program. The level 200 mathematics courses are common to all programs.Table 3 gives an example of how the detailed curriculum and credit values for the first two yearsof the ENGAGE program compare with the 4-year engineering program for one of the programs,electrical engineering. The table shows that from Year 1 to Year 2 the total number of credits Page 15.465.9taken in the ENGAGE program increases, while both the number and the proportion ofdevelopmental modules decreases. In Year 3 the number of credits taken per semester is 64, allof which are mainstream modules. By the time ENGAGE students join mainstream students inYear 4 they should be ready
Paper ID #36951Empathy Development in Community-Engagement CourseNusaybah Abu-Mulaweh Nusaybah Abu-Mulaweh is a Lecturer in the EPICS Program at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. She received her BS in Computer Engineering from Purdue University Fort Wayne, and received her MS in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. After working as a software engineer in industry, she returned to academia as a lecturer and she is currently pursuing her PhD in Engineering Education at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana.William C. Oakes (Director and
Paper ID #39156Development and Use of an Adaptable Arduino-Based Control System forBench-Top Process Control ExperimentsDr. Stacy K. Firth, University of Utah Stacy K. Firth is an Assistant Professor (Lecturer) in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Utah. In her role, she focuses on Engineering education in grades K-12 and undergradu- ate education. She has developed an inclusive curriculum for a year-long Engineering exploration and projects course that is now taught in 57 Utah high schools. She also developed and provides professional development workshops for Elementary and Secondary science
(subject areas, but not credit hours) and faculty qualifications. Page 15.209.2 ≠ Criteria should include a core, consisting of both knowledge and skills. This core should uniformly define what it takes to become an engineer and what constitutes the minimum content of an engineering curriculum. It should also ensure a broad education that emphasizes the basics, encourages lifelong learning, and inculcates desirable experiences and capabilities.These recommendations served as the basis for the development of ABET Engineering Criteria2000 (commonly abbreviated as EC2000). These criteria were formally adopted by
Paper ID #21969MEERCat: A Case Study of How Faculty-led Research Initiatives Gave Riseto a Cross-departmental Research Center with Potential to Inform Local Pol-icyMr. Rohit Kandakatla, Purdue University, West Lafayette Rohit Kandakatla is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity. He has his bachelors and masters in Electrical Engineering from India. He currently serves as the Chair-elect of the ASEE Student Division as has been an active member of the international engineering education community while serving as the President of Student Platform for Engineering Education De
that AR can promote student-centered learning byempowering students to autonomously explore information and solve problems [19]. Diegmannet al. [20] stated that AR has the potential to empower students, fostering proactivity andcultivating the willpower to sustain knowledge beyond class lectures. Wu et al. [21] found thatthrough the organization, search, and evaluation of data and information, AR mobile gameshelped learners strengthen their navigational skills for both primary and secondary data. AR aidsstudents in visualizing and comprehending intricate project design and construction ideas [9],[12], [22]. With its distinctive user interface, AR is useful for finishing projects, presentations,and reports that use both real building models and
educational objectives to reflectcurrent needs of industry. Using current job descriptions focuses these conversations and helpsmaintain currency of the program.IntroductionTo design a curriculum based on ABET-EAC criteria, one works backward, as shown in Figure1. Program Courses Program Program educational outcomes objectives Figure 1: Flowchart for curriculum designProgram educational objectives (PEOs), which are “broad statements that describe the career andprofessional accomplishments that the program is preparing graduates to
following ten years in Georgia Tech’s College of Computing where she was a member of the NSF-funded Learning By DesignTM Problem-Based Learning curriculum de- velopment and research project. She also conducted an NSF-funded ethnographic study of learning in a problem-driven, project-based bio-robotics research lab at Georgia Tech. In addition to her duties in BME, she is an advisor to the interdisciplinaryScience Learning: Integrating Design, Engineering, and Robotics (SLIDER) project.Mr. James William Schwoebel, Georgia Institute of TechnologyMr. Ethan James Craig, Georgia Institute of TechnologyMr. Anish Joseph, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAjit Vakharia, Georgia Institute of TechnologyProf. Steve M. Potter PhD, Georgia
second semester. A checklist of desired writing abilities makes it easier to grade the large number of papers. Furthermore this ensures that all staff involved in the evaluation process uses the same criteria to grade and for providing feedback. This paper describes the implementation of the writing program and how it was evaluated by collecting survey-data. Keywords: technical writing skills; peer review; interactive lecture; project-based learning; first year engineering course1. Introduction and Course DescriptionThe KU Leuven is a Catholic University situated in the Dutch speaking part of Belgium. Theengineering curriculum at KU Leuven consists of a three year Bachelor’s program thatprepares the students for a
] built an AR haptictraining simulator for spinal needle procedures intended for medical students and residents. Aphysical mannequin linked to the virtual environment projected a video of the procedure andprovided feedback if bone or tissue was struck by the needle. Buchau et. al [13] utilizedfinite-element analysis (FEA) combined with a 3D meshing tool to display electromagnetic fieldsin AR for teaching purposes. Y¨uz¨uak and Yi˘git [14] created an AR app to teach N-TypeMOSFET, a field-effect transistor made of metal oxide, to undergraduate electrical engineeringstudents. The marker-based AR would begin animations and display how the transistor wouldreact under various voltage conditions. Dinis et al. [15] presented a virtual reality (VR
environments and promotes creative need-based designs (Crain & Tull, 2004).Reissman et al. (2017) also proposed a new capstone course for Mechanical Engineering studentsat the University of Dayton, which emphasizes the application of physics-based and data miningtoward open-ended project prompts. Peter Idowu (2004) presented a study about the pre-capstonecourse at Penn State Harrisburg to solve the lack of clarity students have in developing projectideas. In this study, researchers concluded that a pre-capstone course enabled students tocommunicate effectively. Elvin Shields (2007) studied the effect of capstone engineering designexperience in fostering creativity. Various methods and techniques can assess students’ creativity. For example
classificatory schemes of how people learn. We willprovide examples of how selected faculty in our College of Engineering are developing ways tointegrate ePortfolio into undergraduate curricula as a device that (1) guides students tounderstand and take ownership of their education, (2) helps faculty define and teach the ABETprogram outcomes (both technical and professional), and (3) enables departments to assessspecific programs and archive materials for outside assessment.Rationale: E-Portfolio Tools for Assessing Professional SkillsAs part of a larger NSF-funded Department-Level Reform (DLR) grant, we are developingmechanisms for using electronic portfolios to document and assess engineering outcomes. Thispaper reports the first phases of this project
University ofCalgary, Schulich School of Engineering for the first year design and communication courses.These courses promote a hands-on, inquiry based learning environment where students build andtest a variety of projects in a dynamic, open-ended curriculum. To allow for a truly hands-ondesign experience, the laboratories are equipped with tool chests containing various hand andpower tools, available for student use during the construction and testing of their projects.Despite the fact that there have been few injuries in the design laboratories, it became clearthrough observations of students and instructors that many of the tools were being usedincorrectly. Allowing for student use of hand tools in the laboratory comes with inherent
worlds could allow the individual tofunction more effectively and less stressfully in both worlds.” The theory is applied broadly toeducation and is completely applicable to engineering, science and math education.Methodology Page 15.1192.6There is limited research on outreach projects influence on black students. We seek to determineeffective informal experiences to motivate minority K-12 students to pursue STEM as a post-secondary education option. The TORCH program will require carefully selected curriculum,both formal and informal, solid quantitative results as well as qualitative results. Longitudinaldata on students’ performance, goals
. Des. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 255–272, 2003.[7] D. Broman, K. Sandahl, and M. Abu Baker, “The Company Approach to Software Engineering Project Courses,” Educ. IEEE Trans., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 445–452, 2012, doi: 10.1109/TE.2012.2187208.[8] N. Correll, R. Wing, and D. Coleman, “A One-Year Introductory Robotics Curriculum for Computer Science Upperclassmen,” Educ. IEEE Trans., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 54–60, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TE.2012.2220774.[9] E. Bütün, “Teaching genetic algorithms in electrical engineering education: a problem- based learning approach,” Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 223–233, 2005.[10] J. Straub, J. Berk, A. Nervold, and D. Whalen, “OpenOrbiter: An Interdisciplinary
Engineering Education majoring in Engineering Education at Florida International University, where he also serves as a graduate research assistant contributing to various projects supporting post-traditional students and transfer students. His research interests include community college-minority serving institution partnerships, transfer students, post-traditional students, and broadening participation in engineering education. He received his B.S. in electrical engineering from Tuskegee University, an M.S in journalism from the University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign, an M.S. in physics from Fisk University, an M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Central Florida and an M.Ed. in educational leadership
inequality, ignoring communityquestions and concerns, or failing to consider the consequences of communities when assessingprogram success [14]. The research tested CC with 150 students in two US universities through asurvey consisting of 46 items that capture systems of oppression in civil engineering throughthree indicators (Critical Reflection: Perceived Inequality; Critical Reflection: Egalitarianism;and Critical Action: Sociopolitical Perception). The study highlighted that such an instrumentcan also be used to assess ABET SOs 2 and 4.Baideme et al. conducted an evaluation on how group learning impacted the curriculum andcourses across junior- and senior-level environmental engineering courses at 14 institutions,considering ABET SO 5 which
would be overwhelming for studentsto study everything that is known about nanomaterials. A sensible approach would be to focusupon selected topics consistent with the background of the students as an introductory measureand encourage them to recognize that there are abundant opportunities to expand their horizon bytaking part in interdisciplinary projects later. Such an exposure would help the students to beinitiated into the world of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationThe three areas of specialization in a
“whatworks” but “why” for retaining underrepresented groups (URGs) in rigorous fields ofstudy. In general changes to pedagogy and curriculum have not yielded an increase in thenumber or diversity of students entering the quantitative disciplines (Jolly et al, 2004).Using the 2011-2013 data as a baseline, the decision was made to help underpreparedengineering students improve their math achievement outcomes by modifying thecurriculum to test an applied mathematics course for engineers adapted from Wright StateUniversity’s NSF funded ENG101 applied math course. Freshmen and transfer students(N=507) entering in Fall 2014 and Fall 2015 included 84% freshmen, 16% transfers, 21%women, and 14% ethnic minorities. While 86% of students reported very strong
effectiveness of an iPad app to enable students touse their fingers or a stylus for sketching exercises, a critical component that promotes spatialskills development.32, 33The curriculum being used includes ten spatial skills modules34, which SKIITS is enhancing inthe following ways:• Revising current online resources. The team is Software and Workbook Modules updating existing modules (i.e., background and 1) Surfaces and Solids of Revolution exercises) with the latest technologies so that 2) Combining Solids students’ responses to exercises are recorded and 3) Isometric Sketching available to the faculty member for grading and 4) Orthographic Projection
teams conceive a substantial real-time DSP project of theirchoice and spend the remainder of the semester designing, simulating, implementing, and testingit. Supplementary modules introducing students to the basics of digital communication, adaptivefiltering, speech processing, and audio signal processing accelerate students’ progress on projectsin these areas. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright c 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Page 9.323.6 Rice ELEC 434. The Rice University Electrical and
- gineering education in informal, traditional, distance, and professional environments. Dr. Goodridge currently teaches courses in ”Teaching, Learning, and Assessment in Engineering Education” and ”Engi- neering Mechanics: Statics.” Dr. Goodridge is an engineering councilor for the Council on Undergraduate Research (CUR) and serves on ASEE’s project board. Dr. Goodridge actively consults for projects includ- ing the development of an online curriculum style guide for Siemens software instruction, development of engineering activities for blind and visually impaired youth, and the implementation and investigation of a framework of engineering content to incorporate into P-12 engineering education.Prof. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah
Paper ID #35670Lessons Learned in Adopting a Multi-Site Combined REU/RET Program forExclusive Remote Participation Due to the COVID-19 PandemicDr. Kofi Nyarko, Morgan State University Dr. Kofi Nyarko is a Tenured Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at Morgan State University. He also serves as Director of the Engineering Visualization Research Laboratory (EVRL). Under his direction, EVRL has acquired and conducted research, in excess of $12M, funded from the Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Army Research Laboratory, NASA and Department of Homeland Security along with
students with: opportunities to work and interact with teams of differentexpertise and nationalities, explicit instruction and courses on communication skills,understanding of the system level thinking (organization level), and explicit teaching on skillsrelated to engineering projects such as problem solving, resolving conflicts, time management,idea creation and presentation to different audience levels. Page 21.65.5Thusly, the automotive engineering curriculum established its course offerings in three levels, asdepicted in figure 2; level 1 covers the core-engineering courses mandatory for all the students inthe program, the next level
Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Learning. Dr. Hammack’s research focuses on the connection of local contexts to STEM interest and identity development in youth, particularly rural youth in elementary and middle grades, as well as how elementary teachers develop teaching efficacy and identity as STEM educators. Through her research, Dr. Hammack aims to advance understanding of how to enhance STEM education in rural schools and communities, providing opportunities to meet the unique needs of rural students.Dr. Nick Lux Lux, Montana State University Nick Lux is a Professor of Curriculum and Instruction in MSU’s Department of Education and is an affiliate of the Montana Engineering Education Research Center. He
) and to provide more context around the participant’s access and experienceworking with computers growing up.Intake 1. Please tell me your major and how you came to choose that major. 2. Describe what programming is to you. (a) What does it mean to “be a programmer”? (b) Do you consider yourself a programmer? Why or why not? 3. Describe how programming is integrated into the curriculum in your major. (a) What did you learn from the curricular activities vs. on your own? 4. Tell me about the project you will be working on today. (a) Why did you choose to start it? (b) How long have you been working on it? (c) How often do you work on it? (d) When do you think it will be complete?Outtake 1. Think back
of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Dr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem-solving, and the
activities in Europe, Asia and Africa. Dr. Friess’ research background includes laser diagnostics, composite materials and performance optimization, and he has been active as consultant and design engineer working on a variety of projects. Current research interests focus on engineering education, sports engineering and sustainability and energy efficiency.Dr. Muhieddin Amer, RIT-Dubai Dr. Amer is a professor of Electrical Engineering at Rochester Institute of Technology - Dubai. He received his PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas at Arlington in 1999. Before joining RIT, he worked for Nortel Networks in Dallas, where he held several technical leadership posi- tions in wireless network engineering
Institute of Technology Mike Eastman is Department Chair and professor of electrical, computer, and telecommunications engi- neering technology at Rochester Institute of Technology. His research interests include embedded systems design and development focusing on hardware algorithm implementation and sensing and control. Most recently, Eastman has been involved with curriculum redesign and academic calendar conversion at RIT. Prior to embarking on a career in academia, Eastman spent six years at Intel Corporation, where he was a Senior Systems Engineer. His work at Intel focused on custom embedded systems hardware design. He holds a B.S. in electrical engineering technology and a M.S. in computer science from RIT.Dr
control. If such a system isin place then it becomes feasible for the research professor to concentrate on ”build your own”experiments. Or, more appropriately, it gives graduate students an opportunity to build their ownopen-ended exploratory experiments.The Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at the Milwaukee School of Engi-neering has recently established a modern real-time control system laboratory. This laboratory wasdeveloped to enhance the quality of undergraduate education in control systems and to reinforce theconcepts that are covered in the lectures. This real-time control laboratory also opens up researchactivities for graduate student projects. The undergraduate experiments give students the opportunityto tie