able to obtain irreversiblenanoporous scaffolds by using specially designed microfluidic devices (see Fig. 3, [4]). Theirreversible gel formation results from the large shear and extension strain rates and total straingenerated by the flow through the device, under a mixed extensional and shear flow conditions. Microchannel wormlike micelles nanogel Glass-beads or micropostsFig. 3. Design of the nanogel fabrication. Micron size particles are introduced inside microchannels to achieve high
. and A. T. Young, editors, Technically Speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology, National Academies Press, (2002). 2. Committee on Public Understanding of Engineering Messages, Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering, National Academy of Engineering, National Academies Press, (2008). 3. C. Alexander, Notes on the Synthesis of Form, Harvard University Press, (1964). 4. K. Akiyama, Function Analysis: Systematic Improvement of Quality and Performance, Andrew P. Dillon, Translator, Productivity Press, Cambridge, (1991). 5. P. E. Vermaas, “Focusing philosophy of engineering: analyses of technical functions and beyond
, and creative processes to achieve goals and make responsible decisions • Global Awareness: ZU graduates will be able to relate to communities beyond the local, perceive and react to differences from an informed and reasoned point of view, and be critically aware of the implications and benefits of cultural interaction. • Teamwork: ZU graduates will be able to work efficiently and effectively in a group. • Leadership: ZU graduates will be able to assume leadership roles and responsibilities in a variety of life situations and accept accountability for the results.3. Overview of Learning Outcomes Assessment CoursesZayed University Students are expected to track and provide evidence of their significant learningexperiences. To
the United States Air Force Academy is discussed, and a plan forimproving ethics across the curriculum is outlined.II. Engineering EducationPrior to 1950 the emphasis in engineering education was on design according to codes and otherstandardized methods outlined in handbooks. It was seen as a very practical subject, with littleapplication of mathematics beyond elementary calculus. During the 1950s and 1960s engineeringeducation experienced a true paradigm shift from this applied, practice-oriented focus to amathematical, academic, ‘engineering science’ focus. 2 Although this model has undergonevarious revisions during the past 40 years, it is still the predominant pedagogy used in engineeringeducation.Since the late 1980s there have been a
us what we maybe already knew, but nevertheless needed to hear: students enterengineering education from diverse points of origin and continue through to careers that are aslikely beyond engineering as within it. However, a close reading of the report also reveals twovoices. On the one hand, there was the voice of educators and administrators eager to celebratethe fact that engineering can serve as rigorous preparation for a variety of future occupations. Onthe other hand, there was a smaller number of educators, including NAE staff members who,through their engagement with the literature on women and minorities in engineering educationsought to make the point that many students enter engineering with diverse backgrounds andpreparation in
students.KeywordsSummer camps; Assessment; In-person to virtual; Underrepresented; URMIntroductionAs new technologies emerged over the last several decades, the need for a STEM workforceincreased and began a movement in the United States (US) to improve STEM education. Worldeducation rankings show the US lagging behind other nations in developing STEM skills [1]. Inorder to help overcome this widening gap, the US began a push for STEM opportunities for K-12students outside of schools, especially for reach underrepresented minority (URM) students whomay not have equal access to STEM opportunities. In 2007, the University of Arkansas Collegeof Engineering (UACOE) began offering summer programs to increase STEM exposure. In thesecamps, students are free to develop
theuse of Lotus ScreenCam tutorials and interactive exercises, games, and quizzes. The ScreenCamexercises interactively guide the student through examples using modeling software such asWorking Model 2-D and MathCad. The instructional material is organized using the LegacyCycle algorithm, which has been shown to be highly successful in K-12 instruction and is basedon a sequence of challenges of increasing difficulty.An example demonstrating the delivery and instructional techniques used is given. The exampledeals with a simple, planar Hinge Joint model of the Human Elbow. The challenges begin withdetermining which of the three muscle groups (biceps, brachioradials, and brachialis) is mostefficient with respect to muscle force magnitude for an
Impacts Technology Students (SKIITS)1 developed an online,asynchronous, accessible-from-anywhere course that community colleges can use as a resourceto offer spatial skills training to their students with a nominal investment of institutionalresources. The course is based on research and materials created with the support of NSF fundingthat were successfully used in face-to-face instruction in four-year universities.SKIITS focuses on three research questions:1. Can effective materials developed through earlier NSF funding to improve spatial skills be transformed into an effective set of online resources?2. Does providing spatial skills training improve the retention of low-spatial-ability students, including women in technician programs?3
prepared to handle them because of the exceptional realism of the flight simulators.Those simulators are beyond the reach of most training budgets so an alternative is needed tomake VR a viable option for continuing professional development.VR is particularly well-suited for training situations involving very large (e.g., large buildingprojects) or very small (e.g., nanotechnology) scales which may be very expensive andlogistically challenging to replicate in a training environment. Another situation where VR ispreferred is in dangerous environments such as chemical plants [2]. These may be difficult if notimpossible to reproduce in live training because of the costs and potential danger. That is thetype of training that will be considered in this
how theirinvolvement in research helped their perception of their program of study to evolve beyond whatthey initially thought it was. While U1 is also a research-intensive institution it is still unclear ifstudents are encouraged to engage in research as undergraduates or if their involvement is purelyvoluntary. Additionally, U2 was reported by the students to have multiple funding/scholarshipopportunities which they found to be extremely advantageous.The participants also offered varied rationales for choosing their majors and how the body ofknowledge associated with the discipline, and a university degree by extension, is beneficial fortheir current and future academic interests. To learn. To help obtain knowledge. It's like more
designedto reinforce course content.2,3The project described in this paper uses the distillation column in the Ohio University unitoperations laboratory to reinforce concepts of sensible heat, latent heat, and binary vapor-liquidequilibrium in an introductory chemical engineering course. Its limited scope is appropriate foruse as an introductory design project. Thus, the project contributes to meeting "technicalcontent" objectives for the course and broader "a-through-k"4 objectives for the curriculum.Motivation"Mass Balances" and "Energy Balances" are a two-quarter sequence of introductory chemicalengineering courses at Ohio University. Their content is largely based on the classic text byFelder and Rousseau.5 Phase equilibrium, Raoult’s Law, and T
virtue is a higher standard than ethics. While something may beethical in terms of codes, standards, and industry norms, it may not be virtuous. Events in theauthor’s experience will illustrate this point. These are presented as case studies where one isargued to be an example of non-virtuous engineering and one is presented as an example ofvirtuous engineering. In addition to two case studies, this paper will briefly consider the virtuesrelevant to engineering and discuss some factors related to ethics that impact equipment designand operations. The thesis of this paper is there may be a moral component in process andequipment design that goes beyond traditional engineering ethics training.IntroductionEthics, virtues, and morals are
Georgia Institute of Technology. Her research focuses on design and engineering education with a focus on promoting diversity and inclusion. She has served as PI and co-PI for grants from multiple spon- sors including NSF and Amazon totaling more than $9M. In addition, her STEM outreach programs and curricula have impacted hundreds of thousands of K-12 students nationwide. She is the cofounder and director of Georgia Tech’s K-12 InVenture Prize, a statewide invention competition, open to all students and teachers in Georgia. She earned her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign in 2007, and her Masters and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2009 and 2012. Dr
. 712–731, 2020.[7] R. P. Loweth, S. R. Daly, K. H. Sienko, A. Hortop, and E. A. Strehl, “Student Designers’ Interactions with Users in Capstone Design Projects: A Comparison Across Teams,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[8] W. A. Sugar, “What is so good about user-centered design? Documenting the effect of usability sessions on novice software designers,” J. Res. Comput. Educ., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 235–250, 2001.[9] J. B. Scott, “The practice of usability: Teaching user engagement through service-learning,” Tech. Commun. Q., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 381–412, 2008.[10] J. L. Hess and N. D. Fila, “The manifestation of empathy within design: findings from a service-learning course,” CoDesign, vol. 12, no. 1–2
during the Advisory Board Meeting, August 16, 2022 6Marra, R.M., Steege, L., Tsai, C., and Tang, N.E. (2016) Beyond “group work”: an integratedapproach to support collaboration in engineering education. IJ STEM Ed 3(17).https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0050-3Matusovich, H.M., Streveler, R.A. and Miller, R.L. (2010), Why Do Students ChooseEngineering? A Qualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of Students' Motivational Values.Journal of Engineering Education, 99: 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01064.xMiller, S., Marhefka, J., Heininger K., Jablokow, K., Mohammed, S., and Ritter, S. (2019) Thetrajectory of psychological safety in engineering teams: a longitudinal exploration in
response to theseconcerns, a program was initiated in the Boise State University College of Engineering toimprove lower division retention via research and internships. Inclusion of lower divisionstudents in both university research and industry internships is contrary to prevailing perceptionsof student capabilities. However, lower division engineering students generally possessnumerous basic skills that enable them to work in an engineering environment where they cangain experience and confidence. Phase One of the Retention through Research and InternshipsProgram was a pilot program in which seven first year engineering students were placed inresearch laboratories with faculty mentors within the College of Engineering during the 2004-05academic
(CS) students are of-ten perceived through the lens of stereotypes. Research has shown that CS majors are seen asmostly nerdy, lazy, introverted white and Asian men with a strong interest in mathematics [3, 4, 5].These stereotypes are common among both CS students and the larger world, and undermine ef-forts to diversify student populations because they discourage some students from entering thefield who might otherwise be interested in CS. In addition, these stereotypes feed into identity con-cerns such as stereotype threat and imposter phenomenon [6], which can interfere with a student’sresilience.These stereotypes are problematic, but we face an additional challenge: the statistics affirm thedemographic stereotypes. In a preliminary study
mechanical linkage between breast cancer and diabetes. Dr. Griggs joined Penn State in the summer of 2019 as an Assistant Teaching Professor, Director of the Multicultural Engineering Program and Director of the Clark Scholars Program. In this role, Dr. Griggs drives initiatives to improve the recruitment and retention of underrepresented groups pursuing degrees in engineering and strives to foster a welcoming environment that celebrates culture and inclusion. Her passion lies in mentoring through meaningful career discussions and helping students gain confidence as well as succeed in their chosen degree fields.Carmen Mariana Vanderhoof Assistant Research Professor (Science Education)Catherine L. Cohan (Assistant Research
placingcommunication, ability to work in teams, and interpersonal skills in the top five of a ranking ofseventeen traits by importance to engineering practice.1, 15While the development of teaming skills is useful in its own right, teamwork also promotesactive learning, a process by which students meaningfully engage with the material rather thanpassively “soaking up” knowledge. Active learning enhances student understanding ofmaterial.16 In team-based project work, students apply material taught in class to concrete goalsand learn from, teach, and support one another as their skills grow. ‘Encouraging cooperationamong students’ (collaboration, rather than competition) and ‘encouraging active learning’(internalizing knowledge through interacting with it) are
1.1 Technical Proficiency a,b,c,d,f CAD tools to develop wireframe, surface, and solid models through demonstrations, 1.3 Computer Applications a,d,g Inventor Lessons 91 Midterm Practical 99.7 33 50 17 0 0 assignments, tutorials and practical 2.5 Self-Learning h,k examinations. 5. To develop an appreciation for 1.1 Technical Proficiency a,b,c,d,f graphics as a communication medium in various application areas through Midterm Written 82.3 Final 84.1 0 83 17 0
Paper ID #28820Understanding students’ experiences with teamwork in the AustraliancontextMr. Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury is a PhD student at Virginia Tech in the department of Engineering Edu- cation. Tahsin holds a bachelors degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and has worked as a manufacturing professional at a Fortune 500 company. As an Engineering Education researcher, he is interested in enhancing professional competencies for engineering workforce development in academia and beyond. He is actively engaged in different projects at the
architects desired. Beyond the passive effects, one of the first major engineering questions was howthe house would be actively heated and cooled to meet the strict temperature and humidityrange imposed by the contest rules. A typical new house today (including most of theother schools’ Decathlon houses) is built with a forced-air system, which moves air from acentralized heat pump out to the house through ductwork. The team determined that thiswas neither the most efficient nor most comfortable way to control temperature orhumidity and opted instead for a hydronic radiant floor system that ran warm water (solar-heated when that is available) through tubing embedded in the floor. This easily won overthe architecture students, as it promised
instructional opportunities inmany modes, whether at campus or school (traditional teaching), at home (warm-ups, post-classtasks, or self-learning), or through distance learning. Realistic simulations enable learners to: (1) Observe the physical processes insightfully at different levels of detail (micro and macro) (2) Analyze the constraints between relevant parameters (relationships) (3) Push these parameters beyond normally allowed values to simulate infrequent operating conditions or casualty situations (cause and effect) (4) Run “what IF” scenarios (minimizing risk) (5) Acquire data from virtual experiments for detailed analysis and comparison to actual operating conditions in a theory-to-practice approach. (This narrows the
beenoperationalized into a survey instrument [22]. However, the national dataset used in this studyprovided specific questions that investigate portions of this model summarized in bullets 2 – 5above. Specifics of these measures are discussed in methods.MethodsThis work seeks to better understand the relationship between engineering identity and leadershipself-efficacy as a component of leadership identity. This relationship is explored throughsecondary analysis of a national dataset. While the nature of secondary analysis prevents anexplicit exploration of all items of interest in the two identity constructs discussed above, theselimitations are outweighed in many ways through the scale of the available data and theconsistency of questions with portions of
warming and the US prestigepress,” Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 125-136, 2004.[5] C. R. Sunstein, “Of Montreal and Kyoto: A tale of two protocols,” Harvard EnvironmentalLaw Review, 31, 2007.[6] K. G. Pennell, M. Thompson, J. W. Rice, L. Senier, P. Brown, and E. Suuberg, “BridgingResearch and Environmental Regulatory Processes: The Role of Knowledge Brokers,”Environmental Science & Technology. 47, 11985-11992, 2013.[7] R. C. Campbell, and D. Wilson, “Engineers' Responsibilities for Global Electronic Waste:Exploring Engineering Student Writing Through a Care Ethics Lens,” Science and EngineeringEthics, 23(2), 591-622, 2017.[8] National Academies of Science, The Science of Science Communication II: Summary of aColloquium. Washington, DC
Design Elements of Collaborative Infrastructure. https://www.includesnetwork.org/about-us/what-we-do21. Koren, P. E., DeChillo, N., & Friesen, B. J. (1992). Measuring empowerment in families whose children have emotional disabilities: A brief questionnaire. Rehabilitation, 37(4), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/h007910622. Kouo, J. L., Hogan, A. E., Morton, S., & Gregorio, J. (2021). Supporting students with an autism spectrum disorder in engineering: K-12 and beyond. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities. 24(11).23. Kuzminski, Netto, J., Wilson, J., Falkmer, T., Chamberlain, A., & Falkmer, M. (2019). Linking knowledge and attitudes: Determining neurotypical knowledge about and
factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, pp. 1–10.[23] Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), pp.238-246.[24] Browne, M. and Cudek, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K. Bollen and J. Long, ed., Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp.136-162.[25] Rest, J., Thoma, S., Narvaez, D. and Bebeau, M. (1997). Alchemy and beyond: Indexing the Defining Issues Test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), pp.498-507.[26] Rest, J., Thoma, S. and Edwards, L. (1997). Designing and validating a measure of moral judgment: Stage preference and stage consistency approaches. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), pp.5-28.
directed the Women in Science and Engineering (WISE) program at Garrison Forest School, an independent pre-K through 12 college preparatory school outside Baltimore, since its inception in 2005. The GFS WISE program partnership with the Johns Hopkins University’s Whiting School of Engineering has placed over 225 GFS high school women in research labs and settings throughout the University. Ms. Perry helped with WISE program development and implementation upon coming to GFS after 19 years working in student affairs at Johns Hopkins. As Dean of Special Programs and Director of the James Center, Ms. Perry currently directs efforts at GFS aimed at public purpose and experiential education.Ms. Anitra Michelle Washington, Western
AC 2007-189: ENGINEERING LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS – ANINTEGRATED APPROACH OF TEACHING THE INTRODUCTORYENGINEERING COURSEAtin Sinha, Albany State University Atin Sinha is the Regents Engineering Professor and Coordinator of the Engineering Program at Albany State University. He received his Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Tennessee Space Institute in 1984. He had worked in aeronautical research and industry (National Aerospace Laboratory-India, Learjet, Allied-Signal) for 12 years before moving to academia in 1990. He is also a Registered Professional Engineer in Oklahoma. Currently, he is engaged in motivating undergraduate students in inquiry based learning through
reading materials.The project’s commercialization initiatives include: • A competitive program for early-stage translational proof-of-principle seed funding, intended to accelerate the technology-commercialization pipeline. The project solicited proposals from across the UT System, not just from the campuses of the UT- TRANSFORM project. • A start on building the UT System’s ecosystem for innovation and entrepreneurship, through a Web site that provides paths for commercialization at the project’s participating institution, including university and community resources.Problems of building the entrepreneurial ecosystemThe promise of common creation and maintenance of a transformational and