-year institution toearn a bachelor’s degree should not rest on the shoulders of the student to seek out the mostreliable transfer credit information while studying at community college. Some of that workshould be simplified by community colleges and 4-year institutions and their programs. As analternative to using policy to increase junior level standing at the 4-year institution, Virginia, thestate in this study, invested in curriculum alignment across colleges. This alignment allowed each4-year institution the added efficiency of making one degree path per program for all the state’scommunity colleges. They then did the harder work to help create maps of the curriculum acrossa student’s associate and bachelor’s degree requirements so
impacted efforts to recruit a more diversepopulation of students into the discipline [6]. In this paper, I demonstrate how an accessible andinclusive middle school mini-unit on fluid mechanics can be constructed using principles ofculturally-relevant pedagogy, community-based learning, and the Ambitious Science Teachingmodel. By doing so, I hope to push back against dominant perceptions about teachingengineering to young learners and offer an example mini-unit plan for other educators to adaptfor teaching aerospace or other relevant engineering concepts.Conceptual FrameworkThis mini-unit – playfully titled “Cool It!” – was developed using principles of culturallyresponsive and sustaining pedagogies (CRSP), community-based learning (CBL), and
, she was one of the recipients of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Curriculum Innovation Award. She is a former board member of ASEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Small Teaching via Bloom’sAbstractEngineering 481 is a typical Technology and Society course that most engineering programsoffer that covers, as listed on abet.org: “the impact of engineering technology solutions in asocietal and global context.” It is a course all students take and can therefore have large classes:180 students in Fall and 240 in Winter in our case. The course has a large end of term deliverablebut in order to maintain attendance in class
, and deliberate action toward doing well [20]. Thus, to be self-aware is to beconscious of your beliefs, values, strengths, and limitations.Reflective practices [21], [22] allow us to observe a student’s development and engagement inthe course without relying on traditional academic work such as assignments, quizzes, andexams. Such traditional academic tasks generally confine students to memorize and repeat whatthey think will allow them to pass the course. Furthermore, traditional problem sets, quizzes, andexams allow very little self-expression from the students. Students are afforded little to no spaceto communicate their personal thoughts with the faculty without significant effort on the part ofthe student or fear of retaliation. To
development of effective advising relationships [12].Although significant research has explored faculty experiences within the advising relationshipand the obstacles that prevent engagement in advising, little research discusses the supports thatpromote and the barriers that prevent faculty from developing and adopting student- centered[13, 14] advising practices that meet both student and faculty members’ personal needs.Research on graduate advising has typically taken a unilateral approach, focusing eitherexplicitly on the promotion of student success outcomes [15-19] or faculty productivity [20-22].Little work has focused on leveraging advising as a mutually beneficial activity that can createvalue for both faculty and students. To breach this
, 147-164.[6] Pendergrass, N, A, Kowalczyk, R, E, Dowd, J, P, Laoulache, R, N, Nelles, W, et al, "Improving first-yearengineering education", Frontiers in Education, 1999.[7] Ossman, K., G. Bucks, et al. “First-Year Engineering Courses Effect on Retention and Student Engagement.”,ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2014.[8] Blair, B. F., Millea, M. and Hammer, J., “The impact of cooperative education on academic performance andcompensation of engineering majors, Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 4, 2004, 333–338.[9] Raelin, J. A., Bailey, M. B., Hamann, J., Pendleton, L. K., Reisberg, R. and Whitman, D. L., The gendered effect
trust, and investigates the correlations between social capital and health,crime, and education levels. In Table 1 below, social capital can be viewed as including both norms and networks; anyspecific community or group of people is only considered to have high social capital if it is highin trust (norms) and individual associations (networks). Brief descriptions of situations for eachpossibility are included. The literature documents the competitive nature of the first half of theengineering curriculum and its adverse impact on student interest and willingness to formcooperative study groups [3, 13]. Additionally, based on personal observations in labs, it has beenfound that students are unlikely to work together if they can accomplish
American communities,students who were once interested in STEM eventually switch to other disciplines noting lack ofsupport [6]. It is known that learning center environments provide both academic and personalgrowth by vigorously engaging, understanding, and assessing information learned in theseenvironments [12].Research question 1/Theme 4: Increased exposure of students to STEM fieldsStudents engaged in hands-on research experience outside the classroom with industry canincrease the number of students who pursue STEM careers in the future [6]. The importance ofshowing a positive intrinsic value of a profession, identifying a job that is enjoyable, andchoosing a job that gives responsibility to self and community are imperative to pre
overruns is aperfect illustration of the political impact of a project. The Washington D.C. projects illustratehow difficult construction can become if society demands that infrastructure remain operationalduring the construction process. These field trips provide students with the opportunity to seeengineering in action. Students see how creativity and the engineering problem solving processcan overcome extremely complex problems, whether they be redirection of traffic flow on I-495or handling the alignment of submerged tunnels at the Big Dig.There is considerable overlap in the student chapter contributions to the various outcomes.Certainly the guest speaker seminars, the conference attendance, and the community serviceprojects described earlier
them to engage confidently.The question is how can this reflective thinking be used in the engineering classes? Thetechnological literacy classes do not delve deeply into many concepts yet students seemed tohave better connectivity between major concepts. They also demonstrated a special passion tofollow up their learning and take actions based on advancing their knowledge in their researchand creating their projects in upper level classes. This is interesting, in particular when onethinks about how they clearly did not like the subject to begin with. With all this in mind, wedecided to see how we could bring the same concepts and use of reflective thinking into theengineering classes. There were challenges, but the effort showed successful
outstanding work ethic,• A high-touch approach, working closely with each student to achieve success,• A strong connection to employers who assist in setting the curriculum and in screening, educating, and evaluating the progress of the students, and• A close partnership with Mississippi PK-12 schools.Students attend class during normal business hours, five days a week, and participate in an activelearning environment. There is very little lecture, with most time spent on hands-on activities. Inaddition to technical content, students also receive guidance on professional development topicssuch as resume development, workplace communication, and interviewing skills. Service-basedlearning is a component of both academies with students giving back to
testhypotheses, and rebuild or reprogram accordingly--students learn to see errors as opportunities,not failures); communication (as mentioned above students are asked to present at school-wideor parent events. In addition, they write about their progress and challenges in a blog or on-lineworksheet.) A key aspect of this program is to engage parents substantively. Working with the schools,LSA prepares events which guide parents to understand education and career paths for theirchildren in STEM and STEM-related professions. LSA does this with the hope that in additionto being better able to advocate for their children, parents (many of whom are young themselvesand un- or under-employed) will see STEM in their own education or career path. While
peer-based learning through research on real-world problems.54In different ways, the first year and introductory courses all require engagement in multi-disciplinary learning, collaborative brainstorming and problem solving, and understanding thecontext of engineering and related disciplines. Research indicates95 that the broaderinterdisciplinary view of engineering, as well as the emphasis on social connectedness and socialgood, appeals to many students, especially those in underrepresented groups, who typicallybecome disillusioned in more traditional freshmen engineering programs. Industry partners,NGOs, and community partners will help to motivate the projects by bringing real-worldproblems into the classroom.b. Core Engineering Courses
educational efforts, and the impact of professional development on teacher performance. Currently, she works on evaluation efforts for grants funded by National Science Foundation, US Department of Education, local foundation, and state grants. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Interactive Editing of Circuits in a Step-Based Tutoring SystemAbstractStep-based tutoring systems are known to be more effective than traditional answer-basedsystems. They however require that each step in a student’s work be accepted and evaluatedautomatically to provide effective feedback. In the domain of linear circuit analysis, it isfrequently necessary to allow students to draw or edit circuits on their screen
of 15-17 campers are chaperonedby two Michigan students, with each group instructed by faculty, research scientists and graduatestudents. With a focus on hands-on activities, groups meet in lab spaces around campus, an at theCollege of Engineering, the Medical School, the Departments of Chemistry and Physics. One student explained that the impact of her involvement in WISE was one of her mostrewarding experiences. She explained that it allowed her to build a network that wasacademically and socially beneficial. This “small community in a large university” gave her asense of where she could go for support. This student not only reaped benefits from the program,but she also served as a mentor for younger students and was a program board
State University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: NSF IRES – Interdisciplinary Research in Korea on Applied Smart Systems (IRiKA) for Undergraduate StudentsIntroductionInterdisciplinary Research in Korea on Applied smart systems (IRiKA) for UndergraduateStudents is an NSF International Research Experiences for Students (IRES) program thatprovides a cohort of five US undergraduate students per year with the opportunity to conductresearch for eight (8) weeks at Seoul National University (SNU), Korea Advanced Institute ofScience and Technology and Ewha Womans University in Korea. The purpose of this program isto engage undergraduate
communication skills in a socially conscious context for civil engineers. Further, theintegration of computational tools into project-based learning has been shown to significantlyenhance student engagement and learning outcomes in engineering courses [3].The project we present in this case study aims to foster critical thinking and professional skills. Itis assigned in a 3rd year undergraduate civil and environmental engineering course on energy andthe environment, with three goals: 1) Increase students’ awareness and understanding ofengineering in a societal context; 2) Strengthen students’ problem solving, data analysis andvisualization skills, and confidence using computational tools; and 3) Develop students’ abilityto communicate their expertise
development, identity formation, and professionalsuccess [2-5]. Although these studies provide valuable information about the impact ofparticipation in extracurricular and co-curricular activities on student learning and development,there is interest in learning more about what motivates students to participate in these activities.Learning more about what motivates students to continue and persist in an activity outside of theclassroom is particularly important for multi-year co-curricular programs, which often facechallenges with sustained engagement.This work is focused on understanding why students continue to engage in a specific multi-yearco-curricular program, the Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP). The GCSP is a programdesigned to
remains for teachers interested in culture-based approaches:How can teachers identify "useful" cultural resources for students, and how can they effectivelyincorporate them into their teaching curricula?5. Research DesignOur study examines a Professional Learning Community (PLC) of eight secondary physics teachers (n=8)to understand how physics teachers leverage students' cultural resources to engage with physics ideas. ThePLC met for 90 minutes each month. During each meeting, one teacher shared a culture-based lesson thatincluded a local issue or cultural aspect at each meeting. Other teachers then discussed ways to improvethe lesson. After the teacher presented the lesson, the other teachers discussed ways to improve thelesson. These meetings
hall for people to informallyask questions and work together to solve issues.URE faculty reported that the most important elements of the URE program were having a pointperson to reach out to for materials, resources and discussion; having a schedule of interimdeadlines; being part of a team of writers; and reviewing other papers within the URE program.Faculty shared a range of challenges they experienced. A couple of the faculty members alludedto managing multiple commitments that impacted their ability to fully support students andissues keeping students engaged through the entire research and publishing process. One facultymember said they had issues staying on-track once students graduated. Faculty shared ways thatsome of their challenges
communities are defined as the groups, formal and informal, thatstudents engage with during their undergraduate degrees. For our work, we allow the students todefine and provide examples of any and all engineering communities; however, we dooperationalize them in our analysis using a Community of Practice lens where we are particularlyinterested in engineering communities that have mutual engagement, shared repertoire, and jointenterprise [1] (i.e., we are focused on communities of practice but recognize that many types ofcommunities may have an impact on student development). We believe these communities areessential for persistent in the field and development of a personal engineering identity. We areinterested in the different ways these
Learning ManagementSystem (LMS) allowed Internet access to course materials, asynchronous communicationbetween the faculty member and students, along with a way to submit assignments and providefeedback. The first few course offerings were basic. However, as new technologies emerged andenhanced teaching methods were utilized this changed rapidly. This paper reviews the challengesencountered and describes the continuing efforts to extend the reach of a traditionaltechnological literacy classroom course by utilizing a blended learning format.IntroductionIt is interesting that a course that traces the development of technology and its impact on societywould actually utilize leading edge technologies as its delivery medium. It was as if the
communication skills • unifying and interdisciplinary broad viewDiscussionIndividual Brainstorming QuestionsAs discussed earlier in this paper, research literature on excellence in engineering educationstresses the importance of knowledge and skills 1, 2, 3, 5, 15. It also includes institutional outcomessuch as more engagement in instruction and learning, increase of diversity with respect tounderrepresented groups, ethical awareness and sensitivity to society impacts, professional andpersonal satisfaction with the value of having studied engineering, increase retention rates,flexible programs that foster connectivity across programs and institutions, and reduction in costs1 .Undergraduate students that
were engaging, practical, andauthentic to their students’ communities. In order to add structure to their project ideas, teacherswere invited to detail their thinking in a 5E lesson planning template. The 5E lesson plantemplate was adapted from the BSCS 5E instructional model (Bybee et al., 2006). With theirinitial project ideas still growing, teachers were asked to consider how they would engagestudents in the project, explore the underlying concepts, explain key features, elaborate on theproject’s connection to their communities, and evaluate student growth. At the conclusion of theWebex work day, teachers were asked to continue to work asynchronously on fallimplementation plans for their individual classrooms and submit their lesson plans
STEM educationkeeps students engaged and results in improved retention of knowledge on topics taught [2], [4].While traditional lectures are still the most common way of teaching, many universities arefocusing more attention on more student-centered activities.Engineering education highly relies on practical applications. Laboratories are the most commonway of practicing engineering theory. Knowledge gained from engineering laboratories is beingused for applying engineering applications to real life design of processes and development ofproducts [5]. Building bridges to transfer theoretical skills to industry applications is important interms of improving future employee quality for [6]. However, the most common pedagogicalmethod is to use
2011the class size increased to 90 from 24 students and one of the secondary textbooks was changed.Also, between Fall 2011 and Fall 2012 the class size further increased to 117 and the classmeeting configuration was changed to thrice per week for 50 minutes from twice per week for 75minutes. The impacts of these adjustments will be addressed below, if applicable. Page 23.1317.12Table 1 indicates that students generally agree or strongly agree that the course is excellent. Thiscan be interpreted in a couple of ways. One way is that students were genuinely engaged withthe course and its activities, and appreciated the manner in which seemingly
workforce.1,2 The California Community College (CCC) system, with its 113colleges enrolling over 2 million students, will be a major contributor to this effort.3 However, atpresent many CCC engineering students lack sufficient access to some of the lower-division(LD) engineering courses needed for successful transfer acceptance into public universityprograms in the state.4 More than half of the 113 CCCs offer few if any of the LD engineeringcourses, and among those that do sustain a reasonably comprehensive LD engineeringcurriculum, most offer only one section of each engineering course per year.In an effort to increase access to LD engineering courses by CCC students, the Joint EngineeringProgram (JEP) was created, developed initially through a
implement an introduction to standards to the campuscommunity. The workshop was successful based on the good participation and feedback from thepanelists and attendees. The key to event success was engaging the faculty. Coordinating withfaculty to find ways to include the workshop material as part of a class discussion, homeworkassignment or other activity further exposed students to standards and reiterated their importanceand impact. Furthermore, the online availability of workshop presentations and the low cost ofimplementation allow for the development a flipped classroom model.Another key element was identification of SDOs based on the needs of the campus community.This ensured a strong interest from faculty and students alike and provided
Primary Purpose, Focus, Objective, etc. Reference Long-term impact on “…The focus of this study is to evaluate the ability of an [20] environmental attitudes and environmental engineering sequence to enable students from knowledge assessed over three multidisciplinary fields of study and a range of diverse semesters of an environmental demographic backgrounds to gain environmental engineering engineering sequence disciplinary breadth that provides background to mature their attitudes toward environmental issues over an 18-month period…” Location, location, location: “…Our objective in this study was to
and careers in these fields; 3. Increase the effectiveness of teachers in engaging students and parents in the Saturday science-related learning activities.In partnership with the Chicago Public Schools, the program targeted K-4th gradestudents from seven schools in five low-income communities of color on the south andwest sides of Chicago. The ChiS&E program was a multi-year commitment for studentsand their families with four-five weekend instructional sessions scheduled in fall andspring/summer semesters of each school year for five years, beginning in the springsemester of Kindergarten. For example, in the spring of 2009, classes began with 64 firstgraders and 64 parents. Sixty percent were African American and forty percent