practice the sustainable development, local to global. Dan is a Past President of the American Academy of Environmental Engineers and Scientists. He is a Diplomate Laureate of the American Academy of Sanitarians. Dan is a lifetime honorary Fellow of the American Academy of Nursing. Professor Oerther’s awards as an educator include lifetime honorary Fellowship in the National League for Nursing’s Academy of Nursing Educators and the Robert G. Quinn Award from the American Society for Engineering Education.Sarah Oerther ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Essentials of the Nurse+Engineer: Chemical Engineering Devices Daniel B. Oerther
Mathematics Education. DOI: 10.1007/s10763-010-9218-3, 2011.21. Lambert, M., Diefes-Dux, H.A., Beck, M., Duncan, D., Oware, E. and Nemeth, R. What is engineering? An exploration of P-6 grade teachers’ perspectives. Proceedings of the 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, October 2007.22. Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S. and Lyons, J. How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 18(1): 60-73, 2009.23. Capobianco, B.M., French, B.F. and Diefes-Dux, H.A. Engineering Identity Development Among Pre- Page 23.475.9 Adolescent
University of Michigan,© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 technical staff at Bell Telephone Laboratories. In 1974, he joined the University of Michigan, where he is now the William Gould Dow Distinguished University Professor of Electrical Engin-eering and Computer Science, the J. Reid and Polly Anderson Professor of Manufacturing Technology, and Professor of Biomedical Engineering. He is a Fellow of the IEEE and the AIMBE and a member of the United States National Academy of Engineering.Michel M. Maharbiz, University of Michigan Michel M. Maharbiz is an assistant professor in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
and Heinz Luegenbiehl, of Liberal Education in 21s Century Engineering.( Peter Lang, 2004) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 High-Impact, Short-Term Immersion Study Abroad in Lyon, France: An engineering student perspectiveIntroductionA lab-and-language summer program in Lyon, France, was created in 2000 to provideinternational undergraduate STEM students with a French immersion experience. The programstructure and its modifications over the years was described previously by the US facultyrecruiter and the French faculty administrator. The present paper presents the perspective of aUS student participant in this
American side and Japanese side have learnedvaluable cultural lessons. With all these experiences of transferring and translating new conceptsto different culture, we hope to resolve problems which might arise when we attempt to furthertransfer EDE to other Asian countries.Bibliographical Information1. M. J. Samiento, S. Matsumoto, T. Kubo; “The engineering Design I and II at Kanazawa Institute of Technology”, Session 2560, ASEE, 1998/June2. L. Alden Kendall, Y. Hoshino, “International Perspectives in Design Education Research” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Industrial Engineering Theory, Applications and Practice, pp160-168, 19993. K. E. Ramadane, J-L Herbeaux, C. Sorrenssen, L. Kendal, R. Perez, M. Matsuishi, T. Kubo, Y
influence students’ global competency development?Our goal in exploring these particular research questions is to shed light how studentsparticipating in EWB exhibit global competency development. Specifically, we strive tounderstand the student perspective of the EWB educational experience with the goal of having a Page 26.500.2more informed understanding of how such an experience might be assessed in the future as anaccepted educational avenue for exposing students to authentic global engineering projects.Global Competencies in Engineering EducationIn the last 15 years, Engineering programs in the U.S. have been working towards
Professor of Engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. She graduated from San Jos´e State University with a BS in Industrial Systems Engineering and from Purdue University with an MS in Industrial Engineering and PhD in Engineering Education. Dina is a 2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship and an Honorable Mention for the Ford Foundation Fellowship Program. Her research interest focuses on changing the deficit base perspective of first-generation college students by providing asset-based approaches to understanding this population. Dina is interested in understanding how first-generation college students author their identities as
Pennsylvania, an area of very slowexpansion. They also help to distance certain communities from the pursuit of more desirable,engineering occupations. We ask how this optimism regarding a new industrial realm comes tobe among educators and policy makers, and what ideologies regarding work, skill andopportunity in technology based industries it may reflect and promote.IntroductionThis paper examines the role of cultural ideologies in technical workforce development. We lookspecifically at rationales offered by planners, educators and employers for training programsintended to equip American workers for new industrial employment opportunities. This training,in secondary and post-secondary schools, has been part of the nation's economic developmentsince
Paper ID #21733Translating Theory on Color-blind Racism to an Engineering Education Con-text: Illustrations from the Field of Engineering EducationDr. Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alice Pawley is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Gender, Women’s and Sexuality Studies Program and the Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. Prof. Pawley’s goal through her work at Purdue is to help people, including the engineering education profession, develop a vision of engineering education as more inclusive, engaged
DevelopmentAs demonstrated by accounts such as Thomas Friedman‟s The World is Flat1 and the Engineer of2020 investigations by the National Academy of Engineering,2 engineering educators are onceagain focusing on necessary changes to our national engineering workforce. If there ever were anopportunity draw useful lessons from history, it would surely be on this topic. Concerns about an“engineering manpower” crisis persisted throughout the Cold War years in American history,fueled by massive federal expenditures and the emphasis placed on science and its application tothe nation‟s arsenal and economic wealth. Even as we proceed to transform, if not dismantle, theinstitutional apparatus developed to meet the exigencies of the Cold War period, it may well
I Session 1547 .— ..- -. A Profile of the 21st Century Engineering Technology Graduate: An Industry Perspective Robert V. Peltier, Farouk Attia Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc./University of HoustonIntroduction By any reasonable standard, Engineering Technology (ET) is a young profession as well as a relativelynew university program, It has only been thirty-one years since the ASEE
Math and Science Teachers to Bring an Engineering Perspective to the Classroom” Bringing engineering education into theclassroom is of particular interest to the state of Ohiosince the Ohio Department of Education (ODE) hasjust created State New Learning Standards for K-12Science that will be fully in use in Ohio scienceclassrooms by 2014-2015. These new standardsplace greater emphasis on STEM education as anintegrated whole. ODE has developed an idealcurricular framework, called the “Eye ofIntegration,” as shown in Figure 1. Science contentis juxtaposed with Universal Skills (21st Century Figure 1: Science Eye of IntegrationLearning Skills) and other content
2006-2560: WOMEN, ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH - PROVIDING CHOICEAND BALANCE?Cecilia Chan, Dublin Institute of Technology Cecilia Chan has published a number of conference papers on Engineering Education in areas of retention, recruiting, motivation and support for non-traditional students such as international students, and female engineers to disseminate successful educational strategies. She is also committed to encourage more women into Engineering. She is also an active researcher in the areas of digital signal processing, machine vision, bio-metrics and medical imaging engineering.Michael Murphy, Dublin Institute of Technology
. Ergezer is a member of ACM and Eta Kappa Nu. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work-in-Progress - The Undergraduate Perspective: How to Survive an Undergraduate Engineering Program Bryon Kucharski∗ , Aaron Carpenter∗ , Joan Giblin† , Mehmet Ergezer∗ ∗ {kucharskib, carpentera1, ergezerm}@wit.edu, † j.giblin@northeastern.edu ∗ Wentworth Institute of Technology † Northeastern University Abstract Student retention across engineering programs often hinges upon students’ ability to adaptto a new academic paradigm, for example
that worked in refugee camps in areas hit with natural disasters and civil conflicts. Atthe end of the semester, students write reflective essays on civil engineering and why they maywant to become civil engineers. In these essays, 50% of the 8 women and 21% of the 84 menstated an interest in serving society. One female student wrote: “I was surprised and interested toread [about] the international and service aspects.... I would like to find out more about this formof ‘emergency civil engineering’.” Another female student commented: “I like that I would bedoing something that makes a difference in the community.”The three-credit First-Year Engineering Projects course (GEEN 1400) has had a few sectionsfocused on “Appropriate Technology” over
engineering identity development critical to prolonged engagement of Black women in engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 92–113, 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20374.[4] J. Huff and M. Ross, “Advancing an Integrative Perspective of Identity in Engineering Education,” in International Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri, Ed., New York: Routledge, 2023. doi: 10.4324/9781003287483.[5] W. Faulkner, “`Nuts and Bolts and People’: Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities,” Soc Stud Sci, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 331–356, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1177/0306312706072175.[6] S. Secules, “Making the Familiar Strange: An Ethnographic Scholarship of Integration Contextualizing Engineering Educational Culture as
. Page 25.728.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Implementation of an International Health Assessment with a Multidisciplinary Team of Undergraduate Engineering and Science StudentsAbstractIn this work, we describe a learning experience involving an international health assessment thatwas implemented by a multidisciplinary team of undergraduate engineering and science students.The health assessment was completed as part of a field experience integrated within a newlydeveloped global health course. During the field experience, which was conducted inGuatemala, a multidisciplinary team of students interviewed and surveyed various stakeholdersat two
Biological Engineering at the UBC. He is involved in the development of first-year programs in engineering, problem-based learning initiatives, science and engineering outreach, and teaching training for engineering graduate students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 International Engineering Student Motivation to Develop Communication Skills: a Case for an Integrated Training ApproachAbstractVantage College at the University of British Columbia was established to offer innovative first-year programs to international students that integrate core disciplinary content with integratedlanguage training. Although communication skills are
paper presents an “in-their-own-words” student evaluation of the value ofinternational service to engineering education with the purpose of reconciling facultyperspectives and student perspectives. Engineering educators speak in an institutionalizedlanguage of objectives and outcomes which relate the intent of educational activities with theirimpact on student knowledge and preparation for the profession. Most often, this specializedvernacular is not shared by students; and their perception of the importance of various activitiesmay depart from the perception held by the educator. Also, the international landscapeexperienced by outward bound millennial (and post-millennial) students reflects a much differentset of world affairs than their
expand international research opportunities for students in STEM fields. NanoJapan was recognized by the Institute for International Education in 2008 with the prestigious Andrew Heiskell Award for Innovations in Study Abroad. She received a second NSF grant for a multi-phase conference, Strategic Issues in University Internation- alization , that examined a comparative approaches in the US and Japan for the internationalization of science and engineering education. Dr. Matherly is the recipient of two Fulbright grants for international education administrators (Germany and Japan.) She has a BA in English and Political Science from the University of New Mexico, an MS in Education from Indiana University, and an Ed.D
Institute of Technology, Ohio State U., Polytechnic U., U. of South Carolina.2. "Negotiation training through simulation: The ICONS International Negotiations Seminars" by Brigid A. Starkey, Associate Director Project ICONS, Univ. of Maryland. Published in the Educators' Tech Exchange, Spring 1994.3. Simulation numbers changed from Roman to Arabic (normal) notation for ease of identification.4. “Refocusing our efforts: assessing non-technical competency gaps” by Ronald L. Meier, Michael R. Williams, and Michael A. Humphreys. Published in the ASEE Journal of Education, July 2000.BIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:ROXANNE JACOBYSince 1994 Roxanne Jacoby, a consulting engineer, is an Adjunct Professor at Cooper Union, teaching EngineeringManagement courses
: “an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility”. Ethical issues are often very different across cultures. • j: “a knowledge of contemporary issues”. Engineering solutions are world-wide solutions and very much a function of contemporary issues. • k: “an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice”. The modern engineering tools and techniques necessary for engineering practice differ world-wide and will therefore determine the skills of co- workers from other countries.In addition, and in an effort to deepen students’ global perspective through direct exposure, theSoECS is planning a number of international exchange programs, beyond the
objective of academic syllabus is thesame. This common objective is basically the result of increasing global nature ofCivil Engineering education. Undoubtedly, the future of Civil Engineeringeducation strives on the balance of ideas from global perspectives. Thusconcluding the paper, it aims at promoting, stimulating and broadening thedialogue among the engineering students, engineering faculty and universityadministration to develop additional curricular mechanisms through which thetwo universities can produce the next generation of Civil Engineering graduates. Page 7.312.1 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
AC 2011-1415: AVOIDING INFERIORITY: GLOBAL ENGINEERING ED-UCATION ACROSS JAPANGary Lee Downey, Virginia Tech Gary Downey is Alumni Distinguished Professor in Science and Technology Studies and affiliated Profes- sor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. A mechanical engineer (Lehigh) and cultural anthropolo- gist (University of Chicago), he is co-editor of What Is Global Engineering Education For?: The Making of International Educators (Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2010). Author of The Machine in Me: An Anthropologist Sits Among Computer Engineers, he is Editor of The Engineering Studies Series at MIT Press and Global Engineering series at Morgan & Claypool, as well as the Engineering Studies journal
AC 2011-2353: A PARTICIPATORY INVESTIGATION OF LEARNING ININTERNATIONAL SERVICE PROJECTSRussell Korte, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Russell Korte is an Assistant Professor in Human Resource Development at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He has been a co-investigator for the Collaborative Research Lab at Stanford Univer- sity, a research assistant for the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education, and is currently a Fellow with the Illinois Foundry for Innovation in Engineering Education. His research investigates how engineering students navigate their education and how engineering graduates transition into the work- placespecifically studying how they learn the social norms of
communitycolleges. Students then join IRE as upper level engineering students (juniors and seniors).IRE is based around an innovative idea: learning engineering by practicing engineering. IRE is a100% Project-based Learning (PjBL) and design-oriented engineering education program; thestudents gain their technical and professional learning while completing design projects. IREstudents must take four, three credit, design courses called Design I, Design II, Capstone DesignI and Capstone Design II11,12. Figure 1 shows the IRE curriculum. The majority of the projects atIRE are industry projects; however, internal projects are also defined. The industry partners ofthe program provide engineering design projects and technical mentorship for the students whoare
Professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering program at Minnesota State University, Mankato, home of the Iron Range and Twin Cities Engineering programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Managing Transformation to Crack Open Engineering EducationRapid changes in the worldwide engineering ecosystem are creating a compelling rationale torethink engineering education. Tomorrow’s graduate will need to collaboratively contributeexpertise across multiple perspectives in an environment of rapid innovation and technologicalbreakthroughs [1]. Meeting these challenges requires a transformational change rather thanincremental improvements in how we recruit and educate engineering students
Paper ID #19051Interns in the Wild: Using Structured Reflection and Interviews to Investi-gate Early Career Engineering PracticeProf. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and
development.Dr. Julianne Vernon, University of Michigan Julianne Vernon is a Research Program Officer at the University of Michigan, the College of Literature, Science, and Arts where she is coordinating the implementation of faculty led research projects into introductory chemistry and biology lab courses. She received her bachelors of engineering in chemical engineering from the City College of New York and her doctorate degree at University of Florida in Environmental Engineering. She has experience developing international and national research experience for STEM majors. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 An Approach towards the Integration of International Research
AC 2012-4073: BUILDING A COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTION TO OBTAINAND SUSTAIN STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR A COLLABO-RATED LABMr. Fanyu F. Zeng, Indiana Wesleyan University Fanyu F. Zeng is an Assistant Professor in business information systems at Indiana Wesleyan Univer- sity. His research interests include software development, programming, database management, database performance, data mining, software project management, teaching methods, and international cultures in high education. Page 25.275.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Building a Comprehensive