Construction Regional competition in Reno, NV, and coaches the BIM team. Page 23.202.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Applying Decoding the Disciplines in a Construction Engineering Mechanics Course: A description of the Decoding InterviewIntroduction I don’t know how many times I’ve finished what I thought was a great treatment of a topic in structural mechanics, only to find that when I’m grading assignments, the majority of the students just did not ‘get it’. I try to use best practices that include an active learning environment, opportunities for
intheir career path. Thus, this lifelong learning creates agency, empowerment, and upward mobilityin minority groups. Knowledge of the Industry and Career Pathways:ENGagED REU participants reflected that exposure to this experience boosted theirunderstanding of post-college options by raising questions about what they could do with theirmajor and encouraging them to investigate other areas where they could work and study aftergraduation. Students expressed that being involved in engineering education research contributedto their engineering mindset and helped them visualize future careers in industry or research. Inthe following quote, a student shared how the REU experiences strengthened their connection tothe field of engineering: I
: statics and strength of material, circuits, andthermodynamics.Bibliography1. Splitt, F., “Systemic Engineering Education Reform: A Grand Challenge.” The Bent of Tau Beta Pi, Spring 2003.2. Sheppard, S., and Jenison, R., “Examples of Freshman Design Education.” International Journal ofEngineering Education, 13 (4), 1997, 248-261.3. Weggel, R., Arms, V., Makufka, M. and Mitchell, J., “Engineering Design for Freshmen.” prepared forDrexel University and the Gateway Coalition, February1998. http://www.gatewaycoalition.org/files/Engrg_Design_for_Freshmen.pdf4. Richardson, J., Corleto, C., Froyd, J., Imbrie, P.K. Parker, J. and Roedel, R., “Freshman Design Projects inthe Foundation Coalition.” 1998 Frontiers in Education Conference, Tempe, Arizona, Nov
experiences with AI, I propose asubversive reframing of AI as a tool for liberation rather than control. AI, when criticallyengaged, has the potential to cultivate critical consciousness, challenge systemic inequities, andfoster human connection in engineering education. Through three narratives, I explore how AImight be reimagined to advance equity-centered goals in unexpected but potentially impactfulways.The first narrative highlights the use of AI as a critical friend for PhD students in a qualitativeresearch methods course, providing constructive, non-judgmental feedback to help them createresearch proposals and so that they can practice interviewing and coding through role-playingwith AI. The second examines the potential of AI as a mentor for
Paper ID #18098The RED Teams as Institutional Mentors: Advice from the First Year of the”Revolution”Dr. Jeremi S. London, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Arizona State University. She holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Industrial Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue Uni- versity. Prior to her PhD, she worked in quality assurance and logistics roles at Anheuser-Busch and GE Healthcare, where she was responsible for ensuring consistency across processes and compliance with federal regulations. For four consecutive summers
Paper ID #5845An Applied Comparison Study: Solar Energy vs. Thermoelectric EnergyDr. Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State UniversityMr. Keith L. Coogler, Sam Houston State UniversityBill Crockford, Sam Houston State University Dr. Crockford is an assistant professor and registered professional engineer in Texas. Page 23.150.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 An Applied Comparison Study: Solar Energy vs. Thermoelectric EnergyAbstractThermoelectric generators (TEG) are devices that
employed to enable time efficiency and suggested options for focusing on what theyconsidered to be the relevant parts: “one thing the reading component can be either shorter orsummarized.” Participants observed when they were confused by the materials and thearrangement. They had ideas for how they would revise the content to make it more effective:“I kind of understand why you introduced that interview at first. But really, I think it might bebetter to adjust some of them to put them later in the module. Although it was adapted, theprogram filled the learning space with more content than participants had time to process.These observations further point to a need in engineering education for more time, space andpriority to learn, think and reflect
device imagers, now used in digital cameras, camcorders, fax machines and numerous defense and medical applications. The Hinman CEOs Program, for which he is the Faculty Director, received the Stanford University Innovative Entrepreneurship Educators Award in 2002, and Dr. Barbe received the American Society of Engineering Education Outstanding Entrepreneurship Educators Award in 2003 and the Olympus Lifetime of Education Innovation Award in 2008.James Green, University of Maryland James V. Green is Mtech’s Director of Entrepreneurship Education with responsibilities for the Hinman CEOs Program, the Hillman Entrepreneurs Program, and the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program. As a Senior
educators and administrators. Therefore, weask the following research questions:RQ1: What is the internal consistency reliability of the measurement tests used to assesssophomore engineering experiences?RQ2: What is the underlying factor structure of the observed items for scales without sufficientevidence for psychometric properties (EFA)? To what extent do the observed items in well-validated scales accurately measure the theoretically conceptualized construct (CFA)?RQ3: To what extent do scores measuring sophomore experiences vary among differentdemographic groups of engineering students?2. BackgroundThe sophomore year in college often emerges as a period of pronounced dissatisfaction.According to a national report, approximately 25% of students
fruitful.Currently, 3D printing is used in a variety of fields and professions all around the world. It is notrestricted in any way by either culture or language. Education makes use of this sort oftechnology to bring out the latent abilities of students; if a student has an idea, that idea can bebrought to life in the form of a 3D model by the student. The high-tech digital world can now beheld in one's hands, giving students of today the opportunity to enhance it for the benefit offuture generations.References1] Lee, Y. J. (2022). Promoting social and emotional learning competencies in science,technology, engineering, and mathematics project-based mathematics classrooms. School Scienceand Mathematics, 122(8), 429–434.[2] Arslan, A. & Erdogan, I. (2021
University of Toledo, and Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering at the Bangladesh Institute of© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Technology, Khulna. He has published journal and conference papers. Dr Ali has done research projects with Delphi Automotive System, GE Medical Systems, Harley-Davidson Motor Company, International Truck and Engine Corporation (ITEC), National/Panasonic Electronics, and Rockwell Automation. His research interests include manufacturing systems modeling, simulation and optimization, intelligent scheduling and planning, artificial intelligence, predictive maintenance, e-manufacturing, and lean manufacturing. He is member of IIE, INFORMS, SME
Paper ID #36474Practitioner Perspectives of the Impact of COVID-19 on CSEducation in High Schools Serving Historically MarginalizedStudents (Fundamental)Monica McGill (President & CEO) Dr. Monica McGill is the Founder, President, and CEO of CSEdResearch.org, a 501(c)(3) non-profit focused on improving K-12 Computer Science education for all children by enabling and disseminating exemplary, evidence-driven research.Angelica Thompson (Senior Education Researcher)Leigh Ann DeLyser (Executive Director)Luronne VavalStephanie B Wortel-London (Director of Research) © American Society for Engineering
. Primus, 23(5), 477–486.13. Mok, H. N. (2014). Teaching tip: The flipped classroom. Journal of Information Systems Education, 25(1), 7–11.14. Simpson, W., Evans, D., Eley, R., & Stiles, M. (2003). Findings from the HEI “Flip” project: application issues. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 13(5/6), 471.15. Velegol, S. B., Zappe, S. E., & Mahoney, E. (2015). The Evolution of a flipped classroom: Evidence-based recommendations. Advances in Engineering Education, 1–37.16. Ankeny, C. J., & Krause, S. J. (2014). Flipped biomedical engineering classroom using pencasts and muddiest point web-enabled tools. In Proceedings of 121st ASEE Annual Conference &
2006-750: COMBINING REQUIREMENTS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY WORKEric Durant, Milwaukee School of Engineering Eric Durant (M’02) is an Assistant Professor in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He did his graduate studies at the University of Michigan, receiving the PhD degree in 2002. He teaches courses in both computer and software engineering and does consulting work involving signal processing, genetic algorithms, and hearing aid algorithms. Page 11.332.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Combining
://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015025.pdf, 2015.[2] National Center for Education Statistics, “Nontraditional Undergraduates / Definitions and Data.” [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs/web/97578e.asp[3] L. Horn, “Nontraditional Undergraduates: Trends in Enrollment from 1986 to 1992 and Persistence and Attainment Among 1989-1990 Beginning Postsecondary Students (NCES 97-578),” National Center for Educational Statistics, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1996. [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs/97578.pdf[4] A. Minichiello, “From Deficit Thinking to Counter Storying: A Narrative Inquiry of Nontraditional Student Experience within Undergraduate Engineering Education,” International Journal of Education in
Observations, reflection, and goal setting, support development of evidence- supported pedagogy in engineering peer educators Celia Evans1, Lisa Schneider-Bentley1, Jena Rozanski2, Jordan Johnson2, and Ryan Sauve1 1 Engineering Learning Initiatives, Cornell University, 2College of Engineering Cornell UniversityAbstractIn higher education, the role of undergraduate educators is growing. Teaching teams in large coursesoften have a mix of graduate and undergraduate teaching assistants (TAs). We employ and trainundergraduate ‘Academic Excellence Workshop (AEW) Facilitators’ who, in pairs, lead weeklycollaborative learning sessions that parallel challenging core courses. In training sessions, we introduceand
here because you're awoman. And they responded, okay, let's compare stats. And of course, they're better than these men”.Through the data collection, the participants gained clarity of how they experienced the culture throughtheir various identities and were often made to feel like they did not belong. Creek noted in an interviewthat she knows that her experiences are not well understood by other community members. “They don’teven realize when they are doing these things. I think it gets irritating when they’re not willing to change 8Dignity and well-being: Narratives of modifying the culture of engineering education to improve mental
departure from doctoral study,” Ph.D., University of Maryland, College Park, United States -- Maryland, 1996. Accessed: Dec. 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/docview/304267303/abstract/FD24296DBE7247ACPQ/1[23] J. Roy, “Engineering by the numbers. In American Society for Engineering Education,” American Society of Engineering Education, pp. 1–40, 2019.[24] R. B. Johnson and L. Christensen, Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. SAGE Publications, 2019.[25] T. Bluestein, C. Amelink, and M. Artiles, “Campus Climate for Engineering Graduate Students: Examining Differences Between Domestic Minority, Domestic Majority, and International Students,” in 2018 CoNECD - The
Paper ID #8746Where do We Go from Here? Conversations with K-6 Principals FollowingThree Years of Engineering Education Professional Development for TheirFacultyDr. Louis S. Nadelson PhD, Boise State University Louis S. Nadelson is an associate professor in the College of Education at Boise State University, with a PhD in educational psychology from UNLV. His scholarly interests include all areas of STEM teaching and learning, inservice and preservice teacher professional development, program evaluation, multidis- ciplinary research, and conceptual change. Nadelson uses his over 20 years of high school and college math
Paper ID #9703Funds of Knowledge in Hispanic Students’ Communities and Householdsthat Enhance Engineering Design ThinkingMr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, Utah State University Joel Alejandro Mejia (Alex) is a PhD student in Engineering Education and Graduate Research Assistant at Utah State University. He received his B.S. in Metallurgical and Materials Engineering from the Uni- versity of Texas at El Paso, and his M.S. in Metallurgical Engineering from the University of Utah. Prior to coming to Utah State University, Alex worked in industry as a Materials Engineer and Project Engi- neer. His current research focuses on how
learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology,” Science (1979), vol. 332, no. 6034, pp. 1213–1216, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.1204820/SUPPL_FILE/HAAK.SOM.PDF.[4] A. Silva, A. G. Pereira-Medrano, H. Melia, M. Ashby, and M. Fry, “Materials education: adapting to needs of the 21st Century,” in 4th International Symposium of Engineering Education, Sheffield, UK, Citeseer, 2012, pp. 19–20.[5] C. Dichev and D. Dicheva, “Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review,” International journal of educational technology in higher education, vol. 14, pp. 1–36, 2017.[6] B. Morschheuser, L. Hassan, K. Werder, and J. Hamari, “How to design
AC 2012-3730: CREATING LOW-COST INTRINSIC MOTIVATION COURSECONVERSIONS IN A LARGE REQUIRED ENGINEERING COURSEDr. Geoffrey L. Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Geoffrey L. Herman earned his Ph.D. in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Illi- nois, Urbana-Champaign as a Mavis Future Faculty Fellow. He is currently a Postdoctoral rRsearcher for the Illinois Foundry for Engineering Education. His research interests include conceptual change and development in engineering students, promoting intrinsic motivation in the classroom, blended learning (integrating online teaching tools into the classroom), and intelligent tutoring systems. He is a recipient of the 2011 American Society for
Paper ID #25482Kindergartners Planning in the Design Process: Drawn Plans and how theyRelate to First Try Design Attempts (Fundamental)Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Professor of Science and Engineering Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She has a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering, worked briefly as a process engineer, and taught high school physics and pre-engineering. She has taught engineering and science to children in multiple formal and informal settings. As a K- 8 pre-service teacher educator, she
knowing. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., Mahwah, NJ, 2002).10 Linda Vanasupa, Jonathan Stolk, Trevor Harding, and Richard Savage, " A Systemic Model of Development: Strategically Enhancing Students' Cognitive, Psychomotor, Affective, and Social Development," in First International Conference on Research in Engineering Education, edited by Jeff Froyd (IEEE, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2007).11 C. Ames and J. Archer, "Achievement goals in the classroom: Student learning strategies and motivation processes," Journal of Educational Psychology 80, 260-267 (1988).12 Claudia M. Mueller and Carol S. Dweck, "Praise for Intelligence Can Undermine Children's Motivation and Performance," Journal of Personality and Social
Paper ID #36892Teaching engineering design through a team-based multi-disciplinaryhumanitarian engineering project: effects on engineering identity andsense of belongingDr. Shannon Barker, University of Virginia Dr. Shannon Barker completed her PhD at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and completed two post-doctoral fellowships at the University of Washington and Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, specializing in gene delivery. Shannon has been in graduate higher education leadership for six years both at the Georgia Institute of Technology and the University of Virginia, and is currently Associate Profes
students.Prof. Kurt Paterson P.E., Michigan Technological University Kurt Paterson, Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, is also Director of Michigan Tech’s D80 Center. D80 has the mission to develop contribution-based learning, research, and service opportunities for all students and staff to partner with the poorest 80% of humanity, together creating solutions that matter. As Director of several international programs at the undergraduate and graduate levels, Paterson, his colleagues, and his students have conducted numerous community-inspired research and design projects. Paterson is an educational innovator, recently adding courses for first-year students, Great Ideas, and graduate students
Paper ID #48950Scaling Engineering Challenges for PK12 Outreach Programs (Other)Dr. Leah Bug, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Dr. Leah Bug has over 35 years of experience teaching both formal and informal K-20 STEM education, with over 20 years in designing and providing teacher professional development.Dr. Amy Isvik, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Dr. Amy Isvik has 6+ years of experience as an informal STEM educator working with learners in North Carolina, nationally, and abroad.Mrs. Susan Beth D’amico, NC State University College of Engineering - The Engineering Place Susan B. Dˆa C™Amico Coordinator of
14.130.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A Team-Based Design Competition for Freshmen Engineering Students that Emphasizes Sustainable DesignAbstractThis paper discusses a design competition for freshman students in the School of Engineering atJames Madison University. Our engineering program has a sustainability focus that isspecifically related to sustainable design and sustainable systems analysis. Our philosophy ofsustainable design incorporates technical, economic, environmental, and societal criteria. Ourprogram includes a ten credit design course sequence in which development of tangibleprototypes and models will be emphasized. The purpose of the freshman design competition is tointroduce our
Paper ID #21390Methods to Study Elements of the Instructional Scaffolding Strategy Modelfor Enhancing Engineering Students’ Knowledge Construction in an OnlineSocial Collaborative Learning EnvironmentMiss May-Ling Tan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Miss Tan May Ling as an Engineering Education postgraduate student in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM). Her major study in Online Learning such as social collaborative learning (SCL) integrates with web-based instructional scaffolding which is conducted to the engineering students who study in one of pioneer polytechnic namely Ungku Omar Polytechnic. They are technical engineers
spatial skills for engineering students”. International Journal of Science Education. Vol 31(3), pp 459-80, Feb. 2009.[2] S. Sorby, “Spatial Skills Training to Improve Student Success in Engineering,” 2012 Specialist Meeting—Spatial Thinking Across the College Curriculum, pp. 1– 4, 2012.[3] C. Hill, C. Corbett, A. St Rose. Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. American Association of University Women. 1111 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20036; 2010.[4] S.A. Sorby, Developing Spatial Thinking Workbook. Cengage Learning. Boston, MA, 2011.[5] S.S. Metz, C.D. Matt, P. Campbell, J. Langeman, and R. Ribe, “Engage Engineering.” [Online]. Available: https://www.engageengineering.org/.[6] N