Åkerlind48, 53. Interviewstranscribed verbatim become the focus of the phenomenographic analysis when interviews havebeen used as the primary means of data collection. The set of transcripts represent a ‘snapshot’ ofsome of the experiences of a group of people with a particular aspect of the world in response to aparticular set of questions at a particular time49. When data collection has relied only oninterviews, no other evidence exists beyond the transcripts to inform the analysis process43.The analysis process is both one of ‘discovery’54 as well as one of ‘construction’55. The resultsare not known in advance and tested in the study, but must be discovered, or emerge fromtranscripts, and constructed in an iterative way from the transcripts. In
options for curriculum design in first-year programs.Background and ObjectivesIn the mid-2000’s, a call went out to integrate the teaching of science, technology, engineering,and mathematics into what we now collectively refer to as STEM [1]. Since that time, additionalinitiatives have suggested that it might be even more beneficial to integrate the arts into STEMlearning, creating STEAM. Some even argue that it should be pushed even further, addingadditional study of the societal implications of STEAM research and work, further lengtheningthe acronym to STEAMS [2]. For this paper, the focus will remain on STEAM and itsimplications for the first-year engineering curriculum.Students’ experiences in their first-year engineering (FYE) classes are
. Based on the African American Male Theory (AAMT) [4], our research team examinedthe three students’ experiences in the context of the interconnected environmental systems(microsystem, mesosystem, exosystemic, macrosystem, chronosystem). Highlighting theconcepts of “resilience,” “resistance,” and “pursuit of social justice” in AAMT, the authorsexplored the three students’ multiple-layered social and professional identities as emerging Blackmale engineering professionals.Theoretical frameworkThis study is grounded in Bush and Bush’s African American Male Theory [4], which providesan effective analytic framework to understand the unique facets of Black males’ experiencessituated in various educational, academic, and community contexts. Like other
describes how student research and industry projects can benefit through jointuniversity-industry collaboration by introducing new technology for replacing inefficient andoutdated systems and software. This research project involves development of a fullycustomizable, user-defined hardware-software suite for automated signal routing with an openended functionality profile. This intelligent switching system can be customized and employed inany industry where there is a need for programmable, timed, and/or simultaneous routing ofanalog or digital signals between devices. Potential applications of these automated switchingsystems include, but are not limited to: demarcation points, test floors, redundant backupsystems, remote maintenance, etc. This
sequential designs within a mixed methods approach[4], a variety of research techniques was employed to elicit students’ views and attitudes. Afocus group of five Latino/Hispanic students was asked about their perceptions and attitudesregarding the climate within an engineering college. From their responses emerged 10 themes,collapsed into six dimensions; these were later used to construct a nine-item survey instrumentdeployed to over 150 Latino/Hispanic engineering students. In asking whether Latino/Hispanicengineering students felt disconnected to the general student population and to the engineeringdiscipline, the study also investigated the extent to which self-segregation occurred across otherethnic/racial groups. Questions were primarily
cause variations in the results giving openness tofurther research. All surveys were administered to students at the Universidad SanFrancisco de Quito USFQ, in Spanish, and reviewed by native speakers. The resultsprovided statistical information on the significant differences in cultural dimensionsbetween engineers and architects so that it was possible to discuss the possible causes ofthe creation of the gap between the two branches of construction as well as tounderstand variations in pre-pandemic and post-pandemic student outcomes andrecommendations that can be taken to reduce barriers to cooperation between civilengineers and architects.IntroductionBefore the 19th century, infrastructure was carried out by a single professional, whoplayed
Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on struc- tural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. Dr. Canney taught in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Seattle University for four years and now works in private consulting. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Faculty Perceptions of Challenges to Educating Engineering and Computing Students About Ethics and Societal ImpactsAbstractEvaluating ethics and societal impacts (ESI) is an integral part of engineering in anincreasingly globalized and technology dependent world. Despite the recognized
Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and assessment of student learning.Prof. Marnie V Jamieson, University of Alberta Marnie V. Jamieson, M. Sc., P.Eng. is an Industrial Professor in Chemical Process Design in the Depart- ment of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Alberta and holds an M.Sc. in Chemical Engineering Education. She is currently the William Magee Chair in Chemical Process Design, leads the
a survey instrument designed to measure self-efficacyin engineering, feelings of inclusion and outcomes expectations, and collected responses fromundergraduate women studying engineering at four institutions: Penn State University (PSU),Georgia Institute of Technology (GA Tech), University of Texas – Austin (UT Austin) andRensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI).The paper describes the development process for ensuring reliability and validity and also reportsthe preliminary results of the analysis to answer the following research questions. 1. Do students’ feelings of self-efficacy vary from one institution to another? 2. Do students with different year-standings answer the module items differently regardless of institution? 3
definitions and interpretations of effectuation, and theeffectual heuristics, that are as close to those created by Sarasvathy as possible. For thosedefinitions, we used the most recent publication of basic effectuation information as posted onthe website of the society for effectual action, run by the original researchers 34. The body ofresearch on effectuation is generally consistent and intentional about making use of the originallyproposed definition.Use of the most current work published by the original researchers is appropriate because theoriginal theory developers are actively engaged in continuing to develop the theory 35, and thetheory is in an emergent stage 36. Therefore, we adopted and will operationalize the definition ofeffectuation as
Paper ID #27557Forming Key Partnerships to Enhance Graduate Student ProgrammingEmily K. Hart, Syracuse University Emily Hart is the Science and Engineering Librarian at Syracuse University. She is a liaison librarian serving 10 STEM related departments, including the College of Engineering & Computer Science. Emily completed her B.A. in English with a minor in Education at St. Bonaventure University, and her M.L.S. and an Advanced Certificate in Educational Technology at the University at Buffalo. Emily has special- ized in supporting science research for over 10 years. She is an active member of the American Society
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Office ofWeights and Measures (OWM) - has been providing train the trainer and adult education coursesand opportunities to our subject matter experts to help them better analyze, design, develop,implement, and evaluate our technical training content. The goal has been to enable students toachieve a higher level of cognition on the Bloom’s Taxonomy scale (e.g., application versusknowledge). Highlights of the key resources that have been incorporated into the instructionaldesign process are presented as potentially useful for the professional development of instructorsthis is particularly useful for instructors without a background in educational theories andmodels. Some highlights of instructional design
field were guiding their views oftheir current engineering course. Students’ perceptions of the future were evaluated in terms ofhow first-year students viewed the future in relation to their engineering degree and their desireto be an engineer. Survey items evaluating future perceptions include, “My interest inengineering outweighs any disadvantages I can think of'”, and “I want to be an engineer”. Surveyitems evaluating present perceptions include, “I will use the information I learn in thisengineering course in the future” and, “What I learn in my engineering course will be importantfor my future occupational success”. Page 24.504.5Task
, Reno.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 First Generation
, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://colostate.primo.exlibrisgroup.com. [Accessed Jan 10, 2023].[17] P. Allison and E. Pomeroy, “How Shall We ‘Know?’ Epistemological Concerns in Research in Experiential Education,” Journal of Experimental Education, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 91–98, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://journals-sagepub-com. [Accessed Jan 10, 2023].[18] K. Stancin, P. Poscic and D. Jaksic, “Ontologies in education – state of the art,” Education and Informational Technologies, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 5301–5320, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://link-springer-com. [Accessed Jan 10, 2023].[19] L.R. Marks, A. Schimmel-Bristow, L.M. Harrell-Williams, C. Hargons, “Racial Discrimination and Risky Sex: Examining Cognitive
fundamental knowledge of students in introductory materials engineering classes. Most recently, he has been working on Project Pathways, an NSF supported Math Science Partnership, in developing modules for a courses on Connecting Mathematics with Physics and Chemistry and also a course on Engineering Capstone Design.Robert Culbertson, Arizona State University Robert J Culbertson Robert Culbertson is Associate Professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy and Associate Director of the Center for Research in Education on Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology (CRESMET) at Arizona State University. He is a member of the Leadership Team in the Math-Science Partnership project, and he
Page 26.1123.3synthesizer keyboard with conductive fabric gloves in Part 4, “Modern”.The narrative arc of “Wild Sound” celebrates the evolution of technology from rural tomodern industrial times. It has four distinct sections or movements: “Wilderness,”“Rural,” “Industrial,” and “Modern,” illustrated in Figure 1. As part of the performance,non-traditional instruments are constructed on stage, where the sounds of the constructionare part of the musical score. The custom instruments include acoustical instruments thatare shaped with hand and power tools, an “audience participation” instruments mass-produced with a laser cutter, embedded piezo contact microphones, and a variety of MIDIsynthesizers designed using Arduino processor technology. A
2. What else, if anything, did you do to prepare for the midterm? 3. What else could you have done before the test to better prepare yourself? II. During the test 1. What on the midterm gave you problems? That is, what statics or math concepts caused you problems? (Please give this careful thought before answering) 2. What personal (e.g., illness, alertness, etc.) or environmental (e.g., noise, temperature, etc.) issues caused you problems during the midterm? (Please only share information you’re comfortable sharing) III. Preparing for the final exam (please give deep thought to these answers) 1. Based
Paper ID #17160Gaining Insights into the Effects of Culturally Responsive Curriculum onHistorically Underrepresented Students’ Desire for Computer ScienceMs. Omoju Miller, UC Berkeley Omoju Miller is the lead researcher on the ”Hiphopathy” project at UC Berkeley. She has an undergrad- uate degree in Computer Science (2001) and a Master’s degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering (2004) from the University of Memphis. She has over a decade of experience in the technology indus- try. She is currently a doctoral candidate at UC Berkeley in Computer Science Education. Omoju also served in a volunteer capacity as an advisor to
. Furthermore, in our experience, studentstypically fail to do simple tasks that can enhance the quality of their lab reports, typically due torunning out of time in the preparation of said report. In an attempt to change these trends wenotice in our students, many alterations to the laboratory course have been integrated into thecourse since 2010, including the integration of experiments based on emerging technology andmoving to a new laboratory space. However, these elements are costly and not necessarily ableto be integrated at another university. As such, we felt changing the way the course wasconducted could be a cost-free way to generate students excitement toward the lab. To that end,we devised a new game structure to overlay over the existing
” throughclassroom lectures, textbook reading, and the internet. A troubling fact is, after instruction,students often emerge from our classes with serious misconceptions [2 - 6]. In recent years, a number of writing techniques have evolved that make use of variouswriting-to-learn strategies within the domains of engineering, mathematics, and the sciences [7 -16]. The use of writing in introductory classes for non-majors can be an effective vehicle for Page 15.1203.2allowing students to enhance their critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Writing can alsoassist students with the identification and confrontation of personal misconceptions [17
Page 24.492.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Engineering and Science Student Preparedness for Research: Exploring the Connections Between Student Identity and Readiness for ResearchAbstractIt has been suggested that engineering research is advanced by an increasingly diversepopulation of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) researchers withinterdisciplinary research objectives. To develop a diverse population of STEM researchers, wemust understand how their identities influence their feelings of preparedness for researchexperiences. The purpose of this study was to understand how a student’s perception ofpreparedness is influenced
new employees need to bring teamwork skills to the workplace. Although employers may be willing to provide on the job training,they expect that their new employees, at least, possess the understanding of why this skill isimportant in the organization1. As result, the corporate environment has created pressure on institutions of highereducation to prepare students to be effective team players 1,2,3. For this reason accreditationboards at the collegiate level such as the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET), the Accounting Education Change Commission (AECC), and the Joint Commission forAccreditation of Health Care Organizations (JCAHO), among others, are requiring highereducation institutions to introduce teamwork
ofAI tools raises concerns about plagiarism rates and the ethical use of technology in academicsettings. Educational institutions are actively crafting policies to navigate the complexities ofGenAI usage while maintaining academic integrity [2], [3].Recent advancements in GenAI have ushered in a new era for educational methodologies,offering innovative tools for learning and teaching. Integrating GenAI tools such as ChatGPTand MidJourney into educational practices is becoming increasingly common, with these toolspredicted to become as ubiquitous as traditional software like Microsoft Excel in the near future[4]. The emergence of GenAI necessitates reevaluating pedagogical strategies, suggesting a shifttowards technology-integrated learning
connection charts that did not use a schematicformat. This meant that while the students could get the apparatus to function, they could notgeneralize from the results.One by one I rewrote the various laboratory syllabi to present the information in schematicfashion. As a result, the students could be expected to connect, operate and test the same type ofmotor or generator of any size and brand within reason. This step-by-step upgrading had a fewresults, both planned and unplanned.First, it became obvious that the students were much more interested in realistic laboratoryoperations. Also, when I was working in the lab while not scheduled for student contact, variousstudents would drop in to see what was going on. If I said that I was trying to
following National Academies panels: Survivability and Lethality Analysis, Army Research Laboratory (ARL) Au- tonomous Systems. Dr. Rodriguez received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1990. Personal Web site: http://aar.faculty.asu.edu/Mr. Nirangkush Das, Arizona State University Nirangkush Das is the Research Associate in the NSF S-STEM grant 1565177. He is currently pursuing his Ph.D in the department of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering (ECEE) at Arizona State University.Mr. Brent Wallace, Arizona State University Brent Wallace is an undergraduate Electrical Engineering student at Arizona State University. He spe- cializes in the study of control
extra-curricular and co-curricular activities to the studentexperience [7], [8], [9] and the understanding in the higher education sector of the benefits ofextra and co-curricular activities [10], [11], [12]. Further, this work is also informed bypost-secondary sector initiatives to map the rapid development of work-integrated-learning, orexperiential learning [13], [14], and by private sector initiatives to assist youth preparing to enterthe workforce in a time of significant economic, social, and technological change [15].All the feedback related to competencies gathered from instructors, network member directorsand employers was synthesized into a single table for comparison. In Table 1, the first columnincludes competencies self-identified
Latin III grades predicted the college English grades. This same study, further,stated that performance in a college English course may be predicted by using a high schoolEnglish course, any high school secondary language score, general high school grade pointaverage, or the Cooperative English Examination. They also noted that, regarding gender andprediction, vocabulary scores are extremely important in predicting the success of boys inCollege English. However, general information scores are more important for girls in theprediction of success in College English.[46] In Table 1, entitled “Zero-Order Correlation Coefficients Between College English andVarious Measures,” shows that the coefficients of prediction used in the study
Science Foundation (NSF) Scholarships in Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Program (S-STEM), VT-NETS is a scholarshipprogram and research project focused on improving collaboration efforts between Virginia Techand two community college partners. The primary objective of VT-NETS is to determine how allthree partners can increase the success and efficiency of engineering transfer through communitycollege-to-bachelor’s degree pathways, thus increasing attainment of A.S. and B.S. degrees inengineering. VT-NETS works toward increasing access to co-curricular programs, streamliningand aligning advising between institutions, and developing a cohort mentality among the pre-transfer students at the community college. One intention of this
Paper ID #6277”Impact! Exploring Innovation Across Disciplines” - Engaging the Univer-sity Innovation Ecosystem Through a University-Wide CourseDr. Steven B. Shooter, Bucknell University Steve Shooter is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Bucknell University where he has taught for 18 years. He teaches classes such as senior design, exploring innovation, mechanical design, and mecha- tronics. His research is in information management in design, managing innovation and robotics. As a registered professional engineer in Pennsylvania he has consulted with dozens of companies on new product ventures and production