; Exposition, Paper ID #18272. 13 pp. DOI 10.18260/1-2—29155.[7] A. Danowitz and K. Beddoes. 2018. “Characterizing mental health and wellness in students across engineering disciplines,” Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity (CoNECD). Paper ID #24138. 10 pp.[8] S.E. Abdelhamid, C.J. Kuhlman, M.V. Marathe, S.S. Ravi, and K. Reid. 2016. “Agent-based modeling and simulation of depression and its impact on student success and academic retention,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Paper ID #16861. 20 pp. DOI 10.18260/p.26545.[9] Z. Ye, X. Yang, C. Zeng, X. Li, Y. Want, Z. Shen, and D. Lin. 2020. “Resilience, social support, and coping as mediators between COVID-19
Paper ID #9586Defining Engineering EducationDr. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University, followed by fourteen years as a faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering edu- cation. While at Oklahoma State he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he took a chair position in electrical engineering at Bucknell University. He is currently interested in
Paper ID #10297Large Research Center Education and Outreach: Lessons from 5 years ofDistributed Collaborative Design, Development and ImplementationDr. Sean P Brophy, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Thalia Anagnos, San Jose State University Dr. Thalia Anagnos is a professor in the General Engineering Department at San Jose State University, where she has taught since 1984. She also serves as co-Leader of Education, Outreach, and Training for the George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, a consortium of 14 large-scale earthquake engineering experimental facilities
Standards Institute (ANSI), in collaboration with other national organizations, hasdeveloped the United States Standards Strategy (USSS) that states that simple familiarity withstandards is not enough but that there is need for firm education on the fundamentals of standardsand their respective implementation.1It is widely recognized that engineering students do not get much exposure to standards while inschool.2-4 Through a study done in 2004, it was revealed that standards education was notconsidered a priority at the institutions surveyed.5 However, employers have expectations thatnew hires have knowledge of standards and their applications.3,4Additionally, many standards developing organizations (SDO) encounter difficulties inrecruiting the
of philosophy and engineering is expected to contribute to the field ofengineering epistemology and be of interest to the broader community of engineers andengineering educators. The so-called epistemological distance (a measure of differences inknowledge and ways of knowing) among disciplines can create a barrier or a precondition to shyaway from potentially productive cross-disciplinary communications and collaborations. Thiswork also hopes to play a gap-bridging role, such as remarkable contributions of others 7 who inauthor’s judgment were successful in preserving accessibility to a broad base of engineeringaudience in their efforts toward a philosophy of engineering. In addition, the present paper is aresult of a newly initiated effort
.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/programs.html 18. Richards, C. (1922). Art in Industry. (pp. 10-11). New York: The Macmillan Company. 19. Smith, D. (1963). Industrial arts founded. (pp. 184-185). Muncie: Ball State University. 20. Technicians versus Engineer. NDT Education Resource Center, Brian Larson, Editor, 2001-2011. The Collaboration for NDT Education, Iowa State University. Retrieve from: http://www.ndt-ed.org/Careers/TechvsEng/techvseng.htm Page 23.500.8
collaborative effort among seven campuses to develop multi-disciplinary, multi-institution undergraduate and experiential education programs in renewable and alternative energies. In recognition of his academic activities, he received the 2012 SUNY Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Teaching.Dr. Peter H. Khost, Stony Brook University Peter Khost is an assistant professor in the Program in Writing and Rhetoric and a faculty affiliate in the Department of English at Stony Brook University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Use of Narrative in Undergraduate Engineering EducationAbstract:Many theories of engineering education identify methods to engage students and enhancelearning
two staff, developing energy efficiency programs, and researching the technical and non-technical barriers to energy efficiency in the buildings sector. She has a background in collaborative design and integrated project delivery. She holds a BS and MS in Civil Engineering from the University of Michigan and a PhD in Civil Engineering from UC Berkeley.Elizabeth A AdamsProf. Amy E. Landis, Arizona State University Page 23.570.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Experiential Learning in the Civil Engineering Curriculum: Collaborations between
RPPmodel, this partnership might best be described as a Community of Practice in which equal valueis placed on in-service teachers, Ph.D. students in CS and engineering majors, and students with ahistory of robotics learning experiences in elementary schools, all supported by the staff,infrastructure, and grants of the K-12 STEM Center. External independent assessment has beenprovided by STEM Program Evaluation, Assessment, and Research (SPEAR) consultants withsubstantial experience in evaluating education interventions such as BOTS.Called Building Opportunities with Teachers in Schools (BOTS), the collaborators aimed todesign a low-cost, scalable solution that focuses on improving the teachers’ confidence inteaching computer science through
educationalobjectives and outcomes for minors, courses or similar programs which can be used byengineering units to develop programs for technological literacy of non-engineers at thecollegiate level. Four institutions with varying approaches in this area collaborated for this workas part of a larger NSF supported project. Working definitions for Educational Objectives,Outcomes, Assessment and Evaluation are established to support the work. Available objectivesand outcomes from the literature, which would be pertinent to this audience, were used asprimary sources. The project team prioritized statements from these sources for how they wouldapply to the intended audience of non-engineering, college-level students in the context ofofferings from an engineering
Paper ID #33987The Growth of Interdisciplinarity in Engineering Education in the 21stCenturyDr. Mousumi Roy P.E., University of Connecticut Dr. Roy earned her Doctoral degree from Columbia University, NY, MS from The Cooper Union, NY, and BS from Jadavpur University, India. She has a joint appointment in Civil and Environmental Engineering Department and Management & Engineering for Manufacturing Program (a collaboration between School of Engineering and Business) as an Assistant Professor in Residence in University of Connecticut. Her research interests include interdisciplinarity in Automation, Industry 4.0
Paper ID #34197Freshman General Education Outcomes that Reinforce ABET Student Out-comesDr. Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel Robert Rabb is a professor and the Mechanical Engineering Program Director at The Citadel. He previ- ously taught mechanical engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy and his M.S.E. and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His research and teaching interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering.Dr. James Righter, The Citadel
] A. Silva, M. Fontul, and E. Henriques, “Teaching design in the first years of a traditional mechanical engineering degree: methods, issues and future perspectives.” European Journal of Engineering Education, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2015.[11] P. L. Hirsch, B. L. Shwom, C. Yarnoff, J. C. Anderson, D. M. Kelso, G. B. Olson, and J. E. Colgate, “Engineering design and communication: The case for interdisciplinary collaboration.” European Journal of Engineering Education, no. 4/5, 2001.[12] J. Bean, Engaging ideas : the professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom., ser. The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, c2011., 2011.[13] J. Froyd
growing the Itasca program from 10 students in 1992 to 160 students in 2010. In 2009, he worked with a national development team of engineering educators to develop the 100% PBL curriculum used in the Iron Range model. He has successfully acquired and managed over $10 million in educational grants including as PI on 7 grants from NSF. He has been in the classroom, teaching more than 20 credits per year to engineering students for more than 25 years. His specific areas of expertise are in active learning, faculty development, and learning community development. He has been awarded the 2012 Progress Minnesota award, 2012 Labovitz Entrepreneurialism award, and 2012 Innovator of the Year award from the Rural Community
institutions in China. The Buffalo State College Center for China Studiescelebrated its ten-year anniversary this past fall (2010). Additionally, Buffalo State Collegehouses a Technology Education program and several Engineering Technology programs.Workshop Goals and Objectives The workshop goals were developed collaboratively among CNIER staff and BuffaloState College faculty. Research was conducted by reviewing CNIER Future Engineers materials,Chinese news stories on education, and conducting many interviews. The common over-archingtheme was to promote technological literacy in an integrated fashion that is not specific to anyexisting curriculum, e.g., not a portion of the science or math curriculum. The workshop goals were to
Paper ID #27492Beyond the Maker Movement: A Preliminary Partial Literature Review onthe Role of Makerspaces in Engineering EducationTylesha D. Drayton, The Ohio State University Tylesha D. Drayton, EIT is pursuing a PhD as a graduate student in the Engineering Education Depart- ment at The Ohio State University under the guidance of Dr. Rachel Kajfez. She earned a BS in Civil Engineering, an MS degree in Environmental Engineering, and an MS degree in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University. Her research interest includes engineering education, motivation and identity, student entrepreneurship and
organization. Page 26.1627.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Understanding the NSF Transforming Undergraduate EngineeringEducation Report – Why are Industry and Academic Pathways toward Knowledge Development at Odds? IntroductionOn May 9-10, 2013, the first of a series of workshops titled ‘TransformingUndergraduate Education in Engineering’ (TUEE) was held in Arlington, VA. Hosted bythe American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), the event brought togetherprogram officers from the National Science Foundation (NSF), staff from the ASEE,professors from academic
Professor of Philosophy at Macalester College. Her primary areas of research in- quiry are the philosophy of technology and the philosophy of engineering. She has been actively involved in the creation and development of fPET: the Forum on Philosophy, Engineering, and Technology, and has served as the president of the Society for Philosophy and Technology. Currently, she is co-editor-in-chief of that society’s journal, Techn´e: Research in Philosophy and Technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Thinking Like an Engineer: Responding to the Engineering Blind Spot at Liberal Arts CollegesPart One: introductionAmong the many thoughtful and
. Schwendimann. Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education. In Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL, volume 2, pages 153 – 156, Madison, WI, United states, 2013.[22] Ning Fang. Student-constructed concept maps for active learning in a foundational undergraduate engineering course. In Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, volume 2015, pages ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division; IEEE Computer Society; IEEE Education Society; New Mexico State University; University of Texas –, El Paso, TX, United states, 2015.[23] Antonio Nelson Rodrigues Da Silva, Nidia Pavan Kuri, and Adriana Casale. PBL and B-learning for civil
-driven liberal education course have been described in detail.Both the additional technologies discussed and the Honors project addition have generated astrong reception and interest among the participating students. As such, it appears that thiscourse continues to successfully bridge culture and technology, and facilitates the basicunderstanding of engineering concepts in the ever-more global society that these students willenter upon graduation.The importance of the new developments to educators in general is additional methods toincrease technological literacy of students at the college level. The honors project provides aframework for engineers and non-engineers to work collaboratively to create a functionalengineered device to make music
Electromagnetism and other classes that are mathematically driven. His research and activities also include on avenues to connect Product Design and Engineering Education in a synergetic way. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Technological and Engineering Literacy from different perspectives: A pilot studyAbstractThis paper is a report of the early results for a study of perspectives, views and understanding ofthe meaning, aims and objectives of technological and engineering literacy. The data is collectedfrom faculty and students of engineering and industrial design. The authors have been deliveringtechnological and engineering literacy classes for more than a decade
Paper ID #17769Teaching to the Other Side of Campus: An Engineering Professor’s Experi-ence with an Honors College CourseDr. John R. Reisel, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Dr. John R. Reisel is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM). His research efforts focus on engineering education, combustion and energy utilization. Dr. Reisel was a 2005 recipient of the UWM Distinguished Undergraduate Teaching Award, a 2000 recipient of the UWM College of Engineering and Applied Science Outstanding Teaching Award, and a 1998 recipient of the SAE Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award. Dr
Paper ID #34465WIP Knowing Engineering Through the Arts: The Impact of the Film Hid-denFigures on Perceptions of Engineering Using Arts-Based Research MethodsKatherine Robert, University of Denver Katherine is a doctoral candidate at the University of Denver’s Morgridge School of Education in the higher education department. In her dissertation research, she uses arts-based research methods, new materialist theory, and is guided by culturally responsive methodological principles to collaborate with underrepresented engineering students to uncover their experiences of socialization into the professional engineering culture
Maritime College. Additional experiences include nuclear power start-up and test engineer, chemical process plant engineer, followed by engineering private practice in design and commissioning of gas and steam turbine, reciprocating engine, fuel cell and renewable energy power plants. He served as Adjunct Professor at Central Connecticut State University, and is an Evaluator of engineering education for the State University of New York National College Credit Recommenda- tion Service. He retired from ownership of van Zelm Engineers, Connecticut’s largest mechanical and electrical engineering practice, and has joined the faculty of the U.S. Coast Guard Academy to share his engineering experiences to the benefit of cadet
Paper ID #15831Increasing Engineering Literacy among Non-Engineering StudentsJonathan Grunert, Virginia Tech Jonathan Grunert is a graduate student in Virginia Tech’s department of Science and Technology in Soci- ety, with backgrounds in history and library science. His broader interests are in the history of scientific representation. He has taught courses in American history, Science and Society, and Engineering Cultures.Dr. Stephanie G. Adams, Virginia Tech Dr. Stephanie G. Adams is the Department Head and Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She previously served as Associate Dean for Undergraduate
Paper ID #12542Canons against Cannons? Social Justice and the Engineering Ethics Imagi-naryDr. Donna M Riley, Virginia Tech Donna Riley is Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech.Dr. Yanna Lambrinidou, Virginia Tech Yanna Lambrinidou is a medical ethnographer and adjunct assistant professor in the Science and Technol- ogy Studies (STS) program at Virginia Tech. For the past 8 years, she has conducted extensive research on the historic 2001-2004 Washington, DC lead-in-drinking-water contamination. This work exposed wrongdoing and unethical behavior on the part of engineers and scientists in local and federal
field of scholarly specialization that goes beyond technical writing; • Refusing to separate the utilitarian from the humanistic aspects of communication; • Presenting language as a tool that could help engineers attain their professional goals; • Respecting their students’ choice of profession combined with an interest in and appreciation for the process and products of engineering; • Drawing on the traditions of rhetoric as a way of explaining how language works in the real world; and • Collaborating with technical colleagues based on an understanding of engineering education as the common enterprise in which all were engaged.Infectious enthusiasm and charisma often explained part of their success
experiences.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com- munication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication
Lafayette Amy S. Van Epps is an associate professor of Library Science and Engineering Librarian at Purdue Uni- versity. She has extensive experience providing instruction for engineering and technology students, including Purdue’s first-year engineering program. Her research interests include finding effective meth- ods for integrating information literacy knowledge into the undergraduate engineering curriculum. Prof. Van Epps has a BA in engineering science from Lafayette College, her MSLS from Catholic University of America, a M.Eng. in Industrial Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and is currently working on her PhD in Engineering Education at Purdue.Dr. Michael Thomas SmithDr. Sorin Adam Matei
Paper ID #17792Characterization of Techniques used in Industry: The Practice of ComplexProblem Solving in EngineeringMiss Lina Trigg, William Mason High School I am due to graduate high school in 2017 and have experience in business and engineering environment in the private sector with a Fortune 500 company.Prof. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in Food Process En- gineering from the Department of