Paper ID #21790Metacognition: Helping Students Plan, Monitor, and Evaluate Study Skillsand StrategiesDr. Muhammad Dawood, New Mexico State University Dr. Muhammad Dawood received his BE degree from the NED University of Engineering and Technol- ogy, Karachi, Pakistan, 1985, and his MS and Ph.D. degrees, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, in 1998 and 2001, respectively, both in electrical engineering. Dr. Dawood is involved in teaching both nationally and internationally since 1995. At present, Dr. Dawood is an Associate Professor at the Klipsch School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New Mexico State University
developing Clean Energy curriculum and promotingstudent projects in energy efficiency and sustainability.In conclusion, recommendations are presented for energizing the community and campus to worktogether to achieve sustainability goals to accelerate climate action in and through higher education.Specifically, minimizing the consumption of natural resources for campus operations and maintenanceis the first recommendation. The electricity consumed is primarily produced from fossil fuels. Thecampus is encouraged to employ renewable energy substitutes such as photovoltaic generation to offsetit. Further reduction can be achieved by emulating the features of one energy-efficient building oncampus, which received Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Polytechnics and Colleges of Advanced Technologymainly consist of placements exceeding thirty-six weeks duration, and the tendency is for thisperiod to lengthen. Ryan et al.27 found little rationale in the literature for choosing a singleperiod of work experience that extended from six months to one year (or longer). Wright29 hasargued that the longer placements allow students to see a project, such as an engineering orproduct development project, through all its stages and to participate in the full range oforganizational and work life experiences.SurveyA survey was designed to gauge the success of the recently established formal learning outcomesby assessing student and alumni perceptions of the effect that co-op had on the following: theiracademic
content anddismiss any negative precepts the students had about the steel industry in general.Students would understand as well that the iron and steel field, as the largest metals-based market in the world, still has a wealth of exciting discoveries to be made4. Throughintegration with an existing curriculum, the steel industry and engineering students wouldbe greatly aided by this new material. The specific structure of the lesson given at theUniversity of Kentucky in 2008 is described below in detail.Background and Structure of Plan In their first semester at the University of Kentucky, all engineering freshmentake introductory major-related courses. These introductory courses are designed mainly
. Although it was too early to assess the success of theirevents, they reported the students who participated were enthusiastic and eager to continue withmore events [4].At the University of Washington, faculty created a seminar model for Ph.D. students that was notrequired in the curriculum. The students were able to choose the topics they wanted to discusswhich included “succeeding with Ph.D. program milestones, choosing good elective courses andselecting advisors, defining effective research questions, authorship, and managing citations.”Their first offering of the course was more successful than the second with almost 100%attendance every week, but analysis of the efficacy of the seminar was still underway at the timeof publication [5]. Zerbe et
Paper ID #25422An Interdisciplinary Research Group’s Collaboration to Understand First-Year Engineering RetentionMrs. Teresa Lee Tinnell, University of Louisville Terri Tinnell is a Curriculum and Instruction PhD student and Graduate Research Assistant at the Univer- sity of Louisville. Her research interests include interdisciplinary faculty development, STEM identity, retention of engineering students, the use of makerspaces in engineering education.Ms. Campbell R. Bego, University of Louisville Campbell Rightmyer Bego is currently pursuing a doctoral degree in Cognitive Science at the University of Louisville
AC 2010-386: GOLDSHIRT TRANSITIONAL PROGRAM: CREATINGENGINEERING CAPACITY AND EXPANDING DIVERSITY THROUGH APERFORMANCE-ENHANCING YEARTanya Ennis, University of Colorado, Boulder TANYA D. ENNIS is the current Engineering GoldShirt Program Director at the University of Colorado at Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. She received her M.S. in Computer Engineering from the University of Southern California in Los Angeles and her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Southern University in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Tanya most recently taught mathematics at the Denver School of Science and Technology, the highest performing high school in Denver Public Schools.Jana Milford, University of
Paper ID #20036Performance by Gender on University Placement Tests in Mathematics andSpatial SkillsMr. Gavin Duffy, Ohio State University For the current academic year I am a visiting scholar at Ohio State University with my home institute being Dublin Institute of Technology where I am a lecturer in the School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering. AT OSU I am working on a research project that is investigating the relationship between spatial ability and problem solving in engineering education. Before joining academia I worked in industry as a chemical engineer and control systems engineer and those are the topics
knowledge relevant to the engineering discipline –which we refer to as epistemological boundaries [1,2]. Epistemologies describe the nature and extent ofknowledge – including notions of both the concept of knowing and what knowledge can be known [1,3].In this study, we focus on the extent aspect wherein we use the term epistemological boundaries to referto what information is and is not considered to be part of the engineering discipline’s body ofknowledge.Studies suggest that students have a complex understanding of what engineering, and by extensionengineering knowledge, is [4]. Dusmore et al. [4] show that students’ perceive engineering leadership asgrounded in technical competence when working with others. They also found that students see
. The stu-dent’s feedback showed mainly positive results. For example, the students reported that theusage of such simulation in course contexts helps to understand the theoretical background ofmaterial properties’ determination6.However, the necessity for establishing high quality remote labs in undergraduate educationcan’t be denied and the number of attempts to develop showcase projects is still growing.Publications by Azad, Auer and Harward as well as by García-Zubía and Alves provide anoverview on the recent developments1, 2. Despite of all these examples it seems to be the case,that there is a larger community working on remote labs in electrical engineering than inmanufacturing technology. Moreover, the evaluation of remote laboratories
projects, which required them to do additionalanalysis and research on a topic of their choosing and, importantly, incorporate site visits and theknowledge gained from those visits into the project.Finally, we borrowed some aspects of the Montessori Method17 that we felt might proveadvantageous. Engineering Rome is (1) a multi-level, course (i.e., appropriate for Freshmanthrough graduate students) designed to foster peer learning, and (2) the final project is a guidedchoice work activity with the instructor serving in the role of Montessori’s “directress.” WhileMontessori’s writings generally concern early aged learning (and not college students), we feltthere was substantial evidence that these ideas would be beneficial. For instance, Katz et al
can be no doubt that pre-wired development boards provide a great convenience in using PLDs. However, with suchconvenience, Nickels4 suggests that electrical and computer engineering students may not havea suitable hands-on laboratory experience. As such, our use of a PLD with a classic breadboardis a very different choice.In our further development of CPLDs in the course, we continued with an integrated approach,which is includes our use of schematic capture, CPLDs, breadboards, and and now includes theconcept of hierarchy. With regard to CAD tools Radu, et al2 report that with the inclusion ofCAD tools and FPGA development boards, they observed a statistically significant increase instudent learning. Radu et al emphasizes schematics, but
thepeer review is one reason; receiving fairly consistent peer feedback could be another. Fromstudent comments on the survey in the inclusive course and the workshop, we can infer that thespecific peer review comments these students received may result in change. In fact, all 20students indicated that they had or would in the future make one or additional changes based onthe peer review they had received.Related to this, van Ginkel et al. mentioned the importance of timing of the feedback, referring toresearch that shows that the optimum time for feedback is between the first and second oralpresentations.24Future WorkUnlike some undergraduate engineering programs in which oral presentations are integratedthroughout the curriculum, there does not
now works for a non-profit renewable energy organization bringing electrical power to remote villages in Thailand. Another student is working for a non-profit company, utilizing her construction management skills for series of projects in Africa.Blaisdell, et al. found that women who see other women in their classes (students and faculty),have a place to connect with each other, see the relevance of their coursework and itsapplications in the work world are much more likely to graduate.16 This fits with what Belenky,et al. have long shown about women’s learning styles: women generally ground what theybelieve in personal experiences; taking in facts and reason, integrating it with their sense ofthemselves in their lived world
StudyLooking at the leaky pipe has not made significant progress towards understanding all thedimensions of the problem. Women are not and have not entered or persisted in engineering.There is not one single factor that can be pointed to in order to explain why women are notreceiving undergraduate engineering degrees. Previous explanations offered by the field havefocused on student characteristics or looked at a single dimension. The interaction of curriculum,the field, subjective grading scales, unrealistic demands, and declining self-efficacy cannot beseparated from each other. A more complete picture needs to be formulated. The purpose of thisstudy is to understand the social, structural and curricular constraints on the field of engineeringand
demand data and desired peakreduction (power capacity). The program is designed for educational purposes but can also havepractical use in sizing ESSs.* E-mail address: jelio@asu.edu (J. Elio).1. Introduction Reducing electricity demand is commonly seen as one of the most promising solutions tomitigating global climate change [1]. This is for good reason, since electricity productionconstituted 25% of greenhouse gas emissions in 2019, totaling nearly 1,625 million metric tonsof carbon dioxide in the United States [2]. When electricity consumers run consistently, powergeneration plants can run consistently which leads to their highest efficiency and lowest carbonemissions. To explain, baseload power generation plants typically operate
Paper ID #13467BYOE: Affordable and Portable Laboratory Kit for Controls CoursesRebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Rebecca M. Reck is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in systems engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She completed her master’s degree in electrical engineering at Iowa State Univer- sity during her eight years at Rockwell Collins and her bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering with a mathematics minor, from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2005. Her research interests include controls, signal processing, and engineering education. Specific areas of
Professor in the Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering Department at Boise State University. His research interests include simulation modeling for engineering education, vibrations, and acoustics.Seung Youn Chyung, Boise State University Dr. Yonnie Chyung is an Associate Professor in the Department of Instructional and Performance Technology at Boise State University. She received her Doctor of Education degree in Instructional Technology from Texas Tech University, and her Master’s degree in Curriculum and Instruction, with a specialization in Computer-based Education, from Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL. Her research interests have been focused on the development of self
Technology at University of Maryland, Baltimore County. She obtained her B.S. degree from La Universidad de Los Andes in Bogot´a, Colombia and her M.S. and Ph. D. in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Polytechnic University in Blacksburg, Virginia. She has held fac- ulty positions at California State University, Fresno (CSUF), University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) and University of Maryland, College Park (UMCP). She also served as Project Coordinator of the t-STEM Initiative, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, at UMBC. She is actively en- gaged in research and program development in the areas of Engineering for Social Change, increasing the accessibility of STEM education to under-represented
#26 associated with macroscopic leveldefects loaded on factor 3. Questions #12, #16 and #29 were electrical properties associated withthe fourth factor. The fifth factor was loaded by questions #2 (atomic arrangement), #4 (phases)and #9 (crystalline structure), which seemingly have very little to do with each other. Items #7and #10 loaded upon factor 7 and seem to test solutions, while items #1 and 10 loaded uponfactor eight which test atomic arrangement. We found five single-factor structures (item # 3, #20,#21, #27 and #28) that approached a reasonable fit for the MCI data, which will eventually be re-written to fit more with one of the other six factors. Overall, our estimates of how Krause et al3had written each item seemingly fell with
of Michigan where her research interests pivoted to engineering education. Her current research interests focus on examining the messaging undergraduate engineering students receive with respect to the type of work that is valued in engineering. Her research is centered around the goal of making engineering curriculum more socioculturally relevant and the field more inclusive of women and students of color.Shannon M. Clancy, University of Michigan Shannon M. Clancy (she/they) is a Ph.D. candidate in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) and an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of
makers.In a paper touting the promise of maker spaces for education, Martin5 identifies three elements ofthe maker movement that are essential to consider in determining potential possible affordancesfor education: 1) digital tools, including rapid prototyping tools and low-cost microcontrollerplatforms, that characterize many making projects; 2) community infrastructure, including onlineresources and in-person spaces and events; and 3) maker mindset, aesthetic principles, a failure-positive approach, collaboration, and habits of mind that are commonplace within thecommunity. Similar to Martin’s “the maker mindset,” Kurti et al.,6 the authors of ThePhilosophy of Educational Makerspaces: Part 1 of Making an Educational Makerspace, identifythree
content to entire classrooms using picoprojectors. In 2008, he established Class on a Chip, Inc. to commercialize an array of micro-experimental devices for use in engineering, physics, and MEMS classes. In 2014, he established a new class in the Whitacre College of Engineering, Technology Start-up Lab, which takes students through a process to develop their own technology projects for commercialization. Each summer, he teaches a class entitled Solar Energy, which includes a hands-on solar energy design project. Dr. Dallas has served as the principal investigator for two National Science Foundation sponsored Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM) projects, a Research Experience for Undergraduates Site, a Course Curriculum and
), a joint degree offered between Lehigh’s College of Businessand Economics and our Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Science. The IBEcurriculum, supported in part by Lehigh’s Integrated Product Development (IPD) Program,features a multidisciplinary freshman projects workshop course, described in this paper, acapstone technology entrepreneurship experience, as well as special seminars or workshops eachsemester. IBE students can major in any of Lehigh’s business fields or in electrical engineering,civil engineering, computer technology, environmental engineering, industrial engineering,materials science and engineering, mechanical engineering, or structural engineering, whiletaking a variety of courses in business, engineering and arts
“how function and aesthetic form can contributeto the improvement of an engineered object.” The students did not create art as part of thiscourse, but they explored various engineering themes through the study of art. Beams, et al. [8]describe an experimental course that replaced (temporarily) a “Design Methodology” course forelectrical engineering majors, dubbed the “Leonardo Project.” The intent was that “engineerswould experience the design process through direct participation in the arts as artists in multiplefields of artistic expression.” Individual students worked directly with arts faculty mentors tocreate an artistic product. Students were required to prepare project plans in a way thatemphasized parallels between engineering design
Engineering Education, 2014 Thorium Fuel Cycle for a Molten Salt Reactor: State of Missouri Feasibility Study Yoonjo Jo Jo Leea, Matthew P. Simonesa, John C. Kennedyb, Hakan Usa, Phillip F. Makarewiczb, Janese A. Nehera and Mark A. Prelas, (a) Nuclear Science and Engineering Institute, (b) Mechanical And Aerospace Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MOAbstract This paper was generated as part of a course on advanced nuclear fuel cycles supportedthrough a curriculum development grant from the Nuclear Regulatory Comission. The coursewas graduate level and required a research component. The students in the course chose the topicof “Thorium Fuel Cycle for a Molten
practice [5, 13]. To enhance students’ employability skills, career identity and practice readiness; Green, Carbone, and Rayner (2019) argued for more flexible and accessible alternatives to the traditional curriculum [14]. Carbone et al. (2020) identified a range of programs and practices, in addition to placements and internships, including practicums, projects, field trips, and site visits within the plethora of activities that can be used to develop practice ready graduates by expanding students’ perceptions of their career and professional identity [13]. Another example of flexible and accessible alternatives is student organizations. Kurniawaran et al. (2020) argued the positive and significant impact of students
framework or approach. For example, theInstitute for Scholarship on Engineering Education7–9 and the Rigorous Research in EngineeringEducation workshops10–14 each supported and scaffolded three cohorts of scholars in conductingengineering education research. A similar approach to scaffolding expertise while buildingcommunity has also been used with engineering education graduate students, such as the work atPurdue University described by Adams et al.15The Pioneers project is situated within this prior work in that it seeks to better understand thepast, present, and future of the engineering education communities, while also providingprofessional development through networking new community members with more establishedmembers. To achieve our goal
Paper ID #22725Work in Progress: Designing Laboratory Work for a Novel Embedded AICourseDr. Mehmet Ergezer, Wentworth Institute of Technology Mehmet Ergezer (S’06) received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH, USA, in 2003 and 2006, respectively. He received the D.Eng. degree in artificial intelligence from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA, in May 2014. From 2003 to 2005, following his internship with U.S. Steel, he was a Graduate Assistant with Youngstown State University. In
(Brainard and Carlin2). According to the National Research Council in 1998, the inadequaciesand inconsistencies of collection and maintenance of evaluation and retention data are majorhindrances to projecting future manpower needs and identifying problems in the sciences field.Without access to consistent data which predicts success, engineering programs lack the abilityto pinpoint deficiencies within their academic program and keep talented students. In addition toincreasing attrition rates within engineering majors, another problem faced by departments isattracting talented high school applicants. Felder et al.5 in their study on longitudinal engineeringperformance and retention found that both the increasing difficulty of attracting high