AC 2008-1466: IT'S ALL THERE: TEACHING COMPLEX MANAGEMENTCONTENT USING FEATURE FILMSZbigniew Pasek, University of Windsor Zbigniew J. Pasek is an Associate Professor in the Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering Department at the University of Windsor. His interests include industrial automation, informal engineering education and engineering applications in health care. Page 13.820.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 It’s All There: Teaching Complex Management Content Using Feature FilmsAbstractWe all learn in a number of different ways and the
rigidstandards in a variety of real-world situations. Essays testified to the student awarenessand their intent to follow commonly accepted ethical practices in the workplace. Thefollowing discussion presents the individual scenarios and the student responses. Page 13.762.5 Situation #1 dealt with honesty in the workplace. The scenario described asituation where the student missed a day of work because they had partied too hard thenight before. Then the next day, during a meeting, their supervisor inquired why theyhad not been at work. The possible responses included A. They should explain to their supervisor that they were ill. B. They
results of high accuracy, it wouldcreate automation of a task thus removing the possibility of human error. This automation willallow healthcare workers to have more time to do tasks that require more attention or manual work[4]. Despite the many advancements in machine learning, the goal of automation and official useof algorithms in healthcare is far from being achieved.Our research that inspired in adolescents and healthcare began with an increasing rise in machinelearning for real world applications, especially adolescents in healthcare, as seen the restriction inextracurriculars in school due COVID-19. Cardiac focus is due to an interest in how the pandemicrestricted extracurriculars and athletics in school, which led to a decrease of
. Page 14.88.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A Preliminary Survey of Engineering Ethics Courses NationwideIntroductionIt is not enough that engineering students leave campus and head into a job with only the abilityto perform calculations. We live in a world where engineers must not just think about design,but also about the implications of those designs, or how they impact people and the environment.Engineering ethics carries momentous importance. How many undergraduate engineeringprograms require a full course in engineering ethics? What kinds of topics and case studies dostudents in these courses examine? What specifically do students learn in these engineeringethics
integrateresearch ethics into the graduate curriculum in science and engineering. Funded by the NationalScience Foundation, this project has developed four workshops directed toward graduatestudents to provide them with decision making tools for reaching ethical decisions. Theworkshops which build upon one another, (1) help graduate students become aware of issues andproblems in research ethics, (2) outline a method of moral deliberation to help them analyzeproblematic situations, (3) provide students with tools and practice in analyzing real world ethicscases in the research context, and (4) offer a capstone activity in which the students give posterpresentations on a case connected to their research interests.This paper focuses on the third of the series
during final exam week that will be required of all students (given a hypothetical or real-world data set) •Public speaking as a requirement •A one credit seminar to help students set priorities, develop study skills, etc. •Programmable logic controllers •Statistical analysis •Understanding of business fundamentalsDevelopment of recruitment strategies for •Establish a buddy system with a high schoolunderrepresented
and thermal sciences [6-8]. Low cost design, build, and test exercises are also required inanother follow on course in thermal systems design [9-10].The success of the units described in this work ensures they will be used in future classes. Thesedevices, combined with several real world problems inspired by student interest, contributed tovery positive feedback regarding the students’ confidence in their ability to apply courseconcepts beyond the classroom.Water bottle rocket launcher and conservation of massThe soda bottle rocket launcher is widely used for educational and recreational purposes. Severalreferences are available online detailing different launching mechanisms. The device describedhere lends itself to a unique exercise which
..$ . I(beyond the schooldoors) are themselves extremely open-ended. Mercer’s National Engineering Advisory Board, a group of senior technical executives from industry,has%-ongly encouraged the use of multidisciplinary design projects in our program because they representthe types of design challenges that exist today. Engineers are called upon to interface intelligently withothers-outside their area of expertise. For the student, having to tackle a multidisciplinary effort requires newteam building skills that have not been developed in the engineering science courses of the sophomore andjunior years. Another aspect of the “real world” that is easily replicated in most academic engineering designprograms is the need to operate in
• Projects may not have real-world application Disadvantages • Costs fall on teams and the Department Table 2 Pros and cons of industry-sponsored vs. internally-sourcedAs discussed earlier, capstones may be either design-oriented or test-based. The former isexclusively used by EET while both are encountered in MET. Table 3 identifies the pros andcons of each. Design- Advantages • Strengthens design skills oriented Disadvantages • Instructor must ensure appropriate rigor • Industry sponsors source projects • Sponsor input and assistance throughout
differentiating characteristics for successful project teams (Howe et al., 2009). Asundergraduate engineering students must be instructed in solving “real world” practical problems(i.e., open-ended or ill-structured), we propose an educational framework within a multi-yearcapstone program to provide instruction on the professional skills necessary to prepare them forand support their open-ended capstone experience and transition towards career (Jonassen et al.,2006; Incropera & Fox, 1996; Harris & Jacobs, 1995). This paper provides a blueprint for ournew capstone program. As this program and its evaluation are in the beginning stages, wediscuss our plan for the program, including the assessment and evaluation plan, with assessmentresults to be
develop a flexible and simplemulti-core cache memory simulator, which can design andimplement any cache schemes without learning how to use thosesimulators in detail. To meet such demands, this paper proposes theSimple Simulator to implement a multi-core cache scheme forstudents, which can design it through simple running methods usingPin Tool. The proposed Simple Simulator is a trace-drivensimulator since it needs to read traced instructions and data alongwith memory addresses and functions, such as load, store, and otherinstructions. The Pin Tool collects the traced instructions and databy executing real application programs (or benchmark programs)[5, 8]. However, the cache scheme design is not easy since studentsneed to know both CPU and cache
interests are in the areas of Flight Dynamics and Controls and believes that student aerospace design competitions are ideal avenues for students to express their creativity while complementing the knowledge gained in the classroom with hands-on experience as well as promoting greater collaboration and learning across disciplines. Dr. Gururajan’s research interests are interdisciplinary and in the fields of fault tolerant flight control, parallel & distributed computing, real time systems, experimental flight testing using small UAS and UAS, and the design/development of natural language interaction with drones. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Design and Development of a
students in practical, hands-onactivities to practice philanthropy, this course puts the students in control of real funds andemphasizes analysis, discussion, and group decision-making for real impact. Students in the coursewere expected to investigate, analyze and propose ways to mitigate the unintended consequencesof engineering designs and to engage in and take ownership of the philanthropic efforts throughthe grant review process. In addition, it was intended that the course would contain a syllabus thatcould address some of the Grand Challenges presented by the National Academy of Engineering[2] and the student outcomes proposed by the ABET as part of their accreditation process [3].The course was envisioned to have five major components: an
Undergraduate Studies in Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and Associate Director in the Honors College at the Univer- sity of Missouri in Columbia. Triplett has won awards for his research, teaching, and service. He directs the Precision Imaging Research Laboratory (PIRL), which focuses on the development and integration of nanomaterials and their applications in biomedical, energy, and physical science. He currently focuses on the capture of signal transduction mechanisms in real time, specifically interactions between amino acid functional groups of proteins with donor molecules and protein kinase using photonic technology integration. He graduated from Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Florida State
TeamsIntroduction he undergraduate engineering curriculum is made up of mostly engineering science classes, which areTclasses heavy in mathematical content with little to no application. As a result, students rarely get to improve theirengineering judgmentskills, which we define as the ability to develop and use mathematical models for analysis and design. Our research team’s focus has been on implementing open-ended modeling problems (OEMPs) into the engineering science curriculum in efforts to elicit engineering judgment. OEMPs bring real-world engineering examples into courses and leverage the use of active learning that has shown to be so beneficial to students in STEM [1]. McNeill et. al found that undergraduate
astonishment that they could get such great agreement betweenthe physical thing they built and measured, and the ideal circuit they simulated. Thisdemonstrated how powerful simple models and analysis were to describe real world circuits.Creating the labsThe take-home hands-on labs were designed during the summer before the class began. Thisinvolved planning the labs to be consistent with the curriculum, creating the BOM, acquiring theinventory for up to 138 kits, assembling the kits, distributing the kits, writing the lab manual, andrecording the videos.We decided to record videos for the first five labs and hold off on the last five labs to getfeedback from students. Even so, getting ready for the first day involved about 200 hours ofpreparation time
patents. 10 A 1959study published by Barnlund supports this suspicion that perhaps current engineering curriculumoveremphasizes teaming at the expensive of creativity. Barnlunds study concluded that highperforming individuals do not benefit from working in groups – in fact their performance suffers.11 Although teaming provides a real world experience it can be a deterrent to creative thinking,and shouldn’t be the only skill taught in a design class.BrainstormingThe concept of brainstorming was first introduced in the 1957 book “Applied Imagination :Principles and procedures of creative problem solving” by AF Osborn. Osborn identified manyof the tenets that govern brainstorming today – deferring judgement, freewheeling, leapfrogging,and
their artwork. The second exercise was designed to improve studentunderstanding of process safety and analysis of process hazards through role-playing. Groups ofstudents were given information on a real process where an accident had occurred in order toprovide them the technical background on the process. Then, they pretended to be a safetyreview team looking at the process before the accident occurred to try to predict potentialhazards. One team used HAZOP analysis, while the other used the “What-If?” method forevaluating process safety. The activity where students created a piece of artwork and reflectedon how the process of creating art related to engineering design was successful in gettingstudents to think about the process of design and
MET program.The Penn State Behrend MET Capstone ExperienceThe capstone experience is intended to provide the student with an opportunity to integrate theiruniversity education while bridging the gap between school and the “real world” – industry. AtPSB, this is done by incorporating an industrial sponsored project as part of the experience. Theoverall experience involves a sequence of two courses taken in the fall and spring semesters for atotal of 4 credits. The fall course is one credit with the remaining three credits for the springcourse. Although the project is the foundation of the courses, there are other topics taught aswell. The course lectures include important but often overlooked topics related to the practicingengineer such as
equally essential, and more and more this isbeing interjected into the curriculum. It is understood that each curriculum has a plethora ofwork to cover therefore time and effort to add writing and oral communications is hard to comeby. However, it is also recognized that effective communication is the fuel that makes thebusiness world run. We needed to find room for this and we have begun to do so.At the same time, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has clearlyplaced both written and oral communication at the top of their priority list for graduates.Effective communication is one of the required program outcomes and as such is measured andhopefully improved every semester, thus, the University’s “Writing in the
presentations, poster session and written interim and final reports, etc. meeting ABET outcome g. demonstrate the ability to identify, formulate and solve 3 engineering design challenges meeting ABET outcome e. develop a solution to a real-world need taking into account social, environmental and economic factors meeting ABET outcome h.The course schedule was developed to interleave communications exercises with projectexercises beginning with a very simple project to introduce the students to 3-D printing. Theyhad to design (in SolidworksTM) and then print (on the 3-D printer) a BNC ‘dust cap’ that theyhad designed to meet specifications (i.e., it had to fit the BNC connector). Support
comparable multi-disciplinaryexperiments, (3) provide experiments that have relevance to real-world engineering issues, and(4) incorporate sustainable engineering topics into the curriculum while instilling a sense ofglobal responsibility in first-year engineers.Bibliography1. ASEE, http://www.asee.org/about/Sustainable_Development.cfm2. Woodruff, P. (2006). Educating Engineers to Create a Sustainable Future. Journal of Environmental Engineering,132 (4).3. Sukumaran, B., K. Jahan, D. Dorland, J. Everett, J. Kadlowec, Z. Gephardt, and S. Chin (2006). EngineeringClinics: An Integration of Research into the Undergraduate Curriculum. Council on Undergraduate ResearchQuarterly, 26(3), p.115-121.4. Thames & Kosmos, http://www.thamesandkosmos.com
as engineering challenges.Following that, students are guided through reviewing and applying the key equations andconcepts needed to utilize the technology. The equations and concepts were already covered inthe assigned reading. Emphasis is placed on understanding what the real world factors are in themath and how these factors would influence the performance of the technology. The goal of thislevel of questioning is that students are able to apply the equations and engineering fundamentalsto real situations. In placing the material within the context of the technology, students should beengaging in a higher level of learning.[12] In the final stage of the active learning exercise,student teams apply what they have learned to a small, open
real-world engineering issues, and(4) incorporate sustainable engineering topics into the curriculum while instilling a sense ofglobal responsibility in first-year engineers.Bibliography1. ASEE, http://www.asee.org/about/Sustainable_Development.cfm2. Woodruff, P. (2006). Educating Engineers to Create a Sustainable Future. Journal of Environmental Engineering,132 (4).3. Sukumaran, B., K. Jahan, D. Dorland, J. Everett, J. Kadlowec, Z. Gephardt, and S. Chin (2006). EngineeringClinics: An Integration of Research into the Undergraduate Curriculum. Council on Undergraduate ResearchQuarterly, 26(3), p.115-121.4. Thames & Kosmos, http://www.thamesandkosmos.com/products/wp/wp.html5. Bakrania, S., K. Bhatia, W. Riddell, L. Weiss. (2009). Wind
to society of many potentially excellent engineers.”Felder describes the main characteristics of these learning styles as a preference for 1) visual(external) – pictures, diagrams, graphs, demonstrations; 2) sensing – sights, sounds, physicalsensations; 3) inductive – facts and observations are given, underlying principles are inferred; 4)active – engagement in physical activity or discussion; and 5) global – in large jumps,holistically. The main characteristics of the teaching styles are a preference for 1) auditory –words and sounds; 2) intuitive (internal) – possibilities, insights and hunches; 3) deductive –principles are given, consequences and applications are deduced; 4) passive – introspection; and5) sequential – in continual steps.A
subject.Backdrops /Location scenesA variety of backdrops were used for inside shots to provide variety and add interest and tocreate the impression of a roving as opposed to static position lecturer.Location scenes were also used to create interest and to introduce real world examples for thestudents to relate to. A Melbourne electric train scene was used as the introduction to statemachines, with a view to considering how to design an automatic train. A car scene was used tointroduce operational amplifiers in terms of controlling electric cooling fans and also tointroduce digital design in terms of designing car alarms.EditingEditing allows for a more professional production via the insertion of titles and transitions. Italso means that the material does
incorporated into a training plan for upgrading each individual'sskills. Where possible the University Professors would spend periods of time working at the Corps.This had a dual benefit. It provides the Professor the opportunity to work on real world problemsand it provides the student with an opportunity to interact with the Professor in applying higher levelconsiderations to their regular problem solving.Management was pleased with the graduate training that people have received as well as the interestin all advanced training that this program has helped foster. Four students received their MastersDegree and several others are moving in that direction. There is a high level of interest in learningand over 60 students explore participating in the
and systems architectures. He has authored several research articles and has secured multiple research grants, underlining his commitment to advancing cybersecurity and computer science. Beyond his research and academic commitments, he remains an active participant in the academic commu- nity. As an IEEE Senior Member, he serves in multiple international scientific journals and conferences, contributing significantly to the advancement of his fields of expertise.YUSUF USMAN, Quinnipiac University Yusuf is a rising cybersecurity professional pursuing an MS in Cybersecurity at Quinnipiac University. His research centers on the innovative applications of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) for
course, 28 Industrial Engineering and 12Financial Engineering, all are seniors graduating after Spring or Fall semester. This demographicwas chosen for two reasons, 1) their proximity to graduation and experiencing the additionalstressors of applying for jobs, completing courses, and/or relocating, and 2) that capstone is acourse that requires students to work in teams to solve real-world industry problem, addingadditional stress through interpersonal cooperation of all team members and striving for asuccessful project completion.ResultsControl vs. Treatment Analysis: Spring 2022 was considered the control semester and Spring 2023,when the Mentimeter check-in was used was considered the treatment semester.Data ProcessingFollowing an agile
an oral presentation of their final, comprehensive design. Mentors provide feedback oneach of the five report submissions throughout the semester and on the final presentations. Theinvolvement of practitioners as mentors supplements traditional classroom instruction by 1)providing a real-world site design experience that is unique to that of other groups in the class, 2)providing technical expertise and design advice that extends beyond that which is possible solelyby course instructors, 3) providing constructive criticism and feedback that is used by courseinstructors in assigning grades to the design project, and 4) reiterating to the students theimportance of professional licensure.3. Sustainable Land Development (CEE 4264): Sustainable