Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Grace Panther, Oregon State University; Kacey Beddoes, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Cheryl Llewellyn, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Engineers department head listserv, the nationalNSF ADVANCE program listserv, and the engineering education PEER Collaborative listserv.Flyers were also given out and posted at conferences including American Sociological Associationnational conference and a philosophy conference at University of Massachusetts Lowell.Additionally, the survey was advertised on the website of the lead researcher’s research group andResearchGate.com page, and a representative from ASA tweeted about it from his personal Twitteraccount. The survey was online for approximately 1 year and in total received over 300 responses,the majority of which were from engineering faculty members. Not all surveys were complete.Chi-Square analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS. Complete

Conference Session

Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joye Jepson, Antioch University; Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

AC 2008-1061: GENERAL TRENDS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION SUPPORTTHE PARTICIPATION OF WOMENJoye Jepson, Antioch University At the time this paper was written, Letha Joye Jepson was a student in Antioch University's Ph.D. Program in Leadership and Change. The research reported herein contributed to one of two required Individualized Learning Area projects. Joye is a computer engineer with The Boeing Company.Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering Norman Fortenberry is the founding director of the Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE) at the National Academy of Engineering. CASEE is a collaborative effort dedicated to achieving excellence in

Conference Session

Recruitment & Retention of Women II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth T. Cady, National Academy of Engineering; Norman L. Fortenberry, American Society for Engineering Education; Catherine Didion, National Academy of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

AC 2011-335: USING AN EXTENSION SERVICES MODEL TO INCREASEGENDER EQUITY IN ENGINEERINGElizabeth T. Cady, National Academy of Engineering Elizabeth T. Cady is a Program Officer at the Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education of the National Academy of Engineering in Washington, DC.Norman L. Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering (Washington) Dr. Norman L. Fortenberry is the founding Director of the Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE) at the National Academy of Engineering (NAE). CASEE facilitates research on and deployment of, innovative policies, practices, and tools designed to enhance the effective- ness and efficiency of systems for the formal

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Quiles-Ramos, Virginia Tech; Ellen K. Foster, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Donna M Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

individualsfrom easily creating collaborations within their discipline and has the ability to create a dividebetween subdisciplines (Terviö, 2011).Though Engineering Education has had the ability to cross disciplinary barriers and begin to shedlight on the necessary changes needed in the education of future engineering leaders (e.g. Baillie,et al. 2011; Adams, et a; 2011), interesting paradoxes within the field regarding the potentialisolation of engineering education researchers is surfacing. When not directly connected toengineering education departments and established centers, newcomers, individuals with diverseprofessional backgrounds, and even women tend to remain on the periphery a status we referredto here as “lone wolves”. Lone Wolves are

Conference Session

Climate Issues for Women Students

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiang-Yun Du, Aalborg University; Anette Kolmos, Aalborg University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Reform Processes at Two Institutes of Technology. Linköping University, Linköping. Page 12.779.1226. Seymour, E and Hewitt, N (1997), Talking about Leaving – Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.27. Smyth, E. (2005). Gender Differentiation and Early Labour Market Integration Across Europe, European Societies 7 (3), 2005, pp451-479.28. Tarule, J.M., (1996), Voices in Dialogue: Collaborative Ways of Knowing. In: Goldberger et al (eds), Knowledge, Difference, and Power. New York, Basic Books.29. Tonso, L. (1996) The Impact of Cultural Norms on Women. Journal of Engineering Education

Conference Session

Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lynette Osborne, The George Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

AC 2008-2764: PERCEPTIONS OF WOMEN’S TREATMENT IN ENGINEERINGEDUCATION: FROM THE VOICES OF MALE AND FEMALE STUDENTSLynette Osborne, The George Washington University Page 13.971.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 1 PERCEPTIONS OF WOMEN’S TREATMENT IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION: FROM THE VOICES OF MALE AND FEMALE STUDENTSDespite the well-documented under-representation of women in higher education engineeringprograms, little research has probed the perceptions of gendered treatment of women ascompared to men in these programs. Such information may be

Conference Session

FPD V: Gender and Engineering Education: A Panel Discussion and Workshop

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yevgeniya V. Zastavker, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Debbie Chachra, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Caitrin Lynch, Olin College of Engineering; Alisha L. Sarang-Sieminski, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Lynn Andrea Stein, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs, Women in Engineering

collaborator to do it with you. Sit silently in a class and observe behavior; videotape yourself and tally your responses; learn what messages you are subtly sending. 4. Share your observations. Talk to colleagues and students. Make these frameworks a part of the vocabulary of your department or school. Open discussion of these issues, letting those with privilege begin to see it and those who lack it attribute the dissonance to culture and not simply internalize it.One of the most pernicious practices in engineering education is to state that, as a discipline,engineering is gender- (or race- or color- or…) blind, that it is a genuine meritocracy. Bydenying the existence of schemas and the privileges they encode

Conference Session

K-12 Programs for Recruiting Women

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jan DeWaters, Clarkson University; Susan Powers, Clarkson University; Mary Graham, Clarkson University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

2006-1471: PARTNERS IN ENGINEERING: OUTREACH EFFORTS PROVIDEHOLISTIC ENGINEERING EDUCATION FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL GIRLSJan DeWaters, Clarkson University Jan DeWaters, PE is currently pursuing a PhD degree in Environmental Science and Engineering at Clarkson University, with a focus on energy and environmental education. She has several years of experience as the curriculum coordinator for Clarkson's Project-Based Learning Partnership Program and is director of the Partners in Engineering Program that provides mentoring and engineering activities for eighth grade girls.Susan Powers, Clarkson University Susan E. Powers, PhD, PE is a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Associate Dean in

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S. Zahra Atiq, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Sarah Morton; Nehal I. Abu-lail, Washington State University; Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State University; Julie A. Kmec, Washington State University; Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #22417Women’s Motivation to Pursue Engineering Education and Careers: a CaseStudy of MalaysiaMs. S. Zahra Atiq, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Zahra Atiq is a PhD candidate at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is interested in learning about the non-cognitive/affective and individual/demographic factors that impacts students in STEM courses. Specifically, she is interested in understanding the emotions students’ expe- rience while learning computer programming. She is interested to understand women’s participation in computer science and engineering.Sarah

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer C Mallette, Boise State University; Harold Ackler P.E., Boise State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

the connections among women’s experiences in engineering, their identities as writers, and their writing.Harold Ackler, Boise State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Valuing Women’s Contributions: Team Projects and Collaborative WritingAbstractTeam projects offer opportunities for student engineers to learn how to work on a team andproduce collaborative written reports. However, research has shown that women often do morewriting during these projects, and that their writing labor is unrecognized or undervalued,particularly when the technical work is viewed as more essential. In this paper, we examine theresults of a study focused on the

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ellen K. Foster, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) ; Donna M. Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

and uncomfortable material cultures that keep thosealready on the margins outside of the technological landscape. This simple activity brings light tohow normalized power relations in technology cultures might be further problematized in theengineering classroom, and begs further exploration into how such ideas might travel fromfeminist hacker collectives and OSH groups to the classroom setting.Another shared and informative dynamic is that of collaboration and community-building. Forthe engineering education researchers, the ability to push research forward and continue workingin liminal spaces was often contingent on finding supportive networks, organizations, andcolleagues. This reflects similar organizing strategies identified by feminist

Conference Session

Panel: Forming an Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Mills, University of South Australia; Judith Gill, University of South Australia; Suzanne Franzway, University of South Australia; Rhonda Sharp, University of South Australia

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

AC 2009-528: SUSTAINING AND ENJOYING A MULTIDISCIPLINARY,MULTIDEPARTMENT, MULTICAMPUS RESEARCH COLLABORATION ONWOMEN IN ENGINEERINGJulie Mills, University of South AustraliaJudith Gill, University of South AustraliaSuzanne Franzway, University of South AustraliaRhonda Sharp, University of South Australia Page 14.1111.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Sustaining and Enjoying a Multi-disciplinary, Multi-department, Multi-campus Research Collaboration on Women in EngineeringAbstractThe development of a successful, long-term, multidisciplinary research collaboration is notsomething that happens easily or quickly. Since 2001 the authors have collaborated

Conference Session

Focus on Faculty

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University; Anita Grierson, AZ State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

experience in Program Management, Business Development, and Biomechanical Engineering, with products as diverse as air bag systems for helicopters, body armor, and orthopedic implants. She received her Bachelors Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan in 1990, her Masters degree in Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern University in 1994, and a Masters in Business Administration from Arizona State University in 2000. Page 15.529.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Evaluating a University/Community College Collaboration for Encouragement of Engineering

Conference Session

Retention of Women Students II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi M. Steinhauer, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

development and assessment of students’ spatial visualization skills, effective integration of 3D modeling into engineering design, and women’s retention in engineering. Page 25.1311.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Impact of Contextualized, Hands-On, Collaborative Learning on Women’s Persistence in Professional Engineering: Preliminary Findings from a Mixed Methods Study Heidi M. Steinhauer Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityAbstractAs many of our female students desire to develop a

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Pre-college Programs for Women

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paula Ann Monaco, Texas Tech University; Aimee Cloutier, Texas Tech University; Guo Zheng Yew, Texas Tech University; Maeghan Marie Brundrett, Texas Tech University; Dylan Christenson, Texas Tech University; Audra N. Morse, Texas Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division, Women in Engineering

. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Design of an interactive multidisciplinary residential summer program for recruitment of high school females to engineeringAbstract The need to inspire and recruit female high school students to study engineering is wellknown. Texas Tech University (TTU) reports the female population is 18%,17 similar to thenational average. Outreach programs are a common means of exposing students to differentengineering disciplines and a variety of employment opportunities for engineers. Traditionalforms of outreach programs such as seminars, information sessions or research activities areoften less interactive and less student-centered. A week-long summer program was implementedat

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Pre-college Programs for Women

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Laura Meszaros Dearolf, The Perry Initiative ; Amy C Bucha, The Perry Initiative; Lisa L Lattanza MD, University of California San Francisco

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division, Women in Engineering

Lattanza MD, University of California San Francisco Professor and Chief of Hand, Elbow and Upper Extremity Surgery at UCSF Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery Fellowship Director President and Co-Founder of The Perry Initiative, a non-profit organization dedicated to increasing diversity in STEM and Orthopaedic Surgery. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 UNIQUE EXTRACURRICULAR PROGRAM RECRUITS WOMEN INTO ENGINEERING THROUGH ORTHOPAEDIC BIOMECHANICSJenni M. Buckley, PhD1,2; Amy E. Trauth-Nare, PhD3,2; Laura M. Dearolf, PhD2; Amy C.Bucha, MS1,2; Lisa L. Lattanza, MD41 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE2 The Perry Initiative, Newark, DE3

Conference Session

Computing -- Increasing Participation of Women and Underrepresented Minorities

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laura K. Dillon, Michigan State University; Maureen Doyle, Northern Kentucky University; Linda Ott, Michigan Technological University; Wendy Powley, Queen's University; Andrea E Johnson, Spelman College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering, Pre-College Engineering Education, Women in Engineering

science from Purdue University in 1978. She joined Michigan Tech’s faculty shortly after completing her doctorate and chaired the department of computer science from 1996 to 2010. Her research interests are in software engineering, including software pro- cesses, software measurement, and software engineering education. She also has interests in ethical and social aspects of computing and has been active in efforts to increase the number of women in computing for many years. She has been a co-PI on nearly $1.5 million in grants from industry and the National Science Foundation. Dr. Ott is a 2010 recipient of the ACM SIGSOFT Retrospective Paper Award for the paper ”The Program Dependence Graph in a Software Development

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Brewer, University of Georgia; Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Dr. Walther is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is a director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from engineering, art, educational psychology and social work. His research interests range from the role of empathy in engineering students’ professional formation, the role of reflection in engineering learning, and interpretive research methodologies in the emerging field of engineering education research. His teaching focuses on innovative approaches to introducing systems thinking and

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University; Michael Haungs, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

for? • What is the purpose of our current conceptualization of rigor in engineering and engineering education? • In what ways does it promote and limit access to our profession? • How does the notion of rigor can reproduce inequality in upholding certain kinds of graduates as an implied standard in engineering?However, further interview, focus group and survey-based research of our LSE students and LSEstudents at other universities is necessary to fully investigate this argument.Our hope is that this paper functions as a springboard to this collaborative, cross-institutionalresearch agenda as part of other nation-wide efforts to further develop and evaluate “liberalstudies in engineering” programs. While

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Lachney, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

. Page 26.616.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Engineering Bait-and-Switch: K-12 Recruitment Strategies Meet University Curricula & CultureAbstractThis paper uses the metaphor of engineering bait-and-switch to characterize the misalignmentbetween educational approaches of major K-12 engineering initiatives and traditional higher-education engineering programs. We argue that this misalignment is the result of divergentunderlying educational logics. While K-12 engineering education is notably inclusive, “baiting”student interest with context-driven, open-ended problem solving, higher engineering education“switches” toward an exclusive, abstract fundamentals-first

Conference Session

Listening and Negotiation

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University; Kim LaScola Needy P.E., University of Arkansas; Cheryl B. Schrader, Missouri University of Science and Technology

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development, Engineering Leadership Development Division, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She is the Director for the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering, and serves as a Center Associate for the Learning Research and Development Center. Her principal research is in engineering education assessment, which has been funded by the NSF, Department of Ed, Sloan, EIF, and NCIIA. Dr. Sacre’s current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas – innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global competency in engineering. She is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Dr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University Dr. Carpenter is founding Dean of Engineering at Campbell University. She is

Conference Session

Interactive Panel on Improving the Experiences of Marginalized Students on Engineering Design Teams

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lorelle A Meadows, Michigan Technological University; Denise Sekaquaptewa, University of Michigan; Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech; Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Debbie Chachra, Olin College of Engineering; Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education, Electrical and Computer, Engineering Libraries, First-Year Programs, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering, Student, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering, Women in Engineering

experiences.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com- munication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication

Conference Session

From Industry to the Academy - Female Faculty Boundary Spanners Offering and Gaining Perspective

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary K. Pilotte, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Diana Bairaktarova, The University of Oklahoma; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Engineering Education, 2014 Faculty of Practice: Female Faculty Boundary Spanners Offering & Gaining PerspectiveAbstract Universities seem to be reviving their interest in engaging industrial concerns and newlyspecialized fields of study. Among engineering schools, there is an increased dialogue aroundthe desire for greater connections with industry with the goal of seeking richer understanding ofactual engineering practice. In the classroom, pedagogies of engagement and active learningoften demand “in context” learning scenarios to provide students with authentic engineeringexperiences guided by those experienced in education. This quest for collaboration andauthenticity is also seen in calls for funding

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Robyn Paul, University of Calgary; Laleh Behjat P.Eng., University of Calgary; Bob Brennan P.Eng., University of Calgary

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

been an active participant and contributor to both Canadian and international engineering education conferences since 2001. He has published papers in Learning and Individual Differ- ences, the Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, the International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, and Advances in Engineering Education; and has published over 30 conference papers in national and international engineering education conferences. These pa- pers are the result of his collaborations with colleagues from the Schulich School of Engineering and the Department of Psychology at the University of Calgary, as well as colleagues from the University of British Columbia, the University

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kaitlyn Anne Thomas, University of Nevada, Reno; Whitney Gaskins, University of Cincinnati; Kelly J. Cross, University of Nevada, Reno

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

(RED) grant at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Cross’ scholarship investigated stu- dent teams in engineering, faculty communities of practice, and the intersectionality of multiple identity dimensions. Her research interests include diversity and inclusion in STEM, intersectionality, teamwork and communication skills, assessment, and identity construction. Her teaching philosophy focuses on student centered approaches such as culturally relevant pedagogy. Dr. Cross’ complimentary professional activities promote inclusive excellence through collaboration. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021

Conference Session

Potpourri

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

for Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 2005, 14 pages. 13. Padmanabhan, Lin, W., Pieri, R., Patterson, F., and Cobb, S. “Strengthening Native American Pathways to Science and Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 2002, 9 pages. 14. Moore, H., Safai, N.M., and Richardson, D. “Building Bridges from the Community College to a University Engineering Education: A Model for Collaborative Approach,” Proceedings of the American Society Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 2004, 21 pages.15. Anderson-Rowland, M.R., Vanis, M., Zerby, D., Banks, D., and Matar, B., “METS Pilot Program: A Community

Conference Session

At The Institutional Level

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Judy Loveless-Morris, University of Washington; Priti Mody-Pan; Robert Embrey, Highline Community College; Kali Kuwada, Seattle Central Community College; Marisela Mendoza, Columbia Basin College; Robert Olsen, Washington State University; Eve Riskin, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

discuss the challenges and rewards of participating in a multi-institutionalcollaboration.The findings from this paper will add to the scant literature focusing on the challenges of multi-institutional collaborations. Moreover, this paper specifically addresses the challenges ofcollaborative efforts for those interested in recruitment, retention, and assessment. Since multi-institutional research and evaluation are becoming frequent, it is important to address this gap inthe literature as well as provide a model and guidance for future collaborative efforts.Coalitions are touted as best practice when it comes to redesigning how engineering education isdelivered, especially to diverse student populations1. Among the benefits of multi

Conference Session

Preventing Marginalization of Underrepresented Students on Teams

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paige Smith, University of Maryland-College Park; Linda Schmidt, University of Maryland-College Park; Patricia F. Mead; Stephanie Adams

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Mead, Norfolk State UniversityStephanie Adams, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Page 11.700.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 How to Prevent Marginalization of Underrepresented Student Population Members on Engineering Student TeamsAbstractThe best engineering project teams encourage members to attempt tasks outside their academiccomfort zone and support members to succeed. Faculty members must be able to identifyproblematic team interactions and mitigate their impact. This is especially critical when teamsinclude members of underrepresented student populations in engineering. These groups

Conference Session

Poster Session

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Bentow, American Society of Mechanical Engineers; Richard Blais, Project Lead the Way; Laura Bottomley, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; Catherine Didion, National Academy of Engineering; Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering; Christina Vogt, National Academy of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

and has afacilitated collaboration as well as provided web-based resources and training. The panel will provide a forumfor sharing effective mechanisms for incorporating gender equity into existing programs. Panelists will focuson examples that are relevant to the engineering education community and can easily be replicated.OverviewThe purpose of the Gender Equity Extension Service Project is to increase the enrollment, retention, andgraduation of women as baccalaureate-level engineers. The Center for the Advancement of Scholarship onEngineering Education (CASEE) of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) is leading NAE’s effort onthis project. In 2005 19% of the bachelor’s degrees awarded in the United States were awarded to women.iNAE

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Leanne Kallemeyn, Loyola University Chicago; Gail Baura, Loyola University Chicago; Francisca Fils-Aime, Loyola University Chicago; Jana Grabarek; Pete Livas Jr, Loyola University Chicago

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Press series in biomedical engineering. 2020, Waltham, MA: Elsevier/Academic Press.55. Marra, R. and B. Bogue. A.W.E. (Assessing Women In Engineering) – A Model For Sustainable And Profitable Collaboration. In 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2003. Nashville, TN: ASEE.56. DeMonbrun, M., et al., Creating an Instrument to Measure Student Response to Instructional Practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 2017. 106(2): p. 273-298.57. Smith, A., et al., Introductory biology courses: A framework to support active learning in large enrollment introductory science courses. Cell biology education, 2005. 4(2): p. 143.