), funded by six philanthropic foundations, he has con- ducted significant K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach activities to integrate engineering concepts in science classrooms and labs of dozens of New York City public schools. He received NYU- Poly’s 2002, 2008, and 2011 Jacobs Excellence in Education Award, 2002 Jacobs Innovation Grant, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distinguished Award for Excellence in the category Inspiration through Leadership. In 2004, he was selected for a three-year term as a Senior Faculty Fel- low of NYU-Poly’s Othmer Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies. His scholarly activities have included three edited books, six chapters in edited books, one book
learning is preferable over that of Group Ushers. Inorder for both instructors and institutions to benefit from these findings, it is important to notonly highlight the benefits of Personal Coaching but also to provide and utilize opportunities forprofessional development that allow faculty to shift away from the Group Usher strategiestowards Personal Coaching. These opportunities should include targeted training in the PjBLpedagogy and workshops on classroom discourse. In addition to helping instructors with theimplementation of PjBL, these workshops may reaffirm the institutional support for PjBL; it hasbeen shown that faculty who perceive educational innovation support at the institutional levelare more motivated and persistent in the use of
). Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.32. Hyatt, L. W. P. (2011). "21st Century Competencies for Doctoral Leadership Faculty," Innovative Higher Education, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 53-66(14).33. Smith, K. S. & Simpson, R. D. (1995). "Validating teaching competencies for faculty members in higher education: A national study using the Delphi method," Innovation through Higher Education, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 223-234.34. Tigelaar, D. E., Dolmans, D. H., Wolfhagen, I. H., and Vleuten, C. P. M. v. d. (2004). "The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education," Higher Education, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 253-268(16).35. McKitrick
this is mostly due to the higher average age and number ofstudy semesters as well as the lacking enrollment of new students in the traditional programs.Those numbers suggest that new degree programs seem to hamper international mobility.Just a few studies dwell on the motivational factors and obstacles students face when planningand accomplishing international exchange phases. According to numbers from DAAD2, HIS5and the Ministry of Innovation, Science and Research of the German state of North-RhineWestphalia15 the following obstacles are often reported: problems in the recognition process of credits accomplished abroad, time lost in the overall course of studies, problems with harmonizing the international exchange phase
,TeachEngineering, Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE), and Wolfquest. Everett Roger’s7 Diffusion of Innovation theory was used to frame the development of Page 23.839.5protocol questions to help explore how cyberlearning networks develop and spread. Inpreparation for the semi-structured interviews, the proposal documents for each award, andannual/final reports were reviewed to obtain a general understanding of each project and some ofits outcomes. During the interviews, participants shared insights on how their cyberlearningresource was designed, implemented, disseminated, and scaled-up. PIs were also asked abouttheir perspectives on
provide outreach to other teachers and professionals in the area; brainstorming between participating teachers and engineering faculty regarding innovative classroom activities and experiments for first-year university students; and conducting classroom visits by engineering faculty, CEIE staff, and SMTC staff to provide support to teachers and their students as they implement curricular changes.Our intellectual focus was described as follows: Page 23.850.5“Intelligence has been involved in many aspects of our life through new technologies andinnovations. It has become one of the important driving forces in engineering design
), 36 book chap- ters and encyclopedia articles, 118 refereed journal articles and refereed proceedings papers, and well over 200 other publications. He is lead editor of the National Science Foundation-funded book, Qual- ity Research in Literacy and Science Education: International Perspectives and Gold Standards (Springer, 2009). From 1993-2002 he served as the elected co-editor of the Policy Studies Journal through the Policy Studies Organization and chaired the Donald Campbell Award Committee (for outstanding methodologi- cal innovator in policy studies) for the Policy Studies Organization in 2002. He was a member of the 2013 Best Dissertation Award committee for the Information Technology and Politics section of
and Development, PDesign, S˜ao Lu´ıs, pages 10–13, 2012.21 Susan Gasson. Human-centered vs. user-centered approaches. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 5(2):29–46, 2003.22 Dorothy Leonard and Jeffrey F Rayport. Spark innovation through empathic design. Harvard business review, 75:102–115, 1997.23 Joseph Lin and Carolyn Conner Seepersad. Empathic lead users: the effects of extraordinary user experiences on Page 24.51.18 customer needs analysis and product redesign. In ASME DETC Design Theory and Methodology Conference, 2007.24 Peter Landwehr. Empathic design vs
high as third in the nation in producing undergraduate engineering degrees for minority groups and the program was recognized with the 2011 NSBE ExxonMobil Impact Award and the 2012 College Board Innovator Award, Getting through College Category. Page 24.101.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 A Review of the Literature on Transfer Student Pathways to Engineering DegreesAbstract In 2012, the President’s Council of Advisors on Science Technology (PCAST)documented the need to prepare more than 1 million additional STEM
Paper ID #9491A Systematic Approach to Prepare for ABET AccreditationDr. Vincent Wilczynski, Yale University Vincent Wilczynski is the Deputy Dean of the School of Engineering & Applied Science at Yale Univer- sity. As the Deputy Dean, Dr. Wilczynski helps plan and implement all academic initiatives at the School. In addition, he manages the School’s teaching and research resources and facilities, including establishing the Yale Center for Engineering Innovation and Design. Previously Dr. Wilczynski served as the Dean of Engineering at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy. Dr. Wilczynski served in fellowships at the MIT
Paper ID #9142Adopting the BOK2 Student Outcomes: A Six-Year RetrospectiveDr. Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Donald D. Carpenter, PhD, PE, LEED AP is Professor of Civil Engineering where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter is an accredited green design professional (LEED AP) and practicing professional engineer (PE) whose expertise includes Low Impact Development (LID), innovative stormwater best management practices (BMPs), hydrologic and stormwater modeling and design, and field data collection for performance monitoring. His University appointments
offering courses that have no chance of getting people jobs," adding “we have to draftlegislation that would change how much state money universities and community collegesreceive not based on how many butts in seats but how many of those butts can get jobs."2According to Jen Job of the MoveOn.org3: “Liberal arts courses don't *train* students, they*educate* them, preparing them to think critically, adapt to new situations, communicateeffectively, and innovate--all skills the next generation needs in this ever-changing economy.McCrory himself has a liberal arts degree, which apparently enabled him to become Governor!We need to stand up to this hypocrisy now and protect the valuable institution we have at UNC,before we become an assembly line
focusing more on a student‟s professional development, rather than on their becoming socially responsible engineers who are prepared to address the needs of increasingly complex societies and communities using contemporary technologies in a cost-effective way.15Some engineering programs have sought to systematize their service learning. PurdueUniversity‟s EPICS (Engineering Projects In Community Service) program was founded in1995. Under this program, undergraduates earn academic credit for their contributions to long- term, team-based design projects that deliver innovative, technology-based solutions to problems identified by not-for-profit organizations in the community. (Coyle et al.)8The projects serve a
support U.S. military veterans, community college transfer students, and innovative engineering math education. He has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, and M.S. in Industrial Engineering, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering with emphasis in Operations Research from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Dr. Truc T. Ngo, University of San Diego Dr. Truc Ngo is an Assistant Professor of Industrial & Systems Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her research interests are in the areas of green materials and processes involving polymers and composites, organic semiconductors, and supercritical fluids. Dr. Ngo received her Bachelor’s in 1997 and Doctor of Philosophy in 2001, both in Chemical Engineering
rapid prototyping, rapid tooling, and uses different layertechnologies depending on what is being developed, but now the innovation is the use of theinternet to enhance design and manufacturing productivity by having a remote integration7, 8.There are several additive technologies such as Ultrasonic Consolidation, PoyJet 3D Printing,Stereo Lithography, Micro-Stereo Lithography, Inkjet printing, and many more6, 9-11.Rapid Manufacturing and Rapid Prototyping technologies are trying to be adapted to cybertechnologies such as internet and virtually connect the different manufacturing equipment and beable to know production outcomes and equipment maintenance through a network7. In this case,the term of “Cyber Facility” (CF) describes the idea that
Internet, very little research has focused on how tosuccessfully offer and assess the efficacy of such courses [5-7]. U.S. colleges and universities arechallenged to contain and even reduce technology costs, while responding to the expectations ofthe “New Millennial Generation” to upgrade educational systems. One promising idea is to focuson developing and testing innovative models for facilitating collaboration among highereducation institutions, particularly given the limited resources available to many institutions.This is particularly true for many of the more than 3,500 colleges and universities in the UnitedStates that have fewer than 2,000 students and thus cannot afford to make costly, recurringinvestments in expensive labs [8-11]. One
educational laboratories in anundergraduate engineering course have been compared2. Each team of students conducted theexperiments in one of the three formats. This study concluded that for the hands-on lab format,learning outcomes were higher when the lab team collected data sets as a group while for theremotely-operated labs individual data collection was best. Also, it was observed that workingwith real instead of simulated data may induce higher levels of motivation.The need for hands-on experience and conceptual knowledge in engineering education was alsothe subject of another research3. Experiential learning can be used as a foundation for teachingand learning engineering. This study shows that creativity and innovative thinking can benurtured
methods have been positively impacted.Lifelong Learning – Motivations and DefinitionABET1 and the National Academy of Engineering (NAE)2 have established a set of attributesthat engineering graduates should possess upon graduation. These attributes include bothtechnical and non-technical skills and competencies that students are expected to know upongraduation. Generally, the latter is not as well-defined as the former, thus assessment of the non-technical competencies is more challenging and harder to assess.The fast pace of advancement in science and technology makes it vital for all professionals tostay up-to-date with contemporary advances and innovations in various fields of technology. Themultidisciplinary nature of engineering practice
Division of ASEE. Page 23.67.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY SYMBI GK12 PROGRAM: A CASE STUDY OF THE MATERIALS SCIENCE ENGINEER’S APPROACH TOWARDS ADDRESSING COMPLEX SCIENTIFIC PROBLEMS IN THE 8TH GRADE CLASSROOMAbstractThe Des Moines public school system has partnered with Iowa State University to develop innovative andengaging STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) activities for middle school studentsthrough NSF’s GK12 program. Iowa State’s GK12 program, Symbi, pairs a senior graduate student (i.e.,GK12 Fellow
into the Mechanical and Energy Engineering program at the University of North Texas. In the spring of 2010, Jeremy began performing renewable energy research. Soon after, he was leading a team of researchers and collaborating with a green energy start-up. He was the first and only UNT engineering student to be selected as a McNair Scholar, a competitive scholarship offered to top juniors and seniors at select schools around the country. In the summer of 2011, Jeremy accepted a research assistantship at the Milwaukee School of Engineering. This move allowed Jeremy to focus on his passion for innovation, leading to a grant in aid of research from Sigma Xi. This grant funded his development of a novel pyrolysis biomass
simultaneously offers discussion opportunities for real or virtual teams.• In terms of delivering the individual cases in the Library the Virtual Product / 3D Human Subject Demo concept is followed, an innovation on its own, in that learners are taken virtually with experts to factories, R&D studios, exhibitions and laboratories and are given interesting demos and challenges explained by real-world experts who explain one possible solution.• In all cases the library modules show high quality, interactive videos and often 3D objects and 360 degree interactive panoramas so that learners can interrogate objects, take products virtually apart in 3D, enjoy virtual factory or facility tours and even participate/ collaborate
, leading to the creation of new applications for new and existing technology; patents and licenses. 2. Scholarship of integration, bringing and connecting knowledge together from various sources in the field as in course and curriculum improvements and innovations, developing measures to increase the relevance of ET curriculum to industry, writing of undergraduate text books and book chapters. 3. Scholarship of application through consulting activities, leading to improved processes, practices, programs and products in industry. Page 8.1162.5 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering
), which isfunded by the Black Male Donor Collaborative, Brooklyn Community Foundation, J.P. MorganChase Foundation, Motorola Innovation Generation Grant, NY Space Grant Consortium, XeroxFoundation, and White Cedar Fund. The authors thank GK-12 Fellows Carlo Yuvienco andUrsula Koniges for conducting a series of workshops; Hussein Saab for videotaping workshops;and Ben Esner and Susan Hermon for advertising and promoting workshops. The authors alsothank General Engineering and Mechatronics Laboratories at NYU-Poly and the Mott HallBridges Middle School for providing LEGO Mindstorms kits for the robotics workshops. Page 25.598.13References [1
. & Johnsrud, L. (2008). "The Impact of Faculty Attitudes Toward Technology, Distance Education, and Innovation." Research in Higher Education 49(7): 625-646.5 Lease, A. J. & Brown, T.A. (2009). "Distance Learning Past, Present and Future." International Journal of Instructional Media 36(4): 415-26.6 Tanner, J. R., Noser, T.C., & Totaro, M.W. (2009). "Business Faculty and Undergraduate Students' Perceptions of Online earning: A Comparative Study." Journal of Information Systems Education 20(1): 29-40.7 Abdous, M. & Yoshimura, M. (2010). "Learner Outcomes and Satisfaction: A Comparison of Live Video- Streamed Instruction, Satellite Broadcast Instruction, and Face-to-Face
students. Figure 1: Students Working on PrototypesPrototypeThe particular design challenge was borrowed from the previously cited innovation class: designa hand-held assistive device to allow a wheelchair-bound person to interact with a walk-up(standing height) ATM. Entering a PIN on a standard keypad, retrieving cash, and both insertingand retrieving a bank card were the tasks required to function on the group’s prototypes. Inearlier discussion of prototyping the class had learned that only key features functioned on earlyengineering prototypes, which was the concept used to choose the list of functions for theproject. As such, appearance was not important to the grades, although several groups tweakedtheir prototypes to have a sleek
the course and itscontent; and the remainder seeks to bring out the most innovative and effective approaches toteaching the course in use by instructors. Additionally, a limited historical comparison is madebetween the selected survey results and surveys on the same course conducted in 1972, 1990,and 1999.IntroductionThis survey represents the continuation of a series of surveys of undergraduate curricular topicsbegun in 1957 by the AIChE Education Projects Committee and more recently resumed by theAIChE Education Division. This paper presents the results for the third in the series of surveysconducted by the Education Division.Survey BackgroundThe Material and Energy Balance course (MEB) is the topic of the 2010 survey. Theaforementioned
Page 25.833.3Abstract:In 2009, two students from Drexel University’s School of Biomedical Engineering, Science andHealth Systems (BIOMED) initiated the weServe Program (weServe). weServe’s mission is toprovide students with hands-on experiences to utilize biomedical engineering inunderrepresented and under-served communities. Since then, student participation in the programhas increased and weServe dedicates its efforts to both local and global initiatives, creatingpartnerships to develop life-saving and life-enhancing solutions through innovative service. Witha focus on experiential learning, students are given the opportunity to immerse themselves incommunities, learn to identify their needs, and apply their academic educational training in
institution. Inparticular, for thermal-fluid educational areas, experimental equipment could be excessivelycostly, requiring dedicated laboratory space. Our thermal-fluid courses included up to now onlylaboratory activities based on traditional 'bench-scale' equipment. While these experiments haveproven to be valuable educational tools for our courses, we continue to strive to improve andadapt our curricula to include more current and innovative experiments. To overcome bothfinancial and space constraints that presently limit the laboratory, we developed sustainableimprovements of “Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer Lab” course, including several “lab-on-a-chip” based activities to support our educational objectives in thermal sciences and
member in 2011. She was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education.Dr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering at the University of Colorado, Boulder. She has incorporated service-learning projects into the senior capstone design course for environmental engineering since 2001. Her engineering education research interests include sustainable engineering, ethics, and retention of female students.Dr. Daniel W. Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the engineering Assessment Specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Pro