of two of these will be shared in alater section of this paper.Notes from the field: Implementing the Innovation CanvasTechnical Entrepreneurship classes: These notes are from two courses that are bothintroductions to entrepreneurship for engineers and scientists that have been taught for manyyears. The mantra for these courses is that everyone should “think like an entrepreneur.” Thatis, they should learn to identify opportunities and to consider all the necessary aspects ofeffective execution to take advantage of those opportunities. The IC is introduced a few weeksafter they have learned about the traditional business plan and the business model canvas. TheIC is a tool for showing how all of its themes must be considered in dynamic
student teams develop anindustrial product from concept-to-market.Keywords: MS-MBA, dual degree, multidisciplinary, product development, entrepreneurship. BACKGROUNDThe combined MS-MBA program at the University of Tennessee [UT] is unique in its focus onproduct development and entrepreneurship. Students not only learn theory, but also actuallydevelop, build and market a real product by incorporating technological challenges from theengineering side; and accounting, law, and logistic challenges on the business side.Program Overview and GoalsUpon graduation from the UT program, students shall receive an MS degree with a major in aselected engineering discipline and an MBA degree. In general, engineering
innovator and entrepreneur is not only about knowledge; it is also about sharing theprocess, a process best understood in an experiential way. Beyond technical engineering skills, which are embedded in our degree, we focus uponusing REMO to help us advance the essential communication skills we see as central to thesuccess of our BSEIL students and creating an opportunity-oriented mindset combined with anunderstanding of fundamental business concepts, preparing them for a workplace in which theyare expected to communicate and contribute to business decisions and create technical solutionsthat contribute to the triple bottom line.An Affable Functioning Class Room The platform of choice for BSEIL entrepreneurship and innovation
. He studies digital rhetoric, social networks, and educational technology. He works with hybrid class, project-based learning, and in- ter/transdisciplinary collaborations as part of various projects at Arizona State University.Stephanie Sowl, Arizona State University Stephanie Sowl is a research specialist in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State Univer- sity and received her M.Ed. in Education Organization and Leadership from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include underrepresented students’ postsecondary educational trajectories and evaluation of college access and success programs.Dr. Natalie Nailor c American Society for
AC 2008-1422: CHAMPIONING HIGH-TECH RENAISSANCE: SENSOR ANDCONTROLLER SYSTEM INTEGRATION COURSEKhanjan Mehta, Pennsylvania State University KHANJAN MEHTA is a Senior Research Associate in the College of Engineering at Penn State. His professional interests include Innovative System Integration, High-Tech Entrepreneurship and International Social Entrepreneurship. He is an amateur photographer, cook, bartender, poet, traveler, adventurer and proud generalist.Sven Bilen, Pennsylvania State University SVEN G. BILÉN is an Associate Professor of Engineering Design, Electrical Engineering, and Aerospace Engineering at Penn State. His educational research interests include developing techniques
Chemical Engineering. Samantha aspires to work in the cosmetics industry creating products.Ms. Rebecca Hansson, Rowan University I am involved in an engineering clinic at my school that is working on a paper for this.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on stu- dent perception of the classroom environment
University, where she is pursuing a degree in Sec- ondary Mathematics Education. Outside of class, she is an undergraduate researcher for the Department of Engineering Education and a math tutor for the Ohio State University’s Mathematics Department.Zachary Dix, The Ohio State UniversityMr. Nicholas Rees Sattele, The Ohio State University Nicholas is an Undergraduate Research Associate with The Ohio State Department of Engineering Ed- ucation. He is in the process of completing a B.S. in Computer Science and Engineering at Ohio State. His interests include incorporating Entrepreneurial Minded Learning into engineering coursework and interdisciplinary innovation.Dr. Krista M Kecskemety, The Ohio State University Krista
AC 2010-220: BUSINESS BASICS FOR ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS: A CASESTUDY ON A NEW GRADUATE COURSEMcRae Banks, Worcester Polytechnic Institute McRae C. Banks is professor of Entrepreneurship and Strategy, and founder and former director of the Collaborative for Entrepreneurship & Innovation at WPI. Additionally he is immediate past chair of the ASEE Entrepreneurship Division and a founding advisor of the Kern Family Foundation's KEEN Program. He is the founder of five startups in the academic and private sectors and has been immersed in engineering and science entrepreneurship for over 15 years, and entrepreneurship generally for over 25 years
AC 2008-1241: HILLMAN ENTREPRENEURS PROGRAM - CHALLENGES,IMPACT ON A DIVERSE POPULATION, AND EARLY OUTCOMESKaren Thornton, University of Maryland Karen Thornton has more than twenty years experience working as an educator and mentor in two industries, first music performance where she was an artist entrepreneur, and now by supporting young entrepreneurs. She was the program director the University of Maryland’s (UM) award-winning Hinman Campus Entrepreneurship Opportunities (CEOs) Program from its launch in fall of 2000 until December 2006. Karen is currently directing the new Hillman Entrepreneurs Program that is a partnership between UM and Prince George’s Community College and she spends
fundamental assignment in the course and an integralpart of the class.IntroductionAt Arizona State University, The Polytechnic School, project courses are a critical part of theengineering curriculum. Foundations of Engineering Design II is the second project course forfreshman engineers and a core course for a general engineering degree. During the Foundationsof Engineering Design II class, a team project introduces the students to the entrepreneurialmindset. Project-based learning can increase the motivations and interests for studyingengineering [1]. The author received a KEEN Professorship Mini-Grant to develop a project withthe entrepreneurial mindset. The KEEN entrepreneurial mindset consists of curiosity from thestudents about our changing
level course, students learn to tell their uniquestories of their experiences and entrepreneurial mindset growth culminating in an ePortfolio. Inbetween these two curricular bookends, students are involved in their core biomedicalengineering classes. Five of these core courses are designated as gateway courses. In gatewaycourses, students complete signature assignments specifically created to foster entrepreneurialmindset and critical reflection. These signature assignments are also designed to producemeaningful artifacts and experiences that may later be used as part of students’ stories andportfolios. In this paper, we describe the details of the structure and implementation of thisvertically integrated curricular framework and present
classes toenable students to reap the rewards of their product ideas. The university's intellectual property policycontains two interesting facets that pertain to student innovation. First, students own their ideas. If a studentproposes an idea to work on in a course then the student owns the resulting intellectual property as long asthe student does not use more resources than the typical project in the class. The other interesting part of thepolicy is the concept of the innovation committee. The innovation committee, consisting of faculty andadministrators, reviews intellectual property submitted by faculty and students. Faculty are required to submittheir patentable ideas but for students it is optional. If the committee decides the idea has
Education Lab advised by Prof. Sheri Sheppard. Her work focuses on fostering mindful awareness, empathy and curiosity in engineering students. Beth completed a BS in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Virginia in 2010 and a MS in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford in 2012.Dr. Tua A. Bj¨orklund Dr. Bj¨orklund focuses on supporting idea development efforts in product design, entrepreneurship and teaching in higher education. She has been a part of creating the Aalto University Design Factory, an experimentation platform for students, teachers, researchers and practitioners in Finland. Currently Dr. Bj¨orklund is a visiting Fulbright scholar at Stanford University, working at the Center for Design Research
93%Compare and assess the likely success of designs 0 0 4 9 1 71% Table 2 – Student assessment data from design class (N=14)Conclusions and Future WorkThis paper has explored the important topic of ‘creating value’ and has offered expandedconceptions of the mindset and skillset of value creation. Concepts from the fields of design,entrepreneurship, and systems engineering have been applied in this work. It is noted thatopportunities to create value occur at the venture/enterprise level or at the product/system level.The proposed concepts align well with popular works in design and innovation.It is hoped that this paper will inspire
Doctor of Management with George Fox University.Dr. Donald Ken Takehara, Taylor University Don Takehara was Director of the Center for Research & Innovation (CR&I) and Associate Professor at Taylor University for 9 years. With responsibility for leadership and overall success of the CR&I, Don developed/implemented an integrated program of research, entrepreneurship, and business assistance. During these years, research grant funding tripled, over 20 new companies were launched/assisted, and consultant services were provided to 100+ companies/organizations. Don also taught classes in engi- neering, physics, and chemistry and performed research in STEM Education (high altitude ballooning), biomass
Shaffer is the Vilas Distinguished Professor of Learning Sciences at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, in the Department of Educational Psychology, and a Game Scientist at the Wisconsin Center for Education Research. His most recent book is How Computer Games Help Children Learn.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can
to product innovation by presenting research on success factors for productdevelopment in terms of organization and environmental factors.Product Innovation Engineering program, PIEpIn 2005, representatives from the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Stockholm, Sweden,took the initiative to start a large, national long-term program to enhance product innovationcapability in Sweden. This program was finally launched in late 2006, with governmentalfunding, as the Product Innovation Engineering Program, PIEp3, 4. The program is organized as anetwork of researchers, educators and students in innovation engineering with the ambition ofcreating a system change toward innovation and entrepreneurship in institutes of higher
thantraditional measures such as market size and team execution. This research suggests thatrelationship oriented characteristics when evaluated alongside objective risk factors were moreimportant.IntroductionWe have been teaching this material for 20 years. The relationship factors were a majordiscovery for us and we believe that by including them our graduates from our entrepreneurialleadership technology based graduate program will enhance their success rate from the currentlevel of 4%. These will become sufficient conditions to satisfy angel investors in the Southeast.Starting in 1994 our graduate program in technology based entrepreneurship emphasized fourareas of risk for start-up ventures [2]. These are presented in the graduate class introduction
Paper ID #31377Creating a Makerspace for Cross-disciplinary Teaching and Collaborationwith Limited FundingDr. David G Alexander, California State University, Chico Dr. Alexander’s research interests and areas of expertise are in teaching pedagogy, capstone design, renewable energy systems, thermal sciences, vehicle system modeling and simulation, heat transfer, new product development, entrepreneurship, and technology transfer. He is PI and adviser of the Department of Energy Collegiate Wind Competition 2016. He is also working on an undergraduate research project modeling solar cells using a thermodynamics approach and
development, business succession, assessment modeling, technology transfer, executive education and social science research. This includes programs and activities in the United States, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. Dr. Pistrui has held several scholarly appointments in the US and Europe, including the Coleman Founda- tion Chair in Entrepreneurship at the Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago. He served as the founding Managing Director of the Wharton Enterprising Families Initiative at the Wharton School of the Univer- sity of Pennsylvania. In addition, Dr. Pistrui held the Raymond Chair in Family Business and served as the Founding Director of the Center for Family Business and Entrepreneurial Leadership at Alfred
, combined classeswith their business schools or adding entrepreneurial classes to their core curriculums 1. The lackof standardization when it comes to helping engineering students develop these skills is notnecessarily a bad thing, but it certainly highlights the need for a deeper understanding on how thecreative process works and how to foster an entrepreneurial mindset in engineering students.Understanding biassociationThe term biassociation was first coined by Arthur Koestler in 1964 as “a distinction between theroutine skills of thinking on a single ‘plane’ as it were, and the creative act,” or in other words“collision of two apparently unrelated frames of reference” 2. Hitt et al. divides innovativeactions as either “equilibrating” or
profit or non-profit organization 137 (2.60)Started or co-founded a student club or other student groups on campus 478 (9.10)Entered a social entrepreneurship/social innovation competition 119 (2.30)Total Hands-on Experience in Entrepreneurship & Innovation * 1,235 (23.50)(3) Non-hands-on Activities in Entrepreneurship & Innovation n (%)Attended a speaker series or related presentation about entrepreneurship & 2,158 (41.10)innovationAttended a presentation on a new engineering technology, process or design 1934 (36.9)(outside of class)Lived in a residential or dorm-based
ethical practice grounded in science and engineering methods andstandards. The process involves face-to-face meetings and discussions with entrepreneurs of thecity, from the presentation of the problem until the delivery of the plans. Once engineers are partof society it is important that they have a stronger interaction with the wider public. So the goal ofincluding this course in the program is to provide students the opportunity to work closely withthe real local entrepreneurship environment. Apart from this, engineers need to develop broadfundamental understanding of their professional responsibilities, as well as the need to beentrepreneurial in order to understand and contribute in the context of market and businesspressures. If engineers
incorporated into design-focused courses [13] or evenas online modules separate from a specific technical course [14]. Some work has been done toincorporate EML into non-design-focused courses. Hassan et al. [15] incorporated an EMLproject into a sophomore circuits class as an extra credit assignment. While this work wassuccessful, it was optional, smaller in scope, and covered fewer EML learning outcomes than theframework herein. Additionally, Duval-Couetil et al. [16] performed a study across multipleuniversities that showed that increased exposure to EML led to increased understanding andappreciation of entrepreneurial-minded thinking. Most schools interested in instilling theentrepreneurial mindset are able to effectively incorporate it into
. Slevin, Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic management journal, 1989. 10(1): p. 75-87.8. Neck, H.M., P.G. Greene, and C.G. Brush, Teaching entrepreneurship: A practice-based approach. 2014: Edward Elgar Publishing.9. Zhu, E., Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 2006. 34(6): p. 451-480.10. Yang, Y.-T.C., A catalyst for teaching critical thinking in a large university class in Taiwan: asynchronous online discussions with the facilitation of teaching assistants. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2008. 56(3): p. 241-264.11. Ellis, R.A., et al., Engineering students' conceptions
Assessment of the Rose-Hulman Leadership AcademyAbstractGiving students the ability to be entrepreneurial leaders is a potentially valuable outcome for anengineering program. Entrepreneurial leadership consists of communication, teamwork, andproblem solving skills that are important to careers in STEM fields, including engineering. Forengineering, in particular, entrepreneurship and leadership skills relate directly to accreditationoutcomes that every undergraduate engineering program must address. In this study, we describethe assessment of a three day leadership academy program at a small, technical school in theMidwestern United States. Activities in the academy consisted of seminars on leadership stylesand communication comingled with problem
name. While these types of changeswere considered, the Western Michigan University faculty also wished to focus on the strengthsand needs of the local community. One key strength identified was the historical and vibrantculture of innovation and entrepreneurship in regional start-ups and established industries. This Page 24.411.3moved the investigation of current programs in a different direction and identified the uniquechanges that had occurred at the University of Illinois. The University of Illinois had recentlychanged its IE department name to Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering(http://ise.illinois.edu/) and had developed a
offered the week before classes began in the fall of 2015 andthe second was offered again the week before classes in the fall of 2016. The workshop wasloosely structured around the LLP methodology for creating startups as well as the engineeringdesign process. Students were placed on teams and given a predetermined innovation seedproject that was based on a university related problem. They developed hypotheses of designsolutions, made a test plan, got out of the building to test their hypothesis with customers andstakeholders, and iterated until they validated (or invalidated) their solutions. Along the way,they learned about value propositions, product-market-fit, the scientific method, customer-centricdesign, and teamwork.Just as the first year
Engineering Education, 2019 EML Indices to Assess Student Learning through Integrated e-Learning ModulesIntroduction The University of New Haven has facilitated the development and integration of 18 e-learning modules on entrepreneurial topics into regular engineering and computer sciencecourses. In addition to faculty at the University of New Haven, over three years 77 faculty at 53other universities in the US have also integrated these modules into their courses. These modulesare designed so that students learn entrepreneurial content outside of class and then apply themto a class project or assignment (i.e., contextual activities). Instructors are also stronglyencouraged to engage students through
and training about intellectual property policy (n = 6), consulting assistance fromTTO (n = 5), creation of entrepreneurial culture or ecosystem (n = 3), and legal services with lowcost (n =2) were also mentioned as possible solutions for circumventing or mitigatingundergraduate IP issues. Useful standard agreements. Regarding IP agreements, thirty-nine participants respondedthere were existing standard IP agreements that would be useful in this area. Of these responses,9 participants elaborated by saying that specifically outlining when students legitimately own IPwould be helpful. In particular, they pointed out the necessity of having clear standard IPagreements among faculty, university and students in entrepreneurship classes and