asteams developing the engineering process; and as people. The authors present the idea ofworking collaboratively with diverse groups of people to address the needs of differentparticipants in the engineering process.Lucena [25], inspired by the philosopher Nussbaum, provides one of the multipledefinitions for social justice. “Social justice practices, including those by engineers, should attempt to an equal distribution of rights, opportunities and resources in order to enhance human capabilities and reduce the risk and harms among the citizens of a society” (p.10)Every engineering creation, and engineering education act, is a vote to guide societytowards a certain place. Leydens and Lucena [26] argue Social Justice dimensions
is frequently centered on deliveringthe content to students instead of facilitating student inquiry during the learning process.Although many of the principles of constructivism offer promise in the development ofsuccessful learning environments, practical applications are often hard to incorporate into thecommon constraints of the school environment.1With the recent emphasis on “learner-centered” education in engineering education, a deeperunderstanding and application of Piaget’s work is in order. The purpose of this paper is topresent a model of an engineering/education collaborative program that is built on Piagetianprinciples and attempts to outreach to K-12 students to build their enthusiasm for engineeringand science. Thus, this paper
Session 2660 Engineering Education in France Ian Simpson and Brian Manhire Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications de Bretagne / Ohio UniversityAbstract— The aim of this paper is to present the main characteristics of Engineering Educationin France. For historical reasons, the French system is not easy to analyze succinctly and theauthors have had to resort to some oversimplifications. Aspects such as the mutual recognition ofdegrees and professional qualifications have not been examined in this paper. I. INTRODUCTION TO THE FRENCH ENGINEERING EDUCATION SYSTEM Compared to
well as cost and efficiency benefits for the various types ofsystems that are represented.Feedback and ConclusionsThe response to the Systems Engineering Educators Workshop was very positive. At the end ofthe workshop, a handwritten survey was given, and a follow up survey was distributed overemail six months later. In the exit survey, 100% of the ten teachers said that they felt theworkshop would help their teaching in the future, in courses such as physics, physical science,genetics, social studies in collaboration with the science teachers, math, geometry, probabilityand statistics. Of the ten teachers, 8 definitely planned to use workshop activities in theclassroom, one participant was not sure, and one did not. The most popular activities
Reza Sanati-Mehrizy is a professor of Computer Science Department at Utah Valley University, Orem, Utah. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma. His research focuses on diverse areas such as: Database Design, Data Structures, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, Computer Aided Manufacturing, Data Mining, Data Warehousing, and Machine Learning. Page 26.1183.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Nanotechnology in Engineering EducationAbstractNanotechnology is the science, engineering, and
more practical and collaborative approach to problem solving Page 7.329.6and the work environment. They understand the cooperative nature of work in industry, i.e. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Session 3213rarely are projects done by a solo problem solver/designer/engineer. Everything we do is done inteams, so people who have experience through their co-op, working in teams, working in
of knowledge and skills required to address the situations encountered in this large domain. This includes inculcating foreign languages skills, knowledge of foreign laws, practices and customs or knowledge of foreign environments, resources and needs.Lloyd et al12 observe, in connection with an innovative program titled A Dispersed Design TeamApproach for the Globalization of Engineering Education that Michigan State University (MSU)and the University of Texas Pan American (UTPA) collaboratively offer, in addition to the many technical issues the engineering design process normally encounters, extra-technical issues of leadership, power, trust, language, time differences, cultural differences
lessons on a wide range of topics, such asenergy, laws of motion, and electricity and magnetism. Comprehensive curricular units, comprisedof up to 10 stand-alone lessons incorporating low-cost, hands-on activities, are standards-based atthe state and national levels. Each curricular unit also contains math components, lessonbackground concepts, anticipated student outcomes and assessment suggestions.The collaborative development of engineering curricula that impact K-12 students involvescontributions from multiple professionals in the education community, including: research ofbackground and activities by engineering graduate students and K-12 teachers; activity testing byengineering undergraduate students; content review by engineering faculty
Paper ID #9586Defining Engineering EducationDr. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University, followed by fourteen years as a faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering edu- cation. While at Oklahoma State he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he took a chair position in electrical engineering at Bucknell University. He is currently interested in
-departmental camaraderie,community and collaboration and the formation of new cohorts. COE Faculty Development planned NSF IGERT workshops with express purpose ofconnecting faculty across the university with former IGERT directors and other NSF IGERTgrant recipients. The goal of the workshops was to create interdisciplinary connections betweenIGERT grantees and those seeking IGERT grants. A National Science Foundation (NSF)program established the Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT)program in 1997. It currently consists of over 125 award sites that consistently deepens theinterdisciplinary knowledge, experiences, and professional and academic skills of AmericanPh.D. scientists, engineers, and educators. The NSF IGERT
sectors as an engineer and/or project manager. A registered professional engineer and certified project manager (PMP), Dr. Banik has more than 40 refereed publications in the area of civil engineering and construction management. He has presented his research in several well-known and peer-reviewed conferences, such as ASEE, ASCE, ASC, WEFTEC and CIB, and published articles in those conference proceedings. He presented his research all over the world, including the United States, Canada, Greece, Italy, Brazil, and the Philippines. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Strategies and Techniques for Tenure-Track Faculty to Become Successful in AcademiaAlthough engineering and
Paper ID #15913Formative Peer Assessment of TeachingDr. Stephanie Ann Claussen, Colorado School of Mines Stephanie Claussen’s experience spans both engineering and education research. She obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2005. Her Ph.D. work at Stan- ford University focused on optoelectronics, and she continues that work in her position at the Colorado School of Mines, primarily with the involvement of undergraduate researchers. In her role as an Associate Teaching Professor, she is primarily tasked with the education of undergraduate engineers. In her courses
high energy lasers propagation through the turbulent atmosphere, developing advanced control algorithms for wavefront sensing and mitigating effects of the turbulent at- mosphere, digital inline holography, digital signal processing, and laser spectroscopy. He is also involved in developing new eye-tracking experimental techniques for extracting 3-D shape of the object from the movement of human eyes. Dr. Sergeyev is he is a member of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and actively involved in promoting engineering education.Nasser Alaraje, Michigan Technological University Dr. Alaraje’s research interests focuses on processor architecture, System-on-Chip design methodology, Field-Programmable Logic
Paper ID #45069Panel Discussion: Rethinking First-Year Engineering: Management, Collaboration,and Curriculum AlignmentProf. Cory Budischak, Temple University Dr. Cory Budischak, Associate Professor of Instruction at Temple University, focuses on transitioning to 100% renewable energy and advocacy for policy implementation at state and national levels. He’s part of Delaware’s GEAC, aiming to halve emissions by 2030 and eliminate them by 2050. Budischak champions a holistic view of energy systems in order to most effectively transition to a low carbon economy. A proponent of innovative teaching methods like flipped
AC 2010-83: MOTIVATION AND MATURITY LEVEL OF ENGINEERING ANDENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY STUDENTS WITH AND WITHOUT COOPEXPERIENCEMario Castro-Cedeno, Rochester Institute of TechnologyQuamrul Mazumder, University of Michigan - Flint Page 15.889.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Motivation and Maturity of Engineering and Engineering Technology Students with and without Co-Op ExperienceAbstractExperience-based education in the form of Co-Op is generally accepted as having a positivecorrelation with a student’s academic and early career performance. Unfortunately, most of theevidence is anecdotal or based on statistical studies of large databases. It
currently investigating the use of the flipped classroom model and collaborative learning. His research in cyber security for industrial control systems is focused on high assurance field devices using microkernel architectures. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 An Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration to Understand First-Year Engineering RetentionAbstractThis Evidence-based practice paper documents the collaboration, research, and future work ofthe interdisciplinary research team, the Guild for Engineering Education, Achievement,Retention and Success (GEARS) at the University of Louisville’s J.B. Speed School ofEngineering. Over the last 9 years (2010-2018
Paper ID #33860Engineering Ethics Through High-Impact Collaborative/CompetitiveScenarios (E-ETHICCS)Dr. Scott Streiner, Rowan University Dr. Scott Streiner is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department (ExEEd) at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, with a focus in engineering education. His research interests include engineering global competency, cur- ricula and assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education. His funded research
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2024, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 315controls, safety valves, and other fluid power components across the globe. Donald Engineeringdistributes top quality fluid power and motion control products, accessories, and providesengineering solutions for their customer needs. The company president from Donald Engineeringand the global vp of safety business development from Ross Controls both provided guestlectures, training materials and equipment stations with safety sensors and with integrated safetylogic devices to help develop the course
the American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research Methods Faculty Apprentice Award in 2014. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Collaborative Research: Experiential Process Safety Training for Chemical EngineersIntroduction: Engineering solutions typically involve weighing multiple competing and oftenconflicting variables in an attempt to come to an optimal solution. Since many engineeredsystems are used by or impact employees, customers, and the public, the safety and wellbeing ofthose people must factor heavily into engineers’ decision making processes. Indeed, in theprofessional codes of numerous engineering societies, the safety
Paper ID #9051Building Engineering Interest and Sandcastles through Collaborative Instruc-tional DesignDr. Pamalee A. Brady, California Polytechnic State UniversityMr. James B Guthrie P.E., California Polytechnic State University Page 24.244.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Building Engineering Interest and Sandcastles through Collaborative Instructional Design (Works in Progress)AbstractA collaborative research project between students and faculty in the California Polytechnic
Session 3661 Interaction of Engineering Technology and Fine Arts through Instructor Collaboration Andrew T. Rose, Valerie Grash University of Pittsburgh at JohnstownAbstractHigher education strives to prepare graduates for career success and satisfaction in life. At theUniversity of Pittsburgh at Johnstown (UPJ), most students prepare for their career through theirmajor area of study by taking discipline specific courses in their major. To more fully developtheir knowledge, University-wide general education (GenEd) requirements provide all UPJstudents
Paper ID #242092018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Designing and Implementing Teacher Professional Development that Con-nects Social Justice and STEM IntegrationDr. Gina Navoa Svarovsky, University of Notre Dame Gina Navoa Svarovsky is an Assistant Professor of Practice at the University of Notre Dame’s Center for STEM Education and the College of Engineering.Mr. Patrick K Kirkland, University of Notre Dame c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Designing and Implementing Teacher Professional Development
AC 2009-2324: VIDEO TECHNOLOGY FOR INTERUNIVERSITYCOLLABORATION IN A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORYJames Hanson, California Polytechnic State University Page 14.1347.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Video Technology for Inter-University Collaboration in a Geotechnical Engineering LaboratoryAbstractAdvanced video technology was used to incorporate multi-component (inter-university anduniversity-industry) collaborations in geotechnical engineering laboratory courses. The projectwas conducted between California Polytechnic State University (California), Auburn University(Alabama), and Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. (Japan). Synchronous
2006-2419: STUDENT PERSPECTIVES ON INTERNATIONALCOLLABORATIONS IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYMichael Dyrenfurth, Purdue UniversityMichael Ring, Dublin Institute of Technology Page 11.1165.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Student Perspectives on International Exchange/Collaborations Student A Student BMechanical Engineering Technology Manufacturing Engineering College of Technology School of Manufacturing Engineering & Design Purdue University Dublin Institute of TechnologyIntroductionReasons for Participation • Gain perspective of other
director of the Problem Solving Research Group, whose 50+ collaborating members include faculty and students from several universities, as well as industrial representatives, military leaders, and corporate consultants.Dr. Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is the recipient of three NSF awards for research in engineering education and a research associate at Purdue University. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of En- trepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position he was Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology and involved in research in service learning
Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. Krista received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State Uni- versity in 2006 and received her M.S. from Ohio State in 2007. In 2012, Krista completed her Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering at Ohio State. Her engineering education research interests include investigating first-year engineering student experiences, faculty experiences, and the connection between the two. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Collaborative Parsons Problems in a Remote-Learning First-Year Engineering ClassroomIntroductionThis complete evidence
Graphic Design from the Universidad Aut´onoma de Guadalajara Speaker, lecturer, collaborator in national and international research networks; thesis director and postgraduate professor in education and human devel- opment sciences; expert in research project design and new products development process. Researcher in ”Community Development and Social Issues”, she collaborated with Dr. Aaron Brown from Metropolitan State University of Denver, in the design of the ”Humanitarian Engineering Program” and the ”Interna- tional Humanitarian Engineering Seminar” with an interdisciplinary approach. Is the Head of Research at UNIVA’s Guadalajara campus and is a promoter of maturity and technology transfer processes and
Session 1432 Utilization of Active Collaborative Learning in Three Electrical Engineering Courses Rosalyn S. Hobson, Esther A. Hughes Virginia Commonwealth UniversityAbstractEducational research has shown that students learn and retain information better when theeducational process includes active cooperative learning. As a result the face of the engineeringclassroom is changing to include more in-class and team activities allowing the students to take amore active role in their educational process. The use of teams not only enhances the
University of Technology in 2012 and 2018, respectively. Dr. Yang’s research interest includes Computer-Aided Design, Computer-Aided Engineering, and Geometry Modeling and Multimedia. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Preparing Students for Successful Industrial Collaborations in Engineering (Work in progress)AbstractThis practice paper introduces a framework for preparing engineering students for industrialcollaborations. Engaging engineering students in industrial projects provides them withvaluable hands-on working experience in an authentic learning environment. However,industrial collaborations come with challenges among various stakeholders, includingdiscrepancy in
, University of Southern Indiana Kerry S. Hall is an Assistant Professor of engineering at the University of Southern Indiana. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. from the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. He received his B.S. in civil engineering from the University of Evansville, Evansville, Ind. His research interests include nondestructive testing of concrete and non-contact mea- surements. Page 25.708.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Ideation Competition