. This project focuses on theprograms at the SoECS has been ENGR 110, Introduction to student’s educational and professional goals and theFirst Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference July 31 – August 2, 2016, Columbus, OH W1A-1 Session W1A plans to achieve them, including self-evaluation and of a number of mechanisms for upper class engineering improvement activities in the areas of community students to interface with the freshmen. building, professional development, academic
“enriched learning environment”7 thatstudents will find interactive and engaging. In addition, such projects may help to address theneed for a broader education within already full engineering curriculums.ABET accreditation requires that all engineering graduates have effective communication skills,have an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams, and have an understanding of the world,the economy, the environment and society.8 It is a challenge to fit the broad education requiredfor gaining this kind of understanding into an intensive engineering education. Digital videotechnology used in student video projects addresses this challenge.Student created video projects can be extremely effective educational tools as they encouragestudents to
use and/ordevelopment [4]. Though the researchers did not specifically anchor this notion with theengineering profession, it does deeply impact those engaging with technology. Carl Mitcham in1994 anchored the consideration of social responsibility into engineering practice and profession.By framing engineering as a social enterprise, he argued that the integration of socialconsiderations is inherent to engineering practice is required to better equipped modern-dayengineers with capacity to solve not only technical challenges but social and ethical ones as well[5]. Mitcham’s introduction of a sociotechnical engineer was catalyzed later by the NationalAcademy of Engineering’s 2005 report, “Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting
engineering professionalism by Mohawk Valley Engineering Executive Committee, and forging closer relations with the IEEE Mohawk Valley section. Dr. Qazi is a senior member of IEEE and a member of American Society of Engineering Education. M. Yasin Akhtar Raja is a Professor of Physics & Optical Science and ECE at the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Charlotte. He joined UNC Charlotte in 1990 and has served in various faculty po- sitions and on several planning and program committees for establishing new Ph.D. programs, centers, and units. His research expertise spans from Nanophotonics and Optoelectronic devices and components for Optical Communication Networks. His Labs are currently is engaged in Nanophotonics
workshopparticipants through various presentations, videos, hands-on activities, and tours. Teachers,counselors, and administrators all find topics of interest and relevance at Chip Camp.A presentation on the historical development of the microchip and an overview of industry trendslays the foundation for the two-day workshop. Participants get their first taste of the sciencebehind microchips by viewing the video, “A Fab Way to Work”. This 14-minute video is gearedfor high school students and provides an overview of microchip fabrication and careers in theindustry. Students and teachers find this video engaging because it is presented from theperspective of a teenager who after daydreaming in physics class has somehow found himself in asemiconductor
senior highschool students interested in pursuing a career in the STEM field, not only as an outreach effort,but also to make the student aware of their context in addressing the community needs. Theultimate goal for this multidisciplinary team framework is the creation of a comprehensive,cooperative learning environment for undergraduate engineering programs.As part of this program, the students had the opportunity to present their collaborative workresults at the 2018 Texas Regional Alliance for Campus Sustainability, in Stephenville, TX, andat the 2018 UTRGV Engaged Scholar Symposium, in Edinburg, TX. The configuration of thepartnership endorses collaborative leadership through the continuous support from differentorganizations in the
of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for over 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country. His current research focuses on student problem-solving pro- cesses and use of worked examples, change models and evidence-based teaching practices in engineering curricula, and the role of non-cognitive and affective factors in student academic outcomes and overall success. c
all categories, students showed steady increases in average scores (4.2%average increase) across several key areas from pre- to post-survey, indicating enhanced interestand engagement with bioengineering concepts. The largest changes from pre- to mid-project andpre- to post-project were visible consistently in “Telling others about science concepts,”increasing by 5.5% and 8.3% (p = 0.052), respectively. The largest standard deviations wereobserved in “Using mathematics” and “Graduating from college with honors.”Engineering IdentityThe project’s impact on students’ engineering identity was also analyzed using responses tosurvey prompts derived from Goodwin’s Measure of Engineering Identity, which was developedto probe the underlying self
monotonous anddisengaging, reducing students’ motivation to participate or even show up to class. At ouruniversity, most early classes are lecture-heavy; the only opportunities to engage with the contentand other learners often being homework assignments. The usual one-size-fits-all approach toteaching has led to students feeling disconnected from the material, increasing feelings ofimposter syndrome and “burnout,” a sentiment confirmed in the literature [4, 5]. It alsodisproportionately affects minoritized learners [6, 7, 8]. Many students are intimidated to seeksupport outside of lectures, compounding feelings of isolation and disengagement [7, 8].We, the student-teaching team, see that it is necessary to foster community in the classroom
curriculum, and hands-on personalized and collaborative learning strategies aligned with Common Core State and CTE Standards. This integration helps students make meaningful connections between STEM topics and real-life applications as well as develop students’ critical thinking and problem-solving skills. The Center focuses on Algebra topics, the gatekeeper for STEM disciplines, to help close the achievement gap, engage traditionally underrepresented groups and at risk students in learning STEM subjects while preparing all students to be college and career ready. The Center focuses on broadening participation of female and underrepresented minorities in computing and developing students' computer-aided problem-solving skills through programs such
) introduce industry present an overview of different fields and careerprogramming and specifically MATLAB early in our opportunities in electrical engineering. In the second course,program, (iii) stress communication skills, and (iv) attract and ECE 102, students learn to develop algorithms and applyengage more students, in particular from under-represented computational software tools (mainly MATLAB) to solvegroups, into ECE [1]. While we have had some successes – primarily simple electrical engineering problems. They do apopular and engaging team design projects, hands-on lab project using MATLAB programming for data acquisitionexperience, and an alumni mentor program – we still
Degree in Engineering Program. While in college, he was a Ronald E. McNair Scholar, which afforded him the opportunity to intern at NASA Langley. He also earned distinction as a Phi Beta Kappa member and an American Chemical Society Scholar. Dr. Henderson completed his Ph.D. in Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. As a graduate student, he was a NASA Harriet G. Jenkins Graduate Fellow and mentor for the Summer Research Opportunities Program. Dr. Henderson has dedicated his career to increasing the number of students who are in pathways to pursue STEM careers. He believes that exposing students to STEM early will have a lasting impact on their lives and academic
teamworkskills, improving communication and project management skills, and practicing ethical behavior.All undergraduate students must participate in at least two semester-long three credit hourprojects. Projects vary widely in focus, including Service Learning, Entrepreneurial, ProductDevelopment and others; some projects have participating external sponsors. We are collectingdata on ca. 36 - 40 teams each semester, enrolling approximately 400 students.We have developed several strategies for assessing teamwork effectiveness: (1) a self-assessmentof the extent to which each student feels that they have developed teamwork competencies, (2) aKnowledge Test of teamwork concepts drawn from the vast literature on teamwork, (3) a TeamExcellence and Trust
degree program. Not allemployers understand the importance of further formal education, progressive mentoredexperience, and self-development to adequately prepare their engineers for their professionalduties. Further, the use of technology to efficiently and effectively learn and work remotely –accelerated by the COVID 19 pandemic – has left lasting impacts on how both academia andindustry interact with their students/employees. Combined, these factors dictate that academiaand industry pivot and partner to help their civil engineers become more self-aware of theirabilities and self-directed in their formal education, workplace experiences, and life-long self-development to ensure that they attain and maintain the attributes necessary to meet
electrical and systems. He has conducted several projects to reduce carbon dioxide and other building emission impacts by evaluating and improving the energy practices through the integration of sustainable systems with existing systems. His current research focuses on engaging and educating students in sustainable and green buildings’ design and energy conservation. He is currently investigating various ways to reduce energy consumption in office buildings. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Testing Ground Effect Aerodynamics on a Scaled F1 Car Maher Shehadi, PhD Assistant
joined MacEwan as a full-time instructor in 1992. Her leadership ability was immediately evident as, in addition to teaching, she took on chairing and leading a number of college initiatives and committees. These included Chair of the Educational Leadership Institute (ELI), the Academic Vision Steering Committee, Academic Council, and Faculty Roles and Responsibilities. In 2000, MacEwan stu- dents presented her with the Student Champion Award, in recognition of exemplary service, support, and advocacy. In 2005, she received the International Exemplary Leader Award from the Chair Academy, a U.S.-based educational leadership institution. Since then, she has expanded her Chair Academy work to become a facilitator for the
from underrepresented minoritygroups (URMs), not only to complete their undergraduate degrees but also to pursue advanceddegrees and/or careers in engineering (Jiang et al., 2018).The program featured: formal training, workshops, and supplemental activities in the conduct ofresearch; research experience through engagement in projects with scientific and practical meritsin both academic and industrial environments; experience in conducting laboratory experiments;and opportunities to present the research outcomes to the broader community at professionalsettings. Populations from URMs are the main audience for this REU program.Participants spent a total of 10 weeks in the program. In the first two weeks, participants werehosted at one of the
senior undergraduate and graduate Hispanic students in thedesign, fabrication, and testing of microelectronic devices. Specifically, this grant has sponsoredthe research efforts of 3 graduate and 5 undergraduate students, but also outreach efforts haveimpacted around 70 high school students from the public education system. Additionally, 7senior undergraduate students have been indirectly impacted through a special topic course, fromwhich 2 of the participating students were able to publish and participate in a peer-reviewconference. The overall objective of the second project is to initiate a research program tobroaden participation and increase opportunities of Hispanic engineering students so that theycan become engaged in research as
the curricula has changed the way students think aboutproblem-solving and quantitative thinking [7]. It prepares students to solve complex problemsand communicate effectively [7]. Ecological restoration courses, one of the foci of EcologicalEngineering and Science (EES), are currently offered in most universities through departmentsof biology, ecology, forestry, landscape architecture, and environmental science [7].EES is an important component for solving modern environmental problems. Humans faceenormous environmental challenges today including natural resources depletion, pollution ofsoil, water and air, waste disposal, global warming and climate change, deforestation, loss ofbiodiversity, acid rain, and ocean acidification [8]. There is a
of class (Wednesday), anddevices were tested outside during the next class (Monday). The remaining DC class days weredevoted to the second DC, and topics generally followed the steps of the design process.The objective of the first DC was to engage students in effective teamwork through intentionaland reflective practices in the areas of communication, organization and cooperation. The firstDC asked students to design and build a device using recycled materials that could transfer 100milliliters of water from one cup to another though four different mechanisms5. The device wasrequired to be initiated by the drop of a marble six inches above the device. The fast pacednature and rigor of this challenge was intended to put students in the
students tobudgeting, and management; a learn stage for research and complete a project in small groups with the aid of the designinterviews with a client; a design phase for brainstorming and process. To begin this phase, students are placed in or chooseprototyping; a realize stage for analyzing producibility and groups to work with for the entirety of the project. Themanufacturing techniques; and a sustain stage for ensuring instructor then presents a scenario to the students that depictslong-term success. One critical aspect of this design is its a client or community that has a need. To encourageiterative nature that encourages students to view failure as a creativity and imagination, the instructor could
whether the student attended anytype of postsecondary institution, 4-year college-goin is whether the student attended a four-yearacademic institution, and STEM major choice is whether the student enrolled in a four-yearcollege declared a major in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics during the 2016survey wave. The resulting sample size for the linear regression model on college-going is19,770, which includes all students in the HSLS sample who enrolled in any type ofpostsecondary institution (e.g., community college, four-year institution). The outcome variablefor the 4-year college-going model is enrollment at a four-year institution, and the resultingsample size is 13,050. For the model on STEM declaration, the resulting sample
course will include further instruction and explicit feedback on writing.STEM engagement studyIn addition to assessing their competence in course material, students completed a questionnaireat the end of the course designed to measure whether their attitudes towards STEM had changed.Specifically, we were interested in whether students were more interested in STEM relatedtopics, and whether their career choices were impacted by taking the course. The results for thequestions on engagement for the 2018 cohort are shown in Figure 3. The 2017 cohort reportedresponses on a 4-point scale, and 2018 students reported on a 10-point scale, however, resultsfrom the 2017 cohort (not shown) mirrored the trends shown in Figure 3.Figure 3: Results from student
focusing on seismic design, disaster relief and the promotion of diversity in the field of structural engineering.Gabrielle Rose Favro, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Gabrielle Favro is a graduate architectural engineering student at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She has been involved with the structural engineering community throughout her un- dergraduate experience in many ways, such as a 4-year membership of the Cal Poly student chapter of the Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC) and participation in the Earthquake Engi- neering Research Institute (EERI) Undergraduate Seismic Competition as a Construction Team leader. After graduation, she hopes
statements represents one keyway that engineering students can communicate and compare the design problems that they haveidentified [9], [12], few studies have explored how engineering students may approach needsstatement development in practice as part of their projects. The goal of this study was toinvestigate undergraduate engineering students’ conceptions about needs statement development,how their conceptions were impacted by training and practice related to developing needsstatements, and challenges encountered by students while developing needs statements.2. Background2.1 Recommended practices for developing needs statementDesign textbooks [3], [9] and design guides [7], [8], [14] provide several recommendations forneeds statement development
competition outcomes. Studentfeedback was very positive with requests to organize the follow-up event.The effectiveness of communication channels with respect to engaging and recruiting students for theevent is summarized in Table 1. Each channel lists the data when communication was sent ahead of thecompetition on November 16, 2022. Channel Audience Opened Page Views Registered CET training page – emailed 2 weeks prior event 3600 123 140 9 CET training page – emailed 1 week prior event 3600 130 146 11 Isley Innovation Hub – emailed 2 weeks prior event 412 38 40 6 Isley Innovation Hub – emailed 1
positive impact of an onlinehomework system in Blackboard on student engagement. WeBWork8 has been used for calculusand algebra classes in several studies; some studies10 showed improved performance on finalexams, while others12 found no difference in performance between students using WeBWork andstudents doing homework on paper. Parlocsay and Stevens4 compared textbook-based homeworkassignments with three automatic web-based homework delivery systems for undergraduatebusiness statistics courses; they found that the delivery methods made little difference on studentperformance measured by GPA. Bonham’s study13 on introductory physics also indicated nosignificant difference on exam performance between groups completing homework online andon paper
undergraduate engineering students toco-teach robotics lessons to fifth graders. Using a multiple-embedded case study approach, weexamine how the interactions and teaching roles within these partnerships influenced PSTs’teaching self-efficacy. Drawing on reflections, lesson recordings, surveys, and interviews, wepresent the cases of three PSTs—Lisa, Madison, and Kayla—who experienced varying levels ofpartner support and student engagement. Lisa and Madison were both compelled to lead roboticsinstruction due to perceived lack of support from their engineering partners, yet they experiencedcontrasting outcomes: Lisa struggled with disengaged students and malfunctioning robots, whichdiminished her self-efficacy, while Madison's success with highly engaged
mapping (using pictures as a survey tool) informallearning space behaviors, attitudes, and preferences within and outside the context of the library.They created nine learning space attributes which address aspects of learning theory, placemaking, and architecture. The nine attributes are: destination, identity (ambience), conversations(interpersonal communication), community (common purpose), retreat (private space), timely(on demand access), human factors, resources and refreshment. When it comes to informalstudying spaces Matthews et al [1] found that students who used informal social learning spacesrepost significantly higher levels of engagement in comparison to those students who do not usesuch spaces. On the other hand, Mallon [6] stated
. engineering workforce in industry is critical tothe continuous improvement, invention, development, and innovation of new technology which is theengine for U.S. economic prosperity and competitiveness. This paper focuses on a unique model forworkforce development that represents a significant advancement in professional graduate educationextending through the professional masters, professional doctorate and fellow levels of engineeringpractice. This advancement in professional graduate education forms a new partnership for university-industry engagement for U.S. engineering workforce development that completes a missing piece of theprocess to better enable U.S. technological innovation which is long overdue. The impact of project-basedlearning on