. Swan, K. Paterson, and A. R. Bielefeldt, “Community Engagement in Engineering Education as a Way to Increase Inclusiveness,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 357–372. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.023.[6] L. Barrington and J. Duffy, “Attracting Underrepresented Groups To Engineering With Service Learning,” in 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Honolulu, Hawaii: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2007, p. 12.298.1-12.298.41. doi: 10.18260/1-2--2993.[7] E. Brubaker, M. Schar, and S. Sheppard, “Impact-Driven Engineering Students: Contributing Behavioral Correlates,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
determined and motivated as they progress through their educational pathways.1. Introduction Background: With funding from the Department of Education, Canada community college and San Francisco Sate University have collaborated to offer research internship experience to the under-represented community college students. This program has been conducted for several yearsnow and every year it impacts close to 20 community college students. The community collegestudents are selected for this program based on criteria of diversity, technical background, and fit.The program covers four disciplines of Electrical, Computer, Mechanical, and Civil Engineering.In each discipline, there is a faculty research advisor at San Francisco State University who
AC 2007-1234: SHOULD I STAY OR SHOULD I GO? ENGINEERING STUDENTS'PERSISTENCE IS BASED ON LITTLE EXPERIENCE OR DATAGary Lichtenstein, Stanford University Gary Lichtenstein, Ed.D., is a Consulting Associate Professor of Engineering at Stanford University, specializing in quantitative and qualitative research methods. His areas of intellectual interest include engineering education, community-based research, and education evaluation and policy. His extensive teaching experience includes courses on qualitative research methods (for graduate students), and on writing and critical thinking (for students ranging from high school to professionals). He lives in southeast Utah. He can be contacted at
each course?)Implementation Considerations based on experience two years into thisIn thinking about how to embark on the implementation of a program of this scale and scopeacross the SUNY System and with limited staff resources within the SUNY CPD, we consideredvery carefully how to be the most efficient and effective in our efforts. Partnering with SLN andOLIS was the initial step in expanding our program development resources. Next we had topresent and get buy in for approach with the various SUNY Communities with which we werealready engaged. This is a very new concept for professional development across SUNY and italso represented a new role for CPD. We continue to spend a great deal of time presenting theconcept at conferences and meeting
course titled “How Engineering Impacts Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” that13 emphasizes the importance of non-technical engineering skills, with a focus on DEI. This course14 considers writings from a variety of authors, representing distinctive perspectives on matters of15 diversity, equity, and inclusion. Through active engagement with this material, this course16 confronts history to identify and understand instances of racism, sexism, discrimination, and17 bias, specifically in science and engineering. This study builds on previous scholarship presented18 to ASEE along with other related fields to demonstrate how discussion-based courses challenge19 graduate students to think more critically about the engineering design
. Page 13.630.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Freshmen Engineering: The Influence of Student Feedback and Involvement on a Course Teaching MATLAB and LabVIEWAbstractThis paper describes the impact that undergraduate student feedback and involvement has had onClarkson University’s freshmen engineering course ES100: Introduction to Engineering Use ofthe Computer. ES100 provides students with an introduction to the MATLAB and LabVIEWprogramming languages, as well as introducing methods to solve engineering and scienceproblems using MATLAB and LabVIEW. All undergraduate engineering majors are required topass this class, which is taught by a team of faculty members from each of Clarkson’sundergraduate engineering
provide a context for integrating science andtechnology within the school, the home and the community. The resulting web-based comic andlinked materials/modules engages and inspires students in STEM education by coupling factualhigh-technology based comic books with internationally significant collections – in both creativeand useful ways. We will continue to augment these materials and will widely disseminate theproducts via a combination of workshops, publications, teacher’s guides, special museumprograms, a traveling exhibit (that can be displayed in other prominent locations) and K-14educational initiatives.The pilot project has exhibited broader impact by providing students the ability to access thematerials at their own pace (in a format
semester’s four-student and six-student group assignments, the female-to-male ratioappeared to influence female students’ perceptions. In larger groups, the gender ratio had a morepronounced impact on communication dynamics and group interactions compared to the two-student groups surveyed during the spring semester. In smaller groups, individual personalitiesand interpersonal dynamics were more evident, reducing the effects of gender ratios.Alternatively, in larger groups, gender ratios exhibit a more visible correlation with students’perceptions and experiences. The study suggests that while gender ratios have a minimal effecton smaller groups, they play a more significant role in shaping the dynamics and perceptionswithin larger group
developadvanced manufacturing research and a rapid prototyping-based teaching laboratory, materialextrusion and material jetting-based AM machines were acquired. The overall goal of thisinitiative is to support design and manufacturing-based educational activities and createopportunities to engage undergraduate students in research. However, there were no such formalcourse offerings on the AM that would allow students to learn and engage in the full spectrum ofthe AM process such as 3D design with optimization in mind to hands-on experience inmanufacturing and testing of these designs. In Spring 2023, a senior elective on AM was offeredfor the first time in the Mechanical Engineering Program. In order to fulfill the growing demandfor a skilled workforce
National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder, Colorado, carrying out theoretical analysis and computer simulations of semi- conductor photonic devices. Dr. Klein first joined Georgia Tech as an ECE faculty member based at the Georgia Tech-Savannah campus in 2003, and in 2012, he transferred to the Georgia Tech campus in Atlanta. Effective January 2018, Dr. Klein was appointed as the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering’s associate chair for Graduate Affairs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Development of Team-Based Hands-On Learning Experiences1. IntroductionStudent learning is known to be enhanced when students are able to engage with new material
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education” perform professionally in a different cultural setting and that WE CAN DELIVER !”. • “We also learned what a great University WVU is. We are grateful to WVU for giving us this opportunity and we highly recommend this type of experience to every student at WVU”. From the perspective of the faculty, two benefits can be brought forward, one is the“closeness” to students developed through the program, the second one is the “closeness” toindustry, which in turn trickles down into better class-room communications and richer illustrativeengineering examples. As pointed out by
effective and appealing tostudents; however, sustaining student engagement is a challenge.IntroductionMentorship is critical to professional development [1]. The impact of engineering mentorshipprograms on students, such as related to their perceptions and self-efficacy, is nebulous [2];impacts are undoubtedly influenced by confounding factors, including the participants involved,contexts, techniques, and mentoring procedures applied. Educators have implemented a plethoraof engineering student mentorship program structures, ranging from formal to semi-formal andapplying various techniques, such as experiential based workshops [3] and one-on-one mentoring[4]. These diverse mentorship approaches are being applied to and studied for the full age
, engaging students in computational thinking, and engineering design. The programs’ design included a summer intensive experience in which teachers fully participated in a computer science or engineering laboratory research and engaged in an inquiry focused content-to-pedagogy teacher professional development workshop, building curriculum from their lab research experience with foci on scientific experimentation and improving students’ STEM achievement and content area literacy. The programs were both aligned with Common Core Math Standards and Next Generation Science Standards and addressed the research question: What is the impact of an intensive research- based teacher professional development program on both teacher and student performance?In
level of preparation and support that may not be feasible to scale to a level accessible to a large number of students. An effective research experience for undergraduate students requires proper definition of a focused research problem, proper training and mentoring. Here we present a summer research program in which we host a selected group of students in a research lab for summer research experience and survey the impact of this experience on their educational outlook. Through a collaboration between a community college focused on education and a 4- year higher education institution offering research opportunities, we have been able to host four undergraduate students from the community college in our research laboratory in
responsibility, community engagement in engineering, and the experiences of low-income and first- generation students in engineering. She has a B.S. in electrical engineering from MIT and an M.S. and Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Stanford University.Ana Karen Biviano ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Work in Progress: A Quantitative Analysis on Teamwork Behavior, Disagreement, and Their Linkages to Students’ Engineering IdentitiesAbstractThis Work-in-Progress paper explores how teamwork experience informs students’ engineeringidentity. Teamwork skills are highly valued by employers but are lacking in many engineeringgraduates. While little is known about the linkage between teamwork
lessons that engage our 21st century students in science and engineering practices. (K.Cruz-Deiter, personal communication, 2019)In years two and three, four expert teachers were invited back to serve as trainers for the secondcohort. One trainer participated in each of the three Sensor Design modules during the first twoweeks of the RET. Project personnel and teacher trainers modeled appropriate instructionalmethods for clear and consistent delivery of content knowledge. Having the returning expertteachers helped new participants understand how RET content could translate into themiddle/high school classroom. The RET experience helped us see what real engineers and scientists are researching and we were able to interact
culture and co-cultures on communication, audience-centeredcommunication (where an audience is one or more person, such as a client), teamwork,perspective-taking, and diversity and inclusion. A key element of the implementation iscritical/analytical reflective writing and reporting, where students are required to examine howtheir perspectives and expectations, extended from their backgrounds and experiences (the“environment” in the Transactional Model of Communication from Figure 1), influences howthey engage in situations and with others, and thus how their participation may impact the peoplethey interact with and the outcomes they experience. Throughout the semester, the terms“interpersonal-“ and “intercultural communication” are used and
extracurricular nonclassroominteractions with peers and faculty appear to have the most consistent positive impact.The findings of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) are particularly useful inframing issues of undergraduate engagement. Since 2000, NSSE has been surveying freshmenand seniors at 1200 U.S. universities and colleges to explore the various ways that studentsengage (or do not engage) in their education. NSSE22 reports that students who took part in oneor more “high-impact” practices (such as a learning community, research with faculty, or studyabroad) reported greater levels of deep learning and greater gains in learning and personaldevelopment. At the same time, first-generation and transfer students were much less likely
, indicating thatthese institutions need to become more welcoming by adopting strategies that are intentional inaddressing the needs of these students where they are rather than placing all the burden on themto adapt to their new environment. Establishing such a community involves more than justadopting established best practices. It requires a shift in mindset on the part of faculty who mustembrace cultural competency principles that allow for setting reasonable expectations ofincoming students and crafting creative approaches to support their learning [7].An attitudinal survey was conducted among the students and faculty to gauge perceptions of theacademic environment. From these surveys, students identified two program elements beyondthe
howto implement digital learning in the classroom. Further, these forums bring CA2VES and itseducational partners one step closer to advancing the future of STEM education in SouthCarolina schools.ii. Regional Initiatives Creating a professional development for teachers to learn more about resources availableto them is a key step in ensuring that more students and parents are aware of career options in thestate’s thriving industries. For WERC and CA2VES, it has been an essential focus of the overallcenter mission to engage industry, educators, students, parents, and the community in a variety ofevents. Including a range of stakeholders in opportunities to learn more about industry sectors,such as advanced manufacturing in South Carolina
via concept maps before and after ethicsinstruction, students in game-based sections used more words related to the “impact” of thedecision, where the students in more traditional classrooms focused on laws. So while game-basedand/or playful learning doesn’t appear to have much of an effect on ethical reasoning, it does altertheir conceptions of ethics more abstractly. And students were mostly positive about the use ofgames to teach engineering ethics overall, which can lead to higher levels of engagement andlearning. It is worth noting that we did not find much evidence to support the broader use of gamesto teach engineering ethics (yet).We also looked at the relationship between DIT2/EERI scores and how students “scored” on theconcept maps
dissertation research is focused on exploring the ethical becoming of architecture students within courses utilizing community-engaged pedagogies.Jiangmei Wu, Indiana University, Bloomington Jiangmei Wu is an interdisciplinary scholar and artist/designer. She has been investigating the relationship between geometry, computational algorithms, and making techniques in the art, science, and engineering of paper folding.Dr. Andres Tovar, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Andres Tovar, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Mechanical and Energy Engineering at Indiana University- Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). He previously served as a Research Assistant Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at
. Assessment and Feedback: The in-class submission format limited feedback and real- world engagement opportunities. Students expressed a need for “more structured feedback mechanisms” and “I wish it had gone beyond in-class submissions to engage with the real world” to enhance their learning.InterpretationThese results suggest that the PBL approach was generally well-received by students,particularly in terms of promoting understanding and engagement with the course content. Whileits impact on deeper thinking transformation appeared positive for many, further investigationmight be needed to understand the factors influencing individual variations in this area.DiscussionHow are student learning and performance affected when a
become responsible citizens in aninterdependent, pluralistic, global community. National University students earn theirdegrees in a unique one-class-per-month format, and attend classes at night so they cancontinue to move forward in the workplace. Programs in this format can be completedfaster than they would be at a traditional university, albeit in an intense fashion. Eachgraduate course has 40.5 hours of class room contact. Students are allowed to take onlyone course at a time.National University’s Master’s Degree in Sustainability ManagementNational University‘s Master of Science in sustainability management degree (M.S.)program is designed to bring provide methods and theory appropriate to the study ofsustainability by exploring the
engage in to prepare forimplementing their engineering design solution; "What do you need to know in order to solve theproblem?" In answering this question, we want students to make connections with one or moreSTEM topics that could meet their interests. We also desire that students determine they mustlearn the very same concept(s) for which the curriculum was designed. We want students tobelieve it was their own idea to learn this content because this can boost feelings of autonomyand competence. If students' answers correspond to the STEM content they will be taught, wehave contributed to supporting student autonomy, competence, and motivation. Students will feelthey have exercised some agency in determining their next learning steps. We want
Session 3225 Engineering Design – On-Line Rebecca Sidler Kellogg, Jerald Vogel, Vinay Dayal Iowa State UniversityIntroductionTransforming engineering curriculum to an on-line asynchronous format presents manychallenges and opportunities. Engineering design has typically been taught as a collaborativeinteractive course at Iowa State University where student involvement and engagement waspromoted in face-to-face synchronous learning environments. With the dawn of e-learning, anew opportunity to reach students on-line, faculty at Iowa State University re-examined
Paper ID #37827Thinking Beyond the Service Course Model: IntentionalIntegration of Technical Communication Courses in a BMEUndergraduate CurriculumJulie Stella Julie Stella is a Visiting Lecturer in the Technology Leadership and Communication de- partment of the IUPUI School of Engineering and Technology. She teaches writing and communication to undergraduate engineering students at IUPUI. She has also taught courses at the graduate level in education technology, usable interface design, and ed- ucation public policy. Her background is fairly diverse, though it centers on writing and teaching. Ms. Stella spent 11
conversation and get to know one another. A continental breakfast, in the lobby, would have been more ideal. In this format, students could congregate and engage with others. Lunch should have been at round tables, not in the lecture hall, to allow table conversation. • Tighter management of group formation for improving communication: Student groups for technical sessions were divided into equal numbers of incoming and returning and should have formally done the same with the team building activity. Team building group of all first-year incoming students were timid in their approach and would have benefitted from having more seasoned experienced students in their group. Some first-year incoming
. He has served on technical program com- mittees of Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, International Symposium on Low Power Electronics Design, and International Symposium on Quality Electronics Design. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Engaging Undergraduate Students in Research: Efficient Logic Design in Nano-Scale using Spin Transfer Torque Memory TechnologyBrandon Leung1, Yu Ting Huang1, Fernando Lorenzo1, Sergio Rodriguez1, Janine Young1, Aliyar Attaran2, Amelito G. Enriquez1, Cheng Chen2, Zhaoshuo Jiang2, Wenshen Pong2, Hamid Shanasser2, Kwok-Siong Teh2, Xiaorong Zhang2, Hamid Mahmoodi2 1Cañada College, Redwood
in small universities that mightbe thought to have less need for the community development an LLC provides.IntroductionLiving-Learning Communities (LLCs), in which students live together in a dormitory or otherresidence while participating in common courses and/or co-curricular activities, have been toutedas a high-impact educational practice [1]. LLCs can be organized around particular majors suchas engineering, identity characteristics such as gender or ethnicity, or interdisciplinary themessuch as sustainability. Over one hundred universities have established Engineering-based LLCsover the past four decades [2], [3], and studies have shown that they can improve short-termmeasures of student success such as engagement, first-year academic