that faculty and students are on equal footing when itcomes to some of the new high-tech options. Even though we are dealing with asophisticated student population of practicing engineers, it’s probably dangerous to trustthat they are familiar and comfortable with our technology choices. We have found thatstudents and faculty each need some level of instruction before the technology becomesinvisible and concentration on content can begin. Instructing the students became a focusduring course development, and instructing faculty in the technologies employed wasincorporated into their orientation to distance education.Policies vs. practice in a traditional system This factor is the most hidden, but probablyhas the greatest potential for derailing
education are encouraging to faculty and illustrate honest student motivation.Question 10 - Have you used any online services, such as ChatGPT (or equivalent), to get helpon homework and/or exams? ● A majority of students have not used chatbots to help with tests and homework.Question 11 - You answered that you used online services. Could you explain a bit why youdecided to use that? How did you use it? Did it help? Was it allowed? ● It is helpful for finding starting points to problem solutions and weriting.Question 12 - Do you have any concerns about integrity and fairness issues for yourself andothers when using ChatGPT (or other chatbots)? Please explain. Do you have any suggestions? ● There are concerns it allows cheating (and
on the environment, health and safety Paper concerns, economics, ethics, etc. H Contemporary Investigating Contemporary issues related to Contemporary issues issues engineering field paper J Professional Performing outreach activities Outreach paper F Responsibility Personal improvement plan Personal evaluation by mentorReferences1.National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies. (2004), The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering inthe new century. Washington DC: National Academies Press2
contributing to this failure is the tremendous inertia of the educationalsystems of the Region. (2, 3)The paper sheds light on the seemingly complex issues that have curtailed proper “connectivity”between academia and industry in the Arab Gulf States, and argues for the urgent need to worktogether towards developing mutually beneficial and long-lasting relations, at the grass rootlevel, so that the interests of people on both sides (students, graduates, faculty members,industrial staff, industry managers, research proponents, etc) will be properly served. Perhaps thegreatest achievement in such an endeavor is to improve the “relevancy” of engineeringeducation, by bringing the college closer to the “realities” on the ground. There is a tremendousneed
? Three approaches for bringing forensics and failure case studies into the civil engineeringcurriculum are possible. These are • New stand-alone forensic engineering or failure case study courses, • New capstone design projects, and • Integration of failure case studies into the existing curriculum. The first two alternatives have been implemented at several institutions, including theUniversity of Texas, Mississippi State University and the University of Colorado at Denver,where practicing forensic engineers are members of the faculty. Clearly, this approach dependson the availability of qualified and interested faculty. Use of forensic projects in capstone(Senior) design courses requires the availability of appropriate projects
learning environment in the classroom as well as the development ofcooperative faculty teams. Guskin 3 observes, "to create learning environments focused directly on activities that enhance student learning, we must restructure the role of the faculty to maximize essential faculty-student interaction, integrate new technologies fully into the student learning process, and enhance student learning through peer interaction." (pp. 18-19)Evidence of the paradigm shift appears elsewhere in the literature related to teachingengineering. ABET’s Engineering Criteria 2000 is a reflection of the new philosophy.Participants at engineering education conferences deplore the excessive use of “chalkand talk” lectures and commend the
careers?”, “Why are sofew women electing to study engineering?”, “How can the public’s understanding ofengineering and technological issues be improved?”. Our proposed graduate programs willundertake studies that will help provide answers to these questions and will provide graduatedegree opportunities in graduate education.We must therefore conclude that not only is there great interest at the national level in makingprogress in engineering education, but also that there are a significant number of de factoengineering education graduate programs that exist in the United States at the present time.While these programs are working, and we congratulate those faculty members who have created
rushed to completion and demonstrated withoutsufficient feedback from the faculty, or evaluation by the students and their peers. The secondproblem was that there was a wide range of variability in the types of individual design projectsundertaken. Often these were little more than paper exercises where the student got littleexperience in actual design.The new design sequence, implemented in academic year 2000-2001 was specifically created toremedy these problems. First, the capstone design experience is now presented in an integratedsequence of three consecutive courses. The entire senior class is divided into design teams thateach begin the same project in September and demonstrate their solutions in a public competitionheld in May. The last
moreefficient learning environment.2. Key Benefits of a Structured Course Pathway ModelReducing Advising Burden and Student ConfusionA clearly defined semester-wise course sequence minimizes dependence on faculty advisors forcourse selection. Faculty can focus on academic mentoring and career guidance rather thanscheduling logistics.Ensuring Timely Graduation and Student RetentionA structured roadmap prevents unnecessary course delays, prerequisite issues, and misalignedselections. Higher on-time graduation rates contribute to better student success metrics andinstitutional performance.Eliminating Prerequisite Complexities and Administrative BurdenManaging prerequisite approvals, overrides, and last-minute exceptions is a persistent challengethat
at the University of Texas at El Paso. He has had experience in learning in both a traditional university program as well as the new online learning model, which he utilizes in his current position consulting with faculty about the design of new learning experiences. His experience in technology and teaching started in 1993 as a student lab technician and has continued to expand and grow over the years, both technically as well as pedagogically. Currently he works in one of the most technically outstanding buildings in the region where he provides support to students, faculty, and staff in implementing technology inside and outside the classroom, researching new engineering education strategies as well as the
concerns about the college experience in general andour department in particular. In addition, we have assisted another honor society oncampus by educating freshmen on the vast career opportunities of technology majors.In the future, we plan to take a leadership role in developing and sustaining a family-oriented atmosphere among the department faculty and students. The faculty in ourdepartment has strongly supported our new student recognition program. In this, we havestarted recognizing scholars who may not have the high GPA’s, but have a greatcommitment in the academic arena and have performed services to our department. Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas Tech
engineering organizations is concerning, of potentialgreater concern is the alarming lack of focus being demonstrated by civil engineering programson new economy issues. In contrast to the broadening of interests being witnessed in manyindustries, too few civil engineering-related programs are adopting a global, new economyfocus6. Is this a reflection of the industry direction, or a problem with the education system? Inshort, it does not matter. What is relevant is the fact that the situation exists and it needs to beaddressed and changed. The industry cannot decry the lack of leadership if a demand and focusis not placed on creating these leaders. Similarly, civil engineering educators and graduatescannot decry a lack of industry interest if a
systematic process to develop appropriate bodies of knowledge for their civilengineering subdisciplines as a service to their students.IntroductionMuch has been written lately about the future of engineering and engineering education.The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) has a project under way to redefineengineering and engineering education, with several publications from that effort alreadyin print1,2. The University of Michigan’s Millennium Project is studying new paradigmsfor learning institutions, and has issued an insightful report on engineering education3.The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) has been especially proactive about thefuture of civil engineering education. It has now been ten years since ASCE adoptedPolicy
management systems development, life cycleassessment, design for the environment, ethical issues, environmentally responsiblemanufacturing, as well as the implications of product take back.1,2,15 In some countries thisstandard is being used to embrace a broader realm than originally intended to include new areassuch as the work environment in life cycle assessment.4 Continuous improvement is anotherinherent aspect of this standard. “It fosters self organization and self regulation, which representsthe groundwork from which it is hoped that continuous improvement of environmentalperformance can be sustained. ISO 14000, in particular, tries to encourage a different and moreeffective environmental ethic to the design of product and processes from the
through a follow-up study that had been used in previous years to collect data oncurrent trends and issues related to the field. This paper will discuss the overarching issues andtrends currently in technical/engineering education and one significant area within the surveythat dealt directly with new instructional strategies for graphics education (i.e. distanceeducation). One section of the survey explored distance education in technical/engineeringgraphics education; as prior research suggested that changes had occurred in the instructionaltopics and practices of the field. Previous research also shows that instructors wondered if thesame topics were being taught and the same technology was being used by graphicsprofessionals as a part of their
2013 2014 Year Figure 1: Change in First Year Students, 2010 to 2014.The College recognized that one of its hallmarks--the successful integration of academic andcareer advising by faculty--had become difficult to sustain. The needs of first-year engineeringstudents were of particular concern since, in addition to managing the transition from high schoolto college, engineering students must handle the rigors of an academically challenging program.While retention remained high, the college decided to prevent any future drop by proactivelyimproving the advising program.The College adopted a dual approach targeting
. For example, at theState University of New York (SUNY), a total of 2,737 students enrolled in the Fall 2017semester with 52% being females and 48% males. However, of the 528 students that enrolled inthe school of engineering technology, only 8.5% of them were females while only 6% of these528 students classify as underrepresented [11]. The U.S Department of Education [12] recentlyidentified that only 11% of students who identify as low-income (includes all ethnic groups) earnan undergraduate degree within six years. This is a remarkably low number given that 58% ofstudents from the highest income group earn an undergraduate degree within the sametimeframe.Another concerning issue running parallel to the low enrollment in STEM fields is the
Engineering havecommon engineering clinic classes throughout their programs of study, in which undergraduateswork in teams on hands-on open-ended projects. The primary goal of Rowan University'sengineering clinic classes is to involve students in multidisciplinary design/research projects thatteach engineering principles in both laboratory and real-world settings. The clinics furtherencourage students to address environmentally conscious design and issues related to sustainabledevelopment. The Sophomore Clinic students work on a semester -long design project everyyear. Faculty drawn from all engineering disciplines teach the course. The design project forFall of 2001 was to design, build and test a semi-autonomous robot that uses power provided
pandemic, worldwide educators adapted by avariety of methods, including a change to the course delivery method. Many universities closedand/or moved to wholly online delivery. With the online video formats, either synchronous orasynchronous, faculty were able to create a library of videos which could be later used as a tool.This new collection of videos could be used for asynchronous delivery or online courses, or assupplemental instructional videos. A survey was conducted to determine student perceptions ofsupplemental instructional videos.Supplemental instructional videos were available pre-pandemic by individual instructors andpublishers. Instructors may have offered videos through a Learning Management System (LMS)or a streaming platform
Paper ID #17550Understanding International Perspectives in Science and Engineering EthicsDr. Thomas M. Powers, University of Delaware Thomas M. Powers is the founding director of the Center for Science, Ethics, and Public Policy (CSEPP) at the University of Delaware. He holds appointments as Associate Professor in the Department of Phi- losophy and in the School of Public Policy and Administration, and resident faculty at the Delaware Biotechnology Institute. His research concerns ethics in science and engineering, the philosophy of tech- nology, and environmental ethics, and his publications range from topics in
instruction, curriculum, andgraduates of the program. The ratings with accompanying detailed commentconstitute an outside independent appraisal of a program. They can bespecially helpful in detecting deficiencies in a program, and inproviding suggestions for improvement. It should be noted that the 149accreditation report is a confidential document between the CAB and theEngineering Faculty concerned. The Dean of Engineering has, however, theright to make the document public, if he so wishes. The remainder ofthis paper deals with how the CAB reports have been used to help theGeological Engineering program at the University of Manitoba.THE FIRST ACCREDITATION VISIT The first accreditation visit to the University
/im-a-student-you-have-no-idea-how-much- were-using-chatgpt[2] B. Marr. "How Generative AI Will Change The Jobs Of Architects And Civil Engineers." FORBES. Accessed: Oct. 1, 2024. [Online.] Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2024/03/15/how-generative-ai-will-change- the-jobs-of-architects-and-civil-engineers/[3] C. Zhang, et al., "What does human-machine intelligence mean for civil engineers?," ASCE Civil Engineering Magazine, pp. 1 - 17, 1 Sept. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.asce.org/publications-and-news/civil-engineering-source/civil-engineering- magazine/issues/magazine-issue/article/2023/09/what-does-human-machine-intelligence
Engineering.Incoming freshmen for the fall 2002 semester were admitted into the engineering program, whiletransfer students only were accepted into the engineering technology program. The first two yearsof the new engineering program are in place, while almost the entire engineering technologyprogram is still operating. In spring 2003, no students, including transfer students, will beadmitted to engineering technology, and the first three years of the engineering program will bepopulated with students.Many issues must be explored when a school changes program curricula, such as which classes toupdate and transition versus classes to delete; pre-requisites and co-requisites; class sequences;laboratory sessions; classroom assignments; faculty loading; and many
2006-279: GREEN ENGINEERING DESIGN THROUGH PROJECT-BASEDINDUSTRIAL PARTNERSHIPSC. Stewart Slater, Rowan University C. Stewart Slater is a Professor and Founding Chair of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D., M.S. and B.S. from Rutgers University. His research and teaching interests are in the area of membrane technology where he has applied this to fields such as specialty chemical manufacture, green engineering, bio/pharmaceutical manufacture and food processing. He is the recipient of the 1999 Chester Carlson Award, 1999 and 1998 Joseph J. Martin Award, 1996 George Westinghouse Award, and the 1989 Dow Outstanding New Faculty Award.Mariano Savelski, Rowan
new perspectives about mentorship.This first year of the Engineering MFP focused on providing practical resources for students andsurveying faculty members to evaluate their mentorship perspectives. The upcoming year willfocus on the opposite; a survey will be created to evaluate the advisor-student relationship fromthe mentee’s point of view, and practical resources for faculty will be implemented.IntroductionRecognizing the importance of students engaging in healthy, stable mentoring relationshipsduring graduate school, Purdue launched the Mentoring Improvement Initiative in January 2022.This initiative aims to pursue evidence-based and culturally responsive research and training forfaculty, students, and staff at the university over the
exchange of philosophies among faculty. These dialogs bring faculty views closer and permit establishing a common understanding of relevant issues. A sense of ownership gets established and a better understanding of one’s own views usually take place.VI. ChallengesAlthough EC2000 proved beneficial to the quality of engineering education, its initialimplementation requires a steep learning curve and a sincere commitment to developing ameaningful assessment program. It is the belief of this author that once an effective assessmentprogram is established, its maintenance will be manageable and of continued benefit.Developing a new assessment program must be approached as an open-ended critical thinkingproject. One or two faculty members at
theincreasingly ubiquitous nature of technology both in and outside of the classroom. Less obvious,but no less important, changes are also taking place in how our students access information, takenotes, study, and interact with their instructors and peers. The study presented in this paperexplores the use and impact of a relatively new education technology, audio - slide lecturecapture, which was implemented in a large first year engineering class in an effort to addressthese changes. While there are a number of existing studies on lecture capture that addressstudent attendance concerns this study also details the difficulties of implementing a lecturecapture system in a large, first year engineering course, both from a technology and an
negative reaction from the NSF.Not to be discouraged by the setback and with what was felt to be an impressive resume of thecollege in hand; a group of faculty and the chief academic officer of the college visited the NSFoffices in Washington, DC. The group was looking for feedback concerning the correct focus fora new proposal for an NSF ATE Center that would receive a more favorable review. At thismeeting, the NSF program officers gave the college a gentle but not too subtle hint for the needof an ATE Center of Excellence devoted to telecommunications. The group was not verysurprised by this turn of events and with this message fresh in our minds; we returned toSpringfield and started the development of a proposal for the Northeast Center for
automation in yourwarehouses.” John explains a dilemma of intensifying pressure on business leaders who have nottaken the appropriate steps towards implementing new technologies until the pandemic falloutrendered it necessary, which leads us directly to the next section of training.Training Executives John and Matt both discuss training issues that arose as a result of the COVIDpandemic. John’s concerns were centered around supply chain shortages and the increasing needfor warehouse automation and immediate implementation: “when you step out in the warehouseand you look at all the things that need to happen, it’s just absolutely overwhelming.” Mostcompanies, at this point, turn towards consultants who can help put organizations on the
Marketplace is intended toenable broader participation and as such is open to all institutions with the capability ofparticipating in undergraduate level capstone projects. The marketplace project sponsors providedomain expertise and advice, students research the project details and work towards solutions,while faculty supervisors help guide the teams and grade their work. The Capstone Marketplacemakes it easier for sponsors to reach out to a broad pool of students and provide them with theadded benefit of an engaged and knowledgeable mentor. Students can more easily find projectsbest matched to their interests and needs and faculty have an open source for student projects thatcan lead to new research partners and collaboration.RationaleThe Capstone