6 Post 18.17 4.03 26 98. Discussion and Future WorkAlthough the U.S. has new national science standards, limited studies have investigated theimplementation of the NGSS’ SEPs. Our study is vital to STEM educators and PD providers as itoutlines the challenges and success of implementing a robotics curriculum for science and mathteachers, along with the investigation of teachers’ self-efficacy. As evidenced below, the PDworkshop allowed participants to complete open-ended robot design projects by learning fromtheir engineering instructors while performing collaborative hands-on activities and overcominganxiety, all of which
Experience using ePortfoliosAbstractIntroductionEmployers nowadays focus less on academic achievement and more on personal attributes,experience, and skills. Engineering educators must also contend with the need to involvestudents at cognitive and emotional levels in authentic, meaningful, and immersive learningexperiences amidst a full curriculum. Electronic portfolios (or ePortfolios), combined with aseries of mini projects, have the capability to uniquely address all these needs.ePortfolios have been shown to be effective for supporting student learning by serving as apowerful vehicle for students to display their individual competencies while also allowingfaculty to provide personalized assessment. Due to the personalized nature of ePortfolios
International Science andEngineering demonstration project to ascertain the merit of such an overseas study opportunityfor A.S. degree students. This paper summarizes the construction of two programs, one inSpain and the other in Germany, with a focus on the lessons learned and faculty identifieddifferences between in the United States community college technical education system and itscounterpart in these two European countries. The paper outlines the curriculum developmentrational and its resultant course of study the A. S. degree seeking students will experience duringtheir time in these two countries in 2012. Finally, the recruitment strategies to attract bothtraditional and non-traditional students into this program will be discussed. It is
procedural knowledge and retain important information (Butler &Roediger, 2007; Roediger et al., 2011). However, opponents argued tests can discourage learningas students tend to go with pattern matching or memorization as a way to prepare for tests (Case& Marshall, 2004; Marton & Säljö, 1976). Frequent testing also led to students focusing on fearof failure as motivation for the course (Tan, 1992; Vaessen et al., 2017). These arguments shouldbe considered while we discuss test usage in engineering classrooms as there could be otherways to complement tests to enrich the assessment design and experiences in fundamentalengineering courses. Alternative assessments, such as projects, portfolios, concept inventory, andreflective practices
withinengineering”[5]. The Engineering Science curriculum is divided into two sections, theFoundation and the Options, each lasting two years (four academic terms). The fourFoundation terms “…provide a strong foundation in science, math, technology and design”,and include courses that cover classical mechanics, structures and materials, quantumphysics, systems biology, fluid dynamics, robotics design, thermodynamics, linear algebra, Page 14.1216.2calculus, computer programming, and electrical fundamentals[6]. Engineering Science is bynature a multidisciplinary program that enables students to work within and acrossdisciplines.In their third and fourth years
SoftDes, and briefly describe our nextsteps in this work.Related WorkSoftDes teaches a variety of topics, some of which overlap with topics traditionally taught in CS1courses. The topic list of SoftDes covers much of those described in literature reviews byMedeiros et al. [2] and Luxton-Reilly et al. [1], as well as that of Hertz’s study on topics coveredin CS1 vs CS2 [4]. We are by no means the first course to cover software engineering topics in anintroductory course: Chen and Hall propose a software engineering project for CS1 whoseprocess resembles that of our projects [19], and our coverage of software testing has some overlapwith many courses reviewed by Scatalon et al. [20]. As we continue to iterate on the list of topicscovered in SoftDes
Paper ID #23931 learners. She also has extended experience in curriculum development. Dr Husanu developed laboratory activities for Measurement and Instrumentation course as well as for quality control undergraduate and graduate courses in ET Masters program. Also, she introduced the first experiential activity for Applied Mechanics courses. She is coordinator and advisor for capstone projects for Engineering Technology.Mr. Carlos Michael Ruiz, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 An Advanced Manufacturing Workshop for Enhancing Engineering and Technology EducationAbstractAn Advanced Manufacturing Workshop for educators
Preliminary Design Perspective”, International Journal on Engineering Education, Vol. 13, No. 5, p. 376-379, 1997 “ IEAust Comments on the Chief Scientist’s Discussion Paper: The Chance to Change”, Institution of Engineers, Australia, Engineering House, 11 National Circuit, Barton, ACT 2600, September 2002 D. Chasey , “It’s a Small World After All”, http://departamento15.com/orgullo_salvadoreno_Mario_Bolanos.htm J. Lenoir, J. Russel, “The Roles of the Student in a Project Based Engineering Curriculum”, Western Kentucky University’s Center for Learning and Teaching, Vol. 3, http://www.wku.edu/Dept/Support/AcadAffairs/CTL/booklets/projectlrn.htm “ Science and Engineering Indicators 2002”, National Science Board, http
and ideas. This phase iscalled ‘CREATE’ on which the students create their own projects.As described by Lee et al.6, the goals of these phases are to learn three major terms calledabstraction, automation and analysis that the authors have found as an effective way to describeCT to youth; however, issues and challenges such as the lack of curriculum standards,infrastructure and lack of opportunities for teachers to learn CT make it difficult to implementCT in day-to-day classrooms activities 6. As such, many programs have been focalized inimplementing after hours CT activities. An example of such projects is the Project GUTS(Growing Up Thinking Scientifically)7.With the current implementation of the Common Core Standards (in particular the
of Mexican descent youth in the mid-20th century, higher education student success, and faculty mentoring programs.Dr. Valerie Martin Conley, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Valerie Martin Conley is dean of the College of Education and professor of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She previously served as director of the Center for Higher Education, professor, and department chair at Ohio University. She was the PI for the NSF funded research project: Academic Career Success in Science and Engineering-Related Fields for Female Faculty at Public Two-Year Institutions. She is co-author of The Faculty Factor: Reassessing the American Academy in a
what engineering departments shoulddo to teach communication (Donnel et al., 2011). Available studies have some limitations. Someare part of broader projects and not exclusively focused on communication skills of engineers(Nicometo, Anderson, Nathans-Kelly, Courter, & McGlamery, 2010). Others are focused onlyon writing skills (Conrad, 2017; Kmiec & Longo, 2017; Winsor, 1996) or only on oralcommunication (Dannels, 2002; Darling & Dannels, 2003). There are some investigations basedon just one type of engineering discipline (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2011;Conrad, 2017). Other studies available are limited to the perspectives of executives (Norback,Leeds, & Forehand, 2009; Norback et al., 2010), with the main focus
intricate problems that maybe challenging for typical algorithms in the traditional engineering curriculum. With theexplosive proliferation of embedded systems, and the IoT, controlling complex actuators andsensors in real time is increasingly feasible. Many engineering applications generate vastamounts of data, and deep learning algorithms are effective at recognizing patterns andextracting meaningful insights from these large datasets [5]. Thus, an appreciation of deeplearning methods will contribute to better engineering decision-making processes [6]. Inaddition, deep learning enables better automation, optimization, and control [7]. From designoptimization to production planning, engineers can leverage deep learning to streamlineworkflows and
non-technical (non-traditional) topics associated with engineering design (e.g., ethics and litigation).”4In 1999, Marin et. al. gave additional guidelines toward creating the “optimal” designexperience: 1) “Instructor mentors should inspire students to take ownership; 2) Instructor mentors should foster creative tension; 3) Students must be given the opportunity to fail as well as succeed.”5Others have noted the many benefits of education-industry partnerships at the seniordesign level and throughout the curriculum.6 The author’s believe that the UT Tylersenior design experience follows these principles and other acknowledged pedagogicalprinciples.The senior design experience was tailored to provide an open-ended
community. He is an active member and volunteer for both the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) Computer Society and the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). He has published numerous conference papers and journal articles on innovations in Software Engineering curriculum development and Philosophy of Engineering & Computing.Dr. Justin Michael Greenly, Franciscan University of Steubenville Associate Professor of Engineering, Franciscan University of Steubenville PhD, Chemical and Biomolec- ular Engineering, Cornell University, 2014 MS, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell Uni- versity, 2012 BS, Chemical Engineering, Bucknell University, 2008
resources.Instructors can choose from short textbooks11,12 and full-length textbooks.13,14 They can findsupplemental resources, such as cases and scenarios, through two online ethics centers: theOnline Ethics Center for Engineering and Research at the National Academy of Engineering(www.onlineethics.org), and Ethics CORE, a project of the National Center for Professional andResearch Ethics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign(www.nationalethicscenter.org). The National Institute for Engineering Ethics (www.niee.org)offers videos that dramatize engineering ethics cases; see Loui et al.15 and Loui et al.16 forsuggestions for using the two most recent NIEE videos.Ethics CORE also supports several online communities. As of this writing, one of the
engineering at UTEP: Engineering, Science and University Colleges. Developed over 5 new courses, including UTEP technology & society core curriculum classes specifically for incoming freshman with a STEM background. Mr. Perez was awarded the 2014 ”University of Texas at El Paso award for Outstanding Teaching”. Mr. Perez has eight years of professional experience working as an Electrical and Computer Engineer providing technical sup- port to faculty and students utilizing UGLC classrooms and auditoriums. Mr. Perez is committed to the highest level of service to provide an exceptional experience to all of the UGLC guests. Mr. Perez strongly believes that by providing exceptional customer service that UGLC patrons will
curriculum which previouslyincluded no common engineering courses taken by all of the engineering students.During the 2012-2013 academic year, three first-year engineering courses designed to providestudents with a hands-on experience with engineering and with a link between engineering andthe required mathematics and science courses were introduced. The three courses consist of anintroduction to engineering course called Engineering Foundations and a two-course sequencecalled Engineering Models I and II, which introduces students to MATLAB® as a computing toolfor solving engineering problems. All three courses are required for all engineering andengineering technology majors, are 2 credit hours, and meet once a week for lecture (55 minutes)and once
activities.Quantitative data were collected using a questionnaire. The research team conductedobservations during the PD activities and interviewed the participants about their livedexperiences at the end of the project activities. The participating mathematics and sciencein-service teachers’ perceptions of the content and skills they gained from the PDactivities and the difficulties they faced during both the PD activities and theimplementation of their planned lessons were explored and documented. Walther, et al.[20] argued that research reports should follow a systematic process and provide actualknowledge claims. In our data collection and analyses, we used both qualitative andquantitative paradigms systematically and we attempted to provide knowledge claims
significant benefits in aligning curriculum design and professional development with thechanging demands of Industry 4.0 and 5.0. By leveraging theoretically defined dynamic KSAtaxonomies and predictive analytics, this framework is designed to help address critical gaps inCEE, pending future validation. Expected outcomes if implemented successfully includeincreased accuracy in curriculum profiling, better alignment with industry requirements, andfacilitation of lifelong learning pathways. These outcomes are projected to improve workforcereadiness and adaptability, particularly in sectors such as INFOCOMM, where rapidtechnological advancements and dynamic labor market demands prevail [11, 12].The design and development of this proposed framework aim
Session 1639 Using Collaborative Learning Techniques to Integrate Economics and Engineering Economy at the Freshman Level Laura Moody, Joan Burtner Mercer UniversityABSTRACTMercer University’s School of Engineering has taken the opportunity provided by the transitionfrom the quarter system to the semester system to engage in a two-year-long curriculum renewaleffort. As a result of this effort, the industrial engineering department is responsible fordesigning an integrated economics/engineering economy course to be taught at the freshmanlevel. In keeping with the
] present a three-course sequence integrating sustainability and design. Through comparison of pre- and post-course surveys, the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of the course in increasing first-yearstudents’ knowledge of and confidence in integrating sustainability into engineering design.Similarly, Ritter et al. [7] present a half-semester project on sustainability introduced as part ofan introductory course on engineering design. In the project, students are asked to look atsustainable design from a systems-design lens and also asked to take into account the direct andindirect impact of their solutions on society, the environment, and the economy.Despite the introduction of these educational initiatives, student designers’ active adoption
communication, leadership and business skills.Furthermore, globalization in industry makes international experience an important, but oftendifficult to implement part of the engineering curriculum.1, 2 Experiential learning can be implemented into the engineering curriculum in a variety ofways including co-ops, internships, project and problem based learning, laboratory experiencesand service-learning. However, integration of international experience into an already packedengineering curriculum can be a little more difficult to attain. Study abroad, internationalinternships and co-ops and international service-learning represent some of the ways in whichengineering academia has provided international experiences for some of its students
technology (became available in August 2006) and the National InstrumentsLabVIEW Toolkit for LEGO Mindstorms NXT (became available for downloads in mid-December 2006) are implemented in this novel engineering design experiment. Bluetoothtechnology is used for robot-to-robot communication and control.Previous Work and JustificationThe LEGO Mindstorms NXT Urban Challenge experiment is a part of the pedagogical systemimplemented in the Introduction to Mechatronics course and the Mechatronics curriculum. Thispedagogical system is based on McCarthy’s3 version of the Kolb4 learning cycle and wasmotivated in part by work presented by Harb et al5. According to Kolb and McCarthy one canlearn new concepts by following a pattern (the learning cycle
educational attainment and schooling experiences of Mexican descent youth in the mid-20th century, and higher education student success.Dr. Valerie Martin Conley, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs Valerie Martin Conley is dean of the College of Education and professor of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She previously served as director of the Center for Higher Education, professor, and department chair at Ohio University. She was the PI for the NSF funded research project: Academic Career Success in Science and Engineering-Related Fields for Female Faculty at Public Two-Year Institutions. She is co-author of The Faculty Factor: Reassessing the American Academy in
also promotes and facilitates industry-college partnerships, She serves as chair of the College of Engineering curriculum committee and is a member of the university curriculum committee. Indira has been a faculty member at the University of Nevada, Reno since 1988. As Professor of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering she has been ac- tively involved in funded research. She has been primary mentor to several graduate students who are well placed in industry and academics. Her research areas include: Engineering education, numerical and experimental bioelectromagnetics, RF/microwave/millimeter wave dosimetry, antenna design, and electrical properties of materials. Over the past 33 years she has brought in over $7
and Teaching Assistant, Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 1/99 8/00 Project Engineer, MWH-Boda Environmental Engineering Group, Beijing, China 7/92 1/99 Structural Engineer, Wuzhou Engineering Services, Beijing, ChinaG. Bruce Gehrig, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Associate Chair and Associate Professor Civil Engineering Technology and Construction Management Program Department of Engineering Technology University of North Carolina at Charlotte Page 22.818.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Implementing
- prentice Faculty Grant from the Educational Research Methods ASEE Division in 2009. She also has been an Electrical Engineering Professor for two Mexican universities. Dr. Mendoza is interested in sTEm education, socioeconomically disadvantaged students, Latino studies in engineering and computer aided/instructional technology in sTEm.Dr. Russ Meier, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Russ Meier is a Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the Milwaukee School of Engineering. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Computer Engineering from Iowa State University. His teaching and research interests include embedded systems, evolvable hardware, the use of complex adaptive systems in digital
small projects or open-ended problems, throughout the curriculum. While very valuable inmany ways, these design experiences do not include any reflection on, or awareness of, thelearning process itself.A project of this kind creates new educational opportunities and serves as an active andcooperative learning environment, similar to the one that Shuman et al.1 have alluded to. Itincludes instructions that promote student understanding and development. In addition, itupgrades professor/student communication in a very interactive way. Such advantages may notbe encountered in the typical undergraduate engineering curricula.Active learning can be defined as any instructional method that engages students in their ownlearning process by encouraging
this appreciation out intofuture careers. Over the three-year duration of this project 24 new courses have been introducedinto the university curriculum. Specifically within the Carnegie Institute of Technology (theengineering college), two courses became part of this program to be taught to students withmajors outside the engineering program as a technical elective for arts and humanities degreerequirements.These two engineering courses lend themselves to what has been termed a new “metadiscipline”of sustainability science and engineering1 which merges engineering, environmental, and socialconcepts into an integrated course. Incorporating environmental and social concepts intoengineering courses has been a growing interest for several years
swarms. How will such new technologies change the impact of robots on society?7. Design Project After gaining a firm understanding of' the fundamentals of design and the use of the Mindstorms, the student teams will complete a design challenge by designing, building, and programming their own robot. Final report will include an analysis of the ethical and social impacts of deploying their device.8. Assessment (2 hrs) A pre- and post- class VOSTS test will be administeredDevelopment and Demonstration of VOSTS Assessment ToolThe original Views on Science-Technology-Society (VOSTS) survey5 contained 114 multiple-choice questions spanning seven categories and was described by Aikenhead6. Mack et al.described refinement of the