begin with end in mind.The Education of InnovatorsEngineering Accreditors and Professional SocietiesLifelong learning is a skill to practice in both the cognitive and affective domains [8]. Everyaccrediting body and professional society advocates for the development of lifelong learners[26]. As one example, the American Society of Civil Engineers Body of Knowledge argues forlifelong learning skills to develop through “undergraduate education and mentoring experiences”[7]. During college, students should engage in “independent study projects and open-endedproblems” with the goal of pushing beyond the presentations of their instructors [7]. Asprofessionals, engineers should engage with “continuing education, professional practiceexperience, and
drive motor and an electricmotor/generator which are independently controlled to allow power flow to and from all threecomponents, typically called Power Split. Each power source component in equation (1), in this case, isdivided by its independent rotational velocity term to yield component torque,The planetary gear set, having a sun gear, planet or carrier gears and the ring gear, provides a linearrelationship between the component rotational velocities through the following [6],where ω s is the rotational velocity of the sun gear, ω r the rotational velocity of the ring gear, ω c therotational velocity of the carrier gears and k the ratio of the ring and sun gear radii. This configurationallows one to retain the linear and quadratic
alreadypart of this interconnected ecosystem, surpassing the total human population on Earth at thattime [7].The trajectory of universities in the coming years extends far beyond the mere utilization ofexisting technology. It hinges on universities' capacity to flexibly evolve in response to theevolving demands of the future knowledge workforce, the changing nature of work, and thedynamics of the economy [8].Within this context, this paper offers an expansive examination of the IoT within highereducation institutions, with a particular focus on universities. It delves into a multifacetedexploration, encompassing several emerging trends currently reshaping the landscape of highereducation. Furthermore, it conducts a thorough analysis of the potential
thediversity of interests, skills, and beliefs among those in one’s peer network. Respondentsindicated how those peer relationships can change their academic experience at Duke (“some ofus are in classes together… now we have more people to ask questions or be in group projectswith”; “have[ing] something in common with another woman in your class…makes me feelcomfortable with them”).Beyond making new peer connections through the program, some participants reported atransformation in their view of what networking is and how it can be beneficial to one’sprofessional development, as well as who comprises a professional network. This may havecontributed to empirical findings of network growth, but it also speaks to a fundamental changein perspective with
, “Contextualization as Virtue in Engineering Education,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual 9 Conference, 2021.[21] J. M. Smith, J. Lucena, A. Rivera, T. Phelan, K. Smits, and R. Bullock, “Developing Global Sociotechnical Competency Through Humanitarian Engineering: A Comparison of In- Person and Virtual International Project Experiences,” J. Int. Eng. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 5, 2021.[22] P. M. King and K. S. Kitchener, Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey- Bass Higher and Adult Education Series and
Paper ID #44032WIP: Development of a Framework to Support Technology-Life Balance inUndergraduate Engineering StudentsMs. Milana Hayley Grozic, University of Calgary; The University of British Columbia Ms. Milana Grozic (she/her) is a second year psychology major at The University of British Columbia. Her research attempts to merge the fields of engineering and psychology - focusing specifically on engineering education. Her passion for the human psycho extends far beyond psychology and she is proud to bring her unique perspectives into engineering education research.Dr. Emily Ann Marasco, University of Calgary Dr. Emily
communication projects over a three-year period. Provided areinformation on the projects and rubrics, as well as student performance data and feedback onthem.Single Point RubricsSingle point rubrics are a style of rubrics that focus on documenting student mastery of content ata specific standard while providing verbal feedback, particularly on aspects requiringimprovement. One of the most common modes of introduction to single point rubrics appears tobe through a 2015 post on the blog “Cult of Pedagogy.” [9] It has since often been discussedonline and in the research literature in the context of K-12 education where states have setspecific standards for student learning and students must achieve a proficient level in eachstandard. [10]–[12] An example
STEM education improvement efforts. Using a variety of social theory lenses, she investigates and conceives communal, inclusive, and agentive opportunities for secondary students and their science teachers.Ido Davidesco, University of Connecticut Davidesco is an Assistant Professor of Learning Sciences at the University of Connecticut. He is interested in how students engage in authentic science and engineering activities and how computational thinking and data practices can be incorporated into the K-12 science and engineering curricula.Dr. Aaron Kyle, Columbia University in the City of New York ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Integrating Computational
mentor to have amore holistic tool to engage crucial details of the interview process. Reflecting on using the IQRTGiven the tacit skills involved in semi- and unstructured interviewing approaches, noviceresearchers may be challenged to evaluate the quality of how they adapted to the interviewsetting through the questions that they asked. Here, we reflect on key lessons learned based onfour quality indicators of the IQRT: structure, content, context, and reflexivity. We then reflecton how the indicators can be used to form a researcher response for application to futureinterviews.Structure: Looking beyond the protocolThe interview process relies on creating a comfortable space for asking questions and
changeAbstractThe training of engineers often focuses on technical aspects, relegating the role of broader socialissues to secondary considerations. Although disciplinary knowledge is important, engaging inengineering also means participation in and designing for communities of practice. Drawing onsociocultural theories of learning, this study investigates how the hybrid use of technical and socialdimensions in engineering frames students’ design considerations at different points in theengineering pathway. Frameworks developed in prior literature on problem scoping in design tasksfall short in capturing changes to social awareness in responses from students. In our prior workwe expanded these frameworks by measuring changes in social awareness through a
). TheGlobally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently. Journal ofEngineering Education, 95(2), 107–122; Downey, G. L., & Lucena, J. C. (2004). Knowledge and ProfessionalIdentity in Engineering: Code-Switching and the Metrics of Progress. History and Technology, 20(4), 393–420;Huning, A., & Mitcham, C. (1993). The historical and philosophical development of engineering ethics in Germany.Technology in Society, 15(4), 427–439; Kranakis, E. (1997). Constructing a Bridge: An Exploration of EngineeringCulture, Design, and Research in Nineteenth-Century France and America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; Lucena, J.C., Downey, G. L., Jesiek, B. K., & Elber, S. (2008). Competencies Beyond Countries: The Re
, amongother skills, qualitative research know-how and experience around environmental issues ofgrowing concern. Research skills participants experience in the workshops include quickclipboard interviewing to develop approaching strangers in a friendly way, establishing rapport,note-taking, and deep listening. When students return to the workshop, they develop discussionskills, memo-ing, and inductive coding. The purpose of this paper is to document the perceptionsof workshop participants on their feelings and thoughts about what they learned through thisprocess of community-based, research-oriented experiential learning. This study uses rapidethnographic assessment and co-interviewing conducted by the first two authors of this paper.Findings indicate
, B. Abedin, and S. Knight, "Explicating AI Literacy of Employees at Digital Workplaces," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 71, pp. 810-823, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3138503.[24] D. Touretzky, C. Gardner-McCune, C. Breazeal, F. Martin, and D. Seehorn, "A Year in K–12 AI Education," AI Magazine, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 88-90, 2019/12/01 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v40i4.5289.[25] J. L. Galos et al., "Teaching artificial intelligence and machine learning to materials engineering students through plastic 3D printing," Portland, Oregon, 2024/06/23, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/48057.[26] D. G. Balreira, T. L. T. d. Silveira, and J. A. Wickboldt
). USC Connect is a comprehensivelearning initiative that supports undergraduate students with the integration of learning withinand beyond the classroom. This initiative encourages students to connect formal learning withtheir own personal experiences through deep, reflective thinking. Students create a plan to guidehow their experiences can be applied in a purposeful manner that impacts their long-term goals.The program walks students through a four-step process to choose, engage, reflect, and sharewhat was learned with others as a means for documenting and demonstrating leadership skills.Through USC Connect, students can earn special recognition for focusing on one of fourexperiential pathways: Community Service, Global Learning, Professional
total, 32 complete response sets were included in the analysis fromstudents who answered all three surveys and chose chemical engineering as their major in any ofthe three surveys. These responses were selected to investigate the major selection path ofstudents who opt in and stay in the chemical engineering program by the end of their first year.IntroductionThere is a large body of research concerning how a student chooses a college major, but little ofthis literature narrows down majors beyond concentrations or categories like STEM or NaturalSciences [1]. There has been research into the initial decision of choosing a major with twoprimary focuses: experiences before college and anticipated salary after college [1, 3, 4]. Forexample
as an ‘innovation ecosystem’ that ‘ismade up of communities of people with different types of expertise and skill sets.”25 As such, theDayton Region is particularly interested in growing its STEM workforce and inspiring K-12students to consider careers in materials and advanced manufacturing.In 2014, three universities in the Dayton Region, Central State University (CSU), University ofDayton (UD) and Wright State University (WSU), received a grant from the NSF to provideresearch opportunities to K-12 teachers through a Research Experience for Teachers (RET)award. The overarching goals of the NSF RET program are to develop long-term, collaborativerelationships with K-12 teachers and university faculty, involve K-12 teachers in
. A. N. Amaral, “Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance,” Science, vol. 308 no. 5722, pp. 697-702, Apr. 2005.[4] D. A. Harrison, K. H. Price, and M. P. Bell, “Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 96-107, Feb. 1998.[5] B. Mazur, B. Mazur, and P. Biatosticka, “Cultural diversity in organisational theory and practice,” Journal of Intercultural Management., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 5–15, 2010.[6] K. J. Cross and S. L. Cutler, “Engineering faculty perceptions of diversity in the classroom.” In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
, 2020.[23] "A better engineering education," College of Engineering, no. https://www.engr.ncsu.edu/news/2022/12/07/a-better-engineering-education, 2022.[24] M. Cardoso and R. M. Chanin, "The history of Engineering Education: learning from the past to design the future," Research, Society and Development, vol. 11, no. 11, 2022.[25] P. K. Raju and C. S. Sankar, "Teaching Real-World Issues through Case Studies," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 501-508, 1999.[26] "ROXIE: Real Outreach eXperiences In Engineering First-Year Engineering Students Designing for Community Partners," Special Issue on Sustaining Sustainable Design, International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 349-358, 2010
.Cummins, C., Doyle, J., Kindness, L., Lefthand, M. J., Don't Walk, U. J. B., Bends, A. L., Broadaway, S. C., Camper, A. K., Fitch, R., & Ford, T. E. (2010). Community-based participatory research in Indian country: Improving health through water quality research and awareness. Family & community health, 33(3), 166-174.Dunbar, D., Terlecki, M., Watterson, N., & Ratmansky, L. (2013). An Honors Interdisciplinary Community-Based Research Course. Honors in Practice, 9, 129-140.El-Atta, A. H. A., & Moussa, M. I. (2009). Student project allocation with preference lists over (student, project) pairs. 2009 Second International Conference on Computer and Electrical Engineering,Israel, B. A., Schulz
boy, he filled sandbags to channel a river down State Street in his native Salt Lake City after the El Ni˜no winter of 1982-1983. He earned his B.S. from the University of Pennsylvania in 1995, then taught high school through Teach for America and worked as a contractor at Los Alamos National Laboratory before earn- ing his M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of California Berkeley in 1999 and 2005, respectively. He has been at CU Denver since 2005, where he applies ideas from complex systems science to study flow in porous media, leads the graduate track in Hydrologic, Environmental, and Sustainability Engineering (HESE), leads the NSF-sponsored faculty learning community Engineering is Not Neutral: Transforming
larger variety of sources. The most typical data collection tool usedwas interviews in multiple forms—including semi-structured, one on one, and focus groups.Similarly, open-ended surveys were also used as a form of collecting qualitative participantresponses. Some unique forms of data sources were online blogs (Jafer, 2015), online forumposts and emails (Blaser, Steele, & Burgstahler, 2015), student artifacts (Gray et al., 2016), panelproceedings (Genalo et al., 2015), and reflective journals (Brewer et al., 2015). Through theseexamples, we see that in order to contribute to these divisions and the conversation on diversitywe can look beyond the conventional methods of obtaining information and incorporate noveldata sources. 4.7
advantage of identity-flexible aspects of virtual reality technology along with experiential learning techniques and opportunities for online community building to increase efficacy and persistence. iii. Investigate the relationship between student perceptions of subject proficiency and levels of engagement and learning outcomes in the online VR courses.Theory and Impacts of Visual RealityAs a teaching and learning modality, VR is grounded in the theory of constructivism, where thelearner actively constructs knowledge through their subjective representations and understandingof reality [4]. Constructivist learning strategies include situated and experiential learning,whereby the user engages in a process of learning by doing
Excellence in Engineering Education, and has a number offunded and pending grants in engineering education and outreach to K-12 students.MOLLY W. WILLIAMS is a Professor of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, and Associate Dean forResearch and Graduate Programs in the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences. She has taught courses inthermal-fluid sciences, engineering mechanics, instrumentation, and materials science. College responsibilitiesinclude college curriculum and program assessment issues at both the graduate and undergraduate levels, includingprogram accreditation efforts from 1989 through 2001. Page 8.102.12
, 2002.[28] H. Darabi, E. Douzali, S. T. Harford, P. C. Nelson, and F. S. M. Karim, “Beyond Grade Point Average and Standardized Testing: Incorporating a Socio-Economic Factor in Admissions to Support Minority Success.” In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 1-15, Columbus, OH, 2017.[29] S. Barker and A. Clobes, “Work in Progress: A Holistic PhD Admissions Rubric-Design & Implementation,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 1-19, Virtual, 2021.[30] M. R. King, G. K. Jennings, R. G. Chalkley, and L. J. Sealy, “Questioning the Value of the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) in PhD Admissions in Biomedical
is a legacy that I will attempt to carry through my future research.Thank you Papa for every laugh, cry, and song. You will always be missed, but your impact willnever be forgotten.References[1] B. N. McDougall, “Mo‘okū‘auhau versus colonial entitlement in English translations of the Kumulipo,” American Quarterly, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 749–779, Sep. 2015.[2] M. A. Meyer, “Our own liberation: Reflections on Hawaiian epistemology,” Amerasia Journal, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 139–164, 2003.[3] Nākoa Oliveira Katrina-Ann R Kapāʻanaokalāokeola and E. K. Wright, Kanaka ʻŌiwi Methodologies: Moʻolelo and Metaphor. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaiʻi Press, 2016.[4] P. Pascua, H. McMillen, T. Ticktin, M. Vaughan, and K
,” Science Education, vol. 101, no.3, pp. 486–505, 2017. [4] K.B. Wendell, C.G. Wright, and P. Paugh, “Urban elementary school students’ reflective decision-making during formal engineering learning experiences”. Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA. [5] J. Gale, M. Alemdar, J. Lingle, S.H. Newton, R. Moore, and J. Rosen, “Developing engineering proficiency and self-efficacy through a middle school engineering course”. Proceedings of the 2018 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. [6] M. Honey, G. Pearson, and H. Schweingruber, (Eds.), STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects
: 10.1080/87567550209595875[8] R. Cullen and M. Harris, “Assessing learner-centredness through course syllabi,” Assessmentand Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 115-125, 2009. doi:10.1080/026029308019566018[9] M. Eslami, K. Denaro, K., B. Sato, J. Sumarsono, P. Collins, and M. Dennin, “How syllabirelate to outcomes in higher education: a study of syllabi learner-centeredness and grade inequityin STEM”, UCI Education Research Initiative, Working Paper #22-10, 2022. Accessed February2, 2024. [Online] Available: https://cpb-usw2.wpmucdn.com/wp.ovptl.uci.edu/dist/6/18/files/2021/08/CODAS_WP_Eslami-et-al_Syllabi-Paper.pdf.[10] Texas State University, “Public access to course information,” Accessed on March 4, 2024.[Online] Available
Tech and a Master’s of Civil Engineering and an Ed.D. in Technology Education both from N.C. State University. Using his work experience in both engineering and education, he specializes in designing Integrative STEM activities for K-12 students and implementing professional development programs for K-12 educators.Mr. Karl Haefner, Cankdeska Cikana Community College Karl Haefner, Collaborative Team Member University of Phoenix, M.A.e.d., Secondary Education, 2008 Grand Valley State University, B.S. Geology, 2004 Saginaw Valley State University, B.S. Mechanical Engineering, 1988 Mr. Haefner is an engineering instructor at Cankdeska Cikana Community College, where he is actively working to build the Pre
interdisciplinary problems designed to simulate authentic, client-driven situationsin classroom settings. MEAs allow teachers and researchers to observe student development ofconceptual models by requiring students to make their models explicit through design-test-revisecycles. The solution of an MEA requires the use of one or more mathematical or engineeringconcepts that are unspecified by the problem - students must make new sense of their existingknowledge and understandings to formulate a generalizable mathematical model that can be usedby the client to solve the given and similar problems. An MEA creates an environment in whichskills beyond mathematical abilities are valued because the focus is not on the use of prescribedequations and algorithms but
: 1995-2008," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 281-303, 2011.[15] K. Beddoes, "Examining Privilege in Engineering Socialization Through the Stories of Newcomer Engineers," Engineering Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 158-179, 2021.[16] K. Beddoes, "Gender as Structure in the Organisational Socialisation of Newcomer Civil Engineers," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 102-116, 2022.Appendix: Graduate Gender & Socialization Dataset1. J. M. Blaney, J. Kang, A. M. Wofford, and D. F. Feldon, Mentoring relationships betweendoctoral students and postdocs in the lab sciences, Studies in Graduate and PostdoctoralEducation , vol. 11, no. 3. 2020. doi: 10.1108/SGPE-08-2019-0071.2. D