developed and co-teaches the General Engineering Fundamentals of Engineering Design course that in- cludes a wide spectra of activities to teach students the basics of engineering design using a hands-on approach which is also engaging and fun. He is an Institute of Teaching Excellence Fellow and the recip- ient of NJIT’s 2018 Saul K. Fenster Innovation in Engineering Education Award.Mr. Ludvik Alkhoury, New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) Mr. Ludvik Alkhoury is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Newark College of Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), Newark, NJ. He is currently the Lab instructor of Fundamentals of Engineering Design (FED) 101, a course that
. Inaddition, the projects should provide the students a broad research experience by including mostof the following activities: fieldwork, sample analysis, bench-scale testing, and computermodeling. At the end of the semester, students make a formal presentation and submit a writtenreport to their sponsors.Benefits of Service LearningThere have been many papers written on the benefits of service learning. Specifically to theenvironmental field, the EPA Service Learning Document1 gives the following benefits ofservice learning: • Encourages students to learn and develop through active participation in thoughtfully organized service that is conducted in, and meets the needs of, a community • Helps to foster civic responsibility
, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Rosario A. Gerhardt is Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. In addition to her engineering research interests, she is also interested in improving diversity at the K-12, undergraduate, graduate and faculty level. She has been primary organizer as well as a faculty mentor for several Future Faculty Workshops. She also worked in the Office of Institute Diversity at Georgia Tech on a part-time basis from 2011-2015. She was named Senior Goizueta Faculty Chair in 2015.Dr. Jennifer Tygret, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Running head: IMPACT MENTORING
Paper ID #18740Stories of Change: Faculty in Reflective DialoguesDr. Lizabeth T. Schlemer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lizabeth is a professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. She has been teaching for 23 years and has continued to develop innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading. Through the SUSTAIN SLO learning initiative she and her colleagues have been active researching in transformation in higher education.Luciane de Greef, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoDr. Trevor Scott Harding, California
smallgroups develop new curricular materials and strategies through significant effort and then try toconvince others to use them.26 The ASEE and FIE preconference workshops and special on-campus workshops based on a new curricular or pedagogical development provide examples ofthis model. Because these workshops typically last a few hours without any follow-up activity, Page 23.594.2they suffer from the inherent limitations of this model that are discussed in the next section.Although the impact is limited, these types of workshops do alter the way some participantsteach. For example, survey data, collected six to twelve months after faculty
Paper ID #18530Research Experiences for Teachers in Precision Agriculture and Sustainabil-ityDr. Bradley Bowen, Virginia Tech Bradley Bowen is an assistant professor at Virginia Tech in the School of Education’s Integrative STEM program. He has a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech and a Master’s of Civil Engineering and an Ed.D. in Technology Education from N.C. State University. Using both his high school and industry work experience, Dr. Bowen specializes in professional development and outreach for integrative STEM education for K-12 educators.Dr. Alan R. Kallmeyer, North Dakota State University Alan Kallmeyer
at associating the new material to existing memorypatterns, for later retrieval. 11References[1] C. J. Scavuzzo, C. J. Moulton, and R. J. Larsen, “The use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy forassessing the effect of diet on cognition,” Nutritional Neuroscience, 21, 1-15, 2018.[2] S. Vaynman, and F. Gomez-Pinilla, “Revenge of the “sit”: how lifestyle impacts neuronal and cognitivehealth through molecular systems that interface energy metabolism with neuronal plasticity”, Journal ofNeuroscience Research, 84, 699-715, July 2006.[3] A. J. Lamont, M. E. Mortby, K. J. Anstey, P. S. Sachdev, and N. Cherbuin, “Using sulcal and gyralmeasures of brain structure to investigate benefits of an active
-benefits- access-equity (accessed Aug. 16, 2020). 10[10] M. Forsey, S. Broomhall, and J. Davis, “Broadening the Mind? Australian Student Reflections on the Experience of Overseas Study,” Journal of Studies in International Education, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 128–139, May 2012, doi: 10.1177/1028315311407511.[11] K. A. Davis, D. Reeping, A. R. Taylor, D., C. Edwards, H. G. Murzi, and D. B. Knight, “Characterizing Students’ Intercultural Competence Development Paths Through a Global Engineering Program,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018, doi: 10.18260/1-2--30187[12] K. A. Davis, A. R. Taylor, D. Reeping
, and G. Galal, “Stakeholder identification in the requirements engineering process,” in Proceedings. Tenth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 99, 1999, pp. 387–391. doi: 10.1109/DEXA.1999.795198.[6] A. Quijano, “COLONIALITY AND MODERNITY/RATIONALITY ,” Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 168–178, 2007, doi: 10.1080/09502380601164353.[7] M. A. Takeuchi, S. Kayumova, Z. de Araujo, and T. C. Madkins, “Going beyond# RetireELL: A call for anti-colonial approaches to languages in STEM education,” J Res Sci Teach, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 876–879, 2022.[8] E. Tuck and K. W. Yang, “Decolonization is not a metaphor,” Education & Society, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–40, 2012.[9
PeterTurner1andJeffreyHumpherys2Introduction and BackgroundThe Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, SIAM, was awarded a second National ScienceFoundation grant to continue the work on increasing mathematical modeling and computational appliedmathematics in high school and college curricula, and to add a thread considering the implications andpossibilities in the early grades. Both workshops grew out of discussions between SIAM and NSFEducation and Human Resources representatives early in 2011 on the topics of undergraduate and K-12courses and programs, college readiness and career preparation.The main themes of the second workshop, aptly titled, ‘Modeling across the Curriculum II,’ MaC II,investigated ways to increase mathematical modeling across undergraduate curricula
knowledge, garnering poor retention of knowledge in students, and generally failing to create apositive enough association to thwart the attrition of students to other seemingly less challenging majors.The ubiquitous progression of technical classes which engineering students march through, coupled with thegeneral disregard of American students towards math, science and technology appears to create a mindset instudents that is quite difficult to change. Calls have been made for transformation in curriculum, bothfundamental and finite although these changes garner limited returns on investment.This project was created to provide a positive association with the declared major, civil engineering, and tocreate a lasting impression to get through the
verbal, graphical, or mathematical.When an “individual knows what is being communicated and can make use of the material oridea being communicated without necessarily relating it to other material or seeing its fullestimplications” [7] we have sufficient evidence for their comprehension skills being demonstrated.Example 1. From the mechanics of materials assessment: When a metal wire is pulled through ahole smaller than its initial diameter, its strength increases. This is primarily because:A. the material has fewer dislocations.B. the material has more dislocations.C. the compaction of the atoms increases the strength of the interatomic bonds.D. the compaction of the crystals increases the strength of the grain boundaries.E. the wire has been
servesociety were made known more women might enter engineering as a major in college andeventually as a profession.BackgroundAfter gains in the representation of women graduating with engineering degrees from around1990 to 2000, more recently these numbers have been declining in the US and Canada1(http://www.ccpe.ca/e/prog_women_1.cfm). Based on U.S. data from a variety of sources, thepercentage of bachelor’s degrees in engineering that were awarded to women has been fairlyconstant at about 20-21% from 1999 through 2004 (see Figure 1)2,3,4,5. The representation ofwomen in engineering varies significantly by major, with 40.6, 36.5, 23.1, and 13.7% ofenvironmental, chemical, civil, and mechanical engineering bachelor’s degrees awarded towomen in 20043
pose a rather largechallenge. Engaging unprepared students requires a multifaceted approach tailored to theirunique needs. One effective method is the incorporation of active learning strategies, whichpromote student engagement through collaboration and participation in the learning process.Research has shown that techniques such as think-pair-share, problem-based learning, andinteractive group activities can significantly enhance understanding and retention of materialamong underprepared students [14, 15]. Additionally, providing structured support, such assupplemental instruction and peer mentoring, can foster a more inclusive learning environmentand empower students to take ownership of their learning [16,17]. Furthermore, the use
-people of color [18].There are many factors that contribute to disabled students’ low representation in STEM fieldsand education, including, but not limited to: discouraging experiences in their primary andsecondary schooling, struggles to receive and maintain often-inadequate accommodations, biasand discrimination towards disability, a lack of accessible instruction, labs, and tools, poormentorship, as well as exclusion from social and research opportunities [19], [20], [21], [13]. Intheir paper, “Examination of Ableist Educational Systems and Structures that Limit Access toEngineering Education through Narratives,” Autumn Cuellar, Brady Edward Webster, SakashiSolanki, Catherine Mcgough Spence, and Marissa Tsugawa [2022] relay the
their kit after the course’s end, thuspromoting explorative prototyping beyond the semester’s end. Through Arduino’s extensiveonline platform, students are also introduced to a vast community of makers and inventors, witha host of open source projects they can complete at their interest and disposal. The onlycomponents not used within the course are Vernier sensors and an Arduino adapter shield.Vernier sensors are commonly used in high school science courses. In this case, student ease ofuse and familiarity was prioritized over strict adherence to course material guidelines. Further complying with the scope of the course, each demonstration had to exhibit a specificbranch of engineering, highlight its cooperation with other branches of
, Montana State University Dr. Nicholas Lux has is an Associate Professor of Curriculum and Instruction in MSU’s Department of Education. His teaching and research interests are in the area of educational technology. He has worked in the fields of K-12 and higher education for 18 years, and currently teaches in the Montana State University Teacher Education Program. He has experience in educational technology theory and practice in K-12 contexts and teacher education, with a focus on STEM teaching and learning, technology integration, online course design and delivery, program evaluation, and assessment. Dr. Lux’s current research agenda is STEM teaching and learning in K-12 contexts, technology integration in teacher
contexts. Examples offaculty experiments are supplied, as well as a program timeline and interview protocol.IntroductionAfter functioning heroically during the pandemic, the leaders at Michigan Engineering (theUniversity of Michigan College of Engineering) were exhausted and overwhelmed, like so manyuniversity faculty and staff around the nation who had contended with the challenges of a rapidtransition to online education, complex decisions around re-opening, student disengagement, andisolation. With concern for the leaders’ well-being and the flourishing of the college, the deanengaged the Director of Leadership Development in Michigan Engineering to bolsterorganizational health and effectiveness through an executive-level leadership
comprising a total of eight mutually exclusive highway safetyalternatives. The problem statement is as follows:The initial investment required for alternatives 1 through 8 are: $600x103, $700x103, $800x103,$1000x103, $1200x103, $1400x103, $1500x103 and $1600x103, respectively. Based upon the useof Accident Reduction Factors, the expected number of accidents likely to be prevented per yearis estimated as 5, 6.53, 7.6, 9.87, 12.4, 13, 15.06, and 15.27 respectively, for alternatives 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (Note: There is a large body of literature on Accident Reduction Factors, adetailed discussion of which is beyond the scope of the paper8,10). Annual operating andmaintenance cost is assumed to be 5% of the initial investment. Expected project life
certainundergraduate activities and experiences influence engineering career pathways beyond thetraditional binary engineering career paths. This was influenced by my own positionality assomeone who would not be considered to be fully on a traditional “Technical” or “Managerial”career path, but also felt as though specific activities in my undergraduate student experienceinfluenced my career pathway.This research seeks to answer the following questions: (1) Which aspects of the engineeringundergraduate student experience are most influential for specific career pathways thatengineering graduates pursue after their degree? (2) For engineering graduates that took specificcareer paths, which types of undergraduate activities were they most likely to participate
, suffering and social justice do not enter in the design of a gear.)The suggestion has also been made that the ABET Criteria be modified to include an additionaloutcome for Engineering programs beyond the given outcomes (a) through (k):“Engineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain…(outcome l) A fully integrative approach to engineering problems incorporating both reasonand compassion in the development of solutions.” 22In addition, the article “Promoting Peace in Engineering Education: Modifying the ABETCriteria” urges three modifications to ABET Criterion 3: “Modification 1: Promote peace through the development of an individual plan for thelifelong cultivation of an awareness of the interdependence of all and of the
(1,2,3),and adiabatic flame temperature(1,2,3).1. Sensible heat, Q = mC∆T:I am constantly amazed how little physics emphasizes this and students leave physics II withpoor understanding of sensible heat. They understand when you put a pot of water on the stoveand heat it…it warms up. This example grounds Q = mC∆T and is the fundamental way thatheat interacts with solids and liquids. If students do not grasp this, it is impossible to describeother methods of how heat interacts with matter. Using extra time to teach this and assess it, isvital to moving on. If you lose 10% here, you will never get them back. Also be sure to overtlydifferentiate between heat, Q and Temperature, T. Many that make it through physics II, stillmake the mistake that Q
controls, while energy educators could emphasize energy harvesting with pre-made 3D printing components. 3D printing designs and source codes are available for educatorsand students to download [11].This study assessed two students' learning through thematic analysis of reflections. However, inthe future, with a larger-scale lab setting, a structured learning assessment that includes pre- andpost-lab competency surveys could be conducted to measure learning outcomes quantitatively.5.7 Broader Applications of Solar Tracking Technology Beyond EducationBeyond solar tracker’s educational benefits, this technology has broader real-world applications.For example, it can maximize the efficiency of small-scale solar energy systems, such as rooftopsolar
-cognitive factor are included.In the few studies that attempt to combine non-cognitive factors alongside cognitive ability in aneffort to explain college GPA, it has been shown that non-cognitive factors such as study skillsand effort explain significant variance in college GPA beyond cognitive ability[8], [9]. One studyhas shown that learning skills and study strategies alone can provide a 10% increase in predictivevalidity when added to cognitive-only models of academic performance[9]. Similarly, a recentmeta-analysis showed that non-cognitive factors such as conscientiousness, test anxiety, andacademic self-efficacy can explain as much variance in college GPA as high school GPA andSAT scores [10]. While these studies provide intriguing results
, A. Farzamnia and L. C. Fan, "Speed Classification of Upper Limb Movements Through EEG Signal for BCI Application," in IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 114564-114573, 2021.21. Sukumaran, B., Jahan, K., Dorland, D., Everett, J., Kadlowec, J., Gephardt, Z. and Chin, S., 2006. Engineering Clinics: An integration of research into the undergraduate engineering curriculum. CUR quarterly, 26(3), pp.115-121. 16
thatformal experiences contributed to their confidence [2]. While these formal training opportunitiesdo provide confidence boosts to students, many programs are looking beyond conventionalcourse methods, by directing self-directed continuous learning through reviewing professionalliterature [3]. Other programs have focused on the development of new curricula in Industry 4.0topics, as outlined by Sirinterlikci in his review of Industry 4.0 workforce development [4].Further investigation into the barriers in industry for the acceptance of Industry 4.0 technologies,done by Müller, showed on the second largest concern about adopting Industry 4.0 technologieswas the lack of competencies and knowledge [5]. In a further breakdown of this concern aboutthe
thatformal experiences contributed to their confidence [2]. While these formal training opportunitiesdo provide confidence boosts to students, many programs are looking beyond conventionalcourse methods, by directing self-directed continuous learning through reviewing professionalliterature [3]. Other programs have focused on the development of new curricula in Industry 4.0topics, as outlined by Sirinterlikci in his review of Industry 4.0 workforce development [4].Further investigation into the barriers in industry for the acceptance of Industry 4.0 technologies,done by Müller, showed on the second largest concern about adopting Industry 4.0 technologieswas the lack of competencies and knowledge [5]. In a further breakdown of this concern aboutthe
], research on their application to non-cognitive data for predicting lecture engagementremains limited.In this paper, we investigate the efficacy of pre-trained LLMs to predict weekly lecture-basedengagement of college STEM students using their LE data. Moving beyond traditionalapproaches that primarily focus on cognitive attributes [8, 9], our study leverages non-cognitivedata, such as students’ reflections, emotions, and perceptions about lectures, supplemented bytheir socio-economic background information, to gain a more comprehensive understanding ofengagement trends. Specifically, we address the following two research questions (RQs): • RQ1: How effectively can LLMs predict STEM students’ weekly lecture-based engagement using non
through the highest levels of education.Less research has focused on the extent of institutional change necessary to support academicsuccess, the building of partnerships, or the possibility of replicating effective practices that haveworked at other institutions. While a limited number of institutions have developed successfulmodels, expanding the reach of these achievements continues to be a critical challenge fortoday’s colleges and universities. This study focuses on one such partnership and model ofreplication.Two programs that demonstrated success in increasing the number of underrepresented studentspursuing and completing STEM doctoral programs are housed at the University of Maryland,Baltimore County (UMBC). The Meyerhoff program has
an extended period of time. We havebegun initial development of an alternative assessment, but it has not yet been tested andvalidated. The use of such an instrument is crucial if we are to argue for the far-reaching impactof LAP on students. We would also like to track the leadership development of any student whoparticipates in LAP activities. Such tracking is currently beyond our resources now, but we hopeto identify strategies that will help us implement such tracking in the second stage of our project.Bibliography[1] “Educating Engineers for the New Market,” Bloomberg Businessweek, February 27, 2007.[2] Sheppard, S.D., K. Macatangay, A. Colby, W.M. Sullivan, and L.S. Shulman. Educating Engineers: Designingfor the Future of the Field