. He was the recipient of the 2008 Pacific Northwest Section Outstanding Teaching Award and currently serves on the ASEE Board of Directors as Zone IV Chair. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Model for Course-Based Undergraduate Research in First-Year EngineeringAbstractThe Association of American Colleges and Universities identifies undergraduate researchexperiences as a high impact practice for increasing student success and retention in STEMmajors. Most undergraduate research opportunities for community college engineering studentsinvolve partnerships with universities and typically take the form of paid summer experiences.Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) offer
to various extracurricular activities in engineering [6] and informallearning opportunities at museums [7] as their peers in other places. Many of these challenges areheavily impacted by public school funding, which is often based on the tax-base in schooldistricts [8] and the population density in certain areas [9]. Given that some rural communitiesexperience poverty and are relatively small in size, this often means that schools do not receivesufficient funding.On the other hand, rural places, communities, and schools are often said to be tight knit, whichcan provide a wealth of opportunities to engage in unique ways. For engineering and STEMeducation, this is particularly important. For example, connecting students with local experts
disciplines: civil, mechanical, electrical/computer, and biomedical engineering.The mature program now includes fully developed lesson plans for two sections of students,Techtronics I for 6th grade and Techtronics II for 7th grade, each led by a graduate studentcoordinator and five undergraduate teaching Fellows. Emphasis is placed on learning throughhands-on experience and creating an environment that encourages inquiry. Students first studyapplicable scientific theory and are introduced to instrumentation and software tools that will beneeded later. Each unit then culminates in the construction of a related project such as balsawood bridges, Lego robotics, AM radios, or heart monitors. With a student return rate of over70% for 2003-2004, the
focus groups. This coding structure presented points of comparison between thestudents’ questionnaire responses and the interview and focus group transcripts for validating thequestionnaire. Additionally, an interview question asking students to describe the disciplines oftheir teammates was compared against other students’ responses as a measure of students gaininginsight of the disciplines engaged in the interdisciplinary project.ResultsQuestionnaire Data: The rubric from Table 1 was applied to all the pre- and post-coursequestionnaires to capture the level of interdisciplinary understanding of the participants. Overall,the students scored as low as four (only one point per question) to a high of eleven; themaximum possible score on the
Paper ID #35920Beyond the Vanishing Point: Using Future Self Theory and Student-AlumniInterviews to Expand Student Perspectives on Engineering Education andEngineering WorkDr. Harly Ramsey, University of Southern California Harly Ramsey is an Associate Professor of Technical Communication Practice in the Engineering in So- ciety Program at the University of Southern California. She holds a Ph.D. in English, and her training in narrative theory, cultural studies, and rhetoric informs her teaching. Her teaching and scholarship fore- ground the concept of the citizen engineer and the formation of professional engineering
’ expectations within the ECE’s learning environment, which are morefundamental requirements. There are eight themes identified in this study named as: studentperspective on academic and social aspects, limited sense of community in academic settings,motivation and emotional supported needed, search for common communication spaces, need forsynchronous and asynchronous communication systems, design preferences of MR learningspaces, and types of activities to be supported in MR.Figure 4: Remote participant’s view of student participants engaging in an simulated laboratoryscenario using a MR prototype.6.1 Student Perspective on Academic and Social AspectsThis section includes information collected through the interviews. Data collected during
Oral - Define in Global Assessment - Analysis - Assess Implications of Communication Context Assess Economic Impacts Proposed Solution Environmental ImpactsFigure 4. Student performance on final report and video for key learning outcomes, expressedas percentage of possible points. Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Exemplary 100% Performance on Video and Report
of impactful and engaging lesson plans, etc.Pedagogical knowledge, when wielded adeptly, serves as a powerful tool influencing bothstudent motivation and academic performance. One notable advantage is the capacity foreducators to employ a variety of teaching strategies tailored to diverse learning styles [12], thusenhancing student engagement and interest in the learning process. This adaptability can foster apositive classroom environment, motivating students to actively participate and invest in theiracademic pursuits. However, over-reliance on specific pedagogical strategies may lead to rigidityin classroom practices [11], limiting adaptability to individual needs and preferences. Whenfaced with limitations in time and resources
Dishonesty Policy in the SyllabusDuring exams, the class has a strict no-phone/no-electronics policy that is described in the syllabusand an abbreviated version is included on the front page of each exam: No communication device (such as phone, smart watch, computer, unapproved calculator) on your body (in hands/clothing/pockets) or within reach (on your seat, between your legs, under your seat, on the seat next to you) during exams. It is considered cheating to have a phone, computer, or other electronic device (other than approved calculator) accessible during an exam.The instructor doesn’t need to catch the student with the phone taking the picture and uploading itduring the exam. In fact, the teacher didn’t catch
Kaiphanliam is a doctoral candidate in the Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bio- engineering at Washington State University (WSU). Her research focuses include miniaturized, hands-on learning modules for engineering education and bioreactor design for T cell manufacturing. She has been working with Prof. Bernard Van Wie on the Educating Diverse Undergraduate Communities with Affordable Transport Equipment (EDUC-ATE) project since Fall of 2017.Olufunso Oje, Olufunso Oje is a Masters student in the Educational Psychology program at Washington State University. His research interests include learning strategies in engineering education and multimedia learning. He has a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering and
]. Therefore, understanding how these institutions, which directly influence a majorityof Hispanic engineering students, impact a student’s engineering identity is valuable. Asdescribed by Lent et al. [24] and expanded on by Estrada et al. [25], social influence, thatfeedback students receive from individuals in their environment, is a powerful factor in Hispanicstudents’ persistence. Further, as documented by Alonso [26], Hispanic students have expressedthe value of establishing a familia within their engineering community. However, Alon’s study[26] investigating engineering identity development of Hispanic engineering students wasconducted at a conference held by a specific Hispanic professional engineering society. Asmentioned in the study
preparing technical reports and PowerPoint andposter oral presentations. On the last day of the program, students presented their group projects.We report on a 9-year exercise conducted using the WOW project including detailed studentfeedback from the most recent year. 1. IntroductionEngineering design is defined as the communication of a set of rational decisions obtained withcreative problem solving for achieving certain stated objectives within prescribed constraints [1].The role of design in an engineering curriculum is a key factor contributing to its success [1]. 1Engineering design projects provide students with a broad view related to the material presentedin lectures. Through project-based
work on perspective-taking hasfocused on developing tools and environments to engage students in perspective taking [6], [7],[15]–[17]. Practices such as role playing in the context of engineering ethics courses can providestudents with opportunities to understand someone else’s perspective. Community-based designand service-learning experiences also provide students with opportunities to engageempathetically with stakeholder perspectives [8], [18]. Very limited work has been done inunpacking how engineers engage in perspective-taking in discussions of socio-scientific issues.In the limited work on this, most approaches have been quantitative or stage-based. For example,building on Kolhberg’s stages of moral development, Zhu et al. [19
in aninternational technical conference and the introduction to professional networking in thetechnical specialty that this experience provided. Other collaborative efforts with Carl andgraduate researchers that are expected to lead additional conference papers and possiblepublications, and impact of the experience on the undergraduate students‘ current education andcareer plans are also described.Background information on Cognitive Radio, undergraduate research programs, and theparticular program of interest are provided in the next section. Section 3 describes themethodology used in this paper. Section 4 includes observations and descriptions of the studentparticipants‘ experiences before, during, and since completion of the program, and
courses toupper-level courses and give the students some familiarity with the topic. The activities will alsoaddress aspects of equity, accessibility, and inclusion. One activity addresses equity and waterinfrastructure through a water filtration activity, teaching students about filtration materials andtesting water for iron content. The second activity introduces the concepts of noise measurementand logarithmic calculations to bring awareness to hearing and the importance of OSHA standardsin the workplace. This paper will measure, through student surveys, the impact of the activities onbuilding awareness and feelings of DEI as well as the success in communicating the subject matter.IntroductionHofstra’s School of Engineering boasts an extensive
25participating undergraduate programs, and making suggestions on inconsistencies and how toimprove the BOK. The Curriculum Committee regularly corresponds with a wide group ofstakeholders, and is leading the charge to engage CEE faculty and administrators.The Accreditation Committee has been formulating revised civil engineering program criteria,in concert with the ASCE accreditation community, for submission to the EngineeringAccreditation Commission of ABET, Inc. The goal of this endeavor is to incorporate primaryelements of the BOK into civil engineering curricula via the basic level civil engineeringprogram criteria and the advanced level general criteria. In general, flexibility is being sought toallow universities to efficiently obtain
sense of community is particularly important for first yearstudents to aid in retention efforts, and professional persistence is related to one’s identity as anengineer. The formation of an engineering identity plays a part in both interest in engineeringand contributes to perseverance in the major [7, 8, 9, 10]. Exposure to mentors and/or rolemodels within the STEM discipline has a positive impact on an academic sense of belonging, aswell as a positive impact of academic self-efficacy [11], while others have noted that poorfaculty-student relationships negatively impact a sense of belonging and the persistence in themajor [12, 13]. Curricular integration within various engineering departments combined withpeer-peer interactions, specifically
that engages students in open-ended problem solving and design. Her research focuses on the development, implementation, and assessment of model-eliciting activities with authentic engineering contexts. She is currently the Director of Teacher Professional Development for the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE) and a member of the educational team for the Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN).Dr. Johannes Strobel, Texas A&M Dr. Johannes Strobel is Director, Educational Outreach Programs and Associate Professor, Engineering and Education at Texas A&M. After studying philosophy and information science at three universities in Germany, he received his M.Ed. and Ph.D. in
is an increasing interest in getting engineering students to function onteams is the demonstrated impact of cooperative education techniques on student learning.Several meta-analyses 4, 5 of cooperative learning have shown a strong positive impact comparedto more traditional, competitive approaches. Students, however, needed to be trained inteamwork in order to obtain maximal benefit from such cooperative learning approaches. As aresult of the positive effect on students learning and engineering programs’ interest in developingteamwork skills in their graduates, a wide variety of resources on team building are becomingavailable. Such resources include team development handbooks 6, 7, formative assessment forstudents working on teams 8, and
article are twofold: (1) to present the maincharacteristics of a novel, project-based, technical elective course on Introduction to T-LiDAR forstudents in the Civil Engineering (CE), Construction Engineering (ConE) and ConstructionManagement (CM) programs at Georgia Southern University, and (2) to assess students’acquisition of knowledge through the adopted hands-on approach. This work describes details ofthe developed course to expose students to the fundamentals of T-LiDAR and engage them inspecialized activities involving this modern technique to successfully complete 3D point-cloudmodels of real, service-learning projects. These projects benefit the community and could assistuniversities in attaining or maintaining their Carnegie Community
reuse immediately.9 Conclusion and EvaluationThis paper has argued that the Prisoner’s Dilemma is more than a thought experiment:varied carefully, it becomes a hands-on workshop for the full life cycle of trust—how it forms,how it cracks, and how it can be repaired. By mapping each PD variant to a specific trustmechanism, a professional virtue, and an implementable design pattern, we showed a directhighway from classroom simulation to production-grade “trust-by-construction” artefacts.Early exposure to one-shot and iterated PD sharpens cognitive prudence; noisy andasymmetric versions cultivate affective resilience and fairness; networked or finite-horizongames lift students into questions of community stewardship and long-term
multidisciplinary graduate engineering course that bridges the domains of educationand computer science. Leveraging the Communities of Practice framework, we examine how computerscience students integrate new knowledge from education and computer science to engage in aneducational data mining project. In the first course iteration, we investigated the creation of amultidisciplinary community by connecting students from both disciplines through a blend of problem-based learning instruction and traditional lectures. In the second version of the course, we established amultidisciplinary environment by bringing two instructors, one with computer science expertise and theother from education. To investigate the effectiveness of these approaches, we conducted
undergraduate years as a liminalspace or time[4,7] during which students can explore possible selves and possible professionalidentities. Ibarra and Petriglieri characterize this kind of activity as identity play, acharacterization we share. They define identity play as “people’s engagement in provisional butactive trial of possible future selves”[6]. We have identified a number of course experiences aspotential sites for this identity play. These include: • the lab courses where students put on lab coats and safety goggles as they become familiar with standard laboratory equipment and protocols and the technical knowledge of chemistry; • a communication course where students visit schools as the subject matter expert to
social aspect of college, but priorresearch has also shown that good contacts with peers has a positive influence on the degree of astudent’s academic integration which is also an important factor for persistence (Kamphorst etal., 2015). After speaking with these students, it was evident that they value the opportunity tomeet other students majoring in engineering outside of the classroom. Social engagement plays alarge role in the students’ perceptions of their abilities.All the students also mentioned the impact that WISER team have had on them. They go to thesementors for professional advice, academic guidance, and general life tips. They have played avital role in the success of the students interviewed. The fact that all the students feel
maximum possible Likert Scale score of 5 has beenaccomplished in the Body Smart category identified by Howard Gardner. This indicatesthat the students do learn best by performing experiments in a laboratory setting. Inother words, the learners have the ability to effectively correlate their theoreticalbackground knowledge to solving actual real-world problems. Both the categories: Picture Smart and People Smart have recorded a LikertScale score of 4 indicating that students do understand best when they actually see it.Furthermore, a respectable score of 4 in the category of People Smart implies that thestudents’ team work has been successful. Students are capable of understanding betterwhen one utilizes the principles of engaging with other
peers can have long term impact on the choice to pursue and maintain study and a career inengineering. Thus, the interactions with engineering professionals are likely to influence a rangeof students’ perceptions and understandings of engineering as a career. As Schnieder 6 explains,STEM students’ positive perceptions of the professional and interpersonal competencies ofSTEM professionals was positively correlated with their STEM career intentions.The learning processes that students engage in have also been found to influence their careerchoices. Interest and attachment to a STEM related career are formed early in life, often byprimary education 7, suggesting that finding the roots of a justification for the pursuit of anengineering career is
,real-time interactivity, anytime and anywhere access, and engagement. A RL system can beintegrated with existing e-learning methods (such as online courses and mobile learning), whichare important in distance education. Additionally, the development of feasible remoteexperiments across the science disciplines such as biology and chemistry should be considered infuture work.Recent work on VISIR (Virtual Instrument Systems in Reality), a remote lab developed byBlekinge Institute of Technology (BTH) in Sweden investigated its effects on teaching andlearning, including how it aids student learning beyond the hands-on lab exercises experience[11]. VISIR was used in two different courses related to electric and electronic topics over threesemesters
focus on the user. The work also takes advantage of some unique opportunitiesavailable at the University of Washington.Thinking of Instructional Development through the Lens of User-Centered DesignIn our work, we are approaching instructional development through the lens of user-centereddesign (Gould and Lewis, 1995; Maquire, 2001). Faculty are users of current as well asprospective instructional development activities. They are the intended audience for instructionaldevelopment resources, and it is faculty who choose to engage in activities that impact theirteaching and their students’ learning. Instructional development goals can include helping facultybetter engage with curricular materials or better implement pedagogical strategies
instruction allows students to integrateelectronics and mechanical means while addressing issues of social and environmental concernrelated to the impacts of technology. Math, science and other interrelated curricular areas areaddressed through the problem solving product design process, resulting in soundmultidisciplinary instruction while engaging student interest.The EoF program strategy was to bring the UK expertise to the workshop participants. We willexamine the impetus and trajectory of the UK Design and Technology pedagogy and how thispedagogical structure is relevant in our students’ general education experiences. In addition toproviding an overview of the unique experience of the EoF summer program and DECS labexercises, our paper will
empathy revealed empathetic teaching plays anessential role in developing teacher-student relationships and positively impacting students'learning [31].Only one study we found in higher education provide a definition of the concept of teacherempathy. Meyers et al. [5] defined the concept as, “the degree to which instructors work todeeply understand students’ personal and social situations, feel caring and concern in response tostudents’ positive and negative emotions, and communicate their understanding and caring tostudents through their behavior”. This definition involves cognitive, affective, and behavioralcomponents. Meyers and colleagues [5] also claim that teacher empathy enhances studentlearning and offers suggestions for increasing