Paper ID #33533Engineering Explorations: Connecting K-12 Classroom Learning and FieldTrip Experiences through Engineering DesignDanielle Harlow, University of California, Santa Barbara Danielle Harlow is a professor of STEM education at the University of California, Santa Barbara.Ron Skinner, MOXI, The Wolf Museum of Exploration + Innovation Ron Skinner, Research and Evaluation Specialist at MOXI, The Wolf Museum of Exploration + Innova- tion Ron Skinner has been involved with science education and research for the past 30 years. He has taught physics, astronomy, and general science in formal settings to audiences from
child's poster as shown in Fig. 1. This promotional tool capturedlearning progress by identifying areas where students students' curiosity and encouraged interaction. The study tookplace at a public K-8 school in an urban setting. Students ahead), and a sophisticated evaluation function that considersparticipated in different grade levels. We introduced the game multiple strategic factors, such as board control and positionalto all groups through a brief one to two minutes session using advantage. We chose the Minimax algorithm because it isthe trifold poster. This short introduction was designed to spark effective for deterministic, turn-based games
the concepts. Apossible next step would be to use the learning from the workshop to define more rigorousbenchmarks for the students willing to take advanced workshops in various departmentsinvolved. Fabrication process is the key element of nanotechnology and currently only graduatestudents get hands-on-experience with these processes. These concepts should be madeavailable, through simple lab exercises, to K-12 and college level students as well so that theinterest for this emerging field evolve at an early stage and once these students reach at thegraduate level they have enough taste and expertise in this area that they can play an active roleand can be more productive in their work. Previously only a top-down approach was used for
2006-262: IMPROVING SCIENCE LITERACY THROUGH PROJECT-BASED K-12OUTREACH EFFORTS THAT USE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL THEMESJan DeWaters, Clarkson University Jan DeWaters, PE is currently pursuing a PhD degree in Environmental Science and Engineering at Clarkson University, with a focus on energy and environmental education. She has several years of experience as the curriculum coordinator for Clarkson's Project-Based Learning Partnership Program and is director of the Partners in Engineering Program that provides mentoring and engineering activities for eighth grade girls.Susan Powers, Clarkson University Susan E. Powers, PhD, PE is a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Assoc Dean
Paper ID #36866Enhancing Engineering Students’ Innovation Self-Efficacythrough Design of K-12 STEM ProjectsAzadeh Bolhari (Associate Teaching Professor) Dr. Bolhari is a professor of environmental engineering in the Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her teaching focuses on fate and transport of contaminants, capstone design and aqueous chemistry. Dr. Bolhari is passionate about broadening participation in engineering through community-based participatory action research. Her research interests explore the boundaries of engineering and social
Paper ID #29275If you build it, they will come: A case-study of how FSU Libraries grewengineering services through targeted rebranding and outreach for amulti-institution college of engineeringDenise Amanda Wetzel, Florida A&M University/Florida State University Denise A. Wetzel joined Florida State University Libraries in January 2018. She holds a B.H. in Inter- disciplinary Studies from the Pennsylvania State University and a Masters in Library and Information Studies from the University of Alabama. Currently, Denise is pursuing a Masters in Aquatic Environ- mental Science with Florida State University’s Department of
mathematics have always been taught. Technology, in the sense of instructional tools, hasfound its way into some places and not into others, and most STEM educational efforts reallyexclude engineering. More recent conversation has centered on so-called I-STEM, or integratedSTEM, with the implication that the four involved subjects are not stand-alone but really havesome interdependencies. Some groups want to use the term STEAM to officially recognize theimportant role of the arts. What is needed going forward is not a debate on semantics, but a trueparadigm shift in education. This is the role that engineering can play in K-12 and beyond, usingknowledge and experience to solve problems.The state of North Carolina has had a history of leadership in
education. One of the most important areasof recent research development is nanoengineering, science, and technology. Nanoscalephenomena have been investigated across multiple disciplines, and have applications innumerous fields, including medicine, environmental science, defense, and electronicsdevelopment. Additionally, nanoscale phenomena provide a way to integrate engineering anddesign tasks into the secondary classroom (for example, through a lesson on self assembly thatasks students to evaluate multiple factors in designing a model of a self-assembling system).Integration of engineering into the secondary curriculum can be a challenge, particularly withinthe context of rigid traditional curricula.Any major development in secondary education
Paper ID #25690Building a Cybersecurity Pipeline through Experiential Virtual Labs andWorkforce AlliancesDr. Jorge Crichigno, University of South Carolina Jorge Crichigno received the Ph.D. degree in computer engineering from the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque (NM), USA. He is an Associate Professor in the Integrated Information Technology De- partment in the College of Engineering and Computing at the University of South Carolina, Columbia (SC), USA. His current research interests are in the areas of network and protocol optimization for high- throughput high-latency systems, and Internet measurements for cyber
and conceptual difficulties can be a commonexperience among undergraduate engineering students, ethnic minority engineering studentsoften face additional challenges in their undergraduate programs, which can make them feelisolated and hinder their ability to integrate into their college campuses. Integration into thecollege environment plays an important role in students feeling a sense of belonging on campus,and ultimately in their decisions to persist. Racial and ethnic minority students who areintegrated into the college environment through various means can find supports such as friendswith similar backgrounds, advice from advanced students, and role models and advisors, whichcan positively influence academic performance. This paper
students’engagement and factors they consider when making engagement decisions through a compilationof survey items from multiple co-curricular engagement surveys and frameworks [12], [13], [18].In future work of this project, findings from the pilot survey will be used to prototype the co-curricular engagement guide. To further explore engagement decisions of the student population,stakeholder interviews will be conducted and inform iterations of the engagement guide, thusimproving its usability and potential adoption as a resource.Study Context. The student population studied is an undergraduate engineering population at amid-Atlantic research institution. Majors that students can enroll in include biomedicalengineering, chemical engineering, civil and
believe that hebelongs to a network of communication and mutual obligation‖7. Cobb first operationalized thewidely- understood concept of social support to argue that adequate social support may protectthose in crisis from pathologies including illness and death. In the 1980s, Cohen and Wills8expanded Cobb‘s research to investigate the relationship between social support and generalstress. Their research supported Cobb‘s initial finding that social support is a positive Page 23.1073.4mechanism for protecting one‘s well-being. Expanding the effects of social support beyond thelimits of illness and pathology, Cohen and Wills reported that social
Engineering Education, 2013 Be A Scientist: Family Science for Minorities “I enjoyed the experiments, the encouragement toward science, and the engineers’ welcome and support.” – Be a Scientist! ParentINTRODUCTIONBe a Scientist! (BAS) is a five-year longitudinal study, sponsored by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF), where undergraduate engineering students are trained to design andteach hands-on Family Science Workshops (FSWs) to underrepresented minority (URM)children and their families. The project’s goal is to provide quality science andengineering courses to families in New York City and Los Angeles and to identify ascalable model for the program. Through this project, engineering students learn
persist.Qualitative methods allow researchers “to get at the inner experience of participants, todetermine how meanings are formed through and in culture, and to discover rather than testvariables” 10. Beyond the problem of high attrition rates of Latinas in engineering and computerscience, the researcher sought to understand how Latinas respond to the culture of engineering,which drives many students away. To further understand how the engineering culture cancultivate or dissuade Latina persisters, it was most beneficial to invest in students whosuccessfully navigated and persisted in the field of engineering, rather than to focus on those whodid not persist in engineering.As an engineering administrator, the researcher felt it necessary to demonstrate an
pathways to inform education for future engineers?RQ2. What can we learn about the pathways of Makers through the qualitative research approach, constructivist grounded theory, utilizing artifact elicitation interview and critical incident interview methods?This research, guided by RQ1 and RQ2, is situated within a broader four-year study exploresmaking as a means of engaging both current engineering students as well as adults and pre-college students in the engineering landscape described in The Engineer of 2020, ABET a-k, and21st Century Skills.The study was designed with Crotty’s17 four elements of a research study (epistemology
transitions and retention of underrepresented students in engineering and also research about engineering global preparedness and engineering innovation. She also has research expertise in STEM K-12 and in STEM assessment. She chairs USC’s STEM Consortium.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is an Associate Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student moti- vation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group
Paper ID #11396Synthesis of Engineering Undergraduate Students’ Out of Class InvolvementMs. Rongrong Yu, Virginia Tech Rongrong Yu is a PhD student at the Educational Research and Evaluation Program in School of Education at Virginia Tech. She holds a B.S. degree in psychology and a M.Ed. degree in educational psychology. Her research interests include K-12 student mathematics and science achievement, STEM and gender, and co-curricular involvement.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons PE, Virginia Tech Dr. Denise R. Simmons, PE, is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction and in Civil &
changes of global competency levels of engineeringundergraduate students and how it is influenced by different factors through time. A conceptualmodel differs from the formal structures of hypothesis testing in the sense that it is exploratory innature. That is, it looks to uncover any existing relationships between the considered variables,based either in theory or in empirical evidence, instead of testing the magnitude or direction ofhypothesized relationships 15. Our model proposes that students entering an engineering programmay already have certain levels of global competency, and that these potential differences arecritical in designing strategies and interventions at the college-level. In our model, these baselinelevels are influenced by
University Alexandra Jackson is a second year PhD student at Rowan University seeking a specialization in Engi- neering Education. She began her research in Rowan’s Experiential Engineering Education Department in the Fall of 2019, and has developed interests in entrepreneurial mindset and student development. In particular, she is interested in assessment of entrepreneurial mindset through both quantitative and quali- tative methods, and is currently working in both survey and concept map assessment. She was awarded an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship in April, 2022, and hopes to continue her research in entrepreneurial mindset assessment using narrative inquiry.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an
Academies Press.16. G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, and K. Knutson. Learning Conversations in Museums. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 2002.17. G. Hein, Learning in the Museum. London, UK: Routledge, 1998.18. M. Callanan, C. Cervantes, and M. Loomis, “Informal Learning,” Interdisciplinary Reviews, vol. 2, issue 6, pp. 646-655, 2011.19. R. Semper, “science Museums as Environments for Learning,” Physics Today, vol. 43, pp. 50-56, 1990.20. C. A. Haden, E. A. Jant, P. C. Hoffman, M. Marcus, J. R. Geddes, and S. Gaskins, “Supporting Family Conversations and Children’sSTEM Learning,” Early Childhood Research Quarterly, vol. 29, pp. 333-344, 2014.21. J. A. Holmes, “Informal Learning: Student Achievement and Motivation in Science Through Museum-Based
hold an MA in history and an MA in education, they are obtaining an EdD from Hamline University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Recentering the User: How an Inclusive Design Class Pushes Students to See Beyond Their Own Experiences Allison K. Murray, Lisa A. Chase Opus College of Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USAAbstractThe purpose of this ECSJ-DEED joint technical session practice paper is to disseminate thesuccesses and challenges of implementing an inclusive design mechanical engineering elective.Grounded in a human centered design framework, the inclusive engineering design coursefocused on (1) the value of a
AC 2011-700: UNDERWATER ROVS IN PRE-COLLEGE EDUCATION:UNIVERSITY-K12 PARTNERSHIPS THAT GO BEYOND THE COMPE-TITIONSDouglas E. Oppliger, Michigan Technological University Mr. Oppliger is a professional engineer and a lecturer in the Engineering Fundamentals department at Michigan Technological University. He is the director of the High School Enterprise program which has a mission to increase the numbers of students pursuing post-secondary degrees and careers in STEM fields. At its core, this program supports K-12 teachers who are leading teams of students in long-term STEM projects. This work is the latest in Oppliger’s history of working in K-12 STEM areas. For the past 10 years he has developed and taught first
Paper ID #27576Board 90: Latinx Persistence In and Beyond the Degree: Intersections ofGender and Ethnicity (Research)Dr. Alberto Esquinca, San Diego State UniversityLidia Herrera-Rocha, University of Texas at El Paso Lidia Herrera-Rocha is a Mexican American bilingual educator, researcher, and English Language Learner in a U.S.-Mexico border city. She obtained a Bachelor of Science in Psychology and a Master’s in Cur- riculum and Instruction with a concentration in Bilingual Education. She grew up as a student in a transi- tional bilingual program and went on to become a 4th grade bilingual education teacher in El Paso, Texas
represented the most advantageous combination ofthese criteria. During the think-aloud sessions these three participants began many of their phrases withthe word, “So,…” These declarative statements sounded very matter-of-fact and purposeful as ifto say, “Here is what I am going to do…” As a result, these participants sounded very confidentin their approaches as they worked step-by-step through the problem. These statements seem toindicate that they had a clear plan for the problem in mind. Each of these three participants spentless time on the problem compared to the others (with the exception of Joshua, who only gavethe problem a superficial treatment and never moved beyond material selection). The linear anddeterministic approaches of
, disability is stigmatized, and open discussions ofneurodivergence and disability are less prevalent, leading to an inability to understand howindividuals with ADHD navigate engineering ecosystems. We have two main objectives in thispaper: 1) critically analyze framings of ADHD and disability in engineering, and 2) create anddisseminate qualitative elicitation questions to create counterstories from individuals withADHD. This work forms part of a larger project to answer the following research question: Canwe reconceptualize ADHD in engineering beyond deficit frameworks through criticalmethods that uncover and question hegemonic discourses and the power those discourseshave? Positionality Statement and Introduction to Co-authorsOur
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Beyond Our Horizon: Reaching out to Engineering Faculty to Teach Spatial Literacy Beyond Our Horizon: Reaching out to Engineering Faculty to Teach Spatial LiteracyAbstractThe National Research Council of the National Academies has recognized the importance ofspatial thinking as an important skill in the 21st century, and in its report “Learning to ThinkSpatially”, supports its integration in the K-12 curriculum. Building on universities’ increasinglyrecognized and integral support for Information Literacy, comes the realization that SpatialLiteracy should be another of those skills that should be taught at the tertiary level. Recognizingthe
worked as a post-doctoral researcher with the Illinois Foundry for Innovation in Engineering Education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. At UIUC she has collaborated with mul- tiple teams of engineering faculty on implementing and assessing instructional innovation. Dr. Cross is currently a Research Scientist in the Department of Bioengineering working to redesign the curriculum through the NSF funded Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (RED) grant. She is a member of the ASEE Leadership Virtual Community of Practice that organizes and facilitates Safe Zone Training work- shops. Dr. Cross has conducted multiple workshops on managing personal bias in STEM, both online and in-person. Dr. Cross
through the world.What Are Some Practical Ways to Move Beyond the Research in Order to Support Engineeringand Computing Identity Development for Latina Students?Chicana feminism invites us, as engineering education educators, to step into consciousness in order toserve students. This means promoting identity development within and outside of the classroom byinvestigating the teaching and curriculum as well as advising and support changes needed to supportLatina students in these fields. In addition, this means empowering college leaders to act as catalysts ofchange and community building in order facilitate a multi-prong approach to enhancing engineering andcomputing identity development for Latina students.To fully embody this vision will
can generate consistent and coherenttext, convey relevant, concise and easy-to-understand information to explain course-specifictopics and at the same time, easily scale to replace textbooks from other courses.3.0 Beyond TextbookBT is an online work-in-progress OER platform that delivers customized, credible, andcontinuously updated e-textbooks that closely follow course content at no cost in a standardized,but collaborative and dynamic manner. BT allows users to upload lecture notes through itswebsite interface and then given a list of topics, users will be able to auto-generate apersonalized e-textbook from the uploaded notes. The backend algorithm determines therelatedness metrics used to distill the database of notes using the provided
their positive feelings towardEGR101 Connections. All of the students either agreed or strongly agreed that Connections washelpful in connecting them with other students and in connecting ideas from the first-year designcourse with life beyond the course. All of the students strongly agreed that the Connectionsexperience was valuable and worthwhile and that they would recommend it to future students.The responses to the open-ended questions indicate that participants in Connections valuedmeeting and discussing with other students who were going through a similar experience (thefirst-year design course and being first-year engineering students) but who could providedifferent perspectives. Many students also felt supported by the group. The