Engineering from Wright State University. FYEE 2025 Conference: University of Maryland - College Park, Maryland Jul 27Full Paper: A Framework for Engineering Problem Scoping Leading toMindful Engineering Problem SolvingIntroduction & Project BackgroundThe title of engineer is becoming increasingly synonymous with “problem-solver,” which isaccurate given the responsibly of engineers to actively participate in innovating solutions toresearch, industry, and societal challenges both small and large. To this point, widely recognizedand well-regarded institutions of higher education frame the field of engineering research andpractice as the world’s “problem solvers” on their college’s websites or home pages (e.g., [1],[2]). In the last
have the student’simage appear on the TV monitors. Several large-screen monitors are placed at strategiclocations in the classroom. Students at the off-campus locations control their cameras witha ‘joy’ stick and use a microphone to communicate with the instructor. Their images maybe programmed to appear either on separate monitors, one each per group, or all on asingle ‘split screen’ TV monitor. The document camera, with wide-angle and zoomfeatures, is used to display printed or instructor-written class notes on the monitors. Thesmart board replaces a traditional classroom ‘black board’ on which the instructor canwrite using a magic marker. The material written on the smart board appears, as it iswritten in real time, on the monitors but
intuitiveenough to use without written directions and flexible enough to accommodate a wealth of datawithin a single screen, yet remain small enough to allow a reasonable download time over theInternet.Lake Profiler has two components has been developed from this data, one showing the dissolvedoxygen concentration changing over time, the other showing similar changes in temperature.Figure 1 shows the first screen when entering the program. The first box shows the difference indissolved oxygen concentration through a vertical color gradation representing varying values ofdissolved oxygen concentration. The graph to the right provides numerical values for the profilethroughout the depth of the lake. The user can move the black box slider above July 24 to
faculty development program. Of the 19 respondents notteaching in the newly redesigned building, 8 had been through the active learning facultydevelopment program .B. MeasuresStudy I. An online survey was constructed to probe participant’s knowledge, perceptions andpractice of active learning. The survey consists of four sections: knowledge, perceptions, practiceof active learning, and demographics. To explore their current knowledge, participants wereasked to describe what active learning means in their words. To assess their perceptions of activelearning, we identified existing scales in the literature [5] - [7], [11], [12], and finalized 40 itemsacross six constructs: (a) general attitudes toward active learning, (b) familiarity and use
externships [26]. As policymakers and educators seekmechanisms to support trainees’ development, the use of externships may be on the rise, butconclusions about outcomes are not in hand. For example, institutions funded by the NIHBroadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST) awards have included externships in theirprogrammatic model of career development, but have not yet had time to assess impact [27].In this paper, we present an exploratory study of an experiential learning component of our NIH-funded training program: an externship. Using mixed methods, we investigate the roleexternships play in the career development of predoctoral biomedical engineering students.The comprehensive training program in imaging sciences and informaticsWe
Workshops. The School ofEngineering at The Citadel uses the content within the ExCEEd Teaching Workshop forteaching faculty development.Based on the recent American Association of Colleges and Universities (AACU) Provost andDeans list serve discussion (Fall 2016), the amounts for faculty development in small tomedium sized departments vary by university and range from $500 - $1500 annually perfaculty member. In large researched focused schools, faculty must generate their owndevelopment funds. In some schools, the faculty development funds are centralized at theDean or Provost level and faculty submit a request. However, many programs have theamount added to their operating funds to support faculty development opportunities. Theamount is normally
of Randel et al.’s (2018) inclusive leadership model. These leaderindividual difference factors are centered in awareness of bias that pervades behaviors whichnegatively impact the facilitation of belongingness and valuing uniqueness. The implicitassociation test (IAT) is a common measure used to aide in identification of perceptions orassociations between groups (Greenwaldt & Krieger, 2006). By building awareness ofunconscious associations or unconscious biases, one can work to shift in a conscious mannertowards behaviors that support inclusive leadership. Using Randel et al.’s (2018) inclusive leadership framework an engineering leadershipdevelopment program at a large northeastern university incorporated didactic and
Figure 5. At thestarting point, a large majority of students indicated they had no or very limited skills in three technicalareas, including knowledge of (i) how a robotic system works; (ii) how to program an autonomous roboticsystem; and (iii) how to design and build a power distribution circuit board. Students also gave themselvesvery low ratings in their assessment of their understanding of other engineering disciplines and their hands-on and practical engineering skills. The areas where students expressed the greatest confidence at the outsetof the course were their ability to work effectively in a team and, related, their ability to communicate ideasto future engineers from their own and other disciplines. When assessing their skill levels
) Page 10.1288.2 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationThough the subject matter is somewhat traditional, we have introduced innovative ways ofstructuring the class and engaging the first-year engineering students. In this paper we willpresent the various engineering design skills and tools integrated into the course, the projectsbased content of the course, the course structure, and an assessment of the objectives and thefulfillment of the engineering program outcomes.Course Focus: Engineering DesignThe two-course Engineering Principles sequence is focused on the topic of engineering design.The
Paper ID #11169New Faculty Experiences with Mastery GradingDr. Joseph Ranalli, Pennsylvania State Hazleton Dr. Joseph Ranalli has taught since 2012 as an Assistant Professor at Penn State Hazleton in the Alterna- tive Energy and Power Generation Engineering program. He previously earned a BS from Penn State and a PhD from Virginia Tech, both in Mechanical Engineering. Prior to his current appointment, he served as a postdoctoral research fellow at the National Energy Technology Lab in Morgantown, West Virginia. Dr. Ranalli’s current research interests include development of tools and methods for solar energy resource
AC 2008-1261: USING ROBOTICS TO TEACH MATHEMATICS: ANALYSIS OF ACURRICULUM DESIGNED AND IMPLEMENTEDEli Silk, University of Pittsburgh Eli M. Silk is a PhD candidate in the Cognitive Studies in Education program and a Graduate Student Researcher at the Learning Research and Development Center at the University of Pittsburgh. He received his BA in Computer Science at Swarthmore College in 2001. His current research focuses on the use of engineering design to teach science and mathematics in middle and secondary school classrooms.Christian Schunn, University of Pittsburgh Christian D. Schunn is an Associate Professor of Psychology, Cognitive Studies in Education, and
widely discussed in the literature.With this analysis, we seek to contribute knowledge addressing 1) the prevalence of internshipexperiences amongst engineering students drawn from a large, multi-institutional, nationallyrepresentative sample, 2) if the likelihood of having an engineering internship experiences isequitable amongst various student identities, and 3) what additional factors influence thelikelihood of a student having an internship experience, such as engineering field.Data were drawn from a 2015 multi-institutional nationally representative survey of engineeringjuniors and seniors, excluding one institution with a mandatory co-op program (n = 5530 from26 institutions). A z-test was used to analyze differences in internship
engineeringat Deakin fall into four categories: • 18-19 year-old students fresh from high school, who largely study on-campus, • older students in the technical workforce, seeking a university degree to upgrade their qualifications, • industry-based students studying in university-industry partnership programs, • overseas students studying either on-campus, or off-campus through education partners in Malaysia and Singapore.Geographically these students form a very wide student base. The study programs are designedto produce multi-skilled, broadly focused engineers and technologists with multi-disciplinarytechnical competence, and the ability to take a systems approach to design and operationalperformance. A team of around 25
calls will be issued at close of the start-up phase. • A regulatory coordination committee may issue special project calls at any time. Third Party Assessment CommissionedDeloitte studied key areas in order to evaluate and assessManufacturing USA’s national-level impacts, including:• Program Theory and Structure – Is the program doing the right things? – Is the program meeting objectives / impacts?• Program progress – How is the program performing, achieving its objectives, and creating impact? – Qualitatively, what are case studies / examples of impact? – Quantitatively, what does the data tell us about impact?• Recommendations – What can be improved? Copyright © 2016
- § Structures small enough to belevel course that can satisfy one of the three General Elective differentrequirements in our undergraduate engineering programs (see § Nanomechanical oscillators: aFigure 1). This course is intended to provide a hands-on Nanomechanics tale of beams and atomsexperience for junior-level undergraduate students in § Feeling faint forcesnanofabrication and characterization. It discusses the grandchallenges of nanofabrication and showcases examples of § Background: becoming fluentspecific applications of nanotechnology in
Transmitter Points Flashing Timing Module LED Resistor Figure 1. CricketSat wireless sensor platform utilized in a first-year design courseFigure 2. Student project based on CricketSat circuit. Dorm door monitoring system:wireless sensor with magnetic switch (left) and remote receiver (right) This simple, 555-timer based circuit is subsequently used as a platform for a wirelesssensor application for which student teams conceive and develop a system. Example teamprojects have included wireless systems to monitor noise level, assess the viability of solarenergy, ascertain the shock performance on mountain bikes, and monitor entry into dorm
lessons of this workshop to the classes they teach. Thedetails and success of the ETW have been reported in many venues.In Spring 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic swept across the nation and remained a persistentthreat throughout 2021. As a result, the in-person workshops scheduled for Summer 2020 werecanceled and in Summer 2021 was reimagined as a virtual offering. This paper is the first in athree-part series that describe and assess how ASCE modified and continued the ExCEEdprogram during this difficult period.This paper specifically overviews the response by the ASCE Committee on FacultyDevelopment (CFD) to create the virtual ExCEEd Community Exchange (ECX) following thecancellation of the Summer 2020 ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Workshop. The ECX program
opted to skip these activities. I believe this helped the CSEMS/S-STEM mentees in the job search process." (Faculty mentor #10) "[Some] not only attained their BS degree but then went on to study for and earn an MS degree. Some have even gone on to study for PhDs. This was a huge accomplishment of the program although it was not specifically assessed. . . . The number of engineering society officer positions in the college included a large percentage of OMEGA mentees. For these mentees, there were more opportunities for leadership training which in some cases was required as part of being an officer. The mentees who chose this path benefited greatly as they became part of the larger academic
potential for improving program efficiency, stakeholder engagement, and resourceutilization in higher education [9-11]. Focusing on value creation, continuous improvement, and 1minimization of waste, Lean-based frameworks can help administrators tackle the complexlogistics of running a summer camp: scheduling faculty, coordinating facilities, ensuring theavailability of lab equipment, and accommodating the diverse learning needs of participants.This paper examines a large-scale engineering summer camp at Tech, where the College ofEngineering embarked on a comprehensive effort to expand the camp’s reach, diversify itsapplicant pool, and ease the workload
private, large or small, research-focused or teaching-focused. To date,18 universities ranging from Bucknell and Norwich to Penn State and the University of Nebraskahave volunteered to participate. The committee formed in August 2003 and is scheduled to issuea final report that provides curriculum implementation strategies, suggests revisions to the BOK,and offers possible BOK-compliant curricula with commentaries in December 2005. The UnitedStates Military Academy joined the partnership in October 2004. The purpose of this paper is todescribe the current status of the BOK, the nature of the West Point civil engineering curriculum,the reasons why West Point joined this effort, and the initial assessment as to how well thisprogram meets the BOK
, fixtured/machined on a 3-Axis HAAS machining center, andmeasured on a Mitutoyo Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM). The use of specific softwareand equipment available in-house demonstrates how the technology and standards need to bepersonalized to specific products and companies (aspects of this project are discussed below inthe Methodology section). First, the foundational knowledge from taking courses in both theBSME and BSMfgET degree programs is presented in a framework that goes on to describe aCAM course module on digital and smart manufacturing. A description of the examples usedwith students and the results of the assessment are also discussed. In addition to teachingstudents about the product lifecycle in the context of a digital thread
learn is by teachingand by doing. Participants can earn course credit while improving their mentoring and leadershipskills.BEAM operates a student-run class to train our mentors and to develop leadership skills in ourmembers. BEAM serves as a model for effective student-led outreach and education partnershipsbetween universities and their surrounding educational institutions. Our program has beendesigned to contribute to greater diversity and access to engineering while serving the needs ofour primary stakeholders. For two and a half years, we have planned, implemented, assessed, andredesigned a flexible organization to achieve our vision: to impact the future of students in ourcommunity through hands-on learning. This paper will explain the
Paper ID #30555Designing Introductory, Hands-on, Open Source Power Electronics LabExercisesMr. Mark William Thoren, Analog Devices, Inc. Mark Thoren joined Analog Devices (Linear Technology at the time) in 2001 as an applications engineer supporting precision data converters. He’s since held various roles in mixed-signal applications involving training, technical publications, and customer support. Mark recently joined Analog Devices’ System Development Group, where he works on reference designs and developing material for the ADI University Program. He holds a BS in Agricultural Mechanical Engineering and MS in Electrical
], we developed a questionnaire to assess psychosocial factors thatappeared to be related to the retention of women engineering undergraduates. Exploratory factoranalyses and reliability analyses confirmed that the measure we developed reliably assessedseven factors that had been suggested as important for retention: commitment, confidence, theperceived value of engineering, interest/curiosity about engineering, family support, socialperceptions, and perceptions of bias in the field of engineering. While that study was focusedspecifically on women students and interventions to impact those factors and increase retentionof women, our numbers were too small to indicate any statistically significant results. We feltthat much could be learned by
Program at American University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction with emphasis in Physics and Science Education from Kansas State University. Dr. Larkin is involved with Physics Education Research (PER) and has published widely on topics related to the assess- ment of student learning in introductory physics and engineering courses. Noteworthy is her work with student writing as a learning and assessment tool in her introductory physics courses for non-majors. She has been an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) for about 30 years. Dr. Larkin served on the Board of Directors for ASEE from 1997-1999 as Chair of
a consequence, the testingmethodologies, skills, and knowledge of the tester are important qualities because their effectiveapplication will establish confidence among end users that the software is reliable.Despite the importance of such testing within the software industry, it receives little attention inthe undergraduate curriculum [3], with the coverage in Computer Science (CS) and SoftwareEngineering (SE) courses assessed as insufficient [4]. Technology is rapidly changing and thisimplies that instructors must instill in CS and SE students the testing skills, methodologies, andknowledge required to meet the challenges of this dynamic industry. Consequently, theinstitutions concerned should regularly review their courses and programs
Assessment and Program Evaluation Services. He teaches evaluation and test theory. He is the author of two books and more than 80 refereed publications on research methods. Page 24.1313.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning in the Engineering ClassroomIntroductionActive learning approaches are being used more extensively in engineering education as theliterature base on their effectiveness continues to grow.1-12 In addition to the empiricalresearch showing improvement on various learning outcomes, the use
directly or indirectly map to BOK2. Note the survey did not ask "why not"for the vast majority of schools that did not incorporate most/all of the outcomes of BOK2 intotheir program outcomes. Since outcomes need to be assessed, it is speculated that the additionalwork required to assess additional outcomes is a deterrent to adding outcomes beyond thoserequired by ABET. Lastly, 15% of schools surveyed were determined to be based on a mix ofboth ABET and BOK2.Two general conclusions can be drawn from Table 2. First, the number of programs that havedecided to model their program outcomes after BOK2 is small. Second, while programs mayfind the outcomes in BOK2 worthy, adoption of these outcomes to be part of the ABET processon a voluntary basis is
professionalism topics.Students have formal opportunities for interacting across cohorts through project teams. Theinter-cohort collaboration offers opportunities for professional and technical development in thecontext of working on industry projects.The small group meetings referenced on Figure 1 are formal opportunities for students to connectwith other students and with facilitators and are used in the co-op based program. Students meetin small groups of 3-5 students to discuss a variety of topics. All students in the department areregularly asked to complete reflective prompts; the small group discussion can be focused onthose reflective prompts, such as “Why is it important to set goals?” Small group discussionsmay also focus around career
implementation of computertechnology in research and teaching, which was mentioned by nine participants. Next in linewere accreditation/assessment and funding, mentioned by seven of 27.Experience at Penn State in reforming our engineering undergraduate programs has largelymirrored these responses. Indeed the ECSEL coalition, made possible by NSF support, was builtaround the theme of “integration of design across the curriculum.” ECSEL had a very significantimpact on our College-wide efforts to enhance teaching and learning, steering us in a directionand path of work that continue today. We have introduced a variety of new, more effectiveteaching and learning strategies on our campuses including active and collaborative learningalong with technology