customers’ requirements. Direct interaction with the customergives engineering students a more realistic experience of design, and better preparation for theirprofessional careers. However, as Christianson and Rohrbach1 point out, the customers’consideration may be subtle and may require ongoing dialogue and questioning between thestudent designers and the client/customer. Industry has been critical of engineering educationthat does not produce graduates who are sufficiently knowledgeable about how design ispracticed in industry or who are able to deal with open-ended problems.8 Interacting with realclients is a good way to enhance ties between industry and academia. Another method toenhance industrial ties is the use of student portfolios.2, 5Much
program was started well before the Bhopal Disaster.A process safety course was first introduced in 1987 as an elective course. It resulted from ajoint effort by MTU, Wayne State University and BASF as a part of an NSF grant. This effortalso resulted in the textbook, Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications (Crowland Louvar, 1990); the videotape series, “Safety In The Chemical Process Industries” (Crowland Louvar, 1989); and a study guide for the videotapes, “Safety In The Chemical ProcessIndustries - Study Guide” (Crowl et al., 1988). Although these three items were developed atWayne State University, the chemical engineering faculty at MTU played a collaborative role intheir development and tested them in the classroom. The
Paper ID #40062Decision support model to leverage extended reality technologies toaugment manufacturing educationDr. Amit Shashikant Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Amit Jariwala is the Director of Design & Innovation for the School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech. Dr. Amit Jariwala develops and maintains industry partnerships to support experiential, entrepreneurial, and innovative learning experience within the academic curriculum of the school. He is a Woodruff School Teaching Fellow and strives to enhance education by developing classes, workshops, and events focused on implementing hands
different skill sets. Instead,the students collaboratively draw on disciplinary strengths in a constructive teamwork approachto problem-based learning.The class and coursework is divided into two sections: production and promotion. Theproduction group (made up of the Mechanical Engineering Technology, ManufacturingTechnology, Construction Technology, Design Technology, Computer Engineering Technology,Electronics Technology, and Electrical Engineering majors) models itself after a “manufacturingcompany” that designs and produces a marketable product. The promotion group (made up of theBachelor of Arts in Visual Communication Design majors) takes on the roll of an “advertisingagency” that promotes the product. This experience, modeled after industry
learn complex engineering skills such as engineering design and interdisciplinary collaboration. He received his B.S. from Duke University and both his M.S. and Ph.D. from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Page 15.546.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Examining Students’ Perceptions of Interdisciplinarity Based on Gender and Disciplinary AffiliationAbstractThe aim of the research proposed here is to contribute to theories about the development ofundergraduate engineering students as interdisciplinary engineers, by examining engineeringstudents’ perceptions of
to engineering[4]. This study investigates the process of designing a “course” that students take for seven of the eight semesters they are enrolled in the ECE program to promote student agency and have a holistic engineering education experience. The course is designed to integrate with the department curriculum to make out-of-class learning more visible. This allows students to pursue personal interests, and promote a more personalized and collaborative engineering education model that nurtures both academic and personal growth. Another inspiration for this course is to support students in building relationships and connections with each other and faculty. Students enrolled in the
. Within the undergraduate engineering curriculum at the institution, generativeAI-related courses primarily emphasize theories related to natural language processing,machine learning, and language models. However, they often lack actual hands-on experiencein using contemporary tools and application programming interfaces (APIs) to build practicalAI solutions for solving real-life problems. Such solutions often require cross-disciplinarycollaboration with academic partners and industrial collaborators, who may contributedomain expertise and training data in their specific field of generative AI application.To address this gap in the curriculum, we propose a framework to guide students through astructured three-stage progression, emphasizing
of equipment and software and fordeveloping content with the Inside-Out approach. Page 22.1473.9A presentation on the approach and ongoing results was made by the instructor to the departmentindustry advisory board, with similarly strong positive responses. The industry advisorsappreciated the effort to teach the new generation of students in the manner in which theytypically communicate. Most felt that the companies themselves need to adopt similar strategiesin their own training programs. They were excited about the possibilities of partnering on coursecontent as a first step towards establishing a greater collaboration on distance
administration expressed the need for more professional developmentworkshops which has led to growth of the series. Additionally, as part of a Colorado statewideinter-institutional collaboration (GradCO) we are sharing a selection of these workshops beyondour own campus community. These developments have inspired the library to evaluate whetherthe series is meeting the needs of graduate students. Specifically, we are interested in expandingour scope toward career readiness for scientists and engineers entering careers in industry,research, and academia.Existing career readiness frameworks address several core competencies. To best understandwhether our workshops are meeting career readiness goals, we mapped our catalog of pastworkshops to these
profession, education, and research. She is presently a doctoral candidate in Curriculum and Pedagogy with a Collaborative Specialization in Engineering Education at University of Toronto. Her research in- terests include professional identity development, inclusivity, complex collaborations, global engineering education, global competence, international online collaborative learning, and learning communities.Dr. Glory Ovie, The King’s University Edmonton, Canada Dr. Glory Ovie is an assistant professor in the Faculty of Education at the King’s University Edmonton. She holds a PhD in Educational Research from the University of Calgary and a master’s from the State University of New York. Glory is a recipient of several grants
communications assignments. Therefore, the practice of written assessment canresult in less communicative practice for the students. Even more importantly, research has shownthat students often do not profit from written comments. They do not know how to use thecomments to improve their writing, have difficulty interpreting the comments, and in many casesdo not even read them (Bardine 1999, Elbow 1997, Hodges 1997). The problem appears evenmore serious when we consider that in engineering industry workplaces collaborative writing isthe norm, i.e. comments on papers and presentations are given with the expectation that thewriters or presenters will consider the comments and modify their communications accordingly
important questions, since their professional survival will largely depend on how well weprepare them to face the realities of our times. We live in very exciting times. A time when, due to rapid increase in globalization andInformation Technology (IT), most products assembled in the United States have more than 70%of their content supplied by various domestic and overseas firms. As examples consider the carmotors fabricated in Japan for the Big Three American car manufacturers, or the many essentialparts and subassemblies imported from all over by Boeing for their planes. In the information andcomputer technologies, and many others, engineers in different countries work and collaborate onthe same project 24/7. It is a time when staying
projects also expose undergraduates to both theenvironmental engineering profession (collaboration with practicing engineers) and largerresearch universities.1.3 ObjectivesThe objectives of this paper are to:• Describe the implementation of an externally-funded research program at an undergraduate- only engineering college.• Explain the organization of the research program in terms of contracting and effective utilization of undergraduates (with information related to the demand for and the solicitation of these contracts).• Describe how this program has focused on water and wastewater treatability studies (applied research) through small-scope contracts with local utilities, industries, and consultants that provide a valuable service to
. There is, therefore, a broad base of knowledge using LEGO® bricks to expose students to a wide variety of concepts. Shocker MINDSTORMS The Shocker MINDSTORMS program at WSU utilizes LEGO® MINDSTORMS to encourage young students to explore, experiment, and experience STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) learning in a hands-on constructionist environment17. Shocker MINDSTORMS began in 2001 as a collaboration among faculty and staff in the WSU Colleges of Education and Engineering, WSU engineering students, and local industry. The intent was to involve teachers and students in hands-on learning by providing a framework that included teacher training, teacher and student support, and an annual culminating event where students
IV. R&D immersion in industry settings V. Classroom Collaboration VI. Research on Program EffectivenessI. Identify Science Teachers. For the sake of this research effort exemplary teachers wererecruited from the Middle School Science Education Leadership Initiative (MSSELI) program.ThegoalofMSSELIistoidentifyleadscienceteachersfromSanDiegoCityandCountymiddleschools.Onceidentified,theseteachersparticipateinanintensivesummerandacademicyearprofessionaldevelopmentprogramfocusedonsciencecontent,leadershipstrategies,andcollaborationwithscientificinstitutions. During August 2009 grade eightscience teachers were recruited. Nine eighth grade teachers participated in the treatment andfour teachers acted as
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Using Boundary Negotiating Artifacts to Investigate Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary TeamsAbstract: Teamwork, and interdisciplinary teamwork in particular, are increasingly recognizedas an important part of engineering education. Engineering educators have therefore taken aninterest in employing and studying teamwork in their curriculum. Yet much of their scholarshiphas focused on documenting student and faculty experiences of teamwork and describingprograms and courses only. Examinations of the actual practices and artifacts, that studentscreate and use to manage interdisciplinary team collaborations are an underexplored researcharea. However, such studies
• Educational training of students through student research and hands on experiments that uses Broadband technologies and techniques. • Attracting more students especially minority students to the field of Broadband Communications Systems by providing support for their training. • Enhancing the electrical engineering curriculum in the study of Broadband Communication Systems and their application to telecommunication systems and signal processing. • To provide avenues for collaboration with other research laboratories within the university and industry. • To expose students to real industrial experience by serving as interns with industry.4.0 Lessons LearnedWith the experiences we have acquired in
AC 2012-3274: INVESTIGATION OF THE WORK ENVIRONMENT OFENGINEERING PH.D.S IN THE UNITED STATESDr. Joy Watson, University of South Carolina Joy Watson is currently a STEM education consultant working with private industry, academia and the U.S. Navy to develop a logistics/IT course for low-income, high potential middle and high school students. She completed her Ph.D. in the College of Engineering at the University of South Carolina in Aug. 2011. She obtained her B.S. and M.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Before entering the doctoral program, she worked as a process engineer in the pulp and paper industry and as patent examiner at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. At the
participants that the study, can be replicated by other researchers. Findings from anin-depth examination of AM education and employment in NW Florida have profoundimplications for rural communities throughout the U.S. southeast [21]. At a minimum, studyfindings are directly applicable to other regional areas of opportunity (RAOs) in Florida becausethey share economic and demographic profiles [22].Validity and ReliabilityThe external evaluator, in collaboration with the research team and educational partners, facultyfrom four regional AM programs, and a representative from the industry council reviewed andcommented on the data collection instruments and reports. This team of experts assessed faceand content validity of the instruments. Members
from the third industrial revolution. Powerful computers that continually analyze theincoming data over the Internet are communicating with each other creating cyber-physicalsystems, the Internet of Things, and systems to drive the manufacturing sector equipped withadvanced manufacturing technologies efficiently and effectively [1]. The product developmentframework is being redesigned for a streamlined process to accommodate these technologies andincrease process automation. The importance of this trend is demonstrated by National Center forDefense Manufacturing and Machining (NCDMM) via National Additive ManufacturingInnovation Institute - America Makes to promote the collaborative efforts between industries,academia, government agencies, etc
, it also explains diverseperspectives and roles engineers play in collaborative product development and appreciation forknowledge gained in prior courses like Machining, CAD/CAM, GD&T, and Computing.BackgroundBuilding blocks for utilizing Product Manufacturing Information (PMI) and tolerancerepresentations for Smart Manufacturing (SM) are showing up more and more in researchprojects/literature and industry/product/process specific applications. For example, rapidprototyping, composite structures, robotic assembly, augmented reality, and architecture forincorporating business functions that depend on information from applications and productengineering activities were found [1]. Developers of standards like International Organizationfor
2006-368: ASSESSING GROUP LEARNING USING WIKIS: AN APPLICATION TOCAPSTONE DESIGNKelley Racicot, Washington State UniversityCharles Pezeshki, Washington State University Page 11.237.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Assessing Group Learning Using Wikis: An Application to Capstone DesignAbstractIn this paper, we discuss the use of a wiki for documenting social knowledge in thecontext of an industrially-based capstone design course and for assessing group learning.Students create a knowledge management (KM) tool for the explicit purposes of sharinglessons learned with wider audiences and engaging in active group assessment, wherestudents actively develop
San Marcos. He earned his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Shiraz University in Iran, and his M.S.E. and Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Alabama in Huntsville. As an active participant in IEEE and ASEE, his research has received funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Office of Naval Research (ONR), and various industry partners.Prof. Jairo Giraldo, University of Utah Dr. Jairo Giraldo received a B.Sc. degree in Electronic Engineering from the National University of Colombia in 2010 and an M.Sc. and Ph.D. degree from the University of the Andes, Colombia in 2012 and 2015, respectively. Dr. Giraldo is currently a Research Assistant Professor at the Department of
a collaborative educational pathway for the technology leadersof tomorrow.IntroductionOver the last few years, there have been several reports documenting the need for improvingSTEM education and advancing a national innovation strategy. In 2009, the National EconomicCouncil published a report entitled A Strategy for American Innovation: Driving TowardsSustainable Growth and Quality Report that outlined three broad-based strategies: (a) investmentin the building blocks of American innovation; (b) promotion of competitive markets that spurproductive entrepreneurship; and (c) catalyzing breakthroughs for national priorities. One of thebuilding blocks specified in the report is educating the next generation with 21st centuryknowledge and
5 Partnering with the S&T Community Government Academia Industry Universities/Colleges Small/Medium/LargeDomestic/International Companies 6 Naval S&T Successful Transition Flows: Knowledge, Technology, Capability 1-2 years 2-4 years 4-8 years 5-20 years Quick Reaction Technology Maturation Leap Ahead Innovations Discovery & Invention& Other S&T ≈ 8% (FNCs, etc.) ≈ 30% (Innovative Naval Prototypes) ≈12% (Basic & Applied Science) ≈ 50
. His teaching and research interests are in the areas of mechanical design and experimental measurements. Mr. Englund is a Professional Engineer in Pennsylvania and is involved in new product design and research with local industry. Prior to coming to Penn State he was a design engineer in industry.Robert Edwards, Pennsylvania State University-Erie Robert Edwards is currently a Lecturer in Engineering at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College where he teaches Statics, Dynamics, and Fluid and Thermal Science courses. He earned a BS degree in Mechanical Engineering from Rochester Institute of Technology and an MS degree in Mechanical Engineering from Gannon University
looked intohow to make engineering student product designers more conscious of non-technical requirementsin the marketplace. Rather than strictly focus on the technical aspects of product design, they notean increasing demand from industry for market-aware, customer focused graduates, attributesalso associated with entrepreneurship. They have used the framework of a simulated focus groupincorporated as part of a virtual internship and epistemic game Nephrotex to introduce studentdesigners to “customer voice.” They propose that increased customer exposure should lead to de-creased product cost without a loss in product quality. They found that students in the focus groupsection produced less expensive final designs compared to the section without
-based collaborative platforms are developed andused. This initiative is motivated by an ABET outcome assessment item established bythe department on the global perspective of enterprise. As a part of ABET activities, theassessment of this initiative includes a global enterprise perspective rubric, which in turnconsists of three distinct performance criteria. The progress made thus far in terms ofinput, process, and outcome will be presented, and the future direction will be discussed.1. IntroductionIn this paper, we present the continuous improvement process and efforts by theIndustrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering (IMSE) Department at Iowa StateUniversity (ISU) regarding the ability of the undergraduate Industrial Engineering (IE
studentshave been prepared. Advisory committee members review the relevance of the laboratoryexercises and teaching techniques from the industry point of view. All of the new evaluationactivities followed the implementation guidelines described in the publication Executive Guide:Effectively Implementing the Government Performance and Results Act. Dissemination hasoccurred within the network of Massachusetts community colleges and nationally through thePartners in Environmental Technology Education (PETE) conferences, publications and Internet Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education
various aspectsof the design process as envisioned fifteen years from now. Briefly stated, design supportapplications are evolving toward environments that may or may not involve face-to-faceinteraction, such as Internet-related technologies and applications such as remote visualization.While the report was written primarily at the request of NASA and therefore has primary impacton NASA and Aerospace Industry planning efforts, the report (and interpretations of it) will haveimplications for Biomedical Engineering design efforts and plans. This paper will briefly reviewthe National Academy Report, and then will consider current and related future design thrustsand applications in Biomedical Engineering.1. Advanced Engineering Environments, Phase 2