resizing or restructuring. The responses of academicprograms are expected to vary widely, due to the great diversity within
conventional mechanical engineering curriculum.What is more surprising is the relative dearth of credits dedicated to Dynamic Systems andControls (3.6 credits), historically a major component of many degree programs. However, someof this education might have moved into experimentation or electronics courses (in the form ofmechatronics). As discussed below, this overlap of concepts between courses makes it difficultto make definitive conclusions from the data in Table 2, but the sparsity of the matrix may stillbe instructive. For instance, while Georgia Tech has at least one dedicated class in each subjectarea, Stanford has four subject areas without an associated course. This may indicate that theStanford program’s heavy emphasis on design courses
classes and engineering. That is, it is important to create linksbetween non-technical courses and the engineering thought process in order for the student tounderstand how non-technical topics (economics, entrepreneurship, business modeling, ethics,political science, psychology, and global competitiveness) affect an engineer’s job. For example,an engineer can use a basic knowledge of psychology to learn how to empathize with the end userof a product. This in turn will help the engineer become more creative by understanding how hisdesign is perceived by other people. The downside is that the introduction of non-technicalcourses is constrained by credit hours. If a department wishes to pursue this option, it must decidewhat portions of its current
succeed at the two preceding, analyzing the relevant issues, requisite resources anddemands of the task to be achieved, then evaluating the potential responses and choosing amongavailable options to produce the most effective and efficient solution/response. To be prepared toinnovate, engineering students must be able to perform at Bloom’s the top levels (Evaluating andCreating). Developing the desired skill and expertise in analysis, evaluation, and creativethinking and production for unforeseen needs requires authentic experience in tasks that requirestudents to exercise these skills. If they have not experienced creative challenges that requireinnovative responses in their engineering classes, they will not be prepared to do so in
Education, 2020 Work-in-Progress: Design of Polymer Processing Learning Module in a Manufacturing Course for Mechanical EngineersAbstractIn addition to teaching about polymer molding processes, the polymer processing module wasdesigned to increase student curiosity, promote independent learning, and add a customer focus.The module activities included a Question Formulation Technique, Jigsaw, and Mini-designproject/business proposal. The module could be delivered in 2-3 class sessions. This paperdescribes a schedule for the in-class and out-of-class components of the activities. It concludeswith instructor observations about implementation issues, and how the module could beimproved in a second offering.IntroductionProject-based
individually, in-class active andcollaborative learning (ACL) exercises, and problem-based learning (PBL) team projects withentrepreneurially minded learning (EML) components. However, all modules are intended tofoster a better student understanding of the theory, practices, and career opportunities associatedwithin the fluid power industry.Starting in the Fall of 2016, the authors developed the modules and implemented them inmultiple sections (taught by different instructors) of Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanicscourses in three consecutive semesters (Fall 2016, Spring 2017, Fall 2017). Pre and post surveyswere conducted to gage the impact on student learning on the fluid power content before andafter the designed activities. Both direct and indirect
reviewed in one fifty-minute class period. The course material (theory and practice) is co- created by the students and the faculty. Since the control systems class consists of both aerospace and mechanical engineering students, the video challenge was to develop the video that describes the history of control systems development on a particular concept, example, cruise control in automobiles, UAV control etc.b. Quiz Bowl: This is a team activity (3-4 students in each team). This activity is utilized to reinforce the fundamental concepts of the subject material in each chapter. The activity is competitive, fun-based learning technique that gives autonomy to students. How does it work? • Each team prepare 10 $50.00 bills (their
introduction tomechatronic design. This class session featured Shelton’s Rules of Design (see Figure 6), acollaborative brainstorming session to identify the relative strengths of mechanical, electrical,control, and computer system-based solutions to a simple problem, and the introduction of thedesign problem (see Figure 7). Page 26.257.8 Figure 6. Shelton’s “Rules of Design”, an informal set of design rules provided to assist students in working together on their mechatronic design problem
with information about how the class make-up changedover three years, our paper will analyze which of the initial students stayed in engineeringat DU, which left engineering, which left DU, and how the students changed between theirfreshman and senior years. The goal of the study is to see if there is any information in thestudents’ non-academic profiles that can help determine why a student may havesucceeded in engineering at DU or decided to leave. A future objective will also address thepossibility of using the profiles of students to help move towards personalized learning inorder to aid in retention of students within the program.IntroductionSince the 1980s interest in engineering, along with other technical careers, has been on
engineers, with adequate culturalconsiderations. We conducted the first prototype of the curriculum in the form of a two-dayworkshop in summer, 2018. We then developed it into a full-semester engineering course atKogakuin University. Recently, it has also been adapted into a shorter workshop. Thisinterdisciplinary PBL program emphasizes the sharing of information through need-finding andstorytelling prototypes in the field. In addition, to allow rich, in-depth learning of teamwork, wedesigned a PBL project timely relevant to Japanese society, yet which is also grounded in students’daily experiences, and accessible in terms of collecting data and effecting class-level intervention.This project is related to the Shinjuku Station (Fig. 2) near
Paper ID #25459A Visual, Intuitive, and Engaging Approach to Explaining the Center of Grav-ity Concept in StaticsDr. Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University Dr. Raviv is a Professor of Computer & Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Florida Atlantic University. In December 2009 he was named Assistant Provost for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. With more than 25 years of combined experience in the high-tech industry, government and academia Dr. Raviv developed fundamentally different approaches to ”out-of-the-box” thinking and a breakthrough methodology known as ”Eight Keys to Innovation.” He has been
wouldconsist of the first course in the fundamental ME discipline areas. Once a student completestheir core set of classes, they should be able to choose a concentration area, and completeadditional courses in that concentration area to develop technical depth. The specialtyconcentration areas could fit the program’s regional industry base or faculty expertise, e.g.,provide exposure to research areas (nanoscience, etc.) in mechanical engineering.To enable curriculum change and encourage more flexibility, modifications to the ABET generalcriteria and program criteria6 for mechanical engineering (ME), e.g., in the ME criteria, nolonger requiring both thermal and mechanical competencies, but preparation for professionalwork in one or the other, with
Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at Saint Louis Unviersity, Dr. Gorlewicz is currently the director of the Collaborative Haptics, Robotics, and Mechatronics (CHROME) Lab. Her research interests are in medical robotics, haptic devices, human-machine interaction, and in creating and evaluating novel learning technologies.Dr. Sridhar S. Condoor, Saint Louis University Dr. Sridhar Condoor is a professor, KEEN fellow, a Coleman Fellow, and the editor of the Journal of En- gineering Entrepreneurship. He teaches sustainability, product design, and entrepreneurship. His research interests are in the areas of design theory and methodology, technology entrepreneurship, and sustain- ability. He is spearheading technology
in his areas of expertise and service to department and VSE. Reagle has a passion for working with students and enabling them to pursue their goals. He is involved in multiple student centric efforts including developing a small scale, anaerobic digester to harvest energy from food waste in urban and suburban environments; a multidisciplinary entrepreneurship program encouraging students to develop ideas from the classroom; converting a required course in the ME curriculum to use Open Educational Resources; a cross institutional effort to flip and improve a required thermodynamics course; and a mul- tidisciplinary research effort to assess urban hydroelectric microturbines as a solution to joint energy and water
Paper ID #10985Design Projects Concurrent with Capstone DesignDr. John-David S Yoder, Ohio Northern University Page 24.373.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Design Projects Concurrent with Capstone DesignABSTRACTNearly all Mechanical Engineering programs have a capstone design experience. In manycurricula, there is a classroom component that complements the capstone course. Thispaper presents a novel approach to that “complementary” class – one in which students areasked to complete two design projects
in a typical machine designcourse. These are some of the attributes for innovation and creativity which help them develop amindset for possible entrepreneurship. It takes a mechanical engineering graduate a long way topractice professional engineering if he/she develops strong engineering and problems solvingskills with a different mindset. Machine Design is a typical course that gives this experience.Based on many years of teaching this course, in this paper, the authors present the assessment ofcourse learning objectives (CLOs) and how they are linked to direct assessment of homework,class work, exams and design project outcomes. The CLOs are also mapped with the ABETProgram Outcomes. This being a core course it is offered every quarter at
specific EM student outcomes was performed on the submitted groupwork from a section of the class taught in spring 2020. Rubrics with four performance levels for eachstudent outcome were created. A majority of the groups were proficient or exemplary in six of the EMstudent outcomes assessed, and all of the groups were proficient or exemplary in two. Additionally,the project was qualitatively assessed using student feedback and instructor reflections. Preliminaryresults indicate the project successfully met the stated PBL and EML goals. Future work will befocused on individualizing the EM assessment process and developing a baseline for comparison todetermine the effectiveness of the project at meeting the stated skillset-based course
available on the Internet.Course Elements: Communications SkillsThe remaining course elements have been divided into four major themes: (1) CommunicationsSkills, (2) Understanding the Engineer’s Role, 3) Key Project Skills, and (4) Important Trends inthe Engineering Profession. This section addresses the first theme with the following elements:Writing Checklist and APA Guidelines. The first and second sessions of the course arededicated to writing. The students participate in the compilation of a checklist to guide theirwriting mechanics. Thesis statements and the use of outlines are emphasized.Paper 1 Example on Life-Long Learning. During the second class session, the instructorpresents an example Paper 1. The paper has the dual purpose of
Mechanism Design app for iOS and Android platforms developed indigenously andincorporated in this class as a technology enabler (Fig 1). The MotionGen enables students toperform kinematic design of planar four-bar linkage mechanisms that can execute desired paths ormotions. In the recent years, Engineering educators havemandated an introduction of design concepts, in-novation, entrepreneurship, and projects early ina student’s education, promote teamwork, and in-troduce modern engineering tools. The NationalAcademy of Engineer’s “The Engineer of 2020”report concludes that the passive, lecture-based in-struction should be replaced or supplemented byactive, integrated, project-based learning with sig-nificant design component.2, 3 It is not
relation to environments, technologies, and human lives.Dr. Breanne Przestrzelski, University of San Diego Bre Przestrzelski, PhD, is a post-doctoral research associate in the General Engineering department in the Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering, where she seeks to innovatively integrate social justice, humani- tarian advancement, and peace into the traditional engineering canon. Before joining USD in August 2017, Bre spent 9 years at Clemson University, where she was a three-time graduate of the bioengineering program (BS, MS, and PhD), founder of The Design & Entrepreneurship Network (DEN), and Division I rower. In her spare time, Bre teaches design thinking workshops for higher education faculty
experience through supplementalworkshops and seminars. Considering previous research, the Translational Application ofNanoscale Multiferroic Systems (TANMS) research center designed, implemented and assesseda comprehensive REU program to engage students in research during both the academic year andsummer months. TANMS’s REU is an eight-week research experience for undergraduates frommultiple 4-year universities and community colleges. The program components include researchin one of TANMS laboratories, seminars on ethics and diversity, workshops on entrepreneurship,and social events. These activities are woven into an experience to instill sixteen specific skillsthat were grouped into five core categories: I) communication (2 skills); II