colleagues; • develop a network of faculty mentors; • make professional presentations at national and international conferences; • be skilled at developing research proposals; • be skilled at conducting independent research; • be skilled at developing technical papers; • mentor undergraduate students; Page 23.63.12 • organize study groups for graduate and undergraduate ANSEP participants; and • earn a master’s or PhD in a STEM discipline. Grow Your Own PhDIn 2008, ANSEP started the Grow Your Own PhD component. This
Paper ID #6100A Survey of Former GK-12 FellowsDr. Jed S. Lyons, University of South Carolina Dr. Jed Lyons is professor of Mechanical Engineering and interim associate dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering and Computing at the University of South Carolina. His passion is developing hands-on learning experiences for engineering students from grades K through Ph.D.Ms. Erica Pfister-Altschul, University of South Carolina Erica Pfister-Altschul has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from MIT, and an ME in Mechanical Engi- neering from the University of South Carolina. In addition to eight years of industry
first step in reachinga judgment is a need to fully understand the goals of the traditional engineering laboratory. Oncethese goals are determined, ABET can determine whether a simulated or remote course is anadequate substitution for traditional hands-on experience. In January 2002, ABET held acolloquy to solicit input from a select group of experts to determine a taxonomy of engineeringlaboratory learning objectives. A list of 13 learning objectives was created that participants feltadequately describes the goals of the engineering laboratory. However, the participants of thecolloquy requested that the list be validated and any new issues or challenges related toachieving the objectives be documented. This paper takes an initial step in that
of the Middle East and the Arab Gulf States in particular. Page 25.996.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 On the Quality of Teaching: The Role of a “Caring” FacultyAbstract: The paper focuses on the role of a “caring” faculty who believes that being adedicated, thoughtful, and passionate is as important as being professionally competent. Itis argued that faculty members can improve the quality of teaching by becoming moresensitive to students’ needs even if the faculty member is not fully committed to modernteaching/learning methods. A caring faculty understands
Paper ID #7041Bridging Engineering, Science, and Technology (BEST) for Elementary Edu-catorsErin M Fitzgerald, Museum of Science Erin Fitzgerald is a senior professional development/curriculum associate on the EiE Professional Devel- opment team. She received her S.B. from MIT in Literature with a Minor in Mechanical Engineering, and received her M.Ed. from Marquette University in Educational Policy and Leadership with a focus in Secondary Math Education. Prior to joining EiE, Erin was a corps member in Teach for America. While at Teach for America, she taught high school math in Milwaukee, WI in both the public and private
Roche also noted thatworkload not perceived by students to be associated with learning had a slightly negative effecton student evaluations of teaching[19]. In a later paper, Marsh[15] constructed models whichseparated course workload into “Good” (perceived by students to be valuable to their learning)and “Bad” (unnecessary, excessive, etc.) hours – as originally proposed but not published[15] byGillmore and Greenwald – with Good workload positively and Bad workload negativelyassociated with overall teaching rating [15]. Note that the teaching evaluation data used in thepresent study did not discriminate between Good and Bad workloads. It is possible that theslight negative relationship observed in the present study between course workload and
bridge the divide tothe point of mutual trust, mutual respect, and mutual benefit.We are currently in the third year of an NSF-funded GK-12 project, the Student andTeacher Enhancement Partnership (STEP)*, and are preparing to embark on a five-yearextension. A major part of this project has been the building, nurturing, and grooming ofpartnerships between Georgia Tech and local minority high schools. As part of thisproject we have developed a model of partnerships that is grounded in the public policyliterature and that describes the evolution of the partnerships created between GeorgiaTech and four minority-dominated high schools as part of STEP. In this paper we willdescribe the theoretical framework of the partnership model, outline ways to
theopportunity to better understand how their education will be put into practice. Students are notrequired to attend the retreat and no credit is given for attending. The reputation of the retreathas grown among the students. Each year the retreat provides students with insights into theirprofession and their futures. Without question the retreat instills students with a respect for theirchosen profession and greatly motivates and stimulates them to pursue addition interests in theirstudies. This paper describes the retreat in detail, explains how the retreat has affected the livesand careers of the participants, and compares the retreat to other similar integrative experiencesoffered by other civil engineering programs.IntroductionIn the world of
Society for Engineering Educationcompliments, and opinions. This present work describes an anonymous electronic journalsystem as it implemented and employed in the FEH Program as a near real time assessment tool.3. A Real-Time Program Assessment ToolVital to the effective administration of any organization is the ability to quickly identify andaddress potential operational issues. Unfortunately, even though the technologies are readilyavailable to construct tools to facilitate quick-response assessment, many educational institutions(including The Ohio State University community at large) still rely heavily on paper-and-pencilcourse evaluation surveys given at the end of the academic term to assess course or programeffectiveness. This approach can
course taken by students after their sophomore year and an off-campus internshipcompleted during the summer after their junior year. The on-campus portion of the ILTM,which is the primary source of material for this paper, engages the students in an extremelyintensive six-week program that focuses on issues such as globalization, ethics, communicationskills, critical thinking, teamwork, and leadership. The students hear lectures and attendworkshops by faculty and corporate leaders, travel to selected industrial and business sites, andwork with companies on significant and real-world management and technological projects.For the project portion of the program, the 20 students are div ided into 4 project teams of 5students each. Each team is
learning environments wherestudents can gain knowledge and skills. Yet, even the description of developing a learningenvironment points to the need for, at least, understanding or, at most, mastery of teachingprinciples and methods of application.While arguments could be made for requirements of additional education for futurehigher-education instructors (just as most states require Master degrees of P-12 educators) orintegration of education principles and modes of application into existing technical/engineeringgraduate programs, this paper will focus on the existing structure and how two young (in bothsenses of the word) educators were able to extend their knowledge of educational principles andrapidly improve their in-class learning
, 1983 vs. 1993.” AAHE Bulletin 46 (2): 6-8, 12.Sixbury, G.R., and W.E. Cashin. 1995. “Description of database for the IDEA diagnostic form.”IDEA Technical Report No. 9. Manhattan, Kansas: Kansas State University, Center for FacultyEvaluation and Development.Theall, M., J. Franklin, and L.H. Ludlow. 1990. “Attributions and retributions: Student ratingsand the perceived causes of performance.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of theAmerican Educational Research Association, Boston.Theall, Michael, and Jennifer Franklin (eds.). 1990. Students Ratings of Instruction: Issues forImproving Practice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 43 (Fall). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.U.S. News & World Report. 2000. “Best Undergraduate Engineering
tinkering background with thedissection of machines and use of tools, students are now entering with computer, video games,and other “virtual” experiences. This focus has left a void in the ability to relate engineeringprinciples to real-world devices and applications. In this paper, we introduce a new approach forfilling this void in a mechanical engineering curriculum. In particular, we describe modificationsand extensions to machine design courses to include hands-on exercises. Through theapplication of “mechanical breadboards,” clear relationships between machine design principlesand the reality of machine components are established. These relationships reduce the number oftopics covered in the courses, but greatly increase the interest of the
University of Wisconsin at MadisonAbstractThe Engineering Education Scholars Program (EESP) is a small but crucial endeavor in theNational Science Foundation’s (NSF) approach to stimulate a comprehensive reform ofundergraduate engineering education. For two summers, EESP has invited diverse groups ofseveral dozen, doctoral engineering students and junior faculty members to participate in aweeklong, hands-on workshop focused on teaching philosophy, classroom skills, and theessentials of the academic career. This paper outlines the background and scope of EESP, thebenefits enjoyed by participants, and tips on establishing EESP at other institutions.Participants testify to enjoying myriad benefits during and after EESP, especially in effectiveteaching
Paper ID #42951Investigating the Impact of Team Composition, Self-Efficacy, and Test Anxietyon Student Performance and Perception of Collaborative Learning: A HierarchicalLinear Modeling ApproachTridib Kumar Saha, Purdue University Tridib K. Saha is a final-year PhD candidate in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University, specializing in hybrid electric vehicle modeling and simulation, power and energy, and engineering education. He serves as a lecturer in the ECE department, teaching fundamental circuits courses for approximately four years. His academic focus has evolved toward ECE educational research, course
objectives and conducting assessments. Outcomebased education (OBE) is a critical educational development [1], employing both traditionalassessment methods of homework, quizzes, exams, and papers throughout each term as well asnewer paradigm techniques of flipped classrooms and PBL projects which are transformingcurriculum and students alike [2].Furthermore, the competency of the institution, particularly at the tertiary university level, maybe directly or indirectly measured by national and international rankings of the entire institutionor of academic units therein, such as a college. ABET assists with ensuring competency ofinstitutions on a global scale by ensuring minimum levels of preparation of qualifications forindustry [3].Likewise, one may
Paper ID #42078Leveraging Familia: Equipando Padres Program Pilot for Hispanic Parentsand Caregivers of First-Generation-to-College Engineering StudentsDr. Dayna Lee Mart´ınez, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Dayna is a Senior Director of Research & Impact at the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE), where she leads a team of professionals who specialize in data-driven design and implementation of programs and services to empower pre-college students, parents, graduate students, and faculty members in STEM fields, with a particular focus on advancing Hispanic representation and success. With
the PBL cycle to guide thedevelopment of learning teams in forming and enhancing learning and problem solving skills. Adetailed description of CPBL and its implementation can be seen in Khairiyah et. al.11This paper discusses the Engineering Problem Solving Instrument (EPSI) that was designed tomeasure the extent of deep thinking in problem solving after undergoing CPBL. The EPSI wasdesigned based on concepts of engineering and technical problem solving derived from theliterature suited for the CPBL environment. The instrument follows the style of Woods’ MyRole Is Questionnaire (MRIQ) to provide a contrast as well as continuity between deep andsurface learning approaches.12 A case study on the usage of the instrument to measure the extentof
Session 1630 Engineering Change Karl A. Smith1, Angela Linse2, Jennifer Turns2, Cindy Atman2 1 University of Minnesota, 2University of WashingtonAbstract: Calls for change abound in engineering education. The community is responding withinnovations at many different levels. The effectiveness and long-term "staying power" of anynew development is likely to increase if the innovators are explicit about the model of changethey are adopting. Many such models are relevant for the engineering education community. Inthis paper we present a
. Abstract Lab-based courses are generally not available in an online format because of the need forexpensive lab equipment, time consuming technical assistance and troubleshooting. The recentincrease in demand for online instruction extends past current pedagogical methods and is mademore problematic with the addition of a lab component. As part of our initial research, insummer 2010 we implemented an online course by slightly modifying an existing on-campuscourse. Through this exploration, we collect student and staff feedback that will allow us tofurther develop an innovative pedagogical framework specifically tailored for engineeringstudents in an online environment. Our final implementation of an online lab-based course inelectrical
and the University of Minnesota as a mechanical and aerospace engineer, she worked in industry as an automation design engineer and contract programmer. She made computer sci- ence a more appealing topic for her all-women undergraduate student body by presenting this technically valuable course in a project-oriented comprehensive manner. She is currently the director of the Center of Excellence for Women, Science and Technology where she administers the college’s National Science Foundation scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) majors and fa- cilitates various recruiting, advising and placement activities for STEM majors and minors
investments in new application systems are being made by just about every majormanufacturer to address the Year 2000 Problem, replace old mainframe systems, and totake advantage of the latest technological advances. These new systems are replacingsystems that were supporting the supply chain or order fulfilment business process.Very few manufacturers have an integrated set of systems in place that can be used tomanage the product design and change process. Very little of the massive new systeminvestment is going into tools for these processes. This paper outlines how an integratedset of systems can be developed from existing commercial software packages. How thesesystems can be used to proactively manage product cost is discussed.The Importance of
-efficacy beliefs impact their modeling abilities remains largelyunknown.In this study, we create an instrument to measure self-efficacy for modeling based on previousself-efficacy scales created for engineering design. The design scale was chosen for severalreasons. First, it was developed for measuring self-efficacy of engineers specific to an importantengineering capability. Second, it is a tested scale with high content and construct validity. Indeveloping our modeling scale, we have used a similar approach: the subtasks of the modelingprocess are identified and listed and then students are asked how capable they believe they are incarrying each task. We have tested the scale using data from undergraduate engineering students.This paper serves
Paper ID #6581RISK VS. LIABILITY ASSOCIATED WITH OFF-CAMPUS STUDENT EX-CURSIONSProf. Francis J. Hopcroft, Wentworth Institute of Technology Francis Hopcroft is a professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and an institute leader in Interna- tional Service Learning initiatives in Peru and other areas of South and Central America. Page 23.1048.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 RISK VS. LIABILITY ASSOCIATED WITH OFF-CAMPUS STUDENT
Paper ID #47422From Pilot to Practice: Establishing Neuroinclusive Teaching Practices forLong-Term ImpactMs. Connie Syharat, University of Connecticut Connie Syharat is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education and a Research Assistant at the University of Connecticut as a part of two neurodiversity-centered NSF-funded projects. As the Program Manager of a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF:RED) project titled, ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”, she has co-facilitated a range of Neuroinclusive Teaching Institutes and workshops for STEM instructors and Teaching Assistants
194 Hands, Mind and Hearts-on Design Experiences Samuel Landsberger, Artin Davidian, Juan Garibay, Richard Valenzuela, and Barbara Wheeler California State University, Los Angeles/ University of Southern CaliforniaAbstractThis paper presents an innovative duet of programs called HERE and HERO to introducestudents from traditionally disadvantaged backgrounds, students with disabilities, and women– groups under-represented in science and engineering - to problem-solving, socialengagement, and the field of Rehabilitation Engineering. It is the author’s experience thatstudents from all backgrounds, but particularly
Paper ID #46576Enhancing Assessment of Student Engagement in Face-to-Face Global Project-BasedLearnings (gPBLs): Adding Peer Assessment to Improve Slack-based EvaluationMr. Leo Kimura, Shibaura Institute of Technology Leo Kimura received his Bachelor of Engineering in Science and Mechanics from Shibaura Institute of Technology (SIT), Japan, in March 2024. He is currently a master’s program student at SIT, majoring in Mechanical Engineering. His main research area is control systems for microrobots.Prof. Hatsuko Yoshikubo Ph.D., SHIBAURA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Dr. Hatsuko Yoshikubo obtained Ph. D. in English Literature
Paper ID #42151Accountability, Ownership, and Satisfaction: An Innovative Approach toTeamwork in Engineering EducationSydney Kropp, University of OklahomaDr. Doyle Dodd, University of Oklahoma Industrial & Systems Engineering Capstone Coordinator ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Accountability, Ownership, and Satisfaction: An Innovative Approach to Teamwork in Engineering Education Abstract Teamwork skills are essential for engineers to be successful in their careers. Engineersoften work in teams to solve complex problems. Unfortunately
Paper ID #29359Work in Progress: Citizen Scientists’ Description of an EngineerDr. Kenneth Stewart, Angelo State University Dr. Kenneth L. Stewart is retired professor of sociology at Angelo State University where he served on the faculty from 1975 through 2018. He was also among the founding faculty members of the Master of Public Health Degree at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center. Dr. Stewart’s scholarly work has a distinctively interdisciplinary flavor overlapping the fields of sociology, history, political science, pub- lic health, and engineering. He is author or co-author of three scholarly books and
Paper ID #42082Board 365: Relating Sociocultural Identities to What Students Perceive asValuable to their Professional and Learning Efficacy When Engaging in VirtualEngineering LabsDr. Kimberly Cook-Chennault, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Kimberly Cook-Chennault is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at Rutgers University. She holds BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan and Stanford University respectively; anAhmad Farooq, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024