internships during students’ 2nd and 3rd years. These paidinternships will be a minimum of 320 hours each (8 full-time weeks) and are designed to providepractice-based, professional/community service beyond the classroom experience. Students willbe actively coached and mentored by employers, who are closely associated with the LEprogram. Students will learn to adjust to work environments, which empasize accountability andincreased responsibility. The summer internships will be overseen by LE clinical faculty, whowill ensure that interns are properly supervised, monitored, and given significant tasks andresponsibilities. Professional Practice II builds on Professional Practice I by offering studentsincreased responsibility. Professional Practice II
for the globalworkforce is a national priority in the U.S.1 In order to address this need, educational institutionshave made great efforts to increase the recruitment and retention of students in engineering andimprove students’ professional skills through engagement in educational purposeful activities.Involvement in out of class activity has been believed as an effective way of promoting students’cognitive, affective, and career development in higher education.2, 3 The Final Report for theCenter for the Advancement of Engineering Education posits that research on student experienceis fundamental to informing the evolution of engineering education.4 College impact researchsuggests that focusing on what students do during college, both inside
of instruction. It also includes a shortdiscussion of assessment through student surveys.IntroductionActive learning with tangible examples has been shown to improve retention while increasingsatisfaction with the learning experience1, 3. In this project, a simple LED flashlight has beendeveloped to provide grades 5-12 students with a high impact active learning experiencecentered on the role of engineering technology in product development. The simplicity of theflashlight has allowed for a multi-disciplinary approach to this process while staying within a onehour time frame. Students are exposed to electrical components, circuit design, mechanicaldesign, manufacturing considerations, and the role of customers in product
Work structures Professionalism Personal agency Credentials Forms of credential Impacts of Blackness Overcoming Resources Job control Financial control Decoupling Affinity groups Culture Lack of diversity first Black person that a lot of these people have even met. And no one has said that recently, but I remember it like in college or in like elementary school and middle school and high school, that many people have told me that.James
engineers do not return to graduate school or academicwork, seeing no relevance to their career path and calling into question the merit of graduateprograms. The NAE report included a recommendation that reinforces this reality: “Institutions should encourage domestic students to obtain M.S. and Ph.D. degrees.”[6]The absence of practice experienced engineers brings an unfortunate reality in depriving ouracademic and research community of an essential resource, exacting a terrible toll on America’spipeline of innovation and technology. The fallout of this evolution is that today’s research anddevelopment is conducted with a capital “R”, but a lower case “d”. Research institutions pursueR&d and go wanting for the motivation and skills for true
usingrobotics and Mathematics teachers are shown how the politics during the founding of our nation stillaffect how we use technology today.The Cyber Discovery, held in the early part of June, consists of a week-long residential camp attendedby both students and teachers preceded by two teacher-only workshops. Although during the week-longresidential period, the focus is primarily on the students; however, the real focus is on the teachers.When preparing for any effort aimed at recruitment of students to attend a college or university, aquestion naturally arises about how to impact students in the most effective way. Rather than try to hosta camp that would serve 100-200 students in a traditional summer camp atmosphere, our aim was toengage teachers in
].Implications for WorkThere is need to conduct more research that connects community college students’ perceptions ofcosts and benefits of obtaining their degree with various broader measures of engagement andsuccess as few. Also, there is a great need to enhance a dialogue between community collegeleaders and employers related to students’ career pathways [21]. Employers can help institutionswith career pathways to ensure that students are being prepared for economically viable jobs. Inaddition, employers can advise faculty and program administrators on issues of curriculum andprovide students with work-based learning and job-shadowing experiences to enhance theirclassroom learning [20].To ensure that the ET/AM programs, curriculum, training and
has alsoshown that gamification has a positive impact on student learning by encouraging continuouspractice [17] [18].Some of the most commonly used elements of gamification mentioned in the literature areawarding participation and achievement points for completing work assigned by the courseinstructor [19], leaderboards where students can track and compare their achievements withpeers [20] [21], and awarding badges to reward accomplishments [22]. Leaderboards and pointsystems were shown to be particularly effective in encouraging higher motivation andparticipation [23]. Both of these strategies are integrated as an integral part of the gamificationfunction of SEP-CyLE.2.3 Social Interaction A student who is actively engaged in their learning
four semestersto complete. Page 10.279.1Complicating the lack of preparation for college-level mathematics demonstrated by many “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”incoming Engineering freshmen, one of the factors impacting students ability to successfullycomplete Intermediate Algebra is that the traditional instruction of mathematical concepts doesnot provide students sufficient practice in applying those concepts to relevant discipline-specificproblems. This lack of connection between
students for jobs or as an individual Utilitarian Liberal Students as the least powerful members of academia need safe spaces to be themselves as Sharing Security well as spaces to engage with faculty in order to grow and develop. What we provide students as projects often does Actual Students and Societal Impact not match the lofty language we use to discuss Impact Student
two questions: 1) can I do it? and 2) what is in it for me?[11,12,13]Effective pre-engineering activities, such as robotics club and engineering camp, include keyattributes that have been shown to positively influence students to successfully pursue andcomplete an engineering degree: self-motivation, use of problem-solving strategies, use ofcomputer applications, and immediate feedback on success of efforts.[13] Other research hashighlighted key design factors that offer engagement with engineering: the ‘wow’ factor, simpleyet effective ideas, social responsibility, potential for world-wide impact, and personalrelevance.[5] When looking into programs that impact all students, not just a select group thatjoins a club or camp, common themes
ParallelBuilding from the Core Curriculum, the Curriculum of Practice moves knowledge to theapplication of facts, concepts, principles, skills, and methods. The overall goal of this parallelprovides students with opportunities to develop expertise in the chosen discipline. Essentialfeatures include opportunities to: • understand the nature of the discipline in a real world application manner, • understand the impact of this discipline on other disciplines and other disciplines on this discipline, • understand and use the discipline as a means of looking at and making sense of the world, • value and engage in the intellectual struggle of the discipline, • function as a producer in the discipline, and
community as well as working on language. Participants will learn phrases and vocabularythat is relevant to their work. Staying with local families gives the students a unique immersion opportunity to learnthe language and culture of Nicaragua by observing and interacting with their host families. Students will be able tolearn more about the culture when they spend the second week of the program working in local companies. Page 22.947.5Discovering how companies operate and solve problems in a different culture is expected to be one of the mostsignificant learning opportunities for participants.The culture course will provide a
Tecnologico de Monterrey, a mean of 70% ofaccomplishment is intended to be obtained in this course. A conditional analysis was conductedto verify the student’s performance according to their participation in the Scrum methodology.Findings and discussionIn general, the applied Scrum methodology had a positive effect in the students’ perception ofteamwork and in their development of systemic reasoning. In the first key measurement, studentsbecame more aware of their roles and responsibilities, as well as the communication problemsthroughout the project. This change allowed the students to apply corrective countermeasureseffectively and on time.Using the modified T-TPQ to analyze student’s perception of teamwork, a significant increase ofproject
- cational research around identity, indigenizing engineering practice and teaching, and the structural issues impacting Indigenous engineers. She currently lives and works on the present and ancestral Homeland and unceded territory of the Wiyot Tribe in Humboldt County, California.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication, collabo- ration, and identity in engineering.Dr. Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Homero Murzi (he/´el/his) is an Associate Professor in the
engineering, if such courses even exist. At the same time,universities are often interested in providing their students with diverse learning opportunitiessuch as service learning, both domestically and internationally. However, students often lack theproper experience or training to deal with complex ethical, cultural, or societal situations thatwill likely be encountered or the resources to properly participate while carrying out service-learning projects [1].Numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the impact of various pedagogical andcurricular approaches on the transfer of knowledge in ethics and social justice in STEMdisciplines, often with disappointing results [2]–[5]. However, it may be that we are notmeasuring concepts of ethics
Hewitt.11 Seymour and Hewitt found that students who leave STEMfields do not differ significantly on measures of performance, motivation, or study-relatedbehavior. In interviews with leavers about departing STEM, the students most often citefrustration with the experience in the discipline including criticism of the quality of teaching,advising, and curriculum design. Further students expressed frustration with uninteresting andcontent-laden courses that led to an increasingly negative perception of STEM careers and anoverall disinterest in the subject matter. As a result, much of the focus in engineering educationhas focused on developing engaging classroom experiences through curricular and pedagogicalinnovations.12,13,14,15 This focus has
Education 99(2), p.169-178.Minor, F. D. (2007). Building effective peer mentor programs. Learning Communities &Educational Reform, Summer, 1–16. Retrieved fromhttp://evergreen.edu/washingtoncenter/docs/monographs/lcsa/lcsa4building.pdfMonte, A. E., Sleeman, K. a., & Hein, G. L. (2007). Does peer mentoring increase retention ofthe mentor? Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, T1H–14, T1H–10, 10–13.doi:10.1109/FIE.2007.4417950Newton, F. B., & Ender, S. C. (2010a). Student maturation and the impact of peers. In Students Page 26.1218.10helping students: A guide for peer educators on college campuses (Second., pp. 28–56
-on or experimentation, and the use of chemicals. Ofthe six characteristics identified, students’ personal interests, the relationship between topics andstudents’ everyday lives, and hands-on activities and experimentation were found to increaseinterests. The remaining three components – use of chemicals, prior knowledge, and priorexperience – showed both positive and negative impacts on students’ interests. These resultscontribute to the efforts of educators working on K-12 curriculum development, creatingexperiences for students that increase student learning and understanding of nanoscale scienceand engineering, as well as science and engineering in general.IntroductionThe National Center for Learning and Teaching in Nanoscale Science and
Paper ID #36852Creating a Nature-Inspired Entrepreneurially Minded ManufacturingPodcast to Bolster Technical Communication SkillsDr. Thomas Lucas, Purdue University Dr. Lucas’ primary goal as a professor is to engage with students in the classroom and inspire them to develop their passion, understanding, and appreciation for STEM-based research and industry roles. This is accomplished by providing well-crafted and innovative learning experiences in engineering tech- nology courses and through extracurricular outreach. His research background is in 3D (out-of-plane) micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) sensor and actuator
thatfocus on student learning, and multiple forms of evidence of student learning is a feasiblepractice to foster. When planning a major change, we advocate for starting with an accessibleorganizational change model, like Kotter’s model, but suggest avoiding a linear approach.Finding ways to fold faculty into the effort, whether they are ready or not, is critical. Thisdepends on finding simple and respectful ways to engage them.LimitationsOur insights, though gained over years and following rigorous methodological standards, is sitedin just one institution. While we have benefited from participating in the broader community ofRED projects, our specific context differs from others. While we argue many of our approachesare feasible for others to try
(NYPIRG) as a community client isdiscussed in this report. NYPIRG is an organization with concerns on social issues. Theirwebsite has a clear description of its mission. The New York State's largest student-directedresearch and advocacy organization is NYPIRG 2. The current focuses are on environmentalprotection, consumer rights, higher education, government reform, voter registration, masstransit and public health. NYPIRG is a nonpartisan and not-for-profit group with the aim oftraining students and other New Yorkers to be advocates.NYPIRG conducts student meetings and student generated quantitative reports would promoteconversations with substantial evidence in social learning and enhance informal STEM (ScienceTechnology Engineering Mathematics
of the model, thetheoretical background, pictures and/or video of the set-up and use of the demonstration, a partslist (or order location), cost, and building plans, as well as that something extra about othercourses where the physical model can be used or how to insert greater insight or drama into theclassroom using the model or demonstration. Course assessment data will be provided todemonstrate the impact of physical models on student learning.The basic concepts in mechanics courses must be driven home if students are to comprehendtheir follow-on courses. For most students, particularly visual and sensory learners, classroomdemonstrations are essential to understanding these “abstract” concepts. Students crave concreteexperiences when
design-based task. Recent movements towards multidisciplinary learning inhigher education have called for the design process found science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) to be blended with the artistic and creative process of the arts. Oftenreferred to as STEAM or STEM + Art, this approach aims to pique student interest throughopportunities to engage in creative thinking and artistic techniques while simultaneouslyexploring mathematics and scientific concepts. Due to the wide variety of disciplines that engagein design, DBL has a great deal of untapped potential as a pedagogical approach to address thecalls for multidisciplinary learning between the arts and engineering. This study followed 23undergraduate fine arts
education to get ideas and feedback on ourassessment tools and approaches.This unique course has many benefits. From the perspective of an engineering department, theemphasis on teamwork and communication skills meets several ABET criteria. For womenundergraduates in engineering, it emphases broad skills that help build women’s confidence inengineering, provides an opportunity for women engineers to contribute to society, andemphasizes future career applications of engineering skills. With respect to recruiting more Page 15.933.12underrepresented students into engineering, the outreach activity exposes young K-8 women andminorities to engaging
school, graduate school, jobs in biotechnology. This type of longitudinal assessment will be primarily performed via regular communications(e-mails, online surveys, etc.) with program alumni. We will examine the proportion of ourstudents who pursue STEM compared to national averages. We are particularly interested inhaving an increased number of minority students completing four-year STEM programs.Ongoing evaluation will be provided with support from the Education Development Center’sCenter for Children and Technology (EDC/CCT), an education research organization thatfocuses on how technology can impact teaching and learning. EDC/CCT will form the evaluationstrategy for the Hk Maker Lab and associated activities related to the summer program
25.534.7References1. Rodrigues, R. J. (2001). Industry expectations of the new engineer. Science and Technology Libraries, 19(3-4),179-188.2. National Academy of Engineering. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century,(National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2004).3. Jenson, Jill D. (2004). It's the Information Age, So Where's the Information? Why Our Students Can't FindInformation and What We Can Do to Help, College Teaching 52(3): 107-112.4. Graham, L. and Metaxas, P.T. (2003). “Of course it’s true, I saw it on the Internet”: Critical thinking in theInternet era. Communications of the ACM 46 (5):70-75.5. Riley, D., Piccinino R., Moriarty M. and L. Jones (2010). “Assessing Information Literacy in Engineering:Integrating a College-wide
of pedagogy and the application of community service learning, and inequalities in education, particularly persistence of women and people of color in engineering education.Richard Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Richard A. Layton is the Associate Director of the Center for the Practice and Scholarship of Education and an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. His areas of scholarship include student team management, assessment, education, and remediation, laboratory reform focused on student learning, visualization of quantitative data, and engineering system dynamics. He is a guitarist and songwriter in the alternative rock band
of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”3.3 Roadmap for Planned ChangeBut change is underway. As such, the Kellogg Commission recommends that universities must becomemore engaged institutions with their constituencies: “The clear evidence is that, with the resources andsuperbly qualified professors and staff on our campuses, we can organize our institutions to serve bothlocal and national needs in a more coherent and effective way. We can and must do better.” 20 Thisinvolves going beyond extension to become more productively involved with our communities. Part ofthis community is the practicing engineering
include epistemic cognition in the context of problem solving, researcher identity, and pre-service K-12 teacher preparation.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certification as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP