session in anticipation of more feedback.Fall senior lab. The instructor of the Fall senior laboratory course explained that she workedclosely with the writing instructor to frame the writing process for students. Part of this involvedreferencing the ABET student outcomes as evidence that engineering involves a broader skillsetthan just the technical, but she also made a persuasive argument that "I have good news and goodnews! You only need to do 2 experiments this semester. You will become a better writer." Sheexplained her motivation for making changes and prepared students so they would know what toexpect (Figure 3). To frame the peer review process, which is typically new for students inchemical engineering classes, the Fall senior laboratory
Santiago has been a technical engineer, manager, and executive with more than 26 years of leadership positions in technical program management, acquisition development and operation research support while in the United States Air Force. He currently has over 15 years of teaching experience at the university level and taught over 40 different courses in electrical engineering, systems engineering, physics and mathematics. He has over 30 published papers and/or technical presentations while spear- heading over 40 international scientific and engineering conferences/workshops as a steering committee member while assigned in Europe. Professor Santiago has experience in many engineering disciplines and missions including
organizational diagram of the Evaluation Survey Used for Department Module Sessions graphics/CAD team project where the roles of each team Poor Below Average Average Above Average Good [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] member and leader are indicated and show how they work Average together. Thus, throughout this team project, the students No. Evaluation Items Score naturally learn how to work together and recognize the [1] Selected Areas, Topics and Scope (w
organized by the parameters mentioned above. Technical and Professional Learning Figure 2 shows the professional and technical learning that was accomplished while participants were working on industry or internal projects. The rating scale ranges from 1 (poor learning) to 10 (excellent learning). The results from all participants show that technical learning is almost the same in both project types, but professional learning in internal projects is significantly lower. The likely reason is due to the extensive professional interaction between the students and external engineers. 1= Poor 10=Excellent 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
project requires student teams to integrate a wide range of course concepts: user-focused design thinking, hands-on fabrication, iterative prototyping, computer programming, basiccircuitry, and technical communication. Each team must pull together all of these concepts from amongsta membership of only 3 or 4 first-year students. What’s more, every team separately conceives anddesigns their own game, so every team has a unique set of technical challenges to overcome. Given thecomplexity of this work, student teams would benefit enormously from the availability of a targeted,learn-on-demand resource available throughout their project, especially if that resource feels like anatural, real-world practice that provides genuinely useful assistance in
Engineering, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 9–16, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1680/feng.11.00034.[6] N. Delatte, M. Asce, and K. Carper, “US and International Developments in Forensic Engineering and Education,” Indo-US forensic practices: Investigation techniques and technology, pp. 1–9, 2010, [Online]. Available: www.asce.org[7] K. L. Carper, “Technical Council on Forensic Engineering: Twenty-year Retrospective Review,” Forensic Engineering (2003), pp. 280–296, 2003.[8] N. J. Delatte and K. L. Rens, “Forensics and Case Studies in Civil Engineering Education: State of the Art,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 98– 109, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu
metacognition and problem solving.Dr. Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Campbell University Anastasia Rynearson is an Assistant Professor at Campbell University in the School of Engineering. She has worked on the PictureSTEM project as a graduate student and Postdoctoral Research Assistant through INSPIRE in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received a PhD from Purdue University in Engineering Education and a B.S. and M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Her teaching experience includes outreach activities at various age levels as well as a position as Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Kanazawa Technical College. Her current research
. Page 5.394.3 Page 3Submitted to the International Division of ASEE for presentation at the 2000 ASEE Annual Conference Session 2660 Figure 2: The course web page with links to the syllabus, course content and modules, computer laboratory tutorials, assignments, midterm examination, BSCW, and the Chat room.3. The CAD ProjectFor the Fall of 1999 the selected project is the design of a remotely controlled vacuum cleaner.Through the site http://www.iitap.iastate.edu/portfolio/users/cad/project1.html students weregiven the design requirements for portability, flexibility of
; (2) THERMAL COMFORT – VisuallyExperiencing Heat; (3) AUDIBLE COMFORT- Visually Experiencing Sound; (4) DAYLIGHT -Visually Experiencing Light; (5) SHADING - Visually Experiencing Shade.To implement these modules, various technical tools and laboratory equipment were utilized tosuccessfully develop haptic learning modules (Table 1). Table 1 demonstrates the equipmentassociated with each module, its usage and proposed future equipment that might enhance thehaptic learning pedagogy. Table 1:Equipment & Tools for each module, its usage and proposed future amendments• Module One: (NATURAL VENTILATION)- Visually Experiencing AIRThe first module describes Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) technology to analyze airflowswithin the building
. Carmen is the capstone design class coordinator in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (MAE) department at UAH. She primarily teaches MAE senior design classes with a focus upon product realization – a class she has taught since 2002. Several of Dr. Carmen’s senior design teams have won national and international design competitions including the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division safety competition, the International Aluminum Extrusion Design Competition, the American Astronautical Society/von Braun Symposium student poster competition, the NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate (ESMD) Systems Engineering design competition and the NASA Great
, College Station, TX. His research interests include automation, robotics, cyber-manufacturing and Industry 4.0; optical/infrared imaging and instrumentation; micro/nano manufacturing; and design of technology for engineering education. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation Laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, robotics, and Industry 4.0 systems. He was named Honorary International Chair Professor for National Taipei University of Technology in Taipei, Taiwan, for 2015-23. Dr. Hsieh received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX. ©American Society for
Paper ID #37223The Danger of a Single Story: A Critical and Holistic Account ofRachel’s Experience in Computing for Broadening ParticipationMrs. Nivedita Kumar, Florida International University Nivedita is pursuing her Ph.D. in Engineering & Computing Education at Florida International Univer- sity. She has a computer science and engineering background as well as K-12 teaching. She thinks about creating an inclusive learning environment using critical and feminist frameworks in undergraduate engineering and computing classrooms.Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor
capstone design class coordinator in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (MAE) department at UAH. She primarily teaches MAE senior design classes with a focus upon product realization – a class she has taught for 14 years. Several of Dr. Carmen’s senior design teams have won national and international design competitions including the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division safety competition, the International Aluminum Extrusion Design Competition, the American Astronautical Society/von Braun Symposium student poster competition, the NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate (ESMD) Systems Engineering design competition and the NASA Great Moonbuggy Race
Session 2260 A Co-op Based International Engineering Minor Degree Gary R. Martin, Ed.D. University of the PacificIntroductionIn 1983, I had a student who opted to work his Co-op with his father’s company in Japan.Midway through the experience, I wrote to his father, inquiring if per chance the arrangementhad been of sufficient mutual benefit to warrant replacing his son after his Co-op with anotherstudent. Today, thirteen years later, that company has now had thirty-five of our Co-op students,most of whom did not speak any Japanese prior to the start of their Co-op
participantscontributed to the constructions in any given local moment, (3) the descriptions of constructionswere kept fairly low inference (for example, if a participant noted that Target was trying to helpthe customers by providing them coupons, then a corresponding construction would be “Targetas benevolent”). Instead of discussing our analysis methods in the abstract, we present the analysis in greatdetail (especially in the first segment of the analysis) so that the reader can evaluate ourinterpretations. For the purpose of this paper, we selected four segments to support our claimsempirically. A brief description of these segments are presented in Table 1.Table 1. A brief description of the segments included in the paper Segment Focus Session
Paper ID #28113Board 4: Computers in Education Division: Partnering to Develop Educa-tional Software Applications: A Four-year Retrospective StudyMr. David Reeping, Virginia Tech David Reeping is a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and is an NSF Graduate Research Fellow. He received his B.S. in Engineering Education with a Mathematics minor from Ohio Northern University. He was a Choose Ohio First scholar inducted during the 2012-2013 school year as a promising teacher candidate in STEM. David was the recipient of the Remsburg Creativity Award for 2013 and the DeBow Freed Award for outstanding
engineering identity development critical to prolonged engagement of Black women in engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 92–113, 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20374.[4] J. Huff and M. Ross, “Advancing an Integrative Perspective of Identity in Engineering Education,” in International Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri, Ed., New York: Routledge, 2023. doi: 10.4324/9781003287483.[5] W. Faulkner, “`Nuts and Bolts and People’: Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities,” Soc Stud Sci, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 331–356, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1177/0306312706072175.[6] S. Secules, “Making the Familiar Strange: An Ethnographic Scholarship of Integration Contextualizing Engineering Educational Culture as
interleaved.Advantages: 1. Students had more peer support and could problem solve technical issues with other teams. 2. Students had access to software testing tools and resources. 3. Students received an in-depth understanding of the software product because they were im- plementing it.Challenges: 1. Students struggled with programming-related skills. As a result, too much time was spent on implementing the application. 2. Some team members preferred to avoid the technical work and only contributed to the writing of the reports. 3. Students struggled to meet the statement and branch coverage requirements for testing.Approach 2: Capstone Group Project - with the development and testing phases interleaved.Advantages: 1. Students were
their projects but with somewhatdifferent guidelines provided by their home institutions.Previous International Collaborative Education Initiatives Page 26.973.3Much work has previously been done in global education. In Europe, the Erasmus project hasencouraged students to travel to different countries within the European Union to take classes atuniversities outside their home institutions [3]. There have also been several papers writtendescribing international curriculum development efforts [4-7]. There have also been manyresearch partnerships between universities in which students and faculty have performedresearch at partner institutions
engineering students to be aware of thesocial implications of their engineering designs and to find ways that they can justly apply theirproblem-solving skills to global, sociotechnical issues.Undergraduate engineering students, particularly women, people of color, and individuals withdisabilities, are often motivated by sociotechnical challenges to pursue engineering [3]–[5].However, technical and social aspects of engineering are frequently separated in current forms ofundergraduate engineering education, and engineering students may learn to devalue socialaspects of engineering (e.g., [6]–[8]). This devaluing happens because technical skills are oftenplaced at the forefront of engineering education while sociotechnical skills may be de-emphasized
research programsrelated to maintenance and reliability engineering. The paper presents the challenges andrewards of long-distance cross-cultural student teamwork. The following issues relatedto cyber-linked projects are presented.• Development of a mutually agreed upon procedure in order to achieve the objectives of cyber-linked projects during an eight-week project period.• Periodic video-conferencing, web-based discussions, and sharing of technical information between international teams.• Presentation of project report.• Preparation of the joint final report. Page 6.642.1"Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering
commonand uncommon viewpoints from students of different backgrounds to seek out and join suchresearch programs. Another purpose of this study was to gauge the impacts of summer researchexperiences on US and non-US students. The following research questions guided this study: 1. What is the REU impact on the students’ career goals? 2. What is the REU impact on the students’ self-efficacy about making decision about graduate school and success therein? 3. How do the REU participants perceive any changes on their research knowledge, skills, and engineering career path? 4. What is the difference in the impact of the REU between national and international students?II. MethodA. SettingA.1 Objectives of the REU Program
AC 2008-1393: ENHANCEMENT OF AN ENGINEERING CURRICULUMTHROUGH INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCESPrashanth Jayaraman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Prashanth Krishna Jayaraman is a graduate student in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech. He is currently a Graduate Teaching Assistant in the Department of Engineering Education and helps in teaching the hands on activities of the EngE 1024 course. He is the President of the International Association for the Exchange of Students for Technical Experience at Virginia Tech. He holds a Bachelor's degree in Computer Science and Engineering from Anna University (Chennai, India).Vinod Lohani, Virginia
AC 2008-1531: INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION FOR GEOTECHNICALENGINEERING LABORATORY EXERCISESJames Hanson, California Polytechnic State University Jim Hanson is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at California Polytechnic State University. He is past chair of the Civil Engineering Division of ASEE. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin - Madison and taught at Lawrence Technological University for 9 years before joining the faculty at Cal Poly.Senro Kuraoka, Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. Senro Kuraoka is Senior Researcher at the Research and Development Center at Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. in Japan. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin
Simulation Trainings. Toanalyze students’ presentation skills improvement through the VR-activity, the authorsconducted peer evaluations for pre and post-activity presentations. Additionally, after the VRactivity, the authors conducted an exit survey, obtaining the students’ perception of theactivity. The data obtained from the different surveys and evaluations allowed the authors to(1) develop an ordered probit regression model to understand the influence of several factorssuch as academic level, gender, first-generation and international status; (2) identify themajor deficiencies in CM students' communication and presentation skills; and (3) assess theeffects of VR-based presentation simulations on CM students’ presentation skills. The
be creative andengage with peers [2]. As such, technical issues related to ensuring innovative pedagogies thattrain and support STEM students have escalated, such as the integration of STEM coursespositioned in upper and lower divisions to benefit student learning and training [3]. However,student engagement suffers from the challenges associated with such logistics, which is alsoevident from the lower number of STEM graduates in recent years [4]. Therefore, it has becomecritical to address student engagement by integrating real-world contexts to develop morechallenging examples that relate their coursework to real-life experiences [5]. Another means toa couple of classrooms with real-world exposure is the use of available technological
Paper ID #9577Agile Development Process of a Web-Based Application to Improve Retentionof Hispanic STEM StudentsDr. Pablo Biswas, Texas A&M International University Dr. Pablo Biswas received Ph.D. and M.S. in in Industrial Engineering from Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and B.S. in Mechanical Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh. He is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Texas A&M International University, Laredo, TX. Dr. Biswas’s research interest is in supply chain management, inventory control, lean production systems, and information
Paper ID #37167Changing the Way We Educate to Prioritize Minority Students’ MentalHealth and Enhance Their Well-Being ¨Ms. Claudia Calle Muller, Florida International University Claudia Calle M¨uller is a Ph.D. student in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Florida International University (FIU). She holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica del Per´u (PUCP). Claudia has 4+ years’ experience in structural engineering designing reinforced concrete resi- dential and commercial buildings in Peru; 2+ years’ experience in entrepreneurship building a successful health coaching
, Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, at the University of Wisconsin-Stout. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Challenges and Opportunities in International Service LearningAbstractService learning, and specifically the work of organizations such as Engineers Without BordersUSA, have become popular with universities looking to provide their students with appliededucational opportunities which blend technical skills with a broader social mission and help theinstitution demonstrate its global impact. However, questions remain regarding the truly realizedoutcomes for students, as well as the unintended consequences that may be experienced by thepartnering communities. This paper describes
Session 2560 INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION IN EUROPE Ian R. SIMPSON ENST de Bretagne/France1. INTRODUCTION.In the November 1996 edition of ASEE's excellent Journal, "Prism," Russel C. JONES,Executive Director of the National Society of Professional Engineers in the USA,published an article entitled : " The World as Workplace." He concluded this article withthe following paragraph :" The era of international practice for engineers has clearly arrived, and eachengineering education system must revise its programs to adequately prepare itsgraduates for work in the global