AC 2011-2551: IMPROVING MATH SKILLS THROUGH INTENSIVE MEN-TORING AND TUTORINGJianping Yue, Essex County College Jianping Yue is a Professor in the Division of Engineering Technologies and Computer Sciences at Essex County College, Newark, New Jersey. Dr. Yue is the Principle Investigator (PI) of the DUE 0622440 grant of the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Talent Expansion Program (STEP) at the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Yue received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Hydraulic and Coastal Engineering from Wuhan Institute of Hydraulic and Electric Engineering in Wuhan, China in 1977 and 1982, and a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from Memphis State University, Memphis, Tennessee in 1990
Paper ID #13712Incorporating Research and Design in a Community College EngineeringProgramDr. April K. Andreas, McLennan Community College Dr. April K. Andreas earned a B.S. and M.S. in Mathematics from Southern Methodist University and a Ph.D. in Systems and Industrial Engineering from the University of Arizona. Her papers have ap- peared in journals ranging from ”Networks” and ”The Journal of Global Optimization” to ”The Toast- master” and ”The Quarterly Journal of the Texas Association for the Gifted and Talented.” Dr. Andreas is currently building an engineering program at McLennan Community College in Waco, Texas. The
Paper ID #15817Changing Student Behavior through the Use of Reflective Teaching Practicesin an Introduction to Engineering Course at a Two-Year CollegeMr. Richard Brown Bankhead III, Highline College Richard B Bankhead III is the engineering department coordinator at Highline College. At Highline Colleg,e Richard is committed to developing the behaviors of successful engineering students in transfer students as well as preparing them academically for the challenges of junior level engineering courses. Richard has taught at Highline since 2004 and was awarded the Faculty of the Year Award at Highline Col- lege for the 2009
AC 2010-39: IMPROVING THE PARTICIPATION AND RETENTION OFMINORITY STUDENTS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING THROUGH SUMMERENRICHMENT PROGRAMSAmelito Enriquez, Canada College Amelito Enriquez is a professor of Engineering and Mathematics at Canada College in Redwood City, CA. He received a BS in Geodetic Engineering from the University of the Philippines, an MS in Geodetic Science from the Ohio State University, and a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Irvine. His research interests include technology-enhanced instruction and increasing the representation of female, minority and other underrepresented groups in mathematics, science and engineering
/ethnicity, and field: 2010. (2010). at 9. Heppner, R. S., Lee, R. S. & Wao, H. O. in Becoming and engineer in public universities: Pathways for women and minorities (Borman, K. M., Tyson, W. & Halperin, R. H.) 81–104 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).10. Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N. M. Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. (Westview Press, 1997).11. Strutz, M. L., Orr, M. K. & Ohland, M. W. in Engineering and social justice - In the university and beyond (Baillie, C., Pawley, A. L. & Riley, D.) 143–156 (Purdue University Press, 2012).12. Riley, D. Engineering and social justice. (Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2008).13. Foor, C. E., Walden, S. E. & Trytten, D. A. ‘I Wish that I
social capital. Contemporary Sociology, 29(6), 785-795.13. Stolle-McAllister, K. (2011). The case for summer bridge: Building social and cultural capital for talented black STEM students. Science Educator, 20(2), 12-22.14. Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.15. McKenna, G., & Lewis, V. (1986). Ten steps for retaining under-represented students. Journal of College Student Personnel, 27, 452-453.16. California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office (2013). California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office - Data Mart. Retrieved December 2013 from http://datamart.cccco.edu/17. Enriquez, A. (2011). Strengthening the STEM Pipeline through an Intensive Math
fraction of the nontraditional populationentering as transfers varies by institution from 26% to 94%. Institutions with a higher fraction ofnontraditional students tend to enroll a lower fraction of nontraditional students through thetransfer pathway—some institutions seem to have policies or recruiting procedures that reach outto nontraditional students beyond the transfer pathway. Table 2: Institutions with more nontraditional students rely less on the transfer pathway. Transfer fraction of Nontraditional fraction nontraditional engineering Institution of engineering students students A 8% 94
semester. Physics Jam is modeled after Math Jam (a week-long intensive mathpreparation program on our campus), which showed improvement in student success andcreating a sense of community among program participants. The focus of Physics Jam is tounify the student’s math skills with introductory physics problems prior to the semester, therebyimproving their success in their upcoming course. Physics Jam students were given a pre-assessment and then allowed to proceed self-paced through prearranged video content andpractice problems with constant access to tutor support and an instructor. Page 24.1013.2This paper will discuss the successes and
. Although the lure of hard money wasbeginning to look like a significant problem for establishing long term continuity, we had nochoice but to initiate the hiring process once more under grant funding. This time a larger andmore diverse applicant pool emerged, perhaps a consequence of timing or a declining economy,and we had become more proficient in the screening process. With several good candidates inthe queue, we were able look beyond the basic knowledge and skills needed to also considerideas they might have to grow and strengthen the program. In a record time of two months wewere able to make a selection and we have not been disappointed. We now look forward to newaccomplishments and new programs to develop (7).From its inception, all
Education Grant Program. Smith spent her first 12 years of employment with the Coordinating Board in the Department of Personnel Services, where from 1996 to 1999 she served as the department’s assistant director. Prior to her employment with the Coordinating Board, Smith spent 13 years in the health care field. Smith holds a Ph.D. in Communication Studies, a Certificate in Dispute Resolution, a Master of Arts degree in Speech Communication, and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology, all from The University of Texas at Austin.James K. Nelson, The University of Texas at Tyler Dr. James K. Nelson received a Bachelor of Civil Engineering degree from the University of Dayton in 1974. He received the Master of Science
Louisville J.C. McNeil is an Assistant Professor for the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at University of Louisville. Research includes investigating nontraditional students in engineering, the intersection of co- op experiences and higher education institutions, and how students decide their major. Other research has included how engineering faculty consider quality teaching through the ABET accreditation process and the university climate. Contact her at j.mcneil@louisville.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Exploring Nontraditional Characteristics of Students in a Freshman Engineering CourseNontraditional undergraduate students face many
region. CA2VES employs a two prongedapproach to impact recruitment and career development: (1) support of educational pathwaydevelopment and (2) utilization of K-12 STEM initiatives to engage the next generation ofstudents and workers in advanced manufacturing learning and skill development. Throughpathway development programs CA2VES is able to work with local 2-year colleges to develop apipeline of next generation technicians with the capacity to positively impact the region’sgrowing economy. By 2018, it is projected that over 40 percent of advanced manufacturing jobs will requirepost-secondary education.24 Post-secondary education may include industry recognizedcertification, associate’s degrees, bachelor’s degrees or beyond where any
full tool kit of engineering and complex problem-solving skills that employers desire.5 Additionally, the learning outcomes for each two-yeartechnical degree (AAS) are designated by their individual community colleges and focusprimarily on installation and operation of technology. This creates an inherent gap between theAAS degree and articulation into a traditional 4-year Bachelor of Science degree. Both studentsand employers of the AAS students realize that they need something beyond the AAS degree tohandle the complex systems used today, but the educational path for them to achieve this goal isnot clearly defined or easy to follow. Additionally, the latest "Gathering Storm" report notes thattoday's work force must constantly be upgrading
challenge.Without some level of coordination between community college and bachelor’s degreeengineering programs, students’ efforts at the community college may not contribute effectivelyto their continuing progress at the senior school. In order to facilitate the offering of appropriatecourse work and efficient transfer of credit hours between two and four year institutions, it mightbe helpful to have a streamlined accreditation process for community college engineeringprograms that would assure students as well as the universities they transfer to that the coursework taken at a community college was viable. This certification would be even more importantfor students transferring beyond the local service area of their community college.Although an ABET
the sample of students, specifically looking forevidence of transfer shock and transfer ecstasy among these undergraduate engineering majors.This paper provides a critical foundation for our larger-scale qualitative study, which seeks todelve into the narratives of transfer students in engineering beyond just the academic transition atfive of the eleven MIDFIELD institutions.Regarding vertical versus lateral transfers, our study shows that almost half (46%) of the studentsin our sample transfer laterally from one four-year institution to another. While lateral transfer Page 23.39.11students do not make up a majority of the transfer students
the community college environment to that of the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) at the U.Va. Introduction The National Center for Education Statistics reports that in the year 2013, 3,871 Engineering, 37,475 Engineering Technology and 38,897 Computer Science associate’s degrees were awarded24. This is a very vital set of statistics when one considers that more than 50% of undergraduates from underrepresented groups attend community college9,17,22. It is projected that the majority of jobs will continue to be in computing, accounting for approximately 71% through the year 2018 with traditional engineering (16%) and
Bay Area, received a National Science Foundation Scholarshipsin Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) grant to develop a scholarshipprogram for financially needy community college students intending to transfer to a four-yearinstitution to pursue a bachelor’s degree in a STEM field. In collaboration with the College’sMathematics, Engineering, and Science Achievement (MESA) program – an academic, personal,and professional support structure has been designed and implemented to maximize thelikelihood of success of these students. This support structure aims to create a learningcommunity among the scholars through a combination of academic counseling and mentoring,personal enrichment and professional development opportunities
Teaching as PedagogyTeam teaching originated as pedagogy in 1963 when William Alexander, “Father of theAmerican middle school”, proposed a concept of grouping teachers into teams to educatestudents groups as a means for junior high school reform. The perceived benefits of teamteaching, namely the creation of a supportive, inclusive environment for students and thenecessity for teaming teachers to formally engage one another in planning, integration,evaluation, and reflection, have helped promote its use across K-12 and into higher education 7.Team teaching is collaborative teaching. For all of its many benefits, teaching collaborativelyrequires much above and beyond what is required if one is teaching solo. A true co-taught courseis integration
AC 2011-2176: FACILITATING TRANSFER OF STUDENTS FROM 2-YEARTO 4-YEAR ENGINEERING PROGRAMSKevin Lemoine, Texas Higher Education Coordinating BoardJames K. Nelson, The University of Texas at Tyler Dr. James K. Nelson received a Bachelor of Civil Engineering degree from the University of Dayton in 1974. He received the Master of Science and Doctor of Philosophy degrees in civil engineering from the University of Houston. During his graduate study, Dr. Nelson specialized in structural engineering. He is a registered professional engineer in four states, a Chartered Engineer in the United Kingdom, and a fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers. He is also a member of the American Society for Engineering
, anddisplaced workers. Workshops will also be created to train educators at both the K-12 andpostsecondary levels on the use of FANUC robots and the role the field of robotics plays inSTEM education. This activity is aimed at broadening the scope of the project beyond just BayCollege and Michigan Tech through improving the quality of industrial robotics education atother area institutions. Thanks to the attainment of FANUC Certified Education Training by BayCollege’s full-time faculty member overseeing the program, Mark Highum, Bay College andMichigan Tech will also now be able to offer reciprocal certification opportunities to attendees ofthese events. Lastly, robotic simulation software known as RobotRun is being developed toassist students in
do not, and some initial data analysis that has been conducted.Furthermore, non-credit workshops have since been developed and offered to other faculty ofhigher education, K-12 students, and K-12 teachers. A new robotic simulation software has alsobeen developed to aid in instruction, which will be demonstrated to conference session attendees.Lastly, a fully-functioning mechatronics and robotic systems lab at the community college hasbeen created, largely through the purchase of grant-funded equipment. These initial lessonslearned and the progress made into year two of the grant represents important information toshare with other colleges and universities who might also benefit from forming such apartnership in their area.IntroductionIn the
department. Her current interests focus on the recruitment, retention and success of STEM pipeline students from high school through the university and into the workplace.Dr. Jeannie Christine Stone, Wylie Independent School District Dr. Jeannie Stone began her career in Dallas ISD as a middle school English teacher in 1989. Prior to assuming her current role as Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction in Wylie ISD, Dr. Stone served as a high school teacher, high school assistant principal, high school principal, and other administrative positions. This is her 25th year in public education. Dr. Stone believes in the importance of individualized learning for every student, and she is committed to creating
Materials Science CourseAbstractA substantial percentage of engineering graduates, especially those from traditionallyunderrepresented groups, complete their lower-division education at a community college beforetransferring to a university to earn their degree. However, engineering programs at manycommunity colleges, because of their relatively small scale with often only one permanentfaculty member, struggle to offer lower-division engineering courses with the breadth andfrequency needed by students for effective and efficient transfer preparation. As a result,engineering education becomes impractical and at times inaccessible for many communitycollege students. Through a grant from the National Science Foundation ImprovingUndergraduate STEM
National ScienceFoundation, entitled BLIND FOR REVIEW. The study collected data from engineeringundergraduates and alumni, faculty, program chairs, and associate deans in a nationallyrepresentative sample of 31 four-year colleges and universities and from pre-engineeringstudents at 15 community colleges to examine the curricular, instructional, cultural, andorganizational features that support learning in engineering programs (Table 1). A team ofeducation and engineering researchers developed the survey-based instruments for each of thesepopulations through a rigorous, two-year process that included: 1) literature reviews; 2)individual interviews with administrators, faculty, and alumni; and 3) focus-group interviewswith students. To ensure
, Center for Electromagnetics Research (CER), Northeastern University. Pub- lications/Papers: Reenergizing and Reengaging Students Interest through CAPSULE; A Novel and Evolu- tionary Method on Educating Teachers to Promote STEM Careers Jessica Chin, Abe Zeid, Claire Duggan, Sagar Kamarthi (IEEE ISEC 2011); and ”Implementing the Capstone Experience Concept for Teacher Professional Development” Jessica Chin, Abe Zeid, Claire Duggan, Sagar Kamarthi (ASEE 2011). Rel- evant Presentations: ”K-12 Partnerships” (Department of Homeland Security/Centers of Excellence An- nual Meeting 2009); ”Building and Sustaining K-12 Educational Partnerships” (NSF ERC 2007 - 2010 National Meetings); ”Research Experience for Teachers
Paper ID #13572Increasing Success and Retention in Engineering and other STEM FieldsMs. Karen M. Groppi P.E., Cabrillo College Karen Groppi is an Engineering Instructor at Cabrillo College and California registered Civil Engineer whose work focuses on teaching and mentoring students through hands-on projects which benefit the campus community. She was co-PI on a five year NSF grant for recruiting and retaining students in STEM fields.Dr. Susan Tappero, Cabrillo College Susan Tappero obtained a Ph.D. in pure mathematics from University of California, Santa Cruz in 1992. She has been teaching mathematics and developing
modified if therewere to be a viable differentiation between two year and four year degree programs. It wasapparent to both the TAC Criteria Committee and the TAC Executive Committee that Criterion 3which deals with program outcomes a-k, and Criterion 5 which deals with curriculum, would Page 13.139.2need to be changed. It also appeared that the remaining six general criteria could pretty muchstay as they were and Criterion 9 dealing with program specific criteria, already makesallowance for associate degree programs versus baccalaureate degree programs.The 2008-2009 Criteria currently contains in part the following language "Program outcomesare
. National Science Board. “An Emerging and Critical Problem of the Science and Engineering Labor Force.” 2004, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsb0407/nsb0407.pdf (accessed December 20, 2009).5. American Association of State Colleges and Universities. “Strengthening the Science and Mathematics Pipeline for a Better America.” Policy Matters, 2 (11) (2005).6. Johnson, M. J., & Sheppard, S. D., “Students Entering and Exiting the Engineering Pipeline – Identifying Key Decision Points and Trends,” Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, November, 2002.7. Kimmel, H., & Cano, R. “K-12 and Beyond: The Extended Engineering Pipeline.” Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, October, 2001.8
AVG. TOTAL xx STUDENTS # A B C D E F G H I J K L . . . X Y Z RUBRIC COURTESY OF W. S. U. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY PULLMAN, WA. 99164. LIKERT SCALE WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION (1: Strongly Disagree; 5: Strongly Agree) 1 Cumulative 4 5 3 4 4 4 2 3 5 4 3 4 3 4 4 5 4 4 4 2 Integrated 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 3 5 3 4 4 3 Progressive 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 4 2 3 2 3
administration, organization, recruitment of volunteers, and matching ofstudents with mentors, which will be described in more detail below.Program AdministrationThe peer mentor program is administered at the department level, and focuses only on students inthe mechanical engineering program. Some programs on the same campus and at otherinstitutions include students from many different majors, who may or may not be assigned amentor from the same major. This department’s internal approach allows for a major-specificfocus and a higher degree of connection and rapport between mentors and mentees. For example,the mentors can easily relate to situations that mentees are going through, as they have mostlikely had similar experiences with specific courses and