, housing construction, among others. He was also a Project Management Associate for a Habitat For Humanity housing project in the USA. (ii) RESEARCH: Miguel Andrés' research focuses on (1) decision-making for the design and construction of infrastructure projects, (2) the planning of sustainable, smart and resilient cities, and (3) the development of engineers who not only have solid technical and practical knowledge, but also social understanding for, through infrastructure, address local and global challenges on humanitarian, environmental, social and equity issues. (iii) EDUCATION RESEARCH: Related to STEM education, Miguel Andrés is developing and applying contemporary pedagogies and tools for innovation and
classes and participates in research to improve student understanding of complex dynamics concepts.Ms. Eileen W. Rossman P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Eileen Rossman has a worked in various industries for over 14 years before starting a career teaching engineering. Here industry experience includes field support for Navy Nuclear refueling with Westing- house, analysis and programming of pipeline flow solutions with Stoner Associates, and design of elevator structures and drive components with Schindler Elevator. Since 2002, Eileen has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at California Polytechnic State University. Her teaching experience includes Basic and Intermediate Fluids
simultaneously more descriptive analysis on the needs, specifications, and overall requirements of the system. It allows the designer to understand the design's effects on the world around it and who all is affected, both positively and negatively. I find this section to be extremely helpful, as it allows us engineers to understand the situation from a completely different perspective, giving us an opportunity to amend any previously misrepresented errors or ideas. PA2: Ethics is involved in all forms of engineering. Knowing more about ethics will allow me to think of how my decisions will impact more than just myself and my client PA3: Going through these ethics
2022 ASEE Midwest Section Conference An Undergraduate Research Experience: A Computational Approach to Understand Acoustic Bandgap Features in Cement Nanziri Esther Kayondo, Shreya VemugantiSchool of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science (CEES), University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019AbstractPhononic or acoustic bandgap materials have often been made using a polymer matrix with metalinclusions such as aluminium, tin and steel. These inclusion materials have high densitiescompared to the matrix material. Phononic materials have been applied in cavity resonators,acoustic wave guides, sound filters, and more. This paper introduces phononic material
impact of globalization.Teaching issues like cultural diversity to technical students can be a hard sell. It is not enough tosay that ABET requires it or that “Engineer 2020” desires it. We can provide lists of reasons whycertain organizations and task forces have come to see cultural understanding as an essential partof technical education. Still many technical students remain skeptical about the need to studytopics not directly related to their specializations in technology. The authors propose that thiskind of skepticism can be allayed in a classroom situation if students can be guided, through casestudies, to comprehend the connection between innovation and cultural understanding in a globaleconomy. There are two case studies, of dissimilar
Eisenhart Excellence in Teaching Award. In addition, he works part-time for Eastman Kodak as a Senior Design Engineer and is a TAC of ABET commissioner.Dr. David S Martins, Rochester Institute of Technology David S. Martins is Associate Professor and director of the University Writing Program at Rochester Institute of Technology. His article on the use of scoring rubrics won the Best Article of the Year 2008 in Teaching English in the Two Year College, and his articles have appeared in Communication Studies, the Journal of Medical Humanities, and in edited collections. He works with faculty across the curriculum to integrate writing into their design of high quality learning environments
two-quarter, interdisciplinaryproject-based design course taught by teams of engineering and communication faculty suggeststhat providing students with instruction and coaching in communication—particularly internal,team-based communication—contributes directly to students’ mastery and understanding of thedesign process. In the course, students receive instruction in many facets of communication:writing, presenting, interacting with experts and clients. However, one hallmark of the course isthat students write and talk about design decisions beginning very early in the design process.Because the course requires our students to articulate their ideas so often and so early, thestudents perceive gaps in their own reasoning and design work that
themduring their engineering career12,13.To better understand the types of communication skills necessary for future engineeringgraduates, it is necessary to develop representations of engineering design practice that areinclusive of the communication practices used by engineers on these cross-disciplinary teams6,12.Existing studies of engineering practice have furthered our understanding of “[engineering]design as a social process”14 (p. 161), the use of digital and paper artifacts to support engineeringdesign15,16, teaming within engineering design17, and the role of stakeholder considerationswithin a complex systems design10. Nevertheless, additional research is needed to explore thecommunication practices among engineers on cross-disciplinary
Paper ID #15897Increasing Conceptual Understanding and Student Motivation in Undergrad-uate Dynamics Using Inquiry-Based Learning ActivitiesDr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated
, Burgess, under a chapter heading “Analytical Systems Administration”, notes that:“… now days many computing systems are of comparable complexity to phenomena found in thenatural world and our understanding of them is not always complete, in spite of the fact that theywere designed to fulfil a specific task. In short, technology might not be completely predictable;hence there is an need for experimental verification” 15 .State models can be extended to model security starting with the physical layer. The physicallayer is responsible for the physical communication between nodes. It is concerned with theactual encoding and transmission of data into electricity. The physical layer is critical as farsecurity and delivery of communication data is
session panel presentation by activists regarding specific civil engineering crises [20]. Provide a personal reaction on whether the views expressed are credible and whether the activists and engineers understand the issues. Reflect on how community input could be obtained when designing a structural engineering project and discuss opposing equally ethical and valid reasons for why the structure should or should not be constructed. List stakeholders on a typical project. 10) Complete survey on ethics in class at end of semester.These assignments were typically followed up with an email to the class providing generalfeedback on student decisions and trends in answers, along with some insight into otherviewpoints
institutions involved in engineering education research, as wellas a diverse complement of industry professionals with an interest in engineeringeducation. A cursory scan of the people invited to the workshop from industry revealsindividuals from a variety of industrial career paths. Companies providing hardware andsoftware to educational markets, designated educational specialists and liaisons fromlarge companies, and practicing engineers were all represented.1The mission of the series of workshops, as stated in the TUEE executive summary is “todevelop a new strategy for undergraduate engineering education that meets the needs ofindustry in the 21st century. Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineeringaims to produce a clear understanding of
applied in another class. The learning outcomes of students from two classes arecompared. We observe that students using the cooperative learning strategy gain a remarkablydeeper understanding on the topics of networking and develop more interests in studying.I. IntroductionComputer networking class introduces the basic principles of computer networks design andanalysis. This is a critical class for students majored in Computer Science (CS) and Electrical andComputer Engineering (ECE). It requires students to thoroughly study protocol layers and servicemodels, TCP and UDP semantics, principles of routing and switching, basics of error detection,access control, socket programming, network protocols in different layers and their interactions
that informed our analysis of the participants’ responses:structuration theory.9 Finally, we describe our methods and initial findings analyzing faculty andstaff members’ experiences enacting, understanding, or administering the parental leave policy.This work, reported through this paper, helps bring a new method to engineering educationresearchers who continue to search for answers to women’s underrepresentation in engineeringfaculty positions.Institutional EthnographyInstitutional ethnography, a research method developed by feminist sociologist Dorothy E.Smith,18 is a tool that researchers can use to identify the gendered and raced areas of an
2006-947: THE DO’S AND DON’TS OF STUDENT PROJECT COLLABORATIONBETWEEN COLLEGES: A HINDSIGHT VIEW FROM TWO COMMUNITYCOLLEGESNikki Larson, Edmonds Community College Ms. Larson is currently an assistant professor in the engineering technology department of Western Washington University. Before this appointment, she was an instructor in the materials science technology program for Edmonds Community College. There she is developed the coursework and laboratory experiments necessary to make the new program a success. She has 6 years of industry experience implementing lean manufacturing techniques, managing development projects, and leading cross-functional teams to assess technical capability of
Paper ID #18690GRAPHICAL SIMULATION FOR LEARNERS TO UNDERSTAND THECONSTRUCTION OF JAMAICA’S PARAMOUNT TREASURE: ”THE DE-VON HOUSE”Ms. Sheena Nastasia Marston, The Ohio State University Sheena Marston is a graduate student in civil engineering at Ohio State University. She is currently working towards the completion of a master’s degree. Her background studies resulted in her attaining a B.A degree in Architecture from the University of Technology, Jamaica and a B.Sc. in Construction management from Ohio Northern University.Prof. Fabian Hadipriono Tan, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA Fabian Hadipriono Tan
. Page 26.667.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Enhancing TA Grading of Technical Writing: A Look Back to Better Understand the FutureAbstractTechnical writing is an important skill in all engineering disciplines. Many first-yearengineering programs (FYEPs) include technical writing as one of their core course componentsto begin to instill the importance of and to develop this skill early in aspiring engineers. In orderto assess student learning and provide feedback on technical writing, proper grading of theseassignments is essential. This paper presents the preliminary assessment results of a new gradingtraining program for teaching assistants (TAs) in a FYEP
with, people. The second core course, Prototyping for People:Thinking Strategically & Making Decisions, is co-taught with engineering technology facultyand business management/entrepreneurship faculty. This course engages students in iterativelyprototyping design solutions for the problems people face as well as prototyping potentialbusiness models related to these solutions. The students are led through the process of makingstrategic decisions related to their designs as they deepen their understanding of customer/userneeds, market segments opportunities, costs of goods, competitor operations, and marketstrategies. Importantly, this approach can help students realize the potential viability of theirdesign solutions to impact people
Paper ID #32274A General Structured Procedure to Solve Machine Design ProblemsDr. Joseph J. Rencis P.E., California State Polytechnic University-Pomona Dr. Joseph J. Rencis is the dean of engineering by the Clay N. Hixson Chair for Engineering Leadership, and professor of mechanical engineering at Tennessee Technological University. From 2004 to 2011, he was in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville and was Department Head, inaugural 21st Century Leadership Chair in Mechanical Engineering, and professor. From 1985 to 2004, he was professor and director of Engineering Mechanics in
) President Charles M. Vest,macroscale issues of great societal importance, like energy, water, and sustainability, willdominate 21st century engineering.3 According to the NAE report The Engineer of 2020,engineers of the future must gain a holistic understanding of sustainable economic growth anddevelopment, in order to solve society’s pressing environmental problems.4Regardless of their specialty (e.g. civil, chemical, mechanical), engineers must conduct economicevaluations in designing and constructing/producing structures and products. Economic analysisis often used to choose among several design alternatives. If engineers include environmentalimpacts in their economic analyses, they are more likely to choose alternatives that areenvironmentally
Paper ID #38614An Evidence-Based Approach for Deeper Understanding of Student, Teacher,and Learning DynamicsDr. Teresa Piliouras, Technical Consulting & Research, Inc. Dr. Teresa Piliouras is CEO and founder of Technical Consulting & Research. She is an IT consultant, educator, inventor, and author. Previously, she was an industry professor of Computer Science and Man- agement of Technology at New York University Tandon School of Engineering, and a visiting Professor of Computer Science at Iona College. She held senior management and technical positions at Accenture, Boehringer Ingelheim, PepsiCo, Pitney Bowes, and
Paper ID #44617Enhancing Student Understanding of Digital logic and ComputerArchitecture Through Turing Complete Game ChallengesEric McKanna, Ohio Northern UniversityDr. Firas Hassan, Ohio Northern University Firas Hassan is an associate professor at Ohio Northern University. He got his Ph.D. from The university of Akron. His research interest are in the area of embedded computing of real-time image processing techniques. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Enhancing Student Understanding of Digital Logic and Computer Architecture Through Turing Complete Game Challenges
most students become reasonably skillful at these types of tasks. What is more uncertainis if these students actually graduate with a deep conceptual understanding of their coursematerial.Students tend to struggle with the course content in Introductory Dynamics. This is often the firstrigorous course in engineering that a student takes, and much of the content seems counter-intuitive. Many students continue to talk about the force that “throws you outward” when you aretravelling in a curve, and struggle to understand that a rotating mass has more kinetic energy thanone that is translating. We have assessed student conceptual understanding by administering theDynamics Concept Inventory (DCI) before and after the course. The scores on the DCI
Improving Conceptual Understanding and Problem Solving Skills in Introductory Physics Courses Using the Socratic Dialogue Method Christos Valiotis Antelope Valley College, Lancaster, CAAbstractIntroductory physics courses are required for all engineering majors. Often, engineering studentspractice problem solving for the first time in these courses. Over the years, Physics EducationResearch (PER) has developed a number of curricula that have been proven successful inincreasing conceptual understanding in physics concepts. But questions still remain about theireffectiveness in improving problem solving abilities. The ability to think critically and achievean
Paper ID #26014Assessing the Effectiveness of Peer Instruction in Students’ Understanding ofElectric Circuits ConceptsMr. Rene Alexander Soto Perez, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ren´e Alexander Soto-P´erez received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from the Uni- versidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia, in 1997 and 2013, respectively. He is currently an Assistant Professor with the Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. He has experience in the field of electrical machines and distribution’s systems. Currently, Ren´e is a Ph.D. student at
afoundations course to develop and deliver engineering lessons to fourth or fifth graders. Studentsin comparison engineering classes worked on a team project focused on experimental design fora small satellite system. The purpose of this study was to determine if participating in theEd+gineering collaboration had a positive effect on teamwork effectiveness and satisfactionwhen compared to the comparison class. In both team projects, the five dimensions of theComprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME) system were used as aquantitative assessment. The five dimensions of CATME Behaviorally Anchored Ratings Scale(BARS) (contribution to the team’s work, interacting with teammates, keeping the team on track,expecting quality, and having
theUniversity of Alberta. The project entitled Transdisciplinary Design Education for EngineeringUndergraduates focuses on the transdisciplinary engineering design processes with an aim tointroduce a common understanding of transdisciplinary design to the first-year engineeringundergraduates [9]. This common design understanding is necessary to overcome disciplinarybarriers such as discipline-specific tools, methodologies, and terminologies. This can be done byidentifying common design stages and common design concepts across engineering disciplines[10]. The paper discusses a part of empirical research that was carried out to collect discipline-specific engineering design processes from multiple disciplines, identify the similarities betweentheir
Using a Lexical and Temporal Analysis of Students’ Self- Explanation to Predict Understanding Nicholas M. Rhodes1, Matthew A. Ung2, Jim Herold1, Thomas F. Stahovich2 1 Department of Computer Science, University of California Riverside 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California RiversideAbstractNumerous studies have shown that self-explanation can lead to increased learning outcomes.Here we examine how the how the quality of self-explanation correlates with performance. Morespecifically, we examine how the words students use in their self-explanations correlate withperformance on homework. We also examine how the time spent solving
2006-627: DEVELOPMENT OF A VIRTUAL REFRIGERATION APPARATUS TOPROMOTE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ACTUAL EXPERIMENTPatrick Tebbe, Minnesota State University-Mankato Patrick Tebbe is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Minnesota State University in Mankato where he serves as the Graduate Coordinator for Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Tebbe received the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering as well as the M.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri – Columbia. He is currently a member of the American Society for Engineering Education, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and the American Society for Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning
for biorefinery industry, modeling and prediction of natu- rally occurring carcinogenic toxins, and development of statistical models for tracking individual student knowledge. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Using Multiple Choice Response Options to Assess Uncertainty in Student Understanding of Vector ConceptsIntroductionAssessing conceptual understanding in large engineering courses is a challenging task. When weconsider that assessment in engineering education is often performed in a deterministic fashionand does not include uncertainty, the challenge is even greater. Arguably, including uncertaintyin student assessment could lead to a more meaningful