engineering educators can best help them to be successful. Ourfuture research on RANGE students will explore the challenges that these students experience inbalancing the competing demands of military service and academic pursuits in engineeringeducation.References[1] J. Marcus, "Community colleges rarely graduate the veterans they recruit," The Atlantic, 21 April 2017.[2] U.S. Veterans Administration: National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics, "Summary of veterans benefits: FY 2000 to FY 2016," [Online]. Available: https://www.va.gov/vetdata/utilization.asp. [Accessed 22 January 2020].[3] U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, "Annual Benefits Report, Fiscal Year 2018," Author, Washington, DC, 2019.[4] C. A. Cate, S. Lyon, J
data from 21 schools that participated in the 2008 Project to Assess Climate inEngineering survey, the classroom experiences of women in undergraduate engineering majorsare examined, with specific attention to the effect of race. This study explores the differences orsimilarities that exist between women of different race/ethnic groups with respect to theirperceptions and engagement with faculty and in classrooms, where students begin theirengineering careers.Literature ReviewRecent studies on the recruitment and retention of women in STEM fields have highlighted theneed for research on the intersecting factors of gender and race 4, 5, 6. Qualitative interviewapproaches have been successful in elucidating the perspectives of women STEM
of an ideal libraryspace [3]. Students see their academic library as a multi-purpose destination. They use the libraryfor both individual and group study, reference services, computer use, and meeting andsocializing [4,5].Engineering students are somewhat unique compared to students in other disciplines. They tendto search for information themselves rather than ask a librarian for assistance [6]. Engineeringstudents participate in both individual and group study on a regular basis but they also engage inmore individual study than non-STEM majors [7].Academic libraries use space studies to understand how their spaces are used by students [8]. Fora library renovation at Ohio Northern University, the library conducted a survey and used
resources helps the faculty members perform research moreefficiently. Having a partner to help find articles can relieve or eliminate a source of frustrationin the research process. Faculty members can be a great help to librarians in building acollection of resources that supports the research needs of the university community. Mostimportantly, these partnerships have a positive impact on developing students into an informedsociety of lifelong learners.Even though librarians may not be an obvious choice of partner to help faculty members succeedin their research and teaching efforts, such partnerships have much to offer. Each partnershipwill be unique in its depth and breadth, depending upon the needs and goals of the participants.They can exist
has developed an annual outreach event to bolster the number of women in the cen-tral upstate NY area interested in STEM careers. Our signature outreach event, the WOMEN(Women’s Outreach in Materials, Energy, and Nanobiotechnology) Event, introduces female highschool students and their parents to what scientists and engineers do and how they benefit society.While many outreach programs focus on urban communities, our program targets rural areas wherewomen are particularly at risk for not attending or completing college [3]. During the WOMEN Event, our group hosts 20 to 40 tenth grade females and their parents fromrural areas to further their interest in STEM fields and provide an early start on college planning.Now in its sixth year, the
rewarding students’ entrepreneurialefforts. Engineering entrepreneurship is growing as a subfield of interest as well, with manyinstitutions nationwide placing centers for entrepreneurship and innovation under theirengineering schools and with the establishment of The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship.A study was started at a western research university to better understand the impact of peerconsultants in entrepreneurship for engineering students (Call, Goodridge, & Scheaffer, 2016).These peer consultants from the university’s entrepreneurship center were invited into randomlyselected sections of a Technical Communication for Engineers class to present information aboutentrepreneurship, the on-campus resources and competitions that
College of Business, Grand Canyon University, 3300 W Camelback Road, Phoenix, AZ 85061-1097, USA.3. Cedja, B. N. (2006). An examination of transfer shock in academic disciplines. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 21(3), 279-2884. Hills, J.R. (1965). Transfer shock: The academic performance of the junior college transfer. Journal of Experimental Education, 33, 201-215.5. Lakin, J., and Elliot, C. (2016). STEMing the shock: Examining transfer shock and its impact on stem major and enrollment persistence. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 28(2), 9–316. Smith, N. L., Grohs, J. R., & Van Aken, E. M. (2022) Comparison of transfer schock and graduation rates across
competencies, such as problem solving, critical thinking, andcollaboration. We have also updated the way the students are being evaluated; therefore, casestudies are graded based on rubrics that clearly communicate our expectations to the students.Finally, to track the progress and evaluate the success of the above innovations, we have createdan attitudes survey (beginning/end of the semester) and an informal early feedback survey(middle of the semester).Based on the feedback we got from the students, as well as their grades in the case studies andexams, the implemented innovations improved our students’ critical thinking and trained them inworking in groups. Furthermore, by having them work in realistic case studies, they gained adeeper understanding
Society for Quality, and a PE in quality engineering in the State of California. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 How to Make Engineering Statistics More Appealing to Millennial StudentsAbstractA one-semester calculus-based course in Engineering Statistics is taught in almost allengineering colleges, and is viewed as a “tools” course versus courses focused on engineeringconcepts and principles. Most current engineering faculty members were undergrads in 1970-2010 and graduate students 1975-2015. We argue that the way many of us learned probabilityand statistics, even as graduate students, does not support engagement and appeal to Millennialstudents. The
in the open-ended responses about these team-basedapplied projects was that most occur at the end of the program, usually acting as a capstone orsenior project. As a result, many these projects occur as part of academic classes within theirrespective programs. Projects tend to be tailored to meet the needs of different majors, as well asthe current needs of industry and the community. For example, some of these projects maybenefit the community or a company by having students build a product that can be used (e.g., apiece of specialized equipment or a campus bridge). Likewise, these applied products help thestudent gain direct experience (e.g., skills and knowledge) working on a specialized project intheir field of interest (e.g., a
, one of our primary considerations in the creation of Vis-MoM has beeneducational theory and learning styles. These pedagogical foundations have been used to guidethe development and use of the courseware from the beginning. Of primary use have been theKolb cycle, Bloom’s taxonomy and the concept of scaffolding. In addition, we have attemptedto engage the full breadth of learning styles as illuminated by both the students’ MBTI andVARK scores. In concert with this foundation has been achievement of basic educationalobjectives, which would ensure the success of the desired goals of the project. The educationalobjectives as previously stated are: 1) to reach a student population that has a great variety oflearning styles, 2) to increase overall
Paper ID #29823Taking a Bandsaw to 1st Grade: Transforming Elementary School throughHands-on STEAM Education (Evaluation)Ms. Madhurima Das, NuVu Studio Madhurima Das graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2018 with a degree in Me- chanical Engineering. Since then, she has been working as a Design and Technology Fellow for NuVu Studio teaching design and engineering to K-12 students, with a focus on elementary education. She is interested in the intersections of design, engineering, and art and the impact of hands-on learning. She will be returning to MIT in Fall 2020 to begin her graduate studies in
formation of engineering identity, and increasing synopticism at a curricular level. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Comparing Implicit and Explicit measurements of Engineering and Research Science Identities in Engineering Doctoral StudentsIntroductionThis research brief research paper investigates the relationship between implicit and explicitmeasures of engineering–research science identity in engineering doctoral students (EDS).Drawing on Social Identity Theory as deployed in engineering education research and integratingtheoretical perspectives from social psychology, this research addresses the question: To whatextent do EDS' implicit engineering–research science
freshmen engineering programs, math success, K-12 STEM curriculum and accreditation, and retention and recruitment of STEM majors. Page 25.1087.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Promoting STEM Faculty Members’ Reflection on their Teaching PracticeAs part of an institutional focus on STEM student success, a group of eight STEM faculty fromacross the STEM disciplines participated in a year-long faculty learning community (FLC). Thefacilitated experience was designed to support the professional development of faculty throughexploration and
. 4, pp. 419- 425, 10 2005.[24] P. D. A. Gardner, Pursuing an Engineering Degree: An Examination of Issues Pertaining to Persistence in Engineering., Collegiate Employment Research Institute, Michigan State University, 113 Student Services, East Lansing, MI 48824 ($5.00)., 1990.[25] S. Makridakis, The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms, vol. 90, Elsevier Ltd, 2017, pp. 46-60.[26] H. J. Wilson, P. R. Daugherty and N. Morini-Bianzino, "The Jobs That Artificial Intelligence Will Create", MITSloan Management Review, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 14-16, 2017.[27] A. Parker and K. Marcynuk, "THE SELF-REPORTED CONFIDENCE AND PROFICIENCY LEVELS OF UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENTS IN AN
meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors. An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts. An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.Figure 1: Empty self-assessment form. This form will be filled in by students at the start of their senior year
, University of Cincinnati, will, demonstrate that its graduates meeteleven ABET outcomes: a. Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b. Ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c. Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs d. Ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams e. Ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g. Ability to communicate effectively h. Broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context i. Recognition of the need for and the ability to engage in life-long
University of Connecticut Health Center in Farmington, Conn. She holds a biomedical engineering master’s degree from Rensselaer at Hartford and a bachelor’s degree in biomedical engineering from Marquette University. She is actively engaged in the recruitment and retention of students in the BMET field.Eugenia Fernandez, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis Eugenia Fernandez is an Associate Professor of computer and information technology and Chair of the Department of Computer, Information & Leadership Technology in the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis. She is a Fellow of the Mack Center at Indiana University for Inquiry on Teaching and
for Biotechnology.Non-technical presentations included communicating your big idea, STEAM, and stress release.The campers also toured a prototyping facility at Dynetics, Inc. and took the Ultimate Math FieldTrip challenge at the US Space and Rocket Center. The highlight of the week was the Page 26.344.2Professional Women’s Night, an event that involved professionals rotating among groups ofgirls, speed dating style. In addition to meeting professional women, the girls watched a TEDvideo and had Tedx personnel lead a panel discussion with two of the camp counselors, one anundergraduate STEM student, and one a graduate student in a STEM field
this paper.Keywords: Teaching Evaluation, Active Learning, Faculty experiences, COPUS, Studentlearning, Faculty Development The Use of Peer-Observation Protocols in STEM EducationClassroom observation instruments provide a structure for peer-observation of teaching. Similarto end-of-term student course evaluations, peer observation data can play a critical role inproviding faculty with feedback on their teaching methods, communication, active learningtechniques, and student engagement. Furthermore, observation data can provide a basis forinformed critical self-reflection that may prompt positive changes not only at the instructor levelbut also at departmental, college and institutional levels (Smith, Jones, Gilbert, & Wieman(2013
privilege pedagogicalscholarship the same as disciplinary scholarship which many of our female faculty hadembraced. Currently my institution is engaged in a campus-wide effort to accomplish this levelof structural change.Panelist #2: thankfully, very few. but, I also worry that I have been oblivious to many. When Itaught first-year engineering, the students worked in teams to build a robotic device to carry outsome simple task like sorting marbles. sometimes on a team of men and women, I would catchthe men engaging in subtle or not-so-subtle exclusion of the women. one of the most commonways this happened was the assumption that the women should be responsible for writing thereport while the men built and programmed the device. as this arrangement
viable goal or outcome, and to enhance the knowledge,skills and dispositions of all students. In other words, performance tasks are assignments andprojects used to provide students with practice necessary to determine competency in the skillsand knowledge deemed important. A carefully constructed activity is one where assurance ismade that “what students should know and be able to do” has been identified, and the tasks aredeveloped to accomplish this. According to Danielson and Marquez3, they may be used forassessment and instructional purposes. Good performance tasks are engaging; are realistic,elicit knowledge and skill, enable assessment of individuals, and contain clear directions to thestudents. Because of its role, the performance task was
students, faculty, and alumni. In working towards this change, we are gathering datafrom our stakeholders with the goal of initiating substantial and lasting change. In this work inprogress (WIP), we will share our data gathering process and some of our early feedback fromour faculty, who will be agents of this change.The CHE department at Penn State is one of the larger chemical engineering departments in theUnited States, graduating around 150 undergraduate chemical engineers per year and having 32faculty members. A unique challenge and opportunity for our department is that roughly 25% ofour students enter our program from another campus sometime during their second year. Thesestudents must adapt to a new campus while simultaneously engaging in
a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability(d) An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(e) An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems(f) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) An ability to communicate effectively(h) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal context(i) A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning(j) A knowledge of contemporary issues(k) An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern
reflection, identitydevelopment, communication (all drawn from Olin’s Learning Outcomes [9]), and pluralism(embracing many ways of knowing and being, inspired by [10]). The course helps studentsidentify the personal values that have informed their educational choices, situate their learning incultural and systemic context, apply formal ethical frameworks to their implicit decision makingprocesses, and project their current values and decision making processes onto future endeavorsand impacts that they hope to achieve. While other Olin courses frequently ask students toconsider the context and consequences of a specific technical project, Change the World focuseson the student as a person and a practitioner, not only on the narrowly scoped work at
Teaching Assistant in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She received her B.S. in Civil Engineering and M.Eng. in Environmental Engineering from Utah State University.Ms. Jessica Deters, Virginia Tech Jessica Deters is a PhD student at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engineering Education. She holds a B.S. in Applied Mathematics & Statistics and a minor in the McBride Honors Program in Public Affairs from the Colorado School of Mines. Jessica is engaging in projects that emphasize the sociotechnical na- ture of engineering with a focus on social justice and diversity. She aims to educate the next generation of engineers to understand and value the social, political, economic, environmental, and human
professional and ethical responsibility g. Communicate effectively h. Understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context i. Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning j. Knowledge of contemporary issues k. Use of techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice l. Application of advanced mathematics m. Design, build, and test in mechanical systems area n. Design, build, and test in thermal/fluids area o. Undertake and manage a major design experience Page 25.384.3 Figure 2 Relationship of
doctorate in engineering education. She previously conducted research in Purdue University’s First- Year Engineering Program with the Network for Nanotechnology (NCN) Educational Research team, the Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) Educational Research team, and a few fellow STEM education graduates for an obtained Discovery, Engagement, and Learning (DEAL) grant. Prior to attending Purdue University, she graduated from Arizona State University with her B.S.E. in Engineering from the College of Technology and Innovation, where she worked on a team conducting research on how students learn LabVIEW through Disassemble, Analyze, Assemble (DAA) activities.Dr. Matthew A. Verleger, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona
, maybe having a positively impactful interaction with a teacher or professor early on ina student’s career in STEM leads to a strengthened engineering identity that, in turn, providesincreased resilience and, hence, potential to overcome academic obstacles. We hope that theresults of our continued efforts in this study will contribute effectively to the growing body ofliterature on valuable insights that inform best practices in the development, implementation, andassessment of educational interventions that support students with diverse identities to persist inengineering.Bibliography [1] President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) (2012). Report to the President, Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional
education was a categorical variablecoded as 1 for “graduated from high school equivalent, GED, or less”, 2 for “Degree orcertificate from a vocational school, a junior college, a community college, or anothertype of 2-yr. school”, 3 for “Completed a College degree”, and 4 for “Completed aMasters, Doctoral or other advanced professional degree (JD, MD, PhD, etc.).”ResultsPearson Correlations Table 2 shows the Pearson correlations between the dependent and independentvariables and descriptive statistics for those variables on their original scale. Note thealpha reliability for all the variables (Table 2, far right column) was above the acceptablelevel of 0.70. On average students reported a moderate overlap between their personalidentity and