assurance and computer security and is co-coordinator of the Information Systems Security Laboratory atISU.BARBARA LICKLIDERBarbara L. Licklider is an Associate Professor in the Department of Educational Leadership and Director of ProjectLEA/RN at Iowa State University. With a background in secondary teaching and administration she brings practicalexperience to her goals of moving learning theory into practice in the classroom. Her research revolves around thedevelopment and implementation of models of faculty development to promote cultural change in approaches tolearning in post-secondary education institutions. Page 5.508.9
AC 2012-3563: DESIGN AND COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF DIAPHRAGM-BASED PIEZORESISTIVE PRESSURE SENSORS FOR INTEGRATIONINTO UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUMMr. Alexander Joseph Plotkowski, Grand Valley State UniversityDr. Lihong (Heidi) Jiao, Grand Valley State University Lihong (Heidi) Jiao is currently an Associate Professor in the Padnos College of Engineering and Com- puting at Grand Valley State University. She received her B.S.E.E. and M.S.E.E. from Nankai University, China and Ph.D in electrical engineering from the Pennsylvania State University. Her teaching interests include solid state device physics and fabrication, nanotechnology, and fiber optics. Her research activi- ties include fabrication and characterization of
at the Jet Propul- sion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., and an Invited Professor at INRIA Rhone-Alpes, Monbonnot, France. Research interests include computer vision, mobile robotics, intelligent vehicles, entrepreneurship, and education.Dr. James P. Schmiedeler, University of Notre DameDr. Michael Milo Stanisic, University of Notre Dame Page 25.1135.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Robotic Football: An Inter-university Design Competition Experiment1. IntroductionRobotics competitions have grown significantly over the past decade. The FIRST competitionhas inspired many K
Session 1347 Foreseeing Electrical Engineering Technology - Expectations in the 21st Century Robert J. Hofinger Purdue University-School of TechnologyAbstractIf we knew what was going to happen in the future, we obviously would change our actions. Forinstance, we might go out and buy the next winning lottery ticket, or we might invest in anobscure stock, which is going to increase in value tremendously. Likewise, if we as electricalengineering technology educators knew what the engineering marketplace was going to be like inthe future, we could better
thegeotechnical engineering program at Cal Poly. Emphasized are experiences that the program hashad incorporating field and laboratory testing procedures into the undergraduate curriculum. Abrief discussion focuses on technical and financial support from industry that has helped toenhance the program.BACKGROUNDCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoCalifornia Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly), San Luis Obispo is one of the twenty-three(23) campuses of the California State University, the nation’s largest four-year university system.Cal Poly’s primary mission is undergraduate education, and it specializes in preparing its 15,000students for careers in applied professional and technical fields.Cal Poly’s College of Engineering has
presentations to the students involved in Gifted andTalented Education programs in high schools and junior high schools. I often worked as avolunteer in the Strength of Materials Laboratory. Although approximately 50% of participantswere girls, boys tried to participate most actively in experimental activities. Being sensitive aboutthese issues, I tried very hard to get girls involved. To my surprise, I have discovered that motherswho accompany children to our school have often shown more interest in experiments thanstudents. Comments like: "I never knew that this works this way", "this is so interesting", "they(students) do not know what they are getting; I wish we had learned this when we were in school"are common.Also, as a mother of two children
contribution against six criteria. These criteriawere chosen in consultation with the students prior to the introduction of the system andinclude: teamwork, initiative, effort, achievement, participation in meetings andcontribution to the written report.At the end of the first phase, following a period of ideas generation and selection, eachteam has to present a short-list of up to three well-researched, alternative product ideas.This is usually done by showing how current products fail to perform adequately, or bydemonstrating that demand exists, or could be created, for a product which is notcurrently available.At the beginning of year two a choice has to be made between the alternative productideas so that one can be developed further. There is an
results and reactions are evaluated.Introduction Assessment of the graduate engineer’s capabilities is part of gaining ABET accreditationfor an engineering program. There are many means to do this including standardized tests suchas the GRE or FE examination, interviews with students and/or employers, major research papersand projects, and locally developed essay tests [1]. Another method that the Messiah CollegeEngineering Department has begun to explore is the use of portfolios. Portfolios are commonly used tools in certain professions like art or photography,whereby artists or photographers seek to present collections representative of their best works tocustomers, clients or potential employers. Just as a photographer uses the
University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Developing and Introducing a New Course on Building Façade DesignAbstractThe School of Architecture at Oklahoma State University currently offers accredited programs inArchitecture and Architectural Engineering. These programs share several courses that includeengineering, management, and studio-based courses. In the past few years, several new courseshave been added to these programs that will enable students to be equipped with advancedknowledge, to work in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry, and toserve society. Like other areas, such as manufacturing and software, the construction
-294, 2020[4] E. Latif and S. Miles, “The Impact of Assignments of Academic Performance”, Journal ofEconomics and Economic Education Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 1-12, 2011.[5] A. Grodner and N. G. Rupp, “The Role of Homework in Student Learning Outcomes:Evidence from a Field Experiment”, The Journal of Economic Education, Vol. 44, No 2, pp. 93-109, 2013.[6] O. Eren and D. J. Henderson, “The Impact of Homework on Student Achievement”,Economics Journal, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 326-348, 2008.[7] H. J. Trussel and E. J. Dietz, “A Study of the Effect of Graded Homework in a PreparatoryMath Course for Electrical Engineers” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 92, No. 2, pp.141-146, 2003.[8] A. Fernandez, C. Saviz and J. Burmeister, “Homework as an
Paper ID #42480Data Acquisition Using the Raspberry Pi Pico WProf. David R. Loker, Pennsylvania State University David R. Loker received the M.S.E.E. degree from Syracuse University in 1986. In 1984, he joined General Electric (GE) Company, AESD, as a design engineer. In 1988, he joined the faculty at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. In 2007, he became the Chair of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Program. His research interests include wireless sensor networks, data acquisition systems, and communications systems. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
AC 2011-2754: EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF JUST-IN-TIMETEACHING AND PEER INSTRUCTION METHODS IN CIVIL ENGINEER-ING COURSESWilliam A Kitch, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Associate Professor of Civil Engineering, P.E., Ph.D. Page 22.651.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Evaluation of Effectiveness of Just-in-Time-Teaching and Peer Instruction Methods in Civil Engineering CoursesAbstractThis paper evaluates the effectiveness of just-in-time-teaching and peer instruction methods in atypical required junior level civil engineering geotechnical course sequence. These methods
available solely through ALNs. For example, Web-4M is very effective ina hybrid class that not only meets in a traditional, time-bound classroom but also requires thestudents to take part in a given amount of on-line synchronous discussions, problem-solvingsessions, group homework, or to view presentations. A key component of making these newteaching paradigms work effectively is a tightly integrated distance education delivery system thatallows for storage and retrieval of materials presented in a synchronous forum, thusaccommodating absenteeism and providing a means for student review. The following sections willdiscuss some of the features of Web-4M, explain how the synchronous and asynchronous tools areintegrated and give an example of how
. Barnes. Engineering education under attack. IEEE Transactions on Education, 37:1-2, 1994.[2] J.R. Lohmann. Myths, facts and the future of U.S. engineering and science education. Engineering Education, pages 365-371, April 1991.[3] S.B. Sample. Engineering education and the liberal arts tradition. IEEE Transactions on Edu- cation, 31:54-57, 1988.[4] Morris A. Shamos. The Myth of Scientific Literacy. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1984.ROMAN KUC received the BSEE in 1968 from the Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, andthe PhD degree in Electrical Engineering in 1977 from Columbia University, New York, NY. From1968 to 1975 he was a member of technical staff at Bell Laboratories engaged in the
Page 2.448.5support and encouragement of Maurice Aburdene and Victor Chang are also sincerelyappreciated.REFERENCES1. For example, see: Aburdene, M. F., R. G. McGinnis and D. J. Cartwright, “Exploring Engineering,” Frontiers in Education Conference, 1990, Vienna, Austria. and Schuster, D. S., T. B. Cunningham, and S. A. Richardson, “Exploring Engineering -- The Five Year Evolution of an Interdisciplinary Engineering Course,” World Conference on Engineering Education, 1995, Minneapolis, Minnesota.2. Professor Emily Allen at San Jose State University used this laboratory in MatE 153 “Electronic, Optical, and Magnetic Properties of Materials” in November 1996. Prof. Allen says “It also demonstrates how important the Web is
, communication skills,ethics and professionalism, open mindiness and positive attitude, and math and scienceproficiency. Industry representatives were from companies that employ new engineeringgraduates. Their function within their company was not discussed.A similar assessment done at Auburn University3 found that the top five attributes, in terms ofrelative importance, by 298 industry representatives were the ability to learn on one’s own,technical knowledge in a major engineering discipline, written communication skills, oralcommunication skills and experience with software to solve practical problems. Industryrepresentatives were chosen from companies which place position announcements at Auburn orparticipate in the engineering cooperative education
meant as a supporting element to a class environment and provides guidance to instructorswith regard to problems they can immediately utilize and a framework within which they cancreate their own. Page 15.891.9References [1] Seifert, T. (2004), Understanding student motivation, Educational Research, 46, 2, pp 137-149 [2] Brown, D.G. (ed), (2000), Interactive learning: Vignettes from America’s most wired campuses., MA, Anker. [3] Carter, J., (2000), A framework for the development of multimedia systems for use in engineering education, Computers and Education, 39, Pergamon, pp 111-128 [4] Clark, R., Mayer, R., (2002), E
AC 2011-2742: ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM: IN-TEGRATION OF ARCHITECTURE AND ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEER-INGAhmed Cherif Megri, University of Wyoming Dr. Ahmed Cherif Megri, associate professor of architectural engineering at the University of Wyoming (UW), teaches several HVAC and energy courses. Dr. Megri is also teaching a course titled ”Compre- hensive Performance of Building Envelope and HVAC Systems” for Summer School at UW, and ”Smoke and Fire Dynamics” during summer session at Concordia University, Canada. His research areas include airflow modeling, zonal modeling, energy modeling, and artificial intelligence modeling using the support vector machine learning approach. Prior to his actual position at UW
AC 2010-1936: ON-LINE SURFACE ROUGHNESS MEASUREMENT USINGLABVIEW AND VISION METHOD FOR E-QUALITY CONTROLRichard Chiou, Drexel UniversityMichael Mauk, Drexel UniversityYueh-Ting Yang , Drexel UniversityRobin Kizirian , Drexel UniversityYongjin Kwon, Ajou University Page 15.920.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 On-line Surface Roughness Measurement using LabVIEW and Vision Method for E-Quality ControlAbstractThe annual results of laboratory development under an NSF, CCLI sponsored project,“CCLI Phase II: E-Quality for Manufacturing (EQM) Integrated with Web-enabledProduction Systems for Engineering Technology Education” (NSF Award # 0618665
Paper ID #10807Milestones as a Guide to Drafting Project to Improve the Application of Di-mensioning SpecificationsProf. Leonardo A. Bueno, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Assistant Professor in the Engineering Fundamental department, teaching all the courses offered by the department. His focus is on teaching and preparing students for the upper-level classes that follow in their educational experience. Page 24.906.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014
methods translates into performance gains in latertopics, as measured by results in concept questions from the Concept Warehouse. Finally, based on thesurvey results, students generally appear to acknowledge the usefulness of drawing careful figures.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1821445. The authors gratefully acknowledge this support.References[1] A. Maries and C. Singh, “To use or not to use diagrams: The effect of drawing a diagram in solving introductory physics problems,” presented at the 2012 Physics Education Research Conference, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2013, pp. 282–285. doi: 10.1063/1.4789707.[2] S. Flores, S. E. Kanim, and C. H. Kautz, “Student use of
Paper ID #45426Comparison of Teamwork Assessment Methods in Engineering ClassesMr. Adam Barnes, University of Virginia Adam Barnes graduated with a BS and MS in Electrical Engineering from Virginia Tech. He worked in small business and industry for 18 years before returning to Virginia Tech to teach engineering as a professor of practice. He then moved to Charlottesville and began teaching at the University of Virginia in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, where he has now been for 5 years. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Comparison of Teamwork Assessment Methods
EngineeringEducation," Journal of Engineeing Education 121-130, 2005.[3] Mahoney, J. M., & Nathan, R. (2017, June), Mechanical Vibrations Modal Analysis Projectwith Arduinos Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus,Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--28660[4] Hopfner, H., & Morgenthal, G., & Schirmer, M. & Naujoks, M., & Halang, C. (2013) "OnMeasuring Mechanical Oscillations using Smartphone Sensors - Possibilities and Limitation,"ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review 1-11.[5] Herrington, J., & Herrington, A., & Mantei, J., & Olney, I., & Ferry, B. (2009) Using mobiletechnologies to develop new ways of teaching and learning Murdoch Research Repository(Murdoch Research Repository) 1-14.[6
Statics by Feeling: Effects of Everyday Examples on Confidence and Identity Development,” 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, USA, June 23-26, 2013[3] J. Burkhardt, “The Effect of Additional Statics Class Time on At-Risk Student Performance Paper” 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA. June 14-17, 2015.[4] M. Saad, T. Abu-Lebdeh, D. Pai, and C. Waters, “Recitation In Core Engineering Mechanics Courses: Implications For Retention And Student Performance,” 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, ASEE 2007, Honolulu, HI, USA. June 24-27, 2007[5] Z. Kou and S. Mehta, “Research In Statics Education – Do Active, Collaborative, And Project Based Learning Methods Enhance Student Engagement
Paper ID #37492Before and After: Team Development in Virtual and In-Person Transfer Student Engineering Design TeamsNatalie C.t. Van Tyne (Associate Professor of Practice) Natalie Van Tyne is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, having joined in 2015. Her research interests include guided practice in the use of reflection to improve student learning, the relationship between reflection and critical thinking, pedagogies for engineering ethics education, and guided practice in effective teamwork. She has a background in chemical engineering, environmental
Paper ID #23558Assessment of a Global Engineering Outreach CourseDr. Randy S. Lewis, Brigham Young University Dr. Randy S. Lewis is professor at Brigham Young University (BYU). He received his B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from BYU and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, respectively. He currently serves as chair of the Education and Accreditation Committee of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and as an ABET commissioner for accrediting engineering programs. He previously served in several national positions of AIChE. His research interests include biomaterials development, engineering
. His research interests include wireless sensor networks, distributed systems, computer security, and most recently, software quality met- rics. Dr. Omari is involved in computer science curriculum development and computing-related program accreditation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Designing an ABET- Ready Computer Engineering Program in a Medium-Sized Liberal Arts CollegeAbstractWhile most engineering students aspire to graduate from a top engineering university, manychoose to attend small to mid-size liberal arts colleges for various reasons, including financial,location and learning needs. It is essential that these engineering students are given
until 1983. He then worked at the Harris Corporation as a Senior Scientist until 1996 at which time he joined the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, as Professor and Chairman of the Aerospace Department. He went to Texas A&M University in 2003 as Associate Vice Chancellor of Engineering, and Associate Dean. Dr. Hyland, is currently Royce E. Wisenbaker Chair of Engineering, Professor of Aerospace Engineering, and Adjunct Professor of Physics. Dr. Hyland’s current research interests in- clude nanotechnologies for power collection and transmission and quantum processes for novel distributed imaging systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Human
Paper ID #13534Hands-on Networking & Security Labs on DemandDr. Emil H Salib, James Madison University Professor in the Integrated Science & Technology Department at James Madison University. Current Teaching - Wire-line & Wireless Networking & Security and Cross Platform Mobile Application Devel- opment. Current Research - Mobile IPv6 and Design for Motivation CurriculumRyan Lutz, James Madison University Page 26.835.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
United States Military Academy at West Point. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy and his M.S.E. and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His research and teaching interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering.Ally Kindel Martin, The Citadel Ally Kindel Martin is the Director of Student Success in the School of Engineering. In her position, she has worked with the Supplemental Instruction program, launched STEM Freshmen Outreach initiatives, created an Engineering Mentor Connection program, and revitalized the Engineering Career & Network- ing Expo. She holds a M.Ed. in Higher Education and