this paper, the researchers brought Study 1 into conversation with Study 2and thus overlapping themes and findings informed analysis of observations and interviews.Coding of interview transcripts was based on themes of future visioning, current barriers orissues at hand, possibilities for change, and concrete strategies and mechanisms that participantssurmised might aid in organizing and change efforts. Specific recurring themes identified asissues, suggestions, and visionings (such as the absence of and need for continuing conversationsthroughout the year, the need to change engineering culture, devaluation of various forms ofexpertise other than the technical) were then brought into conversation with practices identifiedin studying feminist
) Division of ASEE in 2011. One sign of therenewed overlap is “the philosophical turn” in which the TEL group went beyond identifying theknowledge technologically literate citizens needed to possess and began to articulate “thegeneralizable principles that distinguish engineering from related disciplines and that transcendparticular technological milieus” [20, p. 1].The 2005-2006 ASEE conferences had 39 papers mentioning STS, of which we deemed 15 to bepracticing applied STS. Those 15 papers show striking commonalities in their arguments andassumptions about the role of STS in engineering education. Specifically, the general definitionof STS that underlies all of these papers is that STS is the idea that technology and society areconnected. The
aid, first-generation college-attendance and socioeconomic status.Research Question: Is there a critical threshold (minimum) for high school grade point averageand standardized test score(s) that accurately predicts underrepresented minority student success,defined as six-year graduation, in engineering? Does the threshold vary by higher educationinstitution? We investigated whether the data supports using a singular combined threshold usingboth high school grade point average (HSGPA) and standardized test scores, or whether the datasuggests using another model for predicting success in engineering as measured by a six-yearengineering graduation rate.Background: During 2005-2015, 81% of all U.S. undergraduate engineering degrees wereawarded
Practice, International Developmentand Design Summit, provide opportunities and ways for engineering students to reach out topoverty-stricken areas, grasp the actual needs of the poverty groups. On this basis,engineering students can carry out “knowledge creation” and “research and development ofinclusive products”. For example, in January 2018, a team of five students from the D-Lab:Development class traveled to D’kar and Kaputura, Botswana for three weeks of projectwork, relationship building, and cultural experiences (Figure 1). Figure 1 Team Botswana: D-Lab Student Fieldwork in January 2018 Communities of Practice:A multi-day practical skill building workshop. D-Lab studentsintroduce the design process of technical products to the
small numbers, already face heavier service loads than their majority, men peers. So,in this study we asked, “What differences have these programs made in the hiring outcomeswithin our college?”This case study describes some of the recent interventions implemented at the University ofColorado Boulder (CU Boulder) College of Engineering and Applied Science (CEAS), apredominantly White, very high research activity doctoral institution [1]. We present thedemographic history of the college’s tenured/tenure-track faculty compared to national averagesin the United States, a discussion of changes incorporated into the tenured/tenure-track facultysearch processes over the past five years, the hiring results over the past decade, and insights
competence, and promoting secondary mentorships[15,16]. Results of baseline surveys of faculty and students are provided to Fellows to be sharedin the department discussions [17]. The Fellows periodically meet with their department chairsand graduate program coordinators and lead discussions with faculty in their home departmentsto share information generated at those sessions. In addition, the Fellows, chairs, programcoordinators, deans, and provosts from each participating institution attend program-widemeetings twice a year at which they learn from the experiences of their counterparts at the othertwo universities. The Fellows also function as change agents, helping faculty in theirdepartments to better understand the experiences of URM students
games formanufacturing simulation. First, we create and validate a hands-on activity that engages groups ofstudents in the design and assembly of toy cars. Then, a corresponding multiplayer VR game isdeveloped, which allows for the collaboration of multiple VR users in the same virtualenvironment. With a VR headset and proper infrastructure, a user can participate in a simulationgame from any location. This paper explores whether multiplayer VR simulations could be usedas an alternative to physical simulations.1. BackgroundFor many engineers, familiarity with the different manufacturing processes is critical. However,while engineering students are learning the technical skills and theories in classes, the opportunityto practice these skills is
a shorter problem connected to the combustionmaterial covered after the heat of combustion material (typically covered in the last week of thesemester). Over the last 15 years, the course content (and instructor) has remained essentiallythe same, with the exception of the material that is covered at the very end of the course. ThatTable 1: Current Topical Coverage in MECHENG 402. General Topic First Exam Second Exam Final ExamReview of ThermodynamicsPower and Refrigeration Cycles (6 cycles) 3 cycle 2 cycles not tested problems on first examIdeal Gas Mixtures
and Personal NeedsAbstractProfessional women in various fields often express issues they encounter in being able to accessquality materials to support professional and personal needs, as well as work-life balance. Bystudying a variety of modes through which these materials are generally obtained, includingconference participation, informal communication via social media, and utilization of networkingopportunities, several gaps were identified in available support for professionals. Professionalsfrom various backgrounds were also surveyed in order to better identify their needs in terms ofcareer development. Distributed through a variety of social networks including Facebook,Twitter, and LinkedIn, as well as the Indiana Secretary for Career
Prevention Specialist with the Violence Prevention & Response team.Bianca Kaushal, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyKelley Marie Adams, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyProf. Paula T. Hammond, Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMs. Sarah Rankin c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Promoting an Inclusive Lab Culture through Custom In-Person Trainings within an Engineering DepartmentCreating diverse, inclusive, and respectful environments is the #1 recommendation of the 2018National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on “Sexual Harassment ofWomen” [1]. To accomplish this goal, the report suggests that academic
university or another college/university they have attended.The event could not be one from high school or earlier. It was not restricted to engineering classes,but only engineering students participated in the survey so the majority of examples were fromengineering or pre-engineering classes.In total, about 170 students provided feedback. The exercise struck a nerve with many studentswho gave detailed descriptions of specific events and often explained why it was bad, stupid,wrong or inappropriate.In general, this topic can be organized into 8 areas: 1) student behavior which was acceptable in the past and is currently acceptable SB_A/A 2) student behavior which was acceptable in the past and is currently unacceptable SB_A/U 3) student
, not simply a tool. In student-centered curricula, the student’s world becomes the heartof learning” [13].Figure 1: Multi/Inter/Trans Disciplinary Approaches, (Modification of Keestra [16])MethodologyThis study involved interviewing four Directors from different University based interdisciplinaryinitiatives across North America. Throughout this paper the term “interdisciplinary initiative”will be used to describe both research, industry and educational collaborations. Approval toconduct the study was obtained from the General Research Ethics Board (GREB) at Queen’sUniversity. The interviews consisted of nine questions as outlined below. 1. How did your interdisciplinary initiative originate and how was the area of focus selected? 2
government, academia, business and industry in electronic and printformats not controlled by commercial publishing i.e. where publishing is not the primary activityof the producing body” [1]. The key element in this and in most definitions of GL is thatmaterials are not produced by commercial publishers. One implication of this is that there can bemany different types of GL. Indeed, Schöpfel and Farace reproduce a list of 131 differentdocument types originally compiled by GreyNet International, all of which can “contain uniqueand significant scientific and technical information that is often never published elsewhere” [1].While readers might quibble with some of the types of GL compiled by GreyNet International,this list of 131 types serves to
", "Feedback and Communication",assessments and topic discovery / "Team Dynamics",comment classification workflows are "Effectiveness of Feedback" ]parallel. } ``` Figure 1. Example Fully Processed Comment json Object Figure 2. Block diagram for derived data generation for FCQ comments.Initial senior projects course structure, assessment and learning goalsThe initial senior design course spanned two semesters, and each student team had their ownaerospace project which was
reinforced teamwork and technical course content.In general, simulated industry experiences were perceived by students to strengthen 2-3 skillseach while the hands-on laboratory experiments were able to build all 5 skills. Students in theoffering with the SIEs only (Fall 2022) and the offering with the SIEs and hands-on laboratoryexperiences (Spring 2023) both showed significant gains over the semester in confidence in theR&D skills and their self-rated preparedness to complete hands-on laboratory research and workin the industry as a process development engineer. Although the average gains in the semesterwith the hands-on laboratory activities were higher, this difference was not statisticallysignificant. Overall, students perceived the SIEs
research on various NSF funded projects that focuses on engineering education, teacher networks and STEM learning environments. Her expertise includes program evaluation, social network analysis, mixed methods, and advanced quantitative methods. Dr. Alemdar is passionate advocate for equitable and inclusive STEM education. She actively engages with educators, students, and communities to promote the importance of STEM disciplines and education research in preparing the next generation for the challenges of the future. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Policy, with a concentration in Research, Measurement, and Statistics, from Georgia State University. ©American Society for Engineering
redefined failure as anopportunity to learn and built their resilience to challenge and risk.The field of engineering education is moving beyond teaching specific content, to thinking abouthow to holistically develop engineers who are resilient, and who can work through failure, tackleill-structured problems, and address real-world challenges [1]-[4]. In solving these real-worldproblems, solutions are rarely straightforward nor adequately achieved through a singular firstattempt [5], [6]. Thus, the ability to iterate through failure is a critical element of both learningand engineering design.How students think about and persist through failure is influenced by their understanding of therole of iteration in both engineering design and their own
, 2023Sustainability designation, introductory course, and a new textbook in anengineering curriculumSustainability is an important topic. If human societies don’t live sustainably, by definition, wewill experience drastic reductions in our population and/or standard of living and may cease toexist. Knowledge about sustainability has become a foundational component of a generaluniversity education and of being an informed citizen. Sustainability, as a subject of study, isincreasingly popular with students and is an increasingly relevant skill domain in the job market[1]. Given that undergraduate engineering curricula are typically very full of technical content,how is it possible to incorporate sustainability principles into an undergraduate
solve complex engineeringproblems (Criterion 1), and no mini project has a single, unique solution, which thereforeemphasizes the complex nature of the problem. The supplied code and comments in each miniproject provide students with only a broad goal; they must identify, formulate, and solve theproblem. The instructor has the freedom to decide what milestones satisfy these threecomponents. Regarding Criterion 6, mini projects generate many plots, pictures, and graphsrequiring students interpret results, summarize, and draw conclusions. Moreover, mini projectsaddress Criterion 7 by often introducing a new programming function or method requiringstudents to consult online documentation for successful implementation. Again, the miniproject’s
doctoral research focused on 1) how engineering stu- dents develop empathy during community-based learning (e.g., service-learning) and 2) how engineering educators can integrate empathy into their teaching. Before studying in the U.S., Linjue (Jade) earned her B.E. in Building Environment and Energy Engineering from the School of Architecture at Tsinghua University in China. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Lessons Learned: Designing an empathy workshop for engineering faculty to promote equity-focused teachingAbstract:This paper shares lessons learned from designing and reflecting on an empathy workshop for engineeringfaculty. The workshop
- terials science instructor for the Engineering 1 program at McMaster University. He was also one of the lead project developers for the first-year multidisciplinary project-based learning course (ENG 1P13). Dr. Yu’s pedagogical approach focuses on experiential learning, collaborative learning, gamified learning, student-centred education, and design-led materials science education. Dr. Yu joined the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the U. of Victoria in September 2022 as an Assistant Professor. He leads a research group (”Hybrid 3D”) that leverages additive manufacturing to develop new generations of hy- brid materials that are lightweight, recyclable and highly tunable to solve global sustainable development
) capstone or integrating experience that develops and illustrates student competencies in applying both technical and non-technical skills in successfully solving manufacturing problems.For the purpose of this study, the ABET student outcomes from the general criteria are labeled asSLO# with # representing numbers 1 through 5 and the program criteria are labeled as SME_letterwith a letter representing a through e SME outcomes. Performance indicators are defined for eachlearning outcome which is measurable and helps identify the performance of students and whetherthey are meeting the learning outcomes or not. These performance indicators are mapped tointroductory, intermediate and advanced courses and are discussed in the following
-year career orientation course, and fourth-year technical course. The technical courses were requiredcourses all in the same department of electrical and computer engineering technology.In the first-year experience course, students were introduced to reflective e-portfolio practices through aPlan-Do-Reflect cycle and activities that asked them to share their experiences in the form of a story. Inthe second-year technical course, an existing assignment was modified to generate a portfolio artifact thatcould be used in an interview. In a third-year career orientation class, a 50 minute workshop was addedshowing students how to draw upon artifacts in their portfolio to tell their story. In the fourth-yeartechnical class, a larger portfolio
revealed: (1) Operationalizing all the time interfered with the excitement of firstmeetings and leaving a space for iterative promise, (2) Women were the ones that women andmen imagined led the operationalizing work during a virtual educational mode before a returnto in-person, (3) Compassion was amplified for students organizing groups with care, “Iknow what it feels like to be a straggler left behind because it happened to me,” and (4)Shock of the 2020 and 2021 pandemic diminishes over time with prophetic stories of a new,lasting kind of collaboration effect, “It’s difficult to make sure that everyone is actuallywilling to sit next to someone else in the room, many are still acting awkward and distantwith each other.” Results suggest that
descriptive alt text for the visual elements in the animations and figuresand established guidelines that will be used in the future as additional print textbooks areconverted to the zyBooks format. These guidelines for figures and animations are discussed inthis section.Alternative Text: FiguresTo address the challenges of describing the technical content in the figures presented above, thefollowing guidelines were established: 1. Figures with multiple plots or graphs are described from left to right and top to bottom. 2. Figures are described in a natural or sequential manner that does not increase the cognitive load. 3. For figures with plots: the title, x and y axes titles with units, range and limits of both the x and y axes, and
that underrepresented students who intend to persist haveinternalized the dominant culture within ECS, which helps enable their success. For studentswho have not internalized that culture, the ‘chilly climate’ is likely all the chillier, which mayinfluence their persistence.1. IntroductionUndergraduate retention and persistence has been studied extensively in higher education andwithin engineering education [1]–[6]. In STEM fields like engineering, retaining students isimportant to building and growing a talented and qualified technical workforce to drive longterm economic growth and help solve societal challenges. Despite decades of research, six-yeargraduation rates within U.S. engineering undergraduate programs remain about 60% [7]–[9].This
Architecture and Urban Design from Columbia University. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Heuristic Reasoning through Community-Engaged Learning in the Architectural Design Process (Work-in-Progress)AbstractPeter Rowe’s “A Priori Knowledge and Heuristic Reasoning in Architectural Design”emphasized the importance of heuristic reasoning through problem-solving in the architecturaldesign process. [1] In recent years, architectural designs are demanded to respond to issuesbeyond the architectural realm, aspiring to expand dialogue around social and environmentalconcerns. This need calls for design strategies that include multi
development of students’ real-world skills [1]. In their ideal state, projects allowstudents to embark on an ambitious agenda, not otherwise achievable in a semester’s work by theprototypical individual student, through coordinated groupwork. Projects allow students to flextheir communication and team-work abilities in a relatively safe and pro-discovery environment.At an even higher level of aspiration, projects can also be designed to be amplifiers of behavioralengagement [2], including serving as community builders within the classroom by facilitatingorganic friendships and exchange of ideas, especially in smaller colleges and programs wherestudents may find themselves as repeat colleagues in classes. Beyond engineering, in an effort toactualize
curricula to make education more all-inclusive and effective is too important to ignore [1].To enhance imaginative and creative thinking skills of undergraduate students in industrial andsystems engineering, poetry-writing assignments were incorporated into a required upper-levelcourse that focused on the modeling and analysis of inventory and supply chain systems in alarge public university’s industrial and systems engineering curriculum [4]. An assessment ofstudent perceptions of these assignments revealed that poetry writing not only provided thestudents with an opportunity to practice their imaginative and creative thinking skills as expectedbut strengthened their conceptual understanding of the technical material as well [5]. To this end
semester’scourse learning outcomes assessment showed that students struggled to determine whichbasic cold forming processes can effectively execute a given manufacturing task. Thisdesigned lab project involved the manufacturing processes of sand casting and coldrolling with corresponding property tests. This required students to collect experimentaldata, complete analytical calculations and compare testing results, providing opportunityto better connect these processes to application. Learning outcomes assessments for thissemester all showed learning improvement and will be discussed in this article.XXXXXX University xxxxxx campus is a statewide campus; all students are commuters.In general, there are 10-20 students in the Materials and Processes I class