WRM Majors. In a nutshell, it was evident fromthe evaluation that the Connect2U approach stimulated student interest and raised awarenessconcerning water resources.IntroductionThe purpose of undergraduate general education courses (GeDC) is to develop a wide range ofsocial, communication and intellectual skills in a student beyond the student’s chosen field thatwill be helpful in the student’s lifelong journey. Each institution, guided by the requirements ofits respective state’s education regulatory board, has accommodated its own set of GeDCsdistributed in various disciplines so that the students can choose 1. Hence, a GeDC classgenerally comprises students with different levels of interest, preparation, prior knowledge, workstyle and
as well as general participation in programs andevents aimed to benefit current students. Over the past three years it has become increasinglydifficult to recruit volunteers for WE@RIT’s largest event, an accepted student overnight calledWE Retreat; and the rate of no-shows at events targeting current students, called Kate’s Hours,has skyrocketed in some cases. For example, WE Retreat saw first-year student volunteerparticipation rates drop from 72% of total WE Retreat volunteers in 2010, to 36% of total WERetreat volunteers in 2019 (Fig. 1). This is a problematic trend given that up through 2019 amajor draw of the WE Retreat program was to allow prospective students to experience anovernight in dormitory housing, which first-year students
teaching focused professor where he is heavily involved in design education and diversity studies.Dr. Steffen Foss Hansen Steffen Foss Hansen currently is Associate Professor in Regulatory Engineering at the Technical Univer- sity of Denmark (DTU), Department of Environmental Engineering and NanoDTU. He has a Master of Techn. Soc. from Roskilde University, a PhD degree in environmental engineering from DTU and a Doc- tor Technices (dr.techn.) from DTU. He conducts research into 1) how science and engineering can best be used in regulatory settings in situations pervaded by scientific uncertainty and complexity and 2) risk analysis, regulation and governance of nanotechnologies, and the applicability of decision-making
developed for the Resilient Control Systems class.Dr. Craig G Rieger, Idaho National Laboratory Craig Rieger, PhD, PE, is the Chief Control Systems Research Engineer at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL), pioneering multidisciplinary research in the area of next-generation resilient control systems. In addition, he has organized and chaired eight Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) technically co-sponsored symposia and one National Science Foundation workshop in this new research area, and authored more than 40 peer-reviewed publications. Craig received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Chemical Engineering from Montana State University in 1983 and 1985, respectively, and a PhD in Engineering and Applied
Analysis of Correlations in Student Performance in Core Technical Courses at a Large Public Research Institution’s Electrical and Computer Engineering DepartmentIntroductionThe National Science Foundation is supporting our Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE)department at Colorado State University (CSU) through their “Revolutionizing Engineering andComputer Science Department” (RED) program. As the focus of this project, we propose toremove the artificial barrier that a traditional course-based curriculum creates [1]. To aide indoing so, we seek to understand the relationships of student performance between technicalcourses within the ECE curriculum. In particular, we begin by studying the
Computing Ma- chinery (ACM), and the Environmental Sensing, Networking and Decision-Making (ESND) technical committee. She has served in technical program committee of IEEE High Performance Switching and Routing, IEEE Sarnoff, IEEE GreenCom and ChinaCom, and as a reviewer for IEEE journals, confer- ences and NSF panels. For more information, please visit: http://iris.nyit.edu/˜zdong02Prof. Reza Amineh, New York Institute of Technology Reza K. Amineh is currently an Assistant Professor at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering, NYIT. Prior to NYIT, he was a principal scientist at the Department of Sensor Physics at Hal- liburton Co. He received his Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from McMaster
sessions attend 1 of 2 October Teaching hackathon sessions Iterating on Designs sessions November Community building happy hours optional (2 events) Sharing Innovations December REDtalks story crafting workshop requiredResearch questionsThe research team is focused on answering the following research question and sub-questions: 1) How are instructors in an undergraduate engineering program impacted (positively and negatively) by participation in an
retention of underrepresentedstudents in the STEM pipeline. Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed research literature and supports research needs in several subjects including scientific,technical, and social science. Scopus was selected due to the expansive coverage of engineering-related articles, particularly exploring engineering programs for high school students. A four-part string was used to garner the relevant search results, as seen in Table 1. Thefirst part of the search string had keywords or subjects that included “engineer,” “STEM” or anyform of “tech.” The second part of the search string included “secondary,” “high school,” and allalphanumeric variations of high school grade levels 9-12 (i.e
Sense of belonging Instrument/ SOBI), is included in Fig. 1 as an example of a broader scale to measure a sense of belonging to the general community among adults. Our previous study [1] is also included in Fig. 1 to enhance the understanding of how we conceptualized and situated the international engineering doctoral students’ belongingness in line with the sense of belonging literature.ADULT (Community) K-12 (Classroom) UNDERGRADUATE (Institution) GRADUATE (Academic unit) Students' Perceived Self-worth Authentic-self Indivisual's
challenged to consider.The second and third days are a combination of participating in general conference activities andfocused group sessions on professional development, involving the program coordinators,practicing engineers, and faculty. To facilitate the former, the students are given assignments toengage with specific types of companies, attend technical presentations, introduce themselves toconference organizers, and the like. The students are required to “connect” with graduatestudents who are currently engaged in the profession and learn about their experiences beyond anundergraduate degree. The technical aspect of the conference is reinforced by connecting at leastone focused PC session to the conference theme, e.g. biomedical applications
the next deliverable duedate following the ideation stage outlined in step 5. For the first meeting, teams are instructed tocontinue the concept ideation practiced during the class session in order to generate morepotential solution ideas. In the second meeting teams are instructed to using a screening methodto refine the total pool of concepts generated down to three to five for final solution designconsideration.The final deliverable for the ideation part of the project is a formal, business-style memo andreport outlining three alternative problem concept solutions an example of which is shown(Figure 6). For reference, participants will be given previously generated student work whichthey will adapt for their own submission.References[1] T
al.34. These latter authors categorize the skills learned in contextof engineering design as: 1. Working effectively in teams 2. Gathering supporting information 3. Defining the specific problem 4. Idea Generation 5. Evaluation of concepts and making decisions 6. Implementing a selected concept 7. Communicating the design effort These skill categories encompass the activities of engineering design but do not addressthe fundamental cognitive model students need to follow to achieve successful designs. In thiswork, we use these categories to define the practical skill sets for self-assessment. With respect toethical decision making, Zhu et al. explored several
to ‘demystify’engineering for high school students and teachers by creating an all-inclusive high school levelengineering course. Two key components of the project include: 1) in-person and online teacherprofessional development (PD) and 2) a learning community of teacher educators, engineeringeducators, and practicing engineers. The PD specifically includes a session that aims to createawareness regarding implicit biases and negative stereotype threats concerning engineeringeducation. The overarching goal of the PD and the learning community is to help teachers makepositive changes in their classrooms to affect student pathways to higher education institutes.High school educators are critical change agents in promoting the pursuit of
-specific courses but there maybe a trade-off between making engineering material more accessible to general educationrequirements as compared to the depth covered in major-specific courses. This paper shows thatencouraging and motivating students to study engineering does not necessarily have to bedistinct from teaching them technical design or engineering skills. Learning outcomes in hands-on design courses are a critical component to student engagement and retention withinengineering and the liberal arts. All of the courses discussed within this paper play important butdifferent roles within the engineering curriculum at Harvard.IntroductionMore and more engineering programs offer introductory design courses earlier in the curriculum,even
to specific engineering major differs, all FYE general engineering students arerequired to take a common sequence of first-year courses including calculus (2), lab science (2),general education (1), and general engineering (2) courses in the FYE program among othermajor specific program requirements. Students are advised by FYE advisors, who are a mix offaculty and staff from the general engineering program, until they are accepted into a degree-granting major, at which point the student is assigned an advisor within their new department,specific to their chosen major.Recent studies have shown that students in FYE programs are more likely to persist tograduation in their first declared major relative to other matriculation models [2], [3
225,500 graduate STEM degrees were awarded in the U.S.; 181,000 being masterdegrees and 44,500 were doctoral degrees [1], [2], [3] . According to the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) [4], URM graduate students only earned about 9% of the overall doctoraldegrees awarded in 2015 and about 13% of undergraduate degrees. This evidence suggests thatSTEM doctoral programs in the U.S. are severely deficient in representation from students ofdifferent racial and ethnic groups. This is a disturbing historical and contemporary trend thatuniversities should pay close attention because of the implications on America’s ability tocompete on a global level with nation states succeeding at preparing individuals for careers inSTEM fields.The participation of URM
taken by engineering students at the United States MilitaryAcademy (USMA), at West Point, NY, students were given an assignment near the end of thesemester to create a study aid. This assignment was designed to combine creativity with studentsunderstanding of technical content and require students to clearly communicate course content.Only general guidance was provided in order to reduce unnecessary constraints and encouragecreativity. Study aids were created by groups of 2 or 3 students on a specific topic from thecourse. The types of student-generated products included: short instructional videos, solutions toexample problems, topic outlines, and written summaries of course material. Once vetted by theinstructors, these student generated
from the community participating in laboratory work 24 hours perweek over the course of 1 semester with Saturday session for professional development ofall women students. Primary outcomes for the program was to increase interest in STEMcareers, confidence in lab skills and engineering design process, learned persistence,particularly in research. Additional objective were for mentors to gain mentoring skills, andthe formation of community to foster belonging. 5In the first iteration of the WRAMP program, affectionately call WRAMP 1.0, 1 graduatestudent was paired with 1 high school student. Research was designated for 2-4 hours foreach high school
BELIEFS 1. It is important to an employer for engineers to know economics. Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree 2. Designers should consider the political situations of countries that supply resources for products. Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree 3. Generally speaking, I expect the price of my consumer electronics to reflect the total costs involved in making the product, including materials and labor. Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree 4. Generally speaking, I expect the price of consumer electronics to decrease with time. Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree 5
this gap. Bringing together such adiverse group of STEM professionals, eliciting their input and applying direct programmaticdesign will empower participants to return to their home environments equipped with tools andresources to impact how they, as women, interface with one another while also cultivatingmeaningful, transformative change in the status quo. Kezar [1] analyzed emerging theories ofinstitutional change as being effected by networks of change makers, rather than by disconnectedindividuals, which has been the norm. Generally, researchers in STEM or STEM educationidentify a need for change, targeted at increasing diversity for example, and then work in theirindividual spheres to bring about that change. The result of fifty years of
(Figure 1), however, in general, Asian female students stick to their programs the most, followedby Asian and White male students (Figure 1). Among male students, Blacks have the lowestcomputing stickiness when compared to their peers. With that being said, all 4 disciplines almostfollow the same pattern, however, students majoring in information science and computerengineering demonstrate more stickiness to their programs in comparison to CS and computerand information sciences disciplines. Computing stickiness of students in each discipline ispresented in Table 1 (N is the number of enrollments in each program). Our results also delineate Discipline Stickiness (%) N Computer
to note that there are no “Human-Centered Design” references inthe first project surveys, as that project (“Robotic Animal”) did not pose a client or specificend-user.Figure 1: First Project vs Final Project Thematic Instances in Survey QuestionsStudent Survey DataA first look at the data suggested that both at the start and finish of the semester, students had adefinition of success that went deeper than simply technical attributes. Figure 1 illustrates thecumulative number of thematic references across both questions after the first project vs the finalproject.A qualitative examination of the first project responses revealed that students tended to offermore generalized answers and lacked overall sophistication in their answers as compared
; and teaching engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Reflective Evaluation of a Pre-College Engineering Curriculum to Promote Inclusion in Informal Learning EnvironmentsIntroductionWithin the United States, pre-college (K-12) students spend approximately 80% of their dayoutside of school [1]. During the remaining 20% of their day, students in United States publicschools spend the least amount of time receiving science-related instruction compared to readingand math [2]. In addition, other disciplines like technology and engineering may not be availableto students during their school day. The accessibility and quality of science
(science, technology, engineering, math) career fields,by having them engage in interactive, team-based engineering projects” (NSBE, n.d.).2 SEEK team roles included: Project Manager, Safety Manager, Materials Manager, Technical Manager, and Project Ambassador3 The SEEK design process is informed by empirical research, the Next Generation Science Standards and the Engineering isElementary design process. It includes: Ask, Learn, Imagine, Model It, Create, Test and Improve as major design activities.measure differences in children’s perceptions and assessing their beliefs, misconceptions, andattitudes about the nature of science and engineering. More recently, the Draw-an-Engineer Testhas also been modified to measure elementary school teachers
such salary-related questions.sunlight to enter the enclosed space. As can be seen, the Interestingly, the same poll found that the older of thoseinterior surface has been painted black to enhance heat post-millennials surveyed (including the 18 year olds) wereabsorption. even more pessimistic. By a more than 3:1 ratio, they STUDENT TRENDS ON SOCIAL ISSUES believed that their generation would be worse off. Our data here are even more striking since the same USAAt
StepsStoppage in a solution generating process is identified during student interviews by meeting thefollowing criteria:1. Solver must explicitly make statement of stoppage. The first indicator of stoppage is the student’s explicit statement that their process has stalled. The interviewer must make an attempt to gather clarifying information from the student during the interview to verify that the solver is truly unable to continue.2. Stoppage must occur prior to solution search or solver must have rejected previously posedsolution. Stoppage occurs as a break in the solution path and should not be assigned to a generated solution that has not been assessed for validity.3. Interviewer must examine the discourse to eliminate
connections between the course exercisesand their expected future studies both during the course and one year after completing the course.IntroductionIn the first-year engineering course sequence at Norwich University, students of civil andenvironmental (CEE), electrical and computer (ECE), and mechanical (ME) engineering, alongwith construction management (CM) learn and practice professional and technical skills thatunite engineers across all disciplines in a common, general introductory course [1]. Historically,students completed a second, common introductory course that was developed around fourmulti-week projects—one predominantly from each discipline. In this operational mode, manyinstructors felt uncomfortable supporting the larger projects
[5], we concluded: “…the key benefits of hands-on approaches for studentsare better outcomes, seeing the relevance of math (andengineering) with real-world examples, deeperunderstanding, more enjoyment, and persistence inengineering.” VOLTMETER INTRODUCTIONThe ability to measure voltage is a fundamental need within FIGURE 2ECE and the engineering field in general. A digital multi- BLOCK DIAGRAM FOR DESIGN PROJECT: VOLTMETER + LCD.meter (or DMM), as shown in Figure 1, is a modern I. Microcontrollers and Embedded Systemsinstrument (usually hand-held) that can measure voltage,current, and resistance
4.3 board and verify. We like to have students work in teams of two, but each student must build their own project, while consulting Overall, the table shows that students generally agree or their lab partner if desired. strongly agree with each of the six questions about course labs. For example, question 1 (The lab work I do for thisIV. Revisiting the Project in Second to Fourth Year Courses course is relevant to my learning) got an averageIn freshman year, this project is mostly just the building of a response/score of 4.4 (out of 5.0 maximum) for both years—“kit”, and doesn’t require much design work. But each
professors?PathFinder is a web-book platform successfully used to disseminate affordable web-books tostudents at a four-year university in the northeast and a nearby community college. Current workincludes expanding the platform to additional institutions. Participants at the FYEE conferencewill be provided the opportunity to discuss PathFinder (or alternatives) in particular andaffordable textbooks in general.References[1] J. Everett “Cooperatively created on-line textbooks with randomly generated assignments”,Journal of Online Engineering Education, vol. 1, pp. 10-19, 2010.[2] J. Everett, K. Mallouk, J. Morgan, J. Stanzione ( “Online Practice Problem Strategies”Journal of Online Engineering Education, vol. 5, pp. 1-9, 2014.