Paper ID #33830Women in Construction Engineering: Improving the Students’ Experiencethroughout their CareersIng. Marcela Alejandra Silva, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile Marcela Silva is the Academic Director at the Engineering Faculty of the Andres Bello University in Cam- pus Santiago. She works as a teacher in the Construction Engineering career and supports innovation and entrepreneurship courses. She obtained a Bachelor’s degree in Construction from the Pontificia Universi- dad Cat´olica de Chile and a Master’s degree in Educational Management from the European University of Madrid. Her passion for learning
implementation of best practices within deaf education at the postsecondary level[9].During the 2017-18 academic year (fall 2017 and spring 2018), the R&D center’s researchfaculty and students worked on several projects. The R&D center encourages students to developand test prototypes of devices to benefit individuals with diverse abilities. Numerous prototypesand services directly resulted from the creative work of DHH students which was thoroughlyvetted by subject matter experts, many of whom are DHH. Selected projects are listed below. • Real-Time Translation Service: The R&D center has been conducting a pilot program with Microsoft Translator, an automatic speech recognition (ASR) technology, in several classes. The ASR
population of students because it provides a framework for describing class, gender, ethnic,racial, and geopolitical issues that these youth confront, suggesting a more distinct framework of race relations that includescitizenship, phenotype, residency status, immigration, language, and history3. Borderlands theory highlights three main componentsincluding: 1. Shifting identities, 2. Critical discourse: Talking Back, and 3. Staying connected through Sitio y Lengua (decolonizing spaces and discourses).The work of Bernal et al. (2009) is significant because of the application of Borderlands theory to Mentoring and it’s intersect withService-learning in order to provide a service to Latinas/os elementary school
workplace settings beyond entrepreneurship. Additionally,there is limited research on the career motivation of early career professionals, despite arecognized need to study the transition from college to the workplace and to counteract the dataindicating a decrease in women engineering professionals after the first ten years. Theselimitations may be addressed through future research.Conclusion and Future ResearchCareer motivation theory and counterfactual thinking are conceptually aligned through theirfunctional definitions, including their retrospective process and goal-setting orientation and theimpact the direction of the counterfactual thoughts has on motivation and future performance,even in cases of negative or traumatic events. This
Academy of Sciences,National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine published Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling thePotential of Women in Academic Sciences and Engineering6. The importance of attaining equality for women inthe STEM disciplines is emphasized by this study: “The U.S. economy relies on the productivity, entrepreneurship, and creativity of its people. To maintain its scientific and engineering leadership amid increasing economic and educational globalization, the United States must aggressively pursue the innovative capacity of all of its people—women and men. Women make up an increasing proportion of science and engineering majors at all institutions, including top programs such as those at the
reviews also use the SAE Rubricfor providing written feedback to the teams. Teams are required to record and submit a summaryof the oral comments made by all judges, and then use the MVP process to prioritize app changesto be implemented in the week between the CDR and final app submission. As part of the finalsubmission, an oral presentation is made to the class, a set of reflective questions are individuallyanswered, and peer evaluations are performed.Sample Student WorkTo better illustrate what student teams have proven themselves capable of through thecornerstone design project, two software applications are briefly reviewed here; examplescreenshots from each application are presented in Figure 2. FIGURE 2. SCREEN IMAGES FROM WATER
for different reasons in a variety of contexts.Participants spoke about their observations of professors’ teaching and research practices inaddition to their professors’ explicit advice. Diallo talked about how he came to perceive certainprofessors as mentors by observing them in class and desiring to emulate their work ethic: I found some professors just standing out. They are mentors in the sense that I looked up to them, I admire their style, and I tried to replicate some of the way they operate, and you know, they are like the benchmark standard, so to that respect, they are mentors.Sabir thought of his professor as having been a mentor in terms of the guidance and professionalsupport she provided by writing
Pittsburgh Dr. Mary Besterfield-Sacre is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Nickolas A. DeCecco Professor in Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She is the Founding Director for the Engineer- ing Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering, and serves as a Center Associate for the Learning Research and Development Center. Her principal research is in engineering education assessment, which has been funded by the NSF, Department of Ed, Sloan, EIF, and NCIIA. Dr. Sacre’s current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas – innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global competency in engineering.Dr. Wendy Carter-Veale, University
]. In the field of pharmacy, APCE accredi-tation [25] in the United States contains a standard for Personal and Professional Developmentwhich consists of the following: self-awareness, leadership, innovation and entrepreneurship, andprofessionalism.In the context of engineering education and accreditation, it does not appear that dispositions areexplicitly considered in the learning outcomes. In the US and several other countries, ABET [26]accredits engineering programs using several criteria. One of them is student outcomes, i.e., “whatstudents should know and be able to do by the time of graduation” [27]. The outcomes are thusrelated to a mix of the skills, knowledge, and behaviors that students acquire in their program, forexample, “Student
, ranging from including entrepreneurial competenciesinto core engineering classes 30 , to programmatic threads in entrepreneurship 26 , to the alignment ofEntrepreneurship and ABET 24 .K-WIDE integrates engineering design and entrepreneurship in a way that lies between formalinstruction and competitions. On the one hand, K-WIDE operates outside of curricular require-ments, in a similar manner to design competitions, business pitches, start-up weekends and othersuch student opportunities 31 . On the other hand, the end goal of K-WIDE is not a product butpersonal growth and learning. This aspect is more similar to a formal curriculum, and as a resultthere is a significant degree of guidance and instruction from the instructors.3 K-WIDE
Education, Winter 2016, pp. 1-27.student commented that “These classes gave us time to thinkoutside the box and more time to work with our teams.” [2] Jarrar, M., Anis, H., “The Impact of Entrepreneurship on EngineeringAnother student stated that “They helped … come up with Education”, Proc. 2016 Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA16) Conf, June 19-22, pp. 1-6.new innovative ideas that just one person may not be able tocome up with on his/her own.” These comments show that [3] Winkler, C., Troudt, E. E., Schweikert, C., Schulman, S. A., “Infusingstudents learned the value of working in a team and the power Business
withover 350 engineering students graduating each year, corporate partners play an important role insupporting capstone projects through providing funding and mentorship [14]. And a fourthpedagogy in recent years is to foster the spirit of entrepreneurship and innovative productdevelopment [13]-[15]. For example, since 2007 twenty private colleges and universities withABET-accredited engineering programs have been funded by the Kern Family Foundation toparticipate in the Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN) [12].At the Electrical Engineering Department of Sonoma State University, our challenge is that weare located in an environment without the rich pool of companies necessary for suchopportunities and we do not have the funding for
Secure CyberspaceSequestration MethodsGrand Challenges for Engineering (GCE)are ideal as a Coherent Theme for K-12InstructionCross disciplinary MotivationContext Societal ConnectionCreativity Relevance A Wide Spectrum of Opportunities High SchoolsGCE as an instructional focus that extends through Allsubjects and through All 4 years e.g. Wake STEM Early College High School; Raleigh, NCA Learning Community within a School e.g. Global STEM Challenges Program at Edison High School; Fairfax, VAA STEM Lab Pathways framed around GCE’s e.g. Tesla STEM High School; Redmond, WA A Wide Spectrum of OpportunitiesMiddle Schools and After School Programs GCE in a daily research core class
. Page 15.519.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010Enhancing the Undergraduate Research Experience in a Senior Design ContextAbstractThe paper presents an instructional framework developed by the authors that engagessenior students in a 5-credit Research and Development course incorporating projectdevelopment, implementation, entrepreneurship, innovation, creativity, teamwork, andcommunication. The paper discusses the development and accomplishments of the courseover the past four years in the context of the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) - aninitiative at the University of Houston intended to encourage the development andenhancement of undergraduate research skills. The philosophy behind the course is
world, innovative,multi-disciplinary product design and build projects. More than developingproducts, the program desires to develop business opportunities that will lead tolocal economic development. To implement these projects, the followingchallenges had to be overcome: 1. A stream of innovative product ideas had to be generated and sustained. 2. Since the products are innovative, the program had to be able to deal with the partial success of a product prototype or concept. 3. The interdisciplinary nature of product development had to be replicated in the functionally divided university setting which contained significant opposition to classes that integrated different
. Examples from the surveyed spaced are the Hobby Shop and Techshop.• Entrepreneurship: spaces focused on actively recruiting founders who want to use the space to build prototypes for their business idea. An example from the surveyed spaces is the Prototypenwerkstatt.Each of the five spaces fits into one primary category, although in most cases each makerspacesupports multiple categories. Both the PRL and Invention Studio have education as their mainfocus in common and use the space primarily for classes. The Techshop is also focusing oneducation in the form of many classes, but students in classes only take up a small percentage oftotal users. Main examples for the community category are the Hobby Shop and Techshop, andwith a secondary
for CECD’s Engineering for Social Change course since its inception, and in 2016 spearheaded an effort with the College of Southern Maryland to support a suc- cessful pilot program of a student-led social entrepreneurship course in the Business and Management Division.Dr. Dave K. Anand, University of Maryland, College Park c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Engagement in Practice: Engineering for Social Change Course in Mechanical EngineeringEngineering for Social Change in the Center for Engineering Concepts Development at theUniversity of Maryland (UMD)The Engineering for Social Change (ESC) Program was developed within the Center forEngineering Concepts
American universities, for example, are excellent references in investmentsin the education of their engineering courses, as well as in modern teaching and adequateinfrastructure [2].Considered by different authors as one of the best ways for students to acquire complete andrealistic knowledge, active learning is another way of teaching. This approach is student-centered, ensuring that professors are professionals who guide students in this process [3],[4]. The involvement of the whole class increases from active learning strategies, making itpossible to develop an opportunity to reflect on learning in a set of solutions to real problems[5].The different active learning strategies also guarantee the development of professional skillsthat students
Fellowship PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES: American Chemical Society American Academy of Nanomedicine (Founding Member) UCLA Alumni AssociationKenneth Pickar, California Institute of Technology Visiting Professor of Mechanical Engineering (1998-present),J. Stanley Johnson Professor (1999-2003)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA. Teaching courses in Entrepreneurship, Management of Technology, Product Design for the Developing World. Coaching start-up Ventures; Presidents Advisory Board for JPL, Co-PI of NSF-funded Entrepreneurial Postgraduate Fellowship Program 2005 Award for Excellence in Teaching by Undergraduate Students of Caltech Board of Directors, Level One Corporation (1997-1999
discussionsabout and comparisons between higher education makerspaces. This paper proposes a classificationsystem for higher education makerspaces and applies the proposed classifications to existing spaces. Theclassification system indicates the purpose of the space and includes indices for the space’s accessibility,population, size, and staffing. While noting that interpretation differences can result from system-widegeneralizations, the concepts of categories and classes are routinely applied in nearly all fields toassimilate data and make comparisons. The higher education makerspace community is now largeenough to benefit from an enterprise-wide classification system. It is suggested that such a classificationsystem will be helpful to improve current
course of action – Step 7: List the exact sequence of actions you will take to implement your solutionIn addition to the unpublished article, the HESE program at Penn State has several other courses.The Social Entrepreneurship class places students in multidisciplinary teams for a specificproject with only a slight focus on the engineering design. Over the course of the semester, thestudents need to develop a business model and implement a business and marketing strategy forsocial ventures for use in the US, Africa, South Asia or Central America. The main objective ofthis course is to make the students value creators. Yet these creators need to work within theconfines of political, social and economic constraints on both the macro and micro
engineering and graduate student professional development.Prof. William W. Clark, University of Pittsburgh Dr. William W. Clark is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science at the University of Pittsburgh, and founder of the tech startup Diamond Kinetics. He is an active researcher and teacher in the field of dynamic systems and control with emphasis on mechatronics, sensing, embedded control, and data-driven systems. He is currently director of the Innovation, Product Design, and Entrepreneurship program in the Swanson School of Engineering at Pitt, and is interested in growing a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship among engineering students. c American Society for
within engineering, outside of engineering, and cross disci- plinarily. Her research includes an emphasis on the translation of research to practice in the form of ped- agogy, curriculum development, and faculty support and programming in implementing evidence-based best practices in teaching and learning.Jennifer WegnerMr. Moses K. Lee, University of Michigan Moses Lee is Assistant Director and Adjunct Assistant Professor at the Center for Entrepreneurship at the University of Michigan College of Engineering. In his roles, Lee directs TechArb, the student startup accelerator, and teaches the entrepreneurship practicum course.Amy Frances Goldstein, University of Michigan Amy Goldstein is the Academic Programs
the tensions between student values and the dominant discourse thathe observed in an undergraduate engineering program [5], a research study exploring thecultures, structure, composition, and processes of a variety of student engineering teams [6], anexploratory study on the relationships between student characteristics such as socio-demographictraits and academic performance, and entrepreneurship education programmatic choices such asacademic and co-curricular programs [7], redesigning a bridge experience that supportscommunity college students’ transition to university STEM programs [8]. The paper by Paguyo,et al., Creating Inclusive Environments in First-Year Engineering Classes to Support StudentRetention and Learning, [4] was selected as
AC 2008-1825: EVALUATING AN INTERNATIONAL COURSE IN PRODUCTREALIZATION FOR GLOBAL OPPORTUNITIESMatthew Mehalik, University of Pittsburgh Page 13.573.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Evaluating an International Course in Product Realization for Global OpportunitiesAbstractThis paper discusses lessons learned from a new course offered in the spring of 2007 at theUniversity of Pittsburgh entitled Product Realization for Global Opportunities. The lessonslearned consist of results from post-trip surveys and from an extensive questionnaire designed byNCIIA to assess entrepreneurship learning. The results reported consist of
Industrial and Systems Engineers and Alphi Pi Mu Honor Society.Dr. Patricia A. Sullivan, New Mexico State University Patricia A. Sullivan serves as Associate Dean for Outreach and Public Service in the College of Engineer- ing at New Mexico State University. She received her PhD in industrial engineering and has over 32 years’ experience directing statewide engineering outreach services that include technical engineering business assistance, professional development, and educational outreach programs. She is co-PI for a National Sci- ence Foundation (NSF) INCLUDES grant, coPI for a NSF grant to broaden participation among minority engineering students through engagement in innovation and entrepreneurship, and co-PI for an i6
Paper ID #33644Building a Sense of Community in a Multidisciplinary, Split-level OnlineProject-based Innovation Design CourseDr. Melissa Mae White, University of Florida Dr. Melissa Mae White develops and instructs course curriculum in Engineering Innovation and Engi- neering Entrepreneurship to the students in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. She works with faculty and students to build an ecosystem focusing on creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship across campus and in the community. She received her Bachelor of Science degree in Biomedical Engineering with a minor in
, contemporary issues, freshmen engineering students, project based learning,entrepreneurshipIntroductionA project based design course that introduces freshman students to future challenges and enhancestheir entrepreneurship skills was implemented. The topics of the course projects have a common goalof addressing socioeconomic challenges such as reduction of CO2 emission and energy consumptionthrough the use of renewable energies. The course assesses the students in developing micro-generation projects for householders, public authorities and businesses, including, small-scale windpower and solar energy technologies. Another important goal is to encourage entrepreneurshipthrough hands-on practicing of how to design, implement and manage small projects
Stanford University. She has been involved in several major engineering education initia- tives including the NSF-funded Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education, National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter), and the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engi- neering Education. Helen holds an undergraduate degree in communication from UCLA and a PhD in communication with a minor in psychology from Stanford University. Her current research and schol- arship focus on engineering and entrepreneurship education; the pedagogy of portfolios and reflective practice in higher education; and redesigning how learning is recorded and recognized.Prof. George Toye, Stanford University Ph.D., P.E., is
senior design courseat the Milwaukee School of Engineering, “the first portion focuses on team building, leadershipdevelopment, problem identification and certification, and design feasibility determination …”(William et al.8 ). Other programs use a class in parallel with the design project, in which thelecture portion covers such topics as “team building, conflict resolution, time and stressmanagement, resources availability, communication skills, and leadership.” (Wilk andAnderson9; Ray10)The courses described in the literature differ in their emphasis on two goals: (1) providinginformation and practice on skills that help students perform better in the senior design projectand (2) providing information that helps students transition from