electrical and computer engineering in 2014, respectively, both from the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. After graduating with her PhD in 2014, she worked at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, first as a NASA Postdoctoral Program Fellow from 2014-2016 and then as RF/Microwave Engineer from 2016-2017. She started as an Assistant Professor at the University of Southern Indiana, Evansville, IN in the fall of 2017. Her research interests include THz technology development, superconducting detectors, heterodyne arrays, and microwave instruments. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Students – Ask them to eat their Steaks!Abstract Some faculty
Paper ID #27745Integration of SAE Student Competition with Project CourseMr. Marc Poynter, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Graduate Student at IUPUI.Swapnil BansodeMr. Tejesh Charles Dube, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis I am a Mechanical Engineering graduate student interested in structural and material science application in the field of mechanical engineeringMr. Michael Golub, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Michael Golub is the Academic Laboratory Supervisor for the Mechanical Engineering department at IUPUI. He is an associate faculty at the same school, and has
Structural Health Monitoring Using Computer Vision, he joined UCF in 2010 as a Lecturer at the Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering (CECE) Depart- ment. He has published computer vision related research work in prominent journals and still mentors graduate students in this particular area. Dr. Zaurin has been very active in the STEM area as he is one of the selected faculty members for the NSF funded EXCEL and NSF funded COMPASS programs at UCF. Dr. Zaurin received College Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching Award in 2015 and 2019, TIP Award in 2016, and also received 4 Golden Apple Awards for Undergraduate Teaching for a record four years in a row. During Fall 2013 he created IDEAS (Interdisciplinary
year 1995 -1997 20 students 4 80 4-8 1997 – 2003 20 Students 4 80 0-2 2003 -2010* 20 Students 2 20 - 30 None* Low students enrollment in the manufacturing engineering technology program. The programwas terminated in 2014.Active LearningIn 2015 the author was employed at a different institution, where he taught an introductory (100-level) plastics course using the modified science-led approach described in the previous section.However, at this institution faculty were encouraged to incorporate the “active learning”approach in their courses to improve students’ academic
Paper ID #241612018 ASEE Zone IV Conference: Boulder, Colorado Mar 25Using Excel as a Tool to Teach Manufacturing and Heat TransferDr. Odon M Musimbi, Metropolitan State University of Denver Odon M. Musimbi, PhD. Assistant Professor, Metropolitan State University of Denver PhD, Engineering (Mechanical), Colorado School of Mines(2011) MS, Engineering Systems, Colorado School of Mines(2011) Diploma, Mechanical Engineer, University of Kinshasa (1994)Dr. Ing. Jean Paul Mulanza, University of Kinshasa Dr.Ing Jean-Paul S. Mulanza Professor, (1990-Present) Department of Mechanical Engineering Polytechnic Faculty University of Kin
networking systems. He has designed several models of high frequency oscilloscopes and other electronic test and measuring instruments as an entrepreneur. He has delivered invited short courses in Penang, Malaysia and Singapore. He is also the author of a textbook in power electronics, published by Prentice-Hall, Inc. His professional career is equally divided in academia and industry. He has authored several research papers in IEEE journals and conferences. His current research is focused on renewable energy technology, smart energy grid.Prof. Omer Farook, Purdue University Northwest Omer Farook is a member of the faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Purdue University, Nothwest. Farook
program logistics for the then current ABETaccredited AE programs in the United States [3]. When this initial study was published on thestate of Architectural Engineering programs there were 17 ABET accredited programs in theUnited States, and currently that number stands at 21. Another study that centered on the facultyat each AE program was published in 2009, and though it does not correlate directly to the focusof this paper, it does give an overview of faculty logistics for each program [4]. A third studypublished by this author is included in the references for its information that formed the basis ofthis study. The focus of that publication was the development of new degree options for an AEprogram, and included research into the then
dimensions and, finally, errors. Occasionally when a graderinspects the similar submissions of a large class, two or more drawings appear to differ only by afew superficial relocations of dimensions or views. Holding two such drawings, one atop theother, to a light may suggest but does not prove of plagiarism. An example prepared by theauthor is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Nearly identical drawings of the same CAD assignment. Page 1 of 7It became obvious to the author that an alternate method of detecting plagiarism was not onlydesirable but possible. Programming tools available in SolidWorks allowed the quick scanningof the part files instead of the drawing files.The program developed for
MSCE/JD dual-degree programs.Dr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army Officer serving 22 years on active duty with the US Army Corps of Engineers and taught at the United States Military Academy at West Point (USMA). He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from USMA in 1994, Master of Science degrees from the University of Alaska Anchorage in Arctic Engineering in 1998 and Missouri University Science & Technology in Civil Engineering in 1999, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University in 2004. He is a registered
did not show up the day of the event.The group consisted of 11 fifth graders and 5 sixth graders. 37.5% of the participants were girlsand most identified as Black/African-American (31.25%) or White (31.25%).Graduate and undergraduate students at the university were recruited by word of mouth asvolunteers for CodeIT Day. All volunteers had some connection with the HXR Lab. The CodeITDay team consisted of 13 faculty/staff, graduate and undergraduate volunteers. Most of thevolunteers were female (84.62 %), graduate students (76.92%) and were Black or AfricanAmerican (76.92%). There were 2 main teachers who led the 2 classrooms and the other aidsassisted in the classroom for additional support to students.Lesson Plans and TechnologyFor CodeIT Day
Paper ID #26630Evaluating the Effect of Flipped Classroom on Students’ Learning in Dynam-icsMr. Mohammad Reza Hassanzadeh Gorakhki, Colorado State University Mohammad Gorakhki is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Colorado State University, and is currently a Graduate Teaching Fellow for the College of Engineering. He graduated with a M.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Colorado State University.Mr. Daniel W. Baker Ph.D., P.E., Colorado State University Daniel Baker, PhD PE is a full-time faculty instructor and is the primary instructor for both the on-campus and
likely to have failed or withdrawn from first-yearclasses [1], [2]. Early intervention is thus crucial, as students often develop necessary study skillstoo late to prevent these early setbacks [3]. Recently, research has begun to focus on developingbrief, low-cost interventions informed by research in social-cognitive psychological science [4].The current research therefore aims to test a novel, brief intervention focused on student thoughtsabout their performance and behavior.In particular, the current research is focused on counterfactual thoughts. These thoughts about“what might have been” are pervasive in everyday life [5]. Moreover, these thoughts play animportant role in causal reasoning [6]–[8]. For instance, if a student
predictors of performance in educational and occupational settings. In particular, she is interested in the effects of examining gender, age, ability, personality, motivation, and self-regulation on a range of outcomes. She is a member of the American Educational Research Association and a Fellow of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychologists.Prof. Michael Wolf, Rice University Michael Wolf is Professor of Mathematics at Rice University as well as Faculty Director of the Rice Emerging Scholars Program, an initiative he co-founded in 2012. The Rice Emerging Scholars program is a comprehensive 2-4 year program that begins the summer before matriculation for a group of matric- ulating Rice students whose
, experiential techniques to improve engineering students’ social emotional development as applied to teamwork and communication, and program assessment methods that minimize stakeholders’ efforts while maximizing the effectiveness of the measurement tool.Dr. Peter J Butler, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkMrs. Helen Edson, The Pennsylvania State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #24800For the past 22 years, Helen has been a student advocate in Penn State’s College of Engineering. Themajority of those years she has spent in the Engineering Outreach and Inclusion office
dampers ontall buildings, identification of building mode shapes, and even modeling a viscous damper usingK’nex, sponges and jello. This paper will demonstrate that K’nex toys can be an inexpensive yetvery effective classroom technology for creating physical models and demonstrations in even themost technical engineering courses. The K’nex Corporation caters to the K-12 population intheir educational efforts5, but there is also a viable market in the university engineeringclassroom. Figure 1: K’nex pieces consist of rods and connectors that allow a variety of structures to be created.This paper is part of a larger effort to develop a consortium of schools that use K’nex product inthe classroom. The consortium members will share ideas, communicate
Paper ID #14584A Building-Block Approach to Industrial Controls Laboratories Using Pro-grammable Logic ControllersProf. Robert J. Durkin, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis Mr. Durkin teaches courses in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Technology; including the capstone design and independent study projects. He serves as a Faculty Senator and earned the 2013 Outstanding Teacher Award. He has over 25 years of engineering and manufacturing experience including; design, project management, and various engineering, research and manufacturing leadership roles. He has been awarded two US patents. He is an
- Page 26.938.2dimension in nature, and are ineffective in many situations. In recent years, many attempts havebeen made whereby the conventional methods are challenged. Programs such as NSF's Engage3and pedagogies such as classroom flipping4 are being demonstrated across many institutions.However, these strategies may present an adoption-rate challenge among instructors, particularlyseasoned professors and lecturers who may have already developed structured lesson plans thatare resistant to modifications. Other alternatives such as immersive visualization technology areoften costly and require specialized laboratory and wearable equipment, creating a disconnectbetween lecture and spatial learning.The positive impact of active learning, spatial
Paper ID #12027Using Peer Review in a Freshman Engineering Graphics Course to EnhanceUnderstanding of Basic Dimensioning TechniquesDr. Nancy E. Study, Pennsylvania State University, Erie Nancy E. Study is on the faculty of the School of Engineering at Penn State Erie - The Behrend College where she teaches courses in engineering graphics and rapid prototyping, and is the coordinator of the rapid prototyping lab. Her research interests include visualization and haptics. She is a former chair of the ASEE Engineering Design Graphics Division and is currently the Circulation Manager and Treasurer of the Engineering Design
building materials. The course is taught in a traditional, instructor-led lecture format. Threesections of the course taught by two different faculty members were included in the study. 59students were enrolled in the course, but useable survey data was only received by 38 students –some students did not properly identify a personality type and/or did not complete the interestand importance questions. Students were asked to complete the personality indicator onlineoutside of class time and then report the results on an in-class survey. Due to circumstancesbeyond the authors’ control at the time, some students were unable or chose not to complete theonline personality assessment and thus their interest rating and importance ratings could not
Paper ID #17767Examining Engineering Technology Students: How They Perceive and OrderTheir ThoughtsDr. Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Lucietto has focused her research in engineering technology education and the understanding of engineering technology students. She teaches in an active learning style which engages and develops practical skills in the students. Currently she is exploring the performance and attributes of engineering technology students and using that knowledge to engage them in their studies.Dr. Jennifer Drapinski Moss, Purdue University Dr. Jennifer Moss is
Paper ID #17789A Helicopter Flight Laboratory Experience in an Undergraduate HelicopterAeronautics CourseLt. Col. Richard Melnyk, U.S. Military Academy LTC Rich Melnyk is an Army Aviator and Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point. He developed and implemented the first course offering of Thermal-Fluid Systems I in 2005. He was an Instructor and Assistant Professor from 2004-2007 and returned to teaching in 2015. He has a PhD in Aerospace Engineering, a PE in Mechanical Engineering, an MBA in Technology Management and recently commanded a
that when compared to more traditional learning approaches,cooperative learning results in higher test scores, higher levels of critical thinking, higher levelsof transfer, and improved ability to work in groups (Johnson and Johnson, 1989). Students wholearn in cooperative environments tend to be more actively engaged and motivated by the topicand have more frequent student-student as well as student-faculty interactions (Lord, 2001).Project PhasesThe project was separated into three phases: a conceptual design phase, a calculations andprototyping phase, and a construction and reflection phase. Rubrics for each phase of the projectwere distributed to the class and are included in the Appendix of this paper.Phase 1: Conceptual Design. During
Paper ID #18535An Undergaduate Engineering Ethics and Leadership Education ProgramDr. Robert J. Barsanti Jr., The Citadel Robert Barsanti is a Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at The Citadel where he teaches and does research in the area of target tracking and signal processing. Since 2015, Dr. Barsanti has served as the William States Lee Professor and Department Head. Before joining The Citadel in 2002, he served on the faculty and as a member of the mission analysis design team at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, CA. Dr. Barsanti is a retired United States Naval Officer. His
lecture meeting to complete a brainstorming worksheet. Potential projectswere identified from broad categories including challenges facing the growth of manufacturingin the United States, advances in manufacturing technology, the application of manufacturing inspecific interest areas (i.e. biomedical, aerospace, etc), and the description of manufacturingprocesses not already covered by the other course content.Each student was then required to develop a 5-minute TED Talk about their chosen topic. Thestudents were permitted one powerpoint slide to use as a visual aid to be displayed during theirtalk. The final exam period was organized as a mini-TED Conference during which the studentspresented their manufacturing TED Talks to faculty and their
do not equip students with the soft skills including communication and collaborativeskills required to face the multi-faceted challenges in the 21st century engineering workforce.There is clearly a need to use active learning methods that promote student learning, engagementand the development of critical skillsThis study describes changes to an engineering economic course aimed at increasing studentengagement by incorporating proven active learning strategies such as project-based andproblem-based learning strategies. This was accomplished by flipping some parts of the courseand spending more class time on discussions, intensive team work and group projects. The planwas to completely flip the course over time so that fundamental concepts
education. Dr. Post is a senior member of IEEE. He is currently serving as the faculty advisor for the Embry-Riddle IEEE Student Chapter. He is also a Registered Professional Engineer of the Commonwealth of Virginia.Dr. Dennis A. Silage, Temple University Dennis Silage received the PhD in EE from the University of Pennsylvania. He is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Temple University, teaches digital data communication, digital signal and image processing and embedded processing systems. Dr. Silage is past chair of the Electrical and Com- puter Engineering Division of ASEE, recipient of the 2007 ASEE National Outstanding Teaching Award and the 2011 ASEE ECE Division Meritorious Service Award. He is a
aTED Talk-style presentation [12]. This project was modeled with permission from abiomechanics project originally presented by Kuxhaus [13].The manufacturing TED Talk was assigned 4 weeks before the final exam period. Students wereprovided an entire lecture meeting to complete a brainstorming worksheet. Potential projectswere identified from broad categories including challenges facing the growth of manufacturingin the United States, advances in manufacturing technology, the application of manufacturing inspecific interest areas (i.e. biomedical, aerospace, etc), and the description of manufacturingprocesses not already covered by the other course content.Each student was then required to develop a 5-minute TED Talk about their chosen topic
this trial and its assessment results. Basedon the overwhelming success of this program, this one-semester trial was extended for a secondsemester.IntroductionThe ECE faculty at Boise State University has experienced an extended period of dissatisfactionwith poor student knowledge and poor use of electrical test and measurement equipment(T&ME). Typically, graduate students were used as lab assistants, but the majority of thesegraduate students had only slightly more experience with electrical T&ME than the students theywere tasked with helping. This problem became even worse when budget cuts prevented thereplacement of the only electrical T&ME experienced technician on staff (after his retirement),even though this technician was
incollege: Fortifying school-relevant selves to reduce social class disparities in highereducation,” Social Issues and Policy Review, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-24, Jan., 2015.[7] C. Goodenow, “The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents:Scale development and educational correlates,” Psychology in the Schools, vol.30, pp.79-90, Jan., 1993.[8] G.M. Walton and G.L. Cohen, “A question of belonging: Race, social fit, andachievement,” J. of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 82–96. Jan.,2007. Appendix: Belongingness SurveyWe are interested in your perception of the people in the Department of Physics.2 Pleaseindicate how well the following questions describe how you feel about the students
assessments included regular homework and Matlab assign-ments. For this to be effective given the accelerated pace of the course, it was necessary to findoptions for feedback other than manual faculty grading. Peer grading has proven to be consistentand reliable when used with massive open online courses (MOOCs). Luo et. al studied nearly 2000peer graded assignments and found that scores were not statistically different than those graded byan instructor.4 Beyond the benefit for the student being graded, peer grading forces the studentgrader to engage with the solution and provide constructive feedback to their peer. For the Mat-lab assignments, feedback was given through an automated grading tool called Matlab Grader.5Though this is a fairly new