begin with low-fidelity prototyping by usingreadily-available materials to produce physical artifacts. These materials engage problem solvers ofall ages and educational levels because successful application of the method rests upon latentcreativity rather than tool usage skills or availability of machines. However, experiencing success inlow-fidelity prototyping does not correlate with success when moving to medium-fidelityprototypes, and this is a consistent source of struggle for teams and individuals. Low-fidelityprototypes may be made from simple materials like cardboard, tape, popsicle sticks, and rubberbands, but the same idea remade as medium-fidelity prototype may necessitate the use of wood,fasteners, a dowel, and actual springs
accurately describe what an engineer does,perhaps reinforcing the old saying that “we fear what we do not know”. Traditionally, earlyAmerican schools taught students essential academic and trade skills. Students were instructed onproper methods of maintaining the farm, homemaking and even apprenticeship skills. Yet why arestudents today, not taught the basics of what is a rapidly growing field in the world? Recently,current programs have been implemented that attempt to bridge secondary education with Page 8.399.1engineering fundamentals, such as the Techtronics1 Program at Duke University, and the Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for
courses in surveying. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationThe Highway course is design and problem solving in nature. It develops students’ ability to usemathematical formulas, specifications and guidelines by design agencies, assumptions and finallycommon sense to recommend solutions for a given highway problem. The Highway Design classcontained twenty nine (29) students.The design software “Land Development Desktop (LDD)” has been introduced to students to aidin the analysis and design of a highway facility. LDD is an AutoCAD based software, which isavailable among a number of other computer
covered at the university, they areoften taught in survey courses and approached descriptively and phenomenologically. An Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationalternative approach is to understand these processes in terms of fundamental principles coveredin the chemical engineering curriculum. A correlation of specific unit operations to chemicalengineering fundamentals is depicted in Table 1. By developing classroom examples in thismanner, these unit operations, are rendered more accessible, including those providing hands-onlearning in the lab. At the same time, a greater depth is provided to
studentleadership roles, she trains and supports faculty in implementing service-learning and consults with otheruniversities on service-learning capacity-building.STEVEN W. PERETTISteven W. Peretti is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at North Carolina State University. A recipientof the NSF Presidential Young Investigator Award in 1991, he has directed research in bacterial protein synthesis,bioremediation, gene transfer in biofilms, and green chemistry applications of bioconversion processes. Recently, hehas become active in the areas of cross-disciplinary education and service-learning. Page 9.1093.8
demonstrate an understanding and ability to use thedesign process to solve engineering design problems.I. IntroductionIn many cases a liberally educated engineer going into the workplace for the first time does notappreciate how the various components of his/her education are linked until those links getforged during the practice of engineering. A traditional engineering curriculum is constructedalong the lines of... an engineer needs to know about X so make a course that teaches X, it isimportant for an engineer to know something about Y so here is a course that teaches Y. Are Xand Y related? They might be if they are part of a discipline or course sequence but therelationship may be more academic than practical. Academic programs tend to be
author continues to teach his classes using this method, and is trying tofind a simplified approach.Comparisons and ConclusionsThe best quality lectures and recordings are created in high-tech distance classrooms. However,the purpose of this research and testing effort has been to find a lower cost option that canprovide good quality lectures and recordings. The comparisons made here are between theregular classroom with a digital tablet permanently installed and the regular classroom with atablet PC brought in by the teaching faculty member.Proceedings of the 2011 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education
atPurdue University. He is also the Purdue football e-Stadium Application Manager for ITaP (Information Technologyat Purdue). Ronald’s research interests include leading-edge technologies that expand the boundaries of dynamic andinteractive content delivered and collaborated on via the graphical communication tool that is the web. Page 10.23.16 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationNATHAN W. HARTMAN is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Graphics Technology at
definition is provided: Page 10.1177.1Definition An imaginary rule has no consequence for breaking the rule other than guilt or shame.Regardless of which expectations are are helpful for student learning and which are not, students Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright c 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationtend to bring these beliefs into university because no one has told them anything different.Although some habits may indeed help students pass courses in the absence of anything better,most habits hinder their learning and prevent them from
results of the test are summarized in Table 1 below.60% of the students answered 13/22 questions or better for a score of 59% or better on the exam.Only 19% of the students answered the required 16/22 or better to achieve at least a 70% score(considered passing by this metric). It is proposed to use the same exam next year to try and get an Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 7.644.1 Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationaccurate measure of where our students are and to decide on an appropriate metric. We could
. Quantitative and qualitative tools are employed to evaluate UX, withstatistical methods applied to quantitative data and Natural Language Processing (NLP)techniques, e.g., Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), used for qualitative analysis.The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 provides an overview and background onthe use of XR technologies for advanced manufacturing education and training, highlighting thebenefits of XR and its limitations and challenges. Section 3 introduces the proposedmanufacturing training module and discusses the development of the VR and MR environments,including system design, hardware/software setup, and integration into undergraduate courses fortesting and evaluation. Section 4 outlines the research study
Paper ID #18785Enhancing participation of deaf engineering students in lab discussionDr. Raja S Kushalnagar, Gallaudet University Raja Kushalnagar is an Associate Professor and the Director of the Information Technology Program at Gallaudet University in Washington, DC. He teaches information technology courses, and mentors deaf, hard of hearing and hearing students in information technology and accessible computing research. His research interests focus on the intersection of disability law, accessible and educational technology, and human-computer interaction. He worked in industry for over five years before
resources, opportunities for re- search and design, and collaboration on educational and technological projects. Ms. Jean-Pierre has taught Mathematics, Problem- Solving and Academic Success Seminars at Polytechnic University and Columbia University. In addition to her experience in academia, Ms. Jean-Pierre has practical experience in developing online technology and multimedia products having worked in corporate positions at Google Inc. and iVillage Inc. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Evaluating a Flipped Lab Approach in a First-Year Engineering Design CourseAbstractThis complete research paper will investigate the continuation of a flipped
Department where he teaches 3D Design Principles and 3D Computer Modeling. Professor Radermacher specializes in three-dimensional problem solving and multiple-material construction techniques. His research activity primarily focuses on themes of technology, consumerism and personal identity. He creates objects and sculpture that question product marketing, consumer attitudes and social formations. Professor Radermacher exhibits his work in national venues including the S.O.F.A. expositions in New York and Chicago. Professor Radermacher is an active member of the “Foundations in Art: Theory and Education” organization and the College Art Association
AC 2012-4128: EMPOWERING STUDENTS WITH CHOICE IN THE FIRSTYEARDr. Lorelle A. Meadows, University of Michigan Lorelle Meadows is Assistant Dean of Academic Programs in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has primary responsibility for the design and delivery of the first year engineering curriculum and conducts engineering education research in the areas of teamwork and motivation.Ms. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication. She co-teaches multiple sections of the course described in this paper.Dr. Elizabeth S. Hildinger, University of Michigan Elizabeth Hildinger teaches in the Program in Technical Communication in the
,(iv) the thermal analysis of air compressor operation using a thermal imaging camera, (v) the creationof a procedure to independently test several lubricants in a single air compressor, and (vi) thedevelopment of a web page containing information learned in the laboratory.This paper presents the student projects that developed this test facility, preliminary experimentalresults generated by these student projects, and the educational experiences of our undergraduatestudents who worked on the projects.IntroductionIn 1997, the authors received a University of Wisconsin System Applied Research Grant to establishthe Energy Conversion Efficiency Laboratory in the Mechanical Engineering Department at TheUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. The
AC 2010-808: ADAPTING ASYNCHRONOUS COMPUTER-BASEDINSTRUCTION TO INDIVIDUAL STUDENT LEARNING STYLESRonald Williams, University of Virginia Ronald Williams is a faculty member in electrical and computer engineering at the University of Virginia. His research interests are in digital systems, embedded computing, and engineering education.Joanne Bechta Dugan, University of Virginia Joanne Bechta Dugan is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Virginia. Page 15.124.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Adapting Asynchronous Computer-Based
and Performing Arts High School of Philadelphia. He has participated in Drexel University's Research Experiences for Teacher's program in 2008 and 2009.Jason Silverman, Drexel University Jason Silverman is an assistant professor in the School of Education at Drexel University and is interested in teaching and learning of mathematics.Gail Rosen, Drexel University Gail Rosen is an assistant professor at Drexel University in the Electrical and Computer Engineering department. She is lead PI on the Discovery K-12 program at Drexel, where university students are developing laboratories to engage performing arts students. Also, in 2009, she received the NSF CAREER award, and will
AC 2011-532: TRANSITIONING A LAB-BASED COURSE TO AN ON-LINE FORMATKevin P Pintong, Binghamton University Kevin Pintong is a first year master’s student and research assistant with interests in online education.Dr. Douglas H. Summerville, State University of New York, Binghamton Page 22.1549.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Transitioning a lab-based course to an online format Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering State University of New York Binghamton Page 22.1549.2 1
Houston, TX from July 2012 through December 2016. He also served as a Chair of Energy Conservation and Conversion Division at American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). Dr. Pecen holds a B.S in EE and an M.S. in Controls and Computer Engineering from the Istanbul Technical University, an M.S. in EE from the University of Colorado at Boulder, and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Wyoming (UW, 1997). He served as a graduate assistant and faculty at UW, and South Dakota State University. He served on UNI Energy and Environment Coun- cil, College Diversity Committee, University Diversity Advisory Board, and Graduate College Diversity Task Force Committees. His research interests, grants, and
Grants Award from IEEE EMC society to develop and teach a course on EMC. She is a Senior Member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) and a Professional Member of ASEE. She was the Chair of the Affinity group - IEEE Women in Engineering of Long Island Section, NY in 2012 and 2013 and Vice Chair of Educational Activities Committee, LI section. Her research interests include Design of Radio Frequency and Microwave Components, Antennas, RF power Amplifiers, Electromag- netic Compatibility and Signal Integrity. She teaches the following courses: Electric Circuits, Electronic devices and Circuits, Signals and Systems, Electromagnetic Compatibility, Communication Systems and Numerical Methods in
organization [5], the Science and Education Director of a US Department of Energylaboratory heavily focus on fusion research [6] and a senior management officers at one of themost successful nuclear fusion start-ups in the US [7]. The latest high visibility of fusion as moreprivate capital starts getting involved has also produced a spike in the number of students enteringundergraduate physics and engineering programs interested in pursuing a career focused on nuclearfusion [8].Recognizing this shift, the Department of Nuclear Engineering at Penn State University has, aspart of a strategy to broaden the scope of its research and academics, started to offer courses gearedtowards students interested in pursuing a career focused on fusion rather than
Paper ID #36687Design of An Interactive Scenario-Based TechnicalManagement Communication Course - A Unique Addition toFuture Engineering Leaders’ ToolboxWei Lu (Dr.) Dr. Wei Lu is a Curriculum Manager in the Department of Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Her research focuses on Higher Education, instructional design, community engagement & service- learning, eLearning & distance learning technology, K-12 (STEM) Education, Communications, Marketing, and Social Economics. She has been involved in several projects that collaborate with non-profit organizations like
, ambient housing technology and rehabilitations aged concrete and wood structures. In addition, Dr. Alshurafa is interested in research related to education-based management and interpersonal communication management.Laura Wieserman Dr. Wieserman is an assistant professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh Johnstown. She received her PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 2016. Prior to working at the University, she was as a Systems Engineer focusing on electronic design, RF analysis, antenna modeling, radar simulation, and renewable energy system design and management. Her current research interests include transient photovoltaic inverter modeling, micro
Management and Civil Engineering Technology Programs, and her research focus is in student engagement and retention in engineering and engineering technology education. Contact: talley@txstate.eduJeron Tyler RogersJustin KeeperDr. Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University Kristi J. Shryock, Ph.D., is the Frank and Jean Raymond Foundation Inc. Endowed Associate Profes- sor in Multidisciplinary Engineering and Affiliated Faculty in Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M University. She also serves as Director of the Novel Unconventional Aerospace Applications iN Core Ed- ucational Disciplines (NUA2NCED) Lab and of the Craig and Galen Brown Engineering Honors Program and National Academy of Engineering Grand Challenges
2007. Shortly thereafter she moved to the United States to pursue graduate studies at the University of Florida. She graduated with a M.S. in CE in 2009 and a Ph.D. in 2012. Dr. Michalaka is passionate about teaching in college and K-12 levels and conducting research in both transportation engineering, focused on traffic operations, congestion pricing, and traffic simulation, and engineering education. Recently, in December 2020, she is also graduated with a Master’s of Science degree in Project Management from The Citadel. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 An Innovative Approach to Teaching Project Resource LevelingAbstractThis
paper sets the limits and gives an overview of such alaboratory for a nano-technology research and infrastructure. This education can develop atechnician-training program and ultimately leads to the capabilities of building proto-type pilotprojects. Since upcoming initiatives are so demanding, newer systems prevent professors toform a company or participate with new entrepreneurs. One of the greatest examples is the long-standing demand of interconnections to nano-electronic components. Giving the right trainingand objectivity, a new generation of entrepreneurs can be enthused amongst our students. Thiswould help our State develop fundamental research in nano-technology. Our effort of building anano-engineering laboratory is to develop novel
served as the secretary in Texas A&M Qatar IEEE student chapter committee. He wants to become a research engineer in future. Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of New Mexico – Albuquerque Copyright © 2008, American Society for Engineering Education
of uniformly accelerated motion see Table 1.Research has shown that experts differ from novices in how they solve physics problems. Forexample, experts tend to think more in terms of the big picture and they see equations in groups.Novices tend to focus more on the algebraic manipulation of equations6,7. No matter what theclassroom setting, this research has important implications for educators. In the study ofkinematics, it indicates the need to help students develop a more holistic understanding of motionequations that facilitates broad application. Part of a learning pathway to develop thisunderstanding is to help students formulate and explore key questions related to uniformlyaccelerated motion. For example: “How many quantities are
Representative Award. He is also a Senior Member of IEEE, Recipient of the IEEE Third Millennium Medal, and Chair of the West Michigan Section. He has been a reviewer for IEEE Transactions including the Transactions on Education. His teaching and research interests include digital signal processing (DSP) and Bioelectromagnetics. He has been a reviewer for engineering textbooks including "DSP First" by McClellan, Schafer, and Yoder, published by Prentice Hall, 1998 and 2003. He was co-editor of ECEDHA Newsletter, national ECE department chairs organization. Hossein is a member of the Editorial Advisory Board of the international research journal Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering