as an entry intomaking meaning of the data.Researchers’ Positionalities The six co-authors of this study consisted of a multidisciplinary group of women, five ofwhom are from minoritized racial/ethnic backgrounds including Black, East and South Asian,Middle Eastern and Latinx, as well as one of whom is white. We also span a number of stages inour academic and professional journeys including masters and doctoral students as well astenure-track and tenured faculty. Our expertise is steeped in teacher education as well aspsychology disciplines such as counseling, clinical, mental health counseling, and schoolpsychology. Together, we are committed to advancing STEM persistence among Women ofColor in STEM in a manner centered on thriving
the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE), College Assistance Migrant Program (CAMP), and The Green Program.Donald Plumlee (Associate Dean) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Measuring Engineering Students’ Gender Based Issues in Sustainability Design ConceptsAbstractThere has been a push to incorporate sustainability concepts into engineering education withinindustries, governments, and accreditation organizations. Universities like Boise State University(BSU) are starting to place greater emphasis on the inclusion of sustainability concepts indifferent engineering program curricula. As
AC 2010-26: IMPROVING TEAM PERFORMANCE: THE COGNITIVE STYLEFACTORJoanna DeFranco, Pennsylvania State University Joanna F. DeFranco is an Engineering faculty member at Penn State University. She earned her B.S. in Electrical Engineering and Math from Penn State, M.S. in Computer Engineering from Villanova, and earned her Ph.D. in Computer and Information science from New Jersey Institute of Technology. Previous to entering academia, Dr. DeFranco held a number of positions in industry and government, including software engineer for Motorola in Horsham, PA and an Electronics Engineer for the Naval Air Development Center in Warminster, PA. She has published a number of articles in journals and
semester helped students to learn a new method ofthinking. In the past many students assumed that operating with concern for the environmentmeant sacrificing profit and eating a lot of granola. The problems helped show students thatoperating with environmental issues in mind can be beneficial in many ways, not just for trees.”Nicole A.“I learned to not always think with my wallet but rather the health of myself, others, and theenvironment. Overall, I no longer see these assignments as a waste of time or busy work,because of the impact it had on my sense of ethics in the engineering world”Alex S.“The purpose of this particular problem was to show that there are situations where the bestapproach economically is not the best approach environmentally
incorporate more than two genderoptions, and is rooted in increasingly rejected notions of biological essentialism. Nonbinary andgender nonconforming students, some of which also identify within the transgender population,exist in liminal spaces throughout society and higher education, and continuation of thisscholarship tacitly denies their existence by framing gender as intrinsically linked to twobiological categories. Engineering professionals, faculty, and students who identify as neithermen nor women must be included and our conversation be expanded for academically rigorousinvestigation into gender dynamics and create inclusive engineering spaces.Conversations around gender neutral bathrooms are just the beginnings of widespread culturalchange
and addressing issues. Individual project consultants are analogous to SMEs. • Events: Traditional 2–3-week sprints are adapted into 1-month milestones. Sprint planning becomes milestone planning. The daily stand-ups are transformed into weekly stand-ups. The sprint demo and sprint retrospective are paralleled by milestone presentations and milestone retrospectives. • Artifacts: The product backlog is mirrored by the research tasks list and the sprint backlog by the milestone tasks list. Increments correspond to milestone presentations, and the final product translates to the technical report.This adaptation of Scrum to a research setting enables a structured yet flexible approach tomanaging
community has begun to turn attention toward attrition mechanisms, moststudies of attrition are done at a cross-sectional level, delving qualitatively into the experiences ofcurrent and former graduate students to understand attrition intentions (e.g., [25]–[28]). Whileliterature from other disciplines indicates that financial pressures and long time-to-degree are twoof the most pressing issues causing attrition, ~80% of doctoral students in engineering are fullyfunded [6], and that the average time to doctoral degree completion is around 5 years, which is onthe shortest timeframe across disciplines due to the applied and well-funded nature of the field [2].Most attrition work in engineering is qualitative, but even quantitative surveys of
relationships between the dimensions of culture and a) student choice ofmajor, and b) student success with a major? RQ3: How do students change over time in their academic programs with respect to thedimensions of culture? RQ4: What factors affect those changes, e.g., pedagogical practices, curriculum, instructors? RQ5: Do the relationships in RQ1-4 vary with demographic indicators, e.g., race or gender? RQ6: What patterns of pedagogical practice operate within academic disciplines?To address these issues, the grant is being developed in a 4-year study to investigate patterns ofcultural traits in students across disciplines, and to build an actionable theory of engineeringculture that can support pedagogies of inclusive and collaborative
also present in the waystudents react to their college education, these are not discussed in this article. Some studentsexpressed a difficulty to adapt to their new found independence, depressions, the need toestablish self-control to maintain good study habits, home sickness, and others. Since the topic ofcollege education has been studied thoroughly we will focus on the motivators and how theseaffect the lives of the students.To explore these issues we conducted a series of focus groups with students ranging from thefirst to the last semester before graduation.This paper is organized as follows; first we review the literature on success factors inengineering, and how intrinsic and extrinsic motivators influence attrition and retention. Then
for the study of these research questions. The finding of mixed responses by therespondents about whether they actively promote participation by women and URM indicates afew concerns. First, the finding shows that some instructors do not make a special effort toincrease participation of these groups, so D&I efforts by instructors are concentrated among asmall group of instructors. Second, the finding begs the question of why some instructors do notmake a special effort to increase female and URM participation. Possible explanations suggestedin the data include 1) differing instructor views on D&I, and 2) faculty time commitments toresearch. There was a consensus that instructors are responsible for addressing in their pedagogythe
network partners. The modulesare based on the same enterprise, providing a common scenario linking concepts and topicsacross courses. Mistry et al.14 describe the results of a similar prototype study in a managementaccounting course. Strong et al.18 describe the framework and overall project in more detail.To measure the effectiveness of the ERP-based production planning and control module, wefocused on two aspects of student learning. First, while exposure to new technologies anddecision-making scenarios is important, there is a concern that it may come at the expense ofcore concepts. In this project, we therefore wanted to measure students’ knowledge of the corecourse material, and we scored student work to measure the ability to apply core
designed using LabVIEW but it would requireinstallation of LabVIEW, hence the need for a new design using graphics. The issue ofefficient cross platform usage will also be considered. It is to be noted however that theexperiments developed for the UK Open Science Lab site were developed using Adobe Flexand Adobe Flash.Conclusion Page 24.419.15The experiments developed by this project are part of the introductory experiments used inthe teaching of chemistry and physics in lower level classes in universities and also thescience classes in high schools. The project would therefore serve the purposes expected by avirtual laboratory in terms of making it
Maintaining focus/experiencing Zoom fatigue 70% Autonomy Lack of engagement during online classes 64% Autonomy Feeling a lack of clear guidance or 60% Competence communication from instructors Feeling social disconnection from peers 55% Relatedness Table 3. ERT challenges noted by students mapped to primary associated SDT needs. Category identification, phrasing and response data in the left and center columns are from [4].The paper suggests multiple teaching techniques to address these issues, including: “breakingdown a long lecture into shorter segments with more frequent breaks, encouraging groupdiscussion among students, [faculty] making
interviews, the 6 faculty members who participated were asked individuallyto comment generally on the following topics: What are your common issues with forming student design teams in your courses? Do your students have opinions on forming teams and what are they? Was gruepr a useful tool for you in this task? Do you have any feedback and thoughts on your implementation of this tool and what are they?The data collected is limited to short responses from each of the participating faculty. The data isintended to further develop and update gruepr and should not be considered complete evidenceof its success or failure. Their opinions were found to be consistent enough by the authorcollecting the feedback to be noteworthy
Paper ID #30371 Carlos Santos is a first year graduate student at the Wake Forest University Department of Psychology. His research includes longitudinal measurement validity and developing personalized user-interface data tools.Dr. Michael D. Gross, Wake Forest University Dr. Michael Gross is a Founding Faculty and Associate Professor of Engineering at Wake Forest Uni- versity and is part of the team that is planning, developing, and delivering the brand new Engineering program. The Engineering department is viewed as an opportunity to break down silos across campus and creatively think about reimagining the undergraduate engineering educational experience, integra- tion and collaboration across departments and
Consultancy Services as an Assistant Systems Engineer from 2011–2012 in India. He has worked as an Assistant Professor (2014–2018) in the department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, KLE Technological University, India. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He was awarded the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018. He is serving as an Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET). He is interested in conducting engineering education research, and his interests include student retention in online and in-person engineering courses/programs, data mining and learning analytics in engineering education, broadening student participation in engineering, faculty
design project report to demonstrate how this framework guides educators towardsdelineating and integrating data reasoning, ethical reasoning, and design reasoning in settingswhere ethical issues (e.g., AI solutions) are commonly experienced. The framework can beimplemented to design courses through design review conversations that seamlessly integrateethical reasoning into the technical and data decision-making processes. 1. IntroductionWhat does conscientious design and innovation mean for engineers today and in the near future?Engineers are continuously utilizing ever-expanding datasets and sophisticated artificialintelligence algorithms. These algorithms are used to generate design alternatives and optimizeexisting designs and systems [1
supported theestablishment of a multidisciplinary graduate training program of education and research onextremely small scale thermal-fluid systems. The applications of extremely small scale thermal-and fluid-systems are expanding exponentially, including: silicon microfabrication technologybased turbines; microscale heat exchangers for cooling high-power electronics, and micro- andnano- scale chemical and biological analyses systems. The objective of this program is to createthe first integrated, multidisciplinary educational program in extremely small scale thermal-fluidsystems. An interdisciplinary faculty will provide a comprehensive education and researchtraining program, including six new, specialized courses and integrated research
Session 1354 The State of Assessment of Entrepreneur Projects1 Mary Besterfield-Sacre, Bradley L. Golish, Larry J. Shuman, and Harvey Wolfe University of Pittsburgh Philip J. Weilerstein National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators AllianceThe assessment of entrepreneurship and innovation projects and coursework is relatively new inengineering education. At the past two National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance(NCIIA) annual meetings, roundtables focusing on assessment provided participants with theopportunity to share
fororganizing experience and substantially strengthened the idea of using cross-curricularexpressive writing to enhance students’ learning (pp. 57-58).1Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, Emig’s and Britton’s work became the basis for recognizingwriting as a primary learning method, for examining writing in specific environments, forobserving the effects of different writing assignments upon learning, and for applying writing indifferent disciplines (WAC). During the New Millennium researchers have begun addressingethical issues involved with WAC programs. (For a more complete discussion of WAC history,refer to Chapter 5, “Writing to Learn,” of Reference Guide to Writing Across the Curriculum, byCharles Bazerman, et al.1) VCUR’s WAC program emerged through
concerned with the effective management of complex systems over theentire product lifecycle. Good systems engineering practice is essential for the effective design,fabrication, testing and operation of complex systems, such as spacecraft and aircraft. However,teaching good systems engineering to undergraduates is often viewed as either impossible(because “true” systems engineering capabilities must be developed in real, professional settings)or impractical. Students at RPL realize that systems engineering is an iterative process and theydevelop judgment that will allow them to compare and evaluate engineering alternatives. Theylearn to discuss systems engineering methods and processes as well as engage in systemsthinking.The main function of SE is
, Steven Jay Lynn, Michael Virgorito, and Ralph R. Miller. 2004. The Role of Cognition on Classical and Operant Conditioning. Journal of Clinical Psychology 60 (2004), 369–392. Issue 4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10251[11] David L. 2016. Game Reward Systems. Learning Theories (2016). https://www.learning-theories.com/game-reward-systems.html[12] Clayton Lewis. 2007. Attitudes and Beliefs About Computer Science Among Students and Faculty. SIGCSE Bull. 39, 2 (June 2007), 37–41. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1272848.1272880[13] Zhiyi Li and Stephen H Edwards. 2018. Applying Recent-Performance Factors Analysis to Explore Student Effort Invested in Programming Assignments. In The 14th Int’l Conf on Frontiers in Education
practicedthroughout the engineering curriculum culminating in the capstone design course. During secondand third year courses, the engineering curriculum focuses on analytical concepts and techniquesultimately intended to support design analysis ability. Given the overcrowded traditionalengineering curriculum, it is not surprising that students do not improve their creative processingskills. The proliferation of assistive software for design has an impact on student training as well.For example, sketching was a critical skill in traditional engineering design but the practice hasbecome less important to students as computer-aided drawing tools have become available tothem.Industrial and academic leaders long expressed concerns about the impact of
. Conclusions and next steps:The program was repeated in the summer of 2022 with an additional instructional session for a totalof five sessions involving the same lead instructors but a new group of middle school students. Afull mixed methods data collection effort was launched to collect both field perceptions and careermotivational data as well as algebraic concept understanding/performance data. AcknowledgementThe Brillantes Program was made possible due to a grant from the Institute of Electrical andElectronics Engineers (IEEE) and the personal research support of faculty at Texas State Universityand the University of Texas at San Antonio.In addition, the Brillantes Program was made possible due to the in
. Research is required at the doctorate degreelevel.2) Program Structure and ContentDuring the development phase of the Alternative Energy summer program there were concernsregarding which students should be allowed to enroll in the program. The author of this paper,who directs the Alternative Energy lab, and who was the primary instructor for the summercamp, had concerns about the safety of the students and the well-being of the equipment whileused by summer camp students. Some of the equipment in the lab is custom built and some isresearch-grade worth many thousands of dollars. Due to these issues it was felt that there had tobe a head-count limit and an age limit for the students for lab activities. The schooladministration wanted to allow all
Science in Computer Science with honors in 2019 from Florida International University. She is dedicated to improving women and minoritized students’ retention and persistence in computer science. Her research interests include exploring inclusive pedagogical practices, implicit theories of intelligence, disciplinary culture, and their effects on women’s and minoritized women’s persistence in computer science. She is passionate about improving diversity and equity in computer science by conducting research that promotes inclusive learning environments. Her goal is to complete her Ph. D. and become a computer science (education) faculty member to continue serving the computer science education community through
[9].They also may have preconceptions or naïve theories about both new and familiar concepts.These pre-conceptions also are called alternative conceptions or misconceptions [10]. Usuallysuch misconceptions are robust, very resistant to change, and deeply rooted in everydayexperience.Two of the major questions in research about misconceptions are: (1) why some concepts aremore difficult to learn than others, and (2) why do students have misconceptions even afterextensive instructions. Referring to a literature, the six most significant reasons were: The reasons some concepts are more difficult to learn may have developmental causes. However, this is not likely to be a key issue for engineering students [11], [12]. Concepts are more
effective? Researchable subtopics: Cost of the material, alternative materials, cost of alternative materials, relevant regulations, potential environmental issues, etc.Search strategies - An intentional and well-thought out approach to finding relevant information. In the case of database searching, the combination of keyterms, phrases, and synonyms derived from researchable subtopics. Non-strategically - such as performing only Google searches, using only natural language searches, not refining the strategy based on results and new discoveries, etc. Simple - such as relevant keyword and synonym searches, simple Boolean techniques, finding an item given a citation, etc. o Example: simple Boolean database search
educational resources and develop new ones for online lecture courses, as well as coreengineering laboratory courses that are delivered either completely online, or with limited face-to-face interactions. The initial areas of focus for laboratory course development are:Introduction to Engineering, Engineering Graphics, Materials Science, and Circuit Analysis.CALSTEP will also develop alternative models of flipped classroom instruction to improvestudent success and enhance student access to engineering courses that otherwise could not besupported in traditional delivery modes due to low enrollment. The project will also evaluate theeffectiveness of the curriculum and train other community college engineering faculty in theeffective use of the
Session: 2330 Graduate Engineering Student Performance Assessment: How learning pattern affects test scores Timothy Chang, New Jersey Institute of Technology, NJ and Daphne Chang, Bloomfield College, NJAbstractIn this paper, the findings based on a graduate electrical engineering course titled “Real-Time Control Systems Design” are analyzed and reported. This course comprises of alecture and laboratory component where the students are expected to transform theirtheoretical knowledge into a viable team laboratory design and present the results to theentire class. Upon