within the Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD) within the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Gregg received his PhD in Educational Leadership and Higher Education from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln with a Master of Technology Management degree and a BS in Manufacturing Engineering Technology, from Brigham Young Univer- sity. Gregg also provides consulting in leadership development and project management working with Strategy Execution and Duke Corporate Education where he provides training for fortune 500 companies throughout the world.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of
University-West Lafayette, personal communication.8. Yoder, R., “Engineering by the Numbers,” https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles/15EngineeringbytheNumbersPart1.pdf.9. Principles and Practices of Engineering: Exam Specifications and design standards,National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES),http://ncees.org/engineering/pe/.10. Daigger, G.T., Murthy, S., Love, N.G., Sandino, J., “Transforming EnvironmentalEngineering and Science Education, Research, and Practice,” Environmental EngineeringScience, pp. 42-50, 34(1), 2017.11. Harrison, J., Klotz, L., “Women as Sustainability Leaders in Engineering: Evidence fromIndustry and Academia,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(3
internal or external, and incompressible or compressible. Which flowsshould be analyzed? With what methods?Turning to the FE Reference Handbook for more detail is unsatisfactory because it does notdescribe several topics; others are addressed only briefly or in sections of the handbook for otherdisciplines. There is not a chapter on Computational Tools in the handbook, spreadsheets are Table 3: FE Mechanical Exam Specifications for Fluid Mechanics A. Fluid properties B. Fluid statics C. Energy, impulse, and momentum D. Internal flow E. External flow F. Incompressible flow G
Engineering from Mines. Prior to joining the Faculty at Mines, Linda served in various roles in the oil and gas industry including operations engineer, production engi- neer, attorney, and international negotiator for oil and gas project development. She teaches Properties of Reservoir Fluids, Mechanics of Petroleum Production, Petroleum Seminar, Field Session, Fossil Energy, Environmental Law and Sustainability, and Corporate Social Responsibility. In addition to teaching in the Petroleum Engineering program at Mines, Linda teaches courses in the Leadership in Social Responsibil- ity, Humanitarian Engineering, Energy, and Midstream Minor programs and the Natural Resources and Energy Policy graduate program at Mines
theworld, and approximate 3-5 times higher than that of Russia, the United States. At present, there are morethan 1,100 colleges and universities in China implementing engineering education, more than 19,000engineering majors, about 5.5 million enrolled students, and more than 1.2 million graduates. China hasformed the world’s largest engineering education system. In this sense, China has become a country withgreat power in engineering education.“a powerful nation”①in engineering education.The implementation period of the Outstanding Engineers Plan is from 2010 to 2020,involving a large number of pilot colleges and universities as well as a wide range ofspecialized disciplines covering levels of undergraduate, master and doctoral degrees, and
incentivizingstudents to participate in field trips, internships, and part-time jobs related to construction, theindustry engagement in the technical component seems to still fall short as reflected in manycompanies by the employers [2]. According to the industry recruiters, although newlyemployed students have a good grasp of the technical concepts, many fail to relate them withthe actual applicability in the proposed tasks. Additionally, employers observed that a lot ofthe students lack other competencies equally important in the practice of the professionincluding leadership, self-motivation, self-evaluation, adaptability, work under pressure, andothers [3]. In the same way, many students also do not feel prepared to enter in theconstruction job market with
Integration of Design Process into Civil Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice Vol. 142, Issue 3[25] Costa, R., & Sobek, D. K. (2003, January). Iteration in engineering design: inherent and unavoidable or product of choices made? In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (Vol. 37017, pp. 669-674).[26] Ullah, I., Tang, D., & Yin, L. (2016). Engineering product and process design changes: a literature overview. Procedia CIRP, 56, 25-33.[27] Paretti, M. C., Pembridge, J. J., Brozina, C., Lutz, B. D., & Phanthanousy, J. N. (2013, June). Mentoring team conflicts in capstone
," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 27, pp. 15378-15381, 2020.[6] K. MacArthur, M. Cox, C. Egan and L. Komer, "Pre-existing Social Conditions: A Call to Prevent the Perpetuation of Gender Inequities in Research Production during COVID- 19," International Journal of Medical Students, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 217-219, 2020.[7] L. Gelles, S. Lord, G. Hopple, D. Chen and J. Mejia, "Compassionate Flexibility and Self-Discipline: Student Adaptation to Emergency Remote Teaching in an Integrated Engineering Energy Course during COVID-19," Education Sciences, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 304, 2020.[8] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen and B. Bogue, "Women engineering students and self‐efficacy: A multi
comments received - addressed appropriate use of technology. 28% of all comments received indicated positive experiences with technology while 15% indicated negative experiences. Those students who had access to effective technology (<5% of responses) including a good laptop and adequate internet access at their study location reported the technology made studying easier. Technology also enabled students to engage effectively in online video conference sessions. Some students (<5% of responses) also reported they found the use of non-university online tools helpful, e.g., Slack, Group Chat, and Google Docs. 9% of responses related to technical difficulties of various types (i.e., negative
success of the students in contributing substantialbusiness, technical, and leadership value to their employers and the internal adoption by sponsorsof team-developed solutions, there have been limited outcomes to-date in generating independententrepreneurial outcomes including commercialization of Enterprise-developed technologies orproducts into commercially offered products or the formation of new businesses.Regional Business Incubators - Also, in 2000, Michigan Tech, in partnership with the cities ofHoughton and Hancock and Keweenaw Industrial Council (now the Keweenaw EconomicDevelopment Alliance) led the development of a proposal to establish a local businessincubator/accelerator under a newly formed a state program entitled “SmartZones
Paper ID #19548Using Programming and Simulation as a Research Tool in a Graduate Capi-tal Budgeting CourseDr. James D Burns, Purdue Univeristy Jim Burns, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Technology Leadership & Innovation Jim joined the faculty at Purdue Polytechnic in 2015 after completing a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Western Michigan University, and has more than 10 years industry experience in the manufacturing sector in a variety of roles including process engineering, operations management, and technical sales. His area of expertise centers on applying OR/MS and Simulation techniques to Supply
that positively impact the c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #19169 lives of young people. Dean Vaughan served on the National Executive Committee of the GEM Con- sortium in Alexandria VA which funds graduate degrees in Engineering and Science. Dean Vaughan is a former President and former Treasurer of the Board of the GEM Corporation and past Chairman of the National GEM Investment Committee. Dean Vaughan was former Vice President of the board of directors and Operations Committee Chair of the National Junior Engineering Technical Society (JETS) based in Alexandria, Va
Engineering Department Fellowship Award in Spring 2010 from University of California, Santa Barbara, Radar Systems Spot Award Achievement Certificate in recognition of superior individual effort for developing signal processing algorithms, in February 2011 from Exelis (currently known as Harris Corp.), Inc. and 59th Annual National Engineers Outstanding En- gineering Achievement Merit Award in Universal City, California in February 2014. He has collaborated actively with researchers in several other disciplines of, particularly computer architecture, reconfigurable hardware, and signal and image processing. He has been a member of Technical Program Committee for International Conference on ReConFigurable Computing and
General Chair of the 2005 International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP-05), Philadelphia PA, and is General Co-Chair of the 2018 IEEE International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), to be held in Kalamata Greece in June 2018. She is recipient of the 2005 IEEE Signal Processing Magazine Best Paper Award, and the 2012 IEEE Signal Processing Society Meritorious Service Award for ”exemplary service in technical leadership capacities”. She is IEEE Distinguished Lecturer for the Signal Processing Society for 2017-2018. More info on her work can be found at www.ece.rutgers.edu/˜cspl c American Society for Engineering Education
Page 26.822.2such as the role of intercollegiate athletics on improved persistence and graduation rates,3 higherlevels of academic conscientiousness achieved through physical exercise and volunteering,4 andthe significant positive impact of co-curricular activities outside the discipline on criticalthinking skills.2Most studies that look specifically at the benefits of student participation in academic co-curricular activities in higher education have focused on investigating learning communities.While the structure, frequency, and individual characteristics of learning communities vary frominstitution to institution, the term “learning community” broadly encompasses those communitiesthat share a common purpose or vision, often in two or more
: Criterion 3. Student outcomes o (c) an ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs within a realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability. o (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of solutions in a Page 26.865.5 global, economic, environmental, and societal context. o (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues. Criterion 5. Curriculum o (c) a general education component that complements the technical content of the
Ben D Radhakrishnan, M.Tech., M.S., M.B.A. Lead Faculty, MS Sustainability Management Program, Applied Engineering Department Subra Subramanya, Ph. D., Associate Professor,Computer Science, Information and Media Systems Department National University, San Diego, CA Page 26.160.2IntroductionThe world at large, United States and the state of California (CA) in particular, have all realizedthat climate change is here and now. The consequences of climate change as declared andasserted by the International Panel of Climate Change range from average temperature rise in thelocal climates and many other
RU: 9 No change: 16 21 1 Multirace Other Engrg: 6 MPU: 7 Decrease: 6 Non-Engrg: 7 N#: 3 *switched major within engineering; **left engineering;+ ME – Mechanical; EnvE – Environmental; CE – Civil; CompSci – Computer Science; Env Stu – Environmental Studies;ChE – Chemical Engineering; BiomE – Biomedical Engineering; ArchE – Architectural Engineering; Int Phys – IntegratedPhysiology; Econ – Economics; LandArch – Landscape Architecture; BioChem – Biochemistry; AnimSci – Animal Science;IntlDev – Community and International Development
steps was followed and adaptedto the program. This adaptation allowed for the revision of the IE curriculum and theconsolidation of the program’s continuous improvement process which is aligned to the ABETaccreditation requirements, as the IE undergraduate program at Universidad Icesi is currentlyworking towards ABET accreditation during the 2016 – 2017 cycle.Figure 1. Curricular continuous improvement process [1]Initial step (Incomes in Figure 1)The curriculum review process began in 2013 with the input of constituencies and faculty as wellas other sources, such as ABET student outcomes, the PEI [2] and the CDIO framework [3]. Asurvey was given to employers, alumni, recent graduates, and interns, the goal of which was toidentify competencies
was to encouragedesign thinking beyond the box but exploring within constraints (10 in × 10 in × 10 in). The formof the ‘Cube’ must be clearly evident through the actual bearing of its 8 corners, or the visualsuggestion of corners. Non-linear elements were not allowed. Figure 3 shows a design session inAR in Architectural Design Studio I where students worked on the conceptual cube together. InArchitectural Design Studio IV, three students in a group were asked to design a conceptual formand massing of a library for energy efficiency on an allocated site (e.g., Chicago) (Figure 4).Students had to consider site constraints, climate, and potential energy consumption related to theform shapes. Figure 3. Students working collaboratively in the
Teaching Incentive Program Award in 1997, the Outstanding Undergraduate Teaching Award in 1998, and the Askounes-Ashford Distinguished Scholar Award in 2004. He is a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), National Academy of Inventors (NAI), American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineers (AIMBE), Institute of Elec- trical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), and International Association for Pattern Recognition (IAPR). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Increasing the Participation of Women in Computer Science and Engineering: A Systematic Approach for Culture ChangeAbstractClosing the
direct contact with students. The curriculumrevisions (Figure 1.1) attempted to maintain the content focus of the original lessons. Revised Curriculum Biometrics 1. September 21: Fingerprinting, Part 1-video on-line September 24: Friday Live Chat on Biometrics 2. September 28: Fingerprinting, Part 2- video on-line October 1: Thursday Live Chat on Biometrics Health and Beauty: Biodiversity I 3. October 5: Estimating Biodiversity- video on-line October 8: Thursday
; Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 2017. ASEE Conferences. https://peer.asee.org/28797.[2] Bansal S. and Kumar D. Iot ecosystem: A survey on devices, gateways, operating systems, middleware and communication. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 27:340–364, 2020.[3] Clonezilla, 2021. URL https://clonezilla.org.[4] Ansible, 2021. URL https://www.ansible.com.[5] Github, 2021. URL https://github.com.
to 14 students which is lower than the standard capacity of30 students. The department launched more sections to reduce class sizes to accommodate thelow-capacity requirement.For the live-streaming mode, the section was assigned to the upgraded Technology EnhancedClassroom which includes additional technical equipment such as a teaching station webcam anddocument camera linked to the projector, as shown in Figures 2.1 through 2.3.Figure 2.1Figure 2.2 Figure 2.3All instructors are required to complete a mandatory training session for the LearningManagement Systems (LMS) for asynchronous and synchronous teaching. LMS allows theinstructors to post course content, including the syllabus, exams, and
been directing FabLabUC since 2015. FabLabUC is a fabrication laboratory located at the Innovation Center, PUC . Currently she is pursuing a PhD in Computer Sciences with a research focus on Engineering Education at PUC.Ing. Isabel Hilliger, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile Isabel Hilliger is the Associate Director for Assessment and Evaluation at the Engineering Education Division in Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile (UC). Isabel received a BEng from UC and an MA in Education Policy from Stanford University. She is currently a PhD Candidate in Computer Science at UC-Engineering. Her research theme is the use of methodologies and analytical tools for continuous curriculum improvement in
- ing 2012. He is also coordinator for Graduate Studies in VLSI and Semiconductors certificate program. Professor Prasad already offered Online 16.517 MMIC Design and Fabrication during Spring 2009 and also developing MEMS Design and Fabrication to be offered Online starting from Spring 2013. He is the author of over 150 theses, dissertations and papers published and presented in journals/conferences of national and international repute. In 2013 Professor Prasad was awarded Fellow from the ASEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Physics is the soul of Engineering in General and Electrical Engineering in Particular
completed the projects andgraduated. Often, the students’ cost estimates come back up in the process of the companiesselecting the projects for inclusion in their work load.A topic of discussion with some of our industry partners has been in regards to the economicanalysis students have provided on their projects. Many of the projects showed that our studentsare technically competent to perform the design analysis required for the projects but thestudents’ costs and estimates of the work required have not always been complete. Because theeconomic data from the senior projects was not controlled, two of the junior design courses wereselected to evaluate how the students performed on the economic analysis, both from deciding ondesign criteria as well
and the local and regional industry was developed and thedegree of involvement of the industry-sponsors and their role during the course of the designproject, which could be helpful for other engineering programs. A brief description of theindustry-sponsored design projects that were successfully completed in the 2016/2017 academicyear.References[1] R.M. Counce, J.M. Holmes, and R.A. Reimer, “An honors capstone design experienceutilizing authentic industrial projects,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 17,pp. 396-399, 2001.[2] ABET Engineering Accreditation Criteria, Criterion 3: Program Outcomes and Assessment,http://www.abet.org, 2016.[3] A. Bejan, G. Tsatsaronis, and M. Moran, Thermal Design and Optimization, New
learning experiences harnessing Elsevier’s information solutions.Mr. Jay J. Bhatt, Drexel University Jay Bhatt is responsible for building library collections in engineering subject areas, outreach to fac- ulty and students, and teaching information and research skills to faculty and students in Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, and related subject areas. He provides individual and small group consultations to students, instructional sessions to specific classes, online research support in both face to face and dis- tance learning programs, and conducts workshops for specialized research areas. Jay is actively involved with the Engineering Libraries Division of the American Society for Engineering EducationDr
students arerequired to evaluate other teams’ presentations. The instructor has revised the presentationevaluation categories for final presentations from six categories to five categories with theemphasis on the bolded category, “Attractive results shown”. The following lists show the sixpresentation evaluation categories and the five categories for final project presentations.Original presentation evaluation category list: 1. Smoothness of the presentation 2. Effective use of technical terms and concepts 3. Effective slides and/or visual materials 4. Adequate technical result(s) shown 5. Clearly shown contributions 6. Clear and effective summary/conclusionRevised presentation evaluation category