. Page 26.887.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Impact of Mentoring and Enrichment Activities on the Academic Careers of Underrepresented STEM Doctoral Students Georgia TechAbstractWhile much national attention has been focused on increasing the participation ofunderrepresented minorities (URMs) in the STEM fields, considerable gaps remain in terms ofeducational attainment between URMs and other racial/ethnic groups. Differences areparticularly stark at the doctoral levels, where underrepresented minorities accounted for only3.3% of STEM PhDs awarded in 2005.14 A recent longitudinal study of minority PhDs inSTEM disciplines found that long
communication.” “Simply by merit of the time commitment to TEPP, I had less time for goofing off, and so my time management and study habits became more efficient. I don’t, however, feel this had a significant impact on my grades or understanding of course material.” In further examination of the impact that TEPP had on the fellow’s grades, a blind study was conducted were student’s grades before and during their experience were examined (See Table 4). Several grades were unable to be obtained. Table 4: TEPP fellows Cumulative Grade point average Pre and During fellowship Student Cumulative Years 1st year 2nd 3rd 4th GPA Pre- Participated year year year TEPP
studies have examined the effectiveness of quickly adaptingengineering courses to remote instruction [2–4]. One interesting challenge noted in the literatureon remote learning during COVID was the difficulty of maintaining active student engagementgiven the lack of face-to-face communication or interaction. The idea of active studentengagement is broader than active learning; the latter focuses on activities designed to makestudents active participants in the learning process, as opposed to passive participants, while theformer requires students to actively engage in the entire learning process. Prince, Felder, andBrent [5] proposed several strategies that could be used to improve active student engagement ina remote setting. These include
improveundergraduates’ learning and development, researchers have stressed the importance of studentengagement in educationally purposeful activities.10,11,12,13 Students’ social and academicengagement takes on many forms depending on one’s academic ability, social identity, and areasof interest. Student variability is compounded when institutional type, population, and financialresources are also considered. However, scholars have identified “high-impact” practices thatpromote student success. Indeed, the Association for American Colleges and Universities(AACU) and America’s Promise Alliance highlight college interventions that assist with studentachievement. One such idea is a learning community. These formal programs require cohorts ofstudents to take
experiences of theirpeers.Mental Health. In discussing, the impact of racialized violence against Black people, oneinterviewee discussed mental health. This person said, That can affect the mental health of any Black Indigenous Person of Color students because those are their people; that’s their community, right? … That can affect their mental health.This interviewee goes on to mention that not being able to discuss these things in class also hadan impact; yet, the interviewee felt these things should not be addressed in class. The intervieweesaid, I’m an engineering major… We can’t bring politics into classrooms cause that kind of deviates from what we’re supposed to be doing. Like if we were political science students
previously shown to enhance student engagement,cognition, and performance [7][16]. For additional depth of study, the reviews of Bishop [2] and Prince[12] provide good summaries of the various methods and their documented impact.In the first-year engineering space, a number of institutions have adopted various degrees of the flippedclassroom model. The focus on design thinking and problem solving in first-year engineering programsmakes them particularly well suited to a flipped approach. Daher and Loehring noted that, while theflipped model they adopted required students to take greater responsibility for their own learning,course evaluations indicated that students did not find the flipped course to be any more work thanprevious iterations [4
experience in the workforce before pursuing graduate school. Lewis Ngwenya has been working with Dr. Dodson to research how humanitarian engineering projects impact professional formation and views of diversity, equity, and inclusion.Ms. Hannah Grace Duke, Lipscomb University Hannah Duke is an undergraduate student in the Raymond B. Jones College of Engineering at Lipscomb University. Hannah is studying mechanical engineering and plans to continue on to graduate school, following the completion of her undergraduate degree, to ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Creating Inclusive Engineers through Humanitarian Engineering: Quantitative Results from a
allstudents, allowing for a comparison by gender, in addition to providing insight on the impact ofCOVID on engineering students in general.For students suffering the loss of support programs within their institution, faculty are the mostcapable of extending support and encouragement during this season of limited access orelimination of programs. Faculty are in direct communication with their students, allowing forone-on-one mentorship both within the courses they teach and outside of class time. While noone faculty member can take the place of all support functions typically offered by theuniversity, faculty can work to encourage student persistence and give hope for futureexperiences after the pandemic is over. Limited individual support of faculty
give focus such disbursement policy to make thesystem engaging for its learners.In addition, all the studies described so far adapt a single user to improve his/her learning skills.While this is a great benefit, we should also consider adaptability of the whole user base, not justa single user. Not any tools described above or found in the literature focus on generalization ofdifficulties while solving Parsons puzzles. This is because the single user adaptation in traditionalITS can’t reveal anything about the general difficulties students struggle during their interactionwith the system.3 System: EvoParsons Parsons Puzzles
the northeastern US. The survey is administered twiceeach academic year to explore self-efficacy, belongingness, preparedness, and engagement, bothlongitudinally and cross-sectionally. In March 2020, our university quickly pivoted to remotelearning in response to the outbreak of COVID-19 and in the fall of 2020 our campus re-openedfor hybrid learning. The abrupt changes in higher education, brought on by the current publichealth crisis, affect students’ learning and mental health, in ways that will likely be long lasting.To measure the impacts of the pandemic on engineering students, twenty Likert-type screenerquestions were added to the survey, which was re-administered in June 2020 and again inSeptember 2020. This paper shares findings from
difference was identified. We also compared students in our sample to a pre-pandemic comparison group using data reported by the developers of the Community of Inquiryscale [27], using one-sample t-test with Cohen’s d effect size estimated. Future analyses willinclude regression analyses and historical comparison of COVID-19 students with prior studentsfor which the institution has data.Qualitative studies include focus group interviews, which were recorded and transcribed forcoding. We also engaged in constant comparison and analysis [33] analysis of focus groupsthroughout team meetings, and reviewed field notes and observer memos from classroomobservations for triangulation of data. Initial coding is ongoing, with an incident-by
Paper ID #37456Understanding Impacts of Soft Robotics Project on FemaleStudents’ Perceptions of Engineering (Work in Progress)Elizabeth McNeela Elizabeth McNeela is an undergraduate student from the Bioengineering department at the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign. Her primary research interest is focused on addressing gender disparities in engineering disciplines.Thomas TranAasiyah AdnanHolly Golecki Dr. Holly Golecki (she/her) is a Teaching Assistant Professor in Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign and an Associate in the John A Paulson School of Engineering and Applied
how capable such tools arewithin certain disciplines. This work in progress aims to shift from evaluating generative AItools’ capabilities to exploring how such tools impact the information-seeking behaviors of theirusers. The paper focuses on the impact of OpenAI’s ChatGPT on the information-seekingbehavior of engineering students. The paper presents data from a survey of engineering students.In addition, the paper provides the methodology and preliminary data from a structured interviewwhere participants will use ChatGPT to address a multifaceted problem concerning the GrandChallenges for Engineering.IntroductionNear the end of 2022, OpenAI released ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence (AI) tool.ChatGPT is a large language model
with an industry biasand one from a science literacy group that had an environmental bias.After watching the videos, students were split into five groups that were assigned a differentperspective: science and engineering, economic impact, environmental impact, societal impact,and political impact. The students were instructed to use their phones or laptops to individuallyresearch hydraulic fracturing through their assigned lens. Following their individual research, thestudents in each group discussed their findings and developed consensus statements that werereported out to the class. The whole class engaged in a discussion around these differentperspectives and groups were invited to ask each other questions. At the end of the period,students
college studentdevelopment and on eliciting much interest from the K-12 students and teachers. The EAPparticipants have expressed gains in soft skills, confidence in abilities to succeed in engineering,and an increase in the self-perception as skilled leaders [5]. As the ambassadors engage oncarrying out the critical mission of serving the EAP, they develop the necessary communication skillsand technical competencies for presentations and mentoring activities. This engagement and skilldevelopment increase the interest and confidence in STEM education, especially during the earlyyears of undergraduate education through the exposure to engineering challenges that show thereal-world relevance of science and engineering. Also, through mentoring in
AC 2011-243: INITIAL EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF MATH STUDYGROUPS ON FIRST-YEAR STUDENT COURSE SUCCESSMarissa Jablonski, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Marissa R. Jablonski is a PhD Student of Civil/Environmental Engineering at the University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee (UWM). She serves as program coordinator of the National Science Foundation (NSF) funded FORTE (Fostering Opportunities for Tomorrow’s Engineers) program at UWM and works to recruit and retain undergraduate minorities and women to UWM’s College of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Marissa is focusing her dissertation on sustainable oxidation of textile wastewater and is working to create small-scale wastewater treatment units for cottage textile
Undergraduate Education aimed to increase the visibility and support for General Education while helping to implement a new General Education program for all PSU undergraduates. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Impact of a Biomedical Engineering Undergraduate Research Program on Student and Faculty Perceptions of CreativityAbstractImmersive research experiences have been shown to significantly improve the research andcommunication abilities of students who participate in them, as well as increase the likelihoodthat these students will pursue higher education after the completion of their bachelor’s degrees.While Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) programs are widespread
Paper ID #281062018 Best Zone II Paper: Comparison of Student and Faculty Perceptions ofIntent and Effectiveness of Course Evaluations in an Engineering Curricu-lumDr. Thomas P. James P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Tom James is presently a Professor of Entrepreneurship at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. His major interests are new product development and global business ventures. He currently teaches courses in accounting, finance, and entrepreneurial studies. In addition to teaching, Dr. James directs the ES- CALATE program, a living-learning community focused on integrating entrepreneurship and technical
to a community-led boardroom, comprised of school boardmembers, community stakeholders and local industry representatives. The program also tracksstudent progress throughout the year using peer- and self-assessments.This research project used quantitative data collection methods to measure the impact of the‘You’re Hired!’ program on changing students’ attitudes towards engineering. The methodologyincludes a statistical comparison of a control group to an experimental group to clearlydemonstrate the benefit of the program. The results of the statistical analysis show there is asignificant difference in the change in student attitudes toward engineering when participating inthe program.IntroductionIn the 21st Century workforce employers are
Session 2154 Multimedia The Use of Inquiry-Based Multi-Media Curriculum: It’s Impact on Students’ Perceptions of Learning Dianna L. Newman, Suneresh Heragu, Sybilyn Jennings University at Albany SUNY/Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute/Russell Sage Colleg eThe use of technology is growing and simultaneously changing the learning process, thestructure of knowledge, and the nature of instruction. 1 In a 1995 survey of college campuses,Green and Gilbert 2 noted that major gains have been made in the use of informational technologyas an instructional resource and Duffy ad Jonassen 3 indicate that new forms of
studies in community-based engagement at SMU’s MA in Sustainability and Development program from 2018-2020 while continuing her work at the Museum. During this time, Cindy also joined the Board of Directors in Downwinders at Risk, a grassroots environmental justice organization, and currently is acting as chair of the nonprofit’s Particulate Matter Education Committee focused on environmental education outreach. Her doctoral research seeks to understand the impact of student learning experiences, particularly student empowerment and motivation, when exposed to justice-oriented curriculum within minority student populations.Jessie Marshall Zarazaga, Southern Methodist University Dr Jessie Marshall Zarazaga directs the
-person presentations, but only two presenter D) Understanding of module students had previous experience with pre- as an audience member. Statistics: t- test, ns = not significant, *p<0.05, recorded presentations. Students rated how **p<0.01 delivering presentations in each presentationstyle impacted a variety of learning outcomes, such as theability to be innovative and take risks, improvedteamwork skills, and improved communication skills, on ascale of 1 to 10—with 1 being no impact and 10 being great impact. Therewas no significant difference in student anxiety levelswhen completing in-person versus pre-recordedpresentations
. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013.Prof. Robert J. Culbertson, Arizona State University Robert J. Culbertson is an Associate Professor of Physics. Currently, he teaches introductory mechanics and electrodynamics for physics majors and a course in musical acoustics, which was specifically de- signed for elementary education majors. He is
Engineering Education, 2021 Impact of Immersive Training on Senior Chemical Engineering Students' Prioritization of Process Safety Decision CriteriaIntroductionProcess safety is becoming a greater focus of chemical plant design and operation due to thenumber of incidents involving dangerous chemical accidents [1]. Since its creation nearly 20years ago, the Chemical Safety Board (CSB) has investigated 130 safety incidents and providedover 800 safety recommendations to operating chemical facilities. Following a gas well blowoutin 2018, the CSB gave a recommendation to the American Petroleum Institute (API) to establishrecommended practice on alarm management [2]. Similarly, in 2017, the CSB gave arecommendation to Arkema Inc. to
AC 2012-2983: ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF FORMAL PEER-LEDSTUDY GROUPS ON FIRST-YEAR STUDENT MATH PERFORMANCEDr. John R. Reisel, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee John R. Reisel is an Associate Professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Wisconsin, Mil- waukee (UWM.) He serves as Associate Director of the Center for Alternative Fuels, and Co-director of the Energy Conversion Efficiency Lab. In addition to research into engineering education, his research ef- forts focus on combustion and energy utilization. Reisel was a 2005 recipient of the UWM Distinguished Undergraduate Teaching Award, the 2000 UWM-College of Engineering and Applied Science Outstand- ing Teaching Award, and a 1998 recipient of the SAE
Paper ID #39775Neurocognitive Examination of the Impact of Design ProjectRepresentation on Student Motivation and PerformanceCorey James Kado, Florida Polytechnic University He is a junior-level student at Florida Polytechnic University, majoring in Mechanical Engineering. He is a Student Research Assistant under Dr. Elisabeth Kames, focusing on Design Neurocognition.Elisabeth Kames, Florida Polytechnic University Dr. Elisabeth Kames is an Assistant Professor at Florida Polytechnic University. Her research focuses on engineering design and manufacturing, including pedagogical approaches. She is also interested in the impact
degrees from Texas State University (M.Ed.), and University of Texas at San Antonio (BA).Erin Scanlon, Texas State University Erin Scanlon is an adjunct professor in the physics department at Texas Lutheran University as well as a doctoral student in developmental education at Texas State University. Her research focuses on curriculum and program evaluation as well as on STEM students’ personal epistemologies.Ms. Michelle Pruett, Texas State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 They choose to attend academic summer camps? A mixed methods study exploring motivation for and the impact of a NASA academic summer pre-engineering camp upon middle school
Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) have been strongly supported throughthe National Science Foundation as a way to increase the number of students engaged with researchand potentially attend graduate school. This qualitative study examines the impact of a creativity-focused REU program in biomedical engineering on students’ conceptions of research and itsrelationship to the creative process. In addition, this study examines how faculty incorporateconcepts of the creative process in their work with the REU students. Results of the study showthat after participating in the program, students were likely to have a conception of research thatwas broader and more cyclical. Results also suggest that students recognize the connectionbetween research and
. John can be contacted at jmc6@psu.edu. Page 13.690.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Impact of Instructors’ Use of the Tablet PC on Student Learning and Classroom AttendanceAbstractThis paper reports on a study examining the effects of posting annotated instructor notesgenerated with Tablet PCs in two 300-level engineering classrooms at a large land-grantuniversity in the United States. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of sharinginstructor notes on students’ attendance, note-taking behaviors, and learning. In Course A, theinstructor posted detailed pre-notes
Communication” to “Introduction to Engineering Design” in 1995. Theconception of design imparted to students in the course also changed during the 1990s fromsomething both challenging and motivational to something very relevant and focused on realproblems in industry and the public sector. In 1998, Engineering Design and Graphics Programwas one of the recipients when Penn state won the Boeing Engineering Educator of the Year Page 7.469.2award [9] for a proposal entitled “Industry-Led Design.” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society