later time in the curriculum, when they are better able to dealwith their often abstract concepts.Figure 2: Average number of exam attempts per studentFinally, with the mathematics and physics courses provided by the faculty of mathematics andmechanical engineering respectively, it turned out to be very difficult to align the subject withthe project flow, resulting in a doubling of work and a far from optimal learning experience.An example would be the hydrostatics course, which required elements of numericalcalculations, regular calculus and statics. However, the timing of these concepts is ill-alignedwith the project flow and as a result, also provided by the project lecturer in advance of thephysics and math courses. Furthermore, many key
engineering curriculum, the devices are used in the experimentsand projects of many courses, such as digital systems, microcontroller, embedded systems,computer organization, etc. There are wide varieties of input devices. It is difficult to maintain acomplete inventory for the lab. In addition, because these input devices are customized for asmall and specialized market, they are relatively expensive. For example, a GPS module or atouch sensor module costs more than many processor boards. An Android device (a phone or a tablet) is a miniature computer with a touch screen and anarray of sensors. There is an opportunity to use its sensors as the I/O peripherals. A low-endentry-level device is just “commodity” and cheaper than special I/O modules
AC 2012-3689: TRANSITIONING A LAB-BASED COURSE TO AN ON-LINE FORMAT: STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESSMr. Kevin P. Pintong, Binghamton University Kevin Pintong is a second-year master’s student with interests in online education and embedded systems.Dr. Douglas H. Summerville, Binghamton UniversityMr. Kyle Temkin, BInghamton University Page 25.1376.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012Transitioning a lab-based course to the online format: Strategies for Success Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Binghamton University
summer camps geared towards middle school, high school, and community college students to expose and increase their inter- est in pursuing Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields. Dr. Astatke travels to Ethiopia every summer to provide training and guest lectures related to the use of the mobile laboratory technology and pedagogy to enhance the ECE curriculum at five different universities.Prof. Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Kenneth Connor is a professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering (ECSE) where he teaches courses on electromagnetics, electronics and instrumentation, plasma physics, electric power, and general engineering. His research
Paper ID #27193An Online Approach to the Analog Electronics LaboratoryMr. Kenneth Ray Hite, West Virginia University Kenneth Hite is a Graduate Student and Lab Manager/Instructor in the Lane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering. His BS is in Electrical Engineering with a focus on Electronics. He has worked as Graduate Assistant for two Solar Decathlon competitions and several undergraduate senior design groups. He has been instructing labs and summer courses since 2012, covering much of the un- dergraduate core Electrical Engineering curriculum. The past several years he has also served as the Lab
University” Teacher Leadership Quality Program. She is also the PI on both ”Syracuse City School District Title II B Mathematics and Science Partnership: Science Project and Mathematics MSP Grant initiatives.Dr. Yacob Astatke, Morgan State University Dr. Yacob Astatke completed both his Doctor of Engineering and B.S.E.E. degrees from Morgan State University (MSU) and his M.S.E.E. from Johns Hopkins University. He has been a full time faculty member in the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) department at MSU since August 1994 and currently serves as the Interim Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering. Dr. Astatke is the winner of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE
accreditation processes. Electronic Engineer, Specialist in Quality Management with disciplinary and investigative training in project management, process op- timization through the integration of mobile technology solutions, Hand Held, information management, implementation of new technologies, maintenance, installation and debugging of electrical systems in production, planning and installation of electrical and data networks.Miguel Gonzalez, Universidad Minuto de Dios Director of Project Management Office at the Social Innovation Science Park. Master in Organizational Management. More than 5 years of experience working in social innovation projects related with green business, innovation in education and housing. Research
require students to learn and apply standards in their class projects. This paper is a follow-up of a 2006-2009 NSF initiative awarded to IEEE to help develop tutorials and case study modules for students and encourage standards education at college campuses. It presents the findings of a faculty/institution survey conducted through Electrical Engineering and ETD listservs representing the major engineering and technology disciplines during fall 2012. The intent of the survey was to the gauge the status of use of standards and regulations in engineering and technology coursework and to identify benchmark practices. In light of survey findings, recommendations are made to standards development
Session 1449 Enhancement of a Civil Engineering Technology Curriculum by the Addition of a Minor in Engineering Management Vernon W. Lewis, Jr. and Paul Kauffmann Department of Engineering Technology Old Dominion University Norfolk, VirginiaAbstractThe Engineering Technology Program at Old Dominion University offers ABET accreditedoptions in Civil, Electrical and Mechanical Engineering Technology. In recent years thisoffering has been expanded to include emphasis areas such as Surveying/Geomatics
collaborative design projects for other real world applications.Multidisciplinary projects are also highly encouraged from the stand point of the departments butalso very relevant and marketable for the student’s future positions.References[1] Hackenberg, G., Richter, C., Zah, M., “A multi-disciplinary modeling technique for requirements management inmechatronic systems engineering,” Procedia Technology 15, 2014: 5-16.[2] “ASME Vision 2030: Creating the Future of Mechanical Engineering Education,” Executive Summary, ASMEBoard on Education, go.asme.org/v2030, September 2012.[3] Brown, A.S., “Who Owns Mechatronics,” Mechanical Engineering Magazine, June, 2008.[4] Haughery, J.R., et al., “Toward Understanding the Impacts, Whys, and Whats Behind
. Volume 2, 15-19 July 2001, pp. 1019 - 102411. Weber J. D; Overbye Thomas; Voltage Contours for Power System Visualization; IEEE Transactions onPower Systems, Vol. 15, No. 1, February 2000, pp. 404-409.12. Meiguins, Bianchi Serique, et. al.; Web-Based Collaborative 3D Information Visualization Tool;Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information Visualization (IV’04), pp. 1093-9547/04.13. Bates-Brkljac, Nada et al.; The VEPS Project: Planning Information Visualization; Proceedings of the NinthInternational Conference on Information Visualization (IV'05), pp. 1550-6037/05; 2005 IEEE14. U.S.-Canada Power System Outage Task Force - Final Report on the August 14th Blackout in the UnitedStates and Canada: Causes and Recommendations
Paper ID #11678The Role of Transdisciplinary Studies in the reform of the Engineering Cur-riculum: A Case StudyDr. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin Dr Heywood is professorial Emeritus of trinity College Dublin-The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEEE and Life Sen Member IEEE and author of Engineering Education: research and development in Curriculum and Instruction..Dr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina is with the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been working on better understanding of students’ learning and issues of
, w her e appropriate Electrical systems IN T EG R AT ED EN G IN EER IN G SC IENC E D ISC IPL IN AR Y E N G IN EER IN G H UM AN IT IES AN D SO C IAL SC IEN C E SFreshman DesignThe sequence starts with a one-credit course, Engineering Design 1, taken by entering Freshmen. This is a key change to the curriculum and reflects the success of other schools2 inimplementing first semester design as well as our previous experience with teaching design toFreshmen in the second semester. Starting the Design Spine from "day one" provides avaluable, early hands-on design experience to give both balance and context for what studentstypically perceive as the rather abstract nature of
Detailed course descriptions of curriculum progressionThis paper shows how model-based system design, as has been described, is integrated inselected courses in all four years of the Mechanical Engineering undergraduate curriculum. Thecourses where this has been implemented are presented in Table 1 and are required courses forall students working toward a Bachelor’s of Science in Mechanical Engineering. This approachis the model-based design counterpart to the “Design Spine” discussed by Sheppard et al.6 whorethought the curriculum at Stevens Institute of Technology to emphasize design throughout allfour years. An initial cohort of freshman engineering students started the proposed model-baseddesign sequence in the fall 2015 semester. Assessment
psychology at both the graduate and undergraduate levels. Robin also serves as the Director of Research for the Engineering Leadership Project at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering which aims to identify how engineers lead in the workplace.Mr. Mike Klassen, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto Mike Klassen is the Leadership Programming Consultant at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. He designs and facilitates leadership programs for engineering students - with a range of focus from tangible skill development to organizational leadership to complex social problems. Mike has a Graduate Diploma in Social Innovation
computer science curriculum volume. Her research is focused on computer science education, specifically how novices learn to program. She is a member of the ACM and the IEEE Computer Society.Dr. Mark J. Sebern, Milwaukee School of Engineering Mark J. Sebern is a professor in the electrical engineering and computer science Department at the Mil- waukee School of Engineering (MSOE), and Founding Program Director for MSOE’s undergraduate software engineering program. He has served as an ABET program evaluator for software engineering, computer engineering, and computer science, and is currently a member of the ABET Engineering Ac- creditation Commission
[10], an academic unit started a two-year project geared toward developing computer-based laboratory instruments (CLIs) for custom hardware. The program goal was set to have theCLIs integrated into the undergraduate curriculum, giving students a first-hand laboratoryexperience. The ease of use and flexibility demonstrated in LabView made it a proficientsolution.The unique UPS system that this paper is focused on presents a similar opportunity in the designof electronic instrumentation and control for a custom UPS system. The purpose is to adapt theindustrial power unit for educational purposes in power electronics and energy storage areas.Traditionally, undergraduate programs supplement instruction with a series of laboratoryexperiments in
challenging content 4. Research found thatstudents’ perceptions of the flipped classroom are generally positive, but poor implementation ofinteractions and scope of pre-class material may result in the diminished student achievement 5.To combat potential limiting factors to student achievement, the authors have proposed tocomplement previous pedagogical approaches with selected aspects of an Electrical andComputer Engineering (ECE) clinic 5, which provides project-based experiences within theundergraduate curriculum. The ECE Clinic approach improves problem-solving skills of studentsby motivating students to continuously engage in self-paced assignments and adapt themselves torecent ECE technology. In order to evaluate the outcome of the ECE clinic
-related topics into their already-crowded curricula, yet undergraduate engineering students are rarely exposed to real biomedicaltopics through their coursework. To provide students with the skills directly relevant to theevolving needs of the biomedical industry, this project will develop and integrate applied bio-medical course content and experiments throughout the Rowan University Engineering curricu-lum.A plan is presented to introduce hands-on, biomedically-related experiments and course materi-als into the engineering curriculum, with a focus on artificial organs. These biomedical moduleswill be integrated throughout Rowan University’s engineering curriculum, into the multidiscipli-nary freshman engineering course, core engineering courses
Al Ferri received his BS degree in Mechanical Engineering from Lehigh University in 1981 and his PhD degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from Princeton University in 1985. Since 1985, he has been a faculty member in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech, where he now serves as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Studies. His research areas are in the fields of dynamics, controls, vibrations, and acoustics. He is also active in course and curriculum development. He is a Fellow of the ASME. Page 24.1304.1 c American Society for Engineering Education
AC 2011-1295: INVESTIGATING AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH FOR DE-VELOPING SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CURRICULUM: THE SYSTEMSENGINEERING EXPERIENCE ACCELERATORAlice F Squires, Stevens Institute of Technology Alice Squires has nearly 30 years of professional experience and is an industry and research professor in Systems Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology in the School of Systems and Enterprises. She is a Primary Researcher for the Body of Knowledge and Curriculum to Advance Systems Engineering (BKCASE) and Systems Engineering Experience Accelerator projects. She has served as a Senior Sys- tems Engineer consultant to Lockheed Martin, IBM, and EDO Ceramics, for Advanced Systems Support- ability Engineering Technology
current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, and the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Dr. Harry Courtney Powell, University of Virginia Harry Powell is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the Charles L. Brown Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Virginia. After receiving a Bachelor’s Degree in Electrical Engineering in1978 he was an active research and design
, Sensor networks, Mobile Robotics, Evolutionary Optimization and Swarm Intelligence for optimization and engineering applications. Dr. Tewolde is a Member of the IEEE Computer Society and the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Innovative Course Modules for Introducing ECE to Engineering Freshmen Girma S. Tewolde Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Kettering University, Flint, MI 48504Abstract:The curriculum for all Engineering majors in our institute includes an inter-disciplinary coursethat exposes all freshman
2008; Barth et al.,2007)11,12, HERE’s co-curricular design takes students from energy audit service projectsthrough sustainability speakers to community service projects for Earth Day (e.g. tree plantingand stream clean-up).The HERE program culminates in a freshman design project that is both part of EM103 andexternal to it. Students in the cohort identify an authentic campus sustainability problem,determine specifications, and design a solution to be implemented in conjunction with the RHITFacilities Operations team. There are scores of potential projects on campus ranging fromlowering electrical costs, reducing waste, and reducing the carbon footprint of the campus.Grant money received from Proctor & Gamble will fund cohort-designed
AC 2012-5411: COLLABORATIVE INQUIRY INTO FOUNDATION KNOWL-EDGE IN COMPUTER ENGINEERING: A CASE STUDY IN HONG KONGDr. Yuen-Yan Chan, Chinese University of Hong Kong Yuen-Yan Chan is with the Department of Information Engineering at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. She possesses a dual background in educational psychology and engineering. She is responsible for teaching a first-year refreshment course and is keen at implementing and evaluating novel pedagogies in her teaching. Chan is the principle investigator and key member of several inter-regional student learning projects. She founded the IEEE Education Society Hong Kong Chapter and is the current Chair. She is also the first NAE CASEE New Faculty
Section Conference A survey to assess the importance of analysis in an undergraduate Mechanical Engineering curriculum Aaron Smith, Alta Knizley, and Morgan Green Mechanical Engineering Department, Mississippi State UniversityAbstractAmong mechanical engineering (ME) educators, there are often competing views about the roleof analysis in undergraduate ME education. Some educators think that the goal of a B.S. in ME ismastery of a set of analytical techniques. However, alumni returning from industry to theauthors’ institution often share that they conduct very little analysis in their work. Othereducators recommend that students should spend more time on practical training
the field will assist in defining the major for potential employers as well as current andpotential students across universities.There are many models available to guide engineering disciplines as they reshape their curricula.Morsi et al. [6] used concept mapping for curriculum development, specifically Electrical andComputer Engineering curricula. Models to evaluate the development and design ofinterdisciplinary curricula through the integration of learning modules gave students a real-worldapplication for learning outcomes [7]. There have been great strides in evaluating the curriculumof the Agricultural and Bio-based engineering programs, referred to in this work as BAengineering, as noted in recent works [2], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Lohani
Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Lawanto holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering and a Ph.D. in human resource education. His research interests include areas in cognition, learning, instructions, engineering design, and e-learning. Currently, he is working on two research projects that investigate students’ cognitive and metacognitive activities while learning engineering. Both projects are funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Page 25.989.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Offsetting Gender Bias in Engineering
) education. Afterpilot classes were developed, in 1998 the FC curriculum was implemented college-wide. In2003, the university adopted a track system with the FYE foundational courses separated intothree tracks: Track A (aerospace, agricultural, biomedical, civil, industrial, mechanical, andnuclear engineering), Track B (computer and electrical engineering), and Track C (chemical andpetroleum engineering). Track A was primarily project-based and used Mindstorms, Legos,magnetic balls, and beams to build structures. Track B focused on circuit design and computerprogramming. Only Track C maintained the FC curriculum until 2013. The target population ofthis study is first-time-in-college (FTIC) chemical or petroleum engineering students who startedin
Lu is an assistant professor in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering of Purdue University and (by courtesy) the Department of Computer Science. In 2004, he obtained an NSF Career Award for studying energy conservation by operating systems. He obtained Ph.D. from the Department of Electrical Engineering at Stanford University in 2002.David Meyer, Purdue University David G. Meyer has been very active in curriculum development, learning outcome assessment, design education, and use of instructional technology. He is currently responsible for creating, maintaining, and teaching the core ECE digital systems course sequence. He has written numerous papers on innovative uses of