that women, students from groups historically underrepresented inSTEM, and first-generation college students are more drawn to fields that they perceive asaltruistic and can lead to careers in which they can help others [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].Therefore, by using this project to situate MSE as a field in which students could impact theircommunities, we hope to increase interest in MSE. Finally, there is evidence to support thatcampus-related projects improve student outcomes by providing real-world experience [14],[15], [16], and can also provide a benefit to the university [17].In this work, we seek to understand the impacts of a campus-focused design project on students’1) sense of belonging in the field of MSE, 2) sense of
ownership among team members and the roles played by individuals shouldbe diverse and authentic.In the context of undergraduate engineering education, collaboration has been cited as asignificant predictor of students’ academic performance 7 . Practicing engineers report thatcollaboration is essential to solving real-world problems as knowledge is often distributed acrossmultiple individuals8 . However in contrast to this, conventional early undergraduate engineeringand engineering technology laboratory assignments are often written as ready-made, recipe-likeexperiments that allow for minimal collaboration in their implementation, usually between astudent and a single lab partner9, 10 and often only to build a circuit and record the pertinent
. The modern hacker community grew from the playful and clever,sometimes irreverent, pranksters of “the Old MIT” going back to the ’60s and ’70s. For theseyoung pioneers the information world was their playground, a place which was unnoticed bymost, feared by those who took note, and misunderstood by nearly all. In 1984, US Congresspassed the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act because a Mathew Broderick film scared them - WarGames [1] [2] [3] [4]. As industry and regulation began to encroach on their playground, thehacker community began to push back.Richard Stallman stated that, “A hacker is someone who enjoys playful cleverness, notnecessarily with computers. The programmers in the old MIT free software community of the’60s and ’70s referred to
satisfied with a hint or a general direction6.• Easy to access. Just as providing feedback would ideally be low cost, the same is true for receiving it – it should not take the recipient extra effort to access the feedback. Computerized ways should be used sparingly, especially with audiences that are not comfortable with computers or if the environment where the feedback is to be used does not readily provide access to computing equipment. In certain circumstances, even if automation were possible, using paper may still be more effective12.• Perceptible. People differ in the strength of their senses for perceiving the world. Some digest information from the outside best when it is presented visually, while others
culture’smisunderstanding and subordination of indigenous knowledge. It argues for the reassertion andrebuilding of traditional knowledge from its roots, its fundamental principles,” transgressingacademic boundaries, “when it requires that researchers also honor the methods and the goals ofinquiry toward which indigenous philosophical assumptions direct us” [24, p. 91]. Julia Watson’sconcept of Lo-TEK [25] positions itself at the intersection of Radical Indigenism and design, [Lo-TEK is] a movement that investigates lesser-known local technologies, traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), indigenous cultural practices, and mythologies passed down as songs or stories. In contrast to the homogeneity of the modern world, indigeneity is reframed
have argued that the implications of immersion with STEM contentinclude heightened student interest and improved academic achievement [21], [22].Consequently, recent efforts in teacher development have encouraged the use of each approachin K-12 instruction [23], [24], [25], [7]. An essential feature of the engineering design process (EDP) includes identifying aproblem, one that scholars suggest should emulate real-world challenges [26], [27], [28]. Yet,there is a dearth of literature on the need for framing those problems through a culturallyresponsive lens. Furthermore, research on both CRP and the EDP suggest that teachers are themost integral factor to any instructional reform [21], [29], [24], [30]. Nevertheless, there remainsa gap
numerous national and international conferences in the fields of education and women’s studies (AERA, AESA, & NWSA). In 2009, Beckett served as a Program Evaluator for the world renowned Apprenticeship in Ecological Horticulture at the Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems (CASFS) at UC Santa Cruz. She co-authored an evaluation of two decades of the apprenticeship program (Perez, Par, & Beckett, 2010). She served as the Program Evaluator for Apprenticeships in Sustainability Science and Engineering Design (ASCEND) at UC Santa Cruz in the 2014-2015 academic year, where she collaborated with the Program Director to build new assessment to measure STEM learning through ”audio diaries,” and piloted an
, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence and on effective methods for teaching global issues such as those pertaining to sustainability.Dr. Sandra D. Eksioglu, Clemson University Sandra D. Eksioglu is an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering Department at Clemson Univer- sity. She received her Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Florida in 2002. Sandra’s research interests are in operations research with applications in supply chain, transportation systems, and energy systems.Joanna Wright, University of Washington
] STEM work knowledge: Understanding the roles, components, and utility of STEM work, knowledge of careers in STEM [35] Epistemic frame: participants’ familiarity with and application of the culture, practices, and norms of a STEM field tied to deep interconnections between skills, knowledge, identity, values, and epistemology [36] Relevance: whether learning feels relevant to the student's present life or future [37] Home resources for learning: whether students have resources at home that can support science learning, which indicates science-specific socio-economic status
environment than that of an individual interview because participants areinfluencing and influenced by others, just as they are in real life (Krueger35, 1994). Focus groupsenable the researcher to increase the sample size without dramatic increases in the time requiredof the interviewer. In addition, focus group techniques are both useful and valid for assessingstudent problems within an undergraduate curriculum (Diamond & Gagnon25, 1985). Thesample of graduating female students earning an engineering degree was obtained from theWomen in Engineering Office at the university in the Midwest. Quantitative data was analyzedusing descriptive statistics and the qualitative data was analyzed using a multi-step contentanalysis methodology.The population
that shapedesign judgment such as aesthetics and feasibility (e.g., Carvalho, Dong, & Maton, 2009) anddomain-specific knowledge of precedent, materials, tools, laws, and skills (Purcell, 2003).Procedural knowledge represents “knowing how” - knowledge of how to perform or operate in asituation (Anderson, 1976). For the domain of design, procedural knowledge may be describedas task knowledge (generally applicable techniques or heuristics for accomplishing tasks) andprocess management knowledge (general approaches for directing one’s solution process such astime management) (Anderson, 1976). The informed design framework offers nine patterns ofdesign task strategies teachers may encourage (or discourage) with students to foster
which aligns “with contextual knowingand with synthetic and evaluative tasks. (p. 4)” 31 Another tool, originally termed the curriculardebrief and now termed the Engineering Professional Skills Assessment (EPSA), was developedat Washington State University to measure all of the ABET professional skills criteriasimultaneously 32, 33. This assessment places students on teams and tasks them with a complex,real-world scenario, giving them merely 45 minutes to “determine the most important problem/sand to discuss stakeholders, impacts, unknowns, and possible solutions. (p. 2)” 33 Other morecommonly used tools such as performance reviews and peer assessments have also beenreported.In order to help engineering students acquire proficiency in
curriculum to real-world applications, and establish a network of collaborationsacross the academic institution (Pines, Sullivan, & Nogales, 2015). Academic makerspaces are 3also utilized to provide training programs for instructions, technicians, managers andentrepreneurs (Taheri et al., 2020).Engineering educators are also interested in integrating a maker component to their programs toattract a more diverse group of students, increase student retention and engagement, improvestudent performance and grades and increase student engagement (American Society forEngineering Education, 2017). Making activities help students develop broad skillsets
doesnot think they exist for others; his self-/advocacy is also limited because he feels like he istargeted as the source of HC messages, even though the video vignette did not exclusivelyfeature racism.Participant 490 Participant 490 is a hydraulic engineering undergraduate student in the US Southwest; heidentifies as male, White, and is a first-generation and non-traditional student. Participant 490wanted to become an engineer because he “…likes to solve problems, and then see them applied.. .in real life.” Thus, the participant is interested in the technical and applied aspects of theengineering field. When asked to define HC prior to the vignette video, the participant noted thatHC is: “Faking and overexaggerating racism or lack of
translating that understanding into quantitative terms (e.g. engineering specifications).The lack of context and opportunities to develop skills necessary for practice is a function ofcurricular structures that are more isolated than integrated, which fail to adequately preparestudents for the profession [17].While Sheppard et al underscored the deficits of the isolated curricular model, their calls for reformare reliant on principles that work to connect domain knowledge to real world context by moreeffectively leveraging existing curricular structures [17]. For example, they note the potential forintegrating more open, ill-structured design and analysis problems, and leveraging laboratorycourses to serve as “practice-like experiences” [17].A
the real world, information that they wish someone had passed along when they werein college.Flyers were created for each speaker containing the title and abstract of the talk, featuring thespeaker’s headshot and the meeting details. Flyers were posted within the college building onelectronic displays, added to the university events calendar, posted on the college’s social mediaoutlets and sent out as an attachment in mass emails to all students, faculty and staff a weekbefore the event, with a reminder email on the day of the event.Mentorship ProgramThe second initiative of the program is the Mentorship Program. This program fosters connectingfreshmen and sophomores with upper-division students, alumni, practicing professionals andfaculty to
encompass both ABET and TUEE’sresults [1,3]. The learning outcomes defined in Table 2 were used to guide additionalinvestigation that either supported or challenged the importance of these outcomes to employersof engineering graduates. Table 2. Student learning outcomes definitions Outcome Concise Definition Communicates effectively and persuasively with varied audiences using both Communication visual and auditory media Engineering Problem Solves real-world engineering problems through careful investigation and Solving development of solutions that prove useful for achieving goals Manages project
groups producetheir own codes of ethics, after all, and do not rely on some general moral code applicable acrossevery member of society. But if we want to fully understand the role of engineering in society,we must also recognize that that which appears to require control derives from notions of elite Page 26.1723.5status on the part of code proponents.This is an ontological perspective that somewhat counters Michael Davis’ description ofengineering ethics as representing a moment in which “knowledge moves to action.” 1 We wouldinstead say, following Dewey7 and in hopes of articulating even more aspects of engineeringactivity, that knowledge is
—to develop and implement rigorousdesign activities based on real-world problems. The IDCs we develop are rooted inhuman-centered design. The core principle of human-centered design involves developinga first-hand understanding of the human needs and behaviors related to a system. Once adesigner understands the system, he or she follows by making decisions based oninspiration from the humans operating within the system. During an IDC, students: (a) usehuman-centered design methods and rapid prototyping tools to solve a real-worldproblem, (b) collaborate with various stakeholders and potential end users, and (c) pitch asolution to a client. For example, in the previously, we ran an IDC during which studentsdesigned a mobile makerspace to visit
and design solutions to problems that the characters face. In doing this, they consider theconstraints of the characters, asking themselves “What would this character want in a solution?,”and the constraints of the classrooms, asking themselves “What can we build using the materialsavailable here?” We have found that this approach benefits students’ learning in bothengineering and literacy.15 Students engage in an engineering challenge that has a client andconstraints to address, mimicking a real-world engineering problem. And, to be able to addressthe client and constraints in their engineering solution, they engage in literacy practices todevelop a deep understanding of the text.Many teachers do not have a background in engineering as they
are organized: Ethics in Engineering Research; Research in an Academic Setting;Taking Research from Lab to Real World; and Graduate Education Opportunities andApplication Process. The students are asked to prepare a reflective write-up for each seminarand workshop following a prescribed format.Research Forum Each year in Spring, UC holds a week-long REU Poster Forum, which includes posterpresentations, an awards banquet, a distinguished guest lecture, “People’s Choice Awards,” andGRE preparation sessions. All UC STEP REU participants are required to make onepresentation in an organized student group meeting (e.g., a Professional Society Student ChapterMeeting, First-Year Experience and Learning Community Meeting, UC Research Forum, etc
. Thisassessment strategy requires students to apply the same knowledge, skills, and attitudes as wouldprofessionals.4 Due to their connections to the real-world, authentic measures are more likely tomotivate students.27 Higher-order thinking skills such as problem solving are fostered as well.Purpose of the studyAcademy leaders aspired to offer the curriculum as a model for high school engineeringeducation. Although the teachers and administrators were pleased with the progress made duringthe program’s initial four years, there was consensus that ample opportunity for improvementremained. Student behavior was a major issue which needed to be addressed – the teachersvoiced concerns that a substantial number of low-achieving students persisted in the
changes from the student perspective.Methods ContextThis research study was situated in a required College of Technology course titled, “DesignThinking.” Students in this course will engaged in critical analysis of real-world problems andglobal challenges. They demonstrated the ability to recognize opportunity and to take initiative indeveloping solutions applying the principles of human-centered design. Students practicedcommunicating and working on teams. Problems and solutions were examined from societal,cultural, and ethical perspectives.The course incorporated a flipped and blended approach which was the result of a faculty courseredesign supported by Purdue University’s Center for Instructional Excellence three years priorto this
applied in the course did not support their learning.“I don’t think it helped a ton, but it was pretty cool and I learned about 3D printing and design from it” “It is really cool to see the part I made and what works and what doesn’t” “I don’t think we would have lost value if our connectors weren’t printed, but it was really cool to have a physical product to see our work”“They are a good real world representation and are interesting, but I would understand the course just as well without them” “It was very valuable to actually see it and not have it just on the computer”DiscussionThe grade distribution between the sections and as related to the common
the ways inwhich academic disciplines differ in terms of the nature and structure of knowledge, which canin turn account for differences in teaching and learning practices [2], [3]. These differencesimpart a unique disciplinary “culture” to academic disciplines within a university setting.Notwithstanding the complexity of attempting to define “culture” as a construct, we adopt theterm here to describe the lens through which people in a given group experience and understandthe world [4]. Similarly, we define an “academic discipline” as a field of specialization with aunique set of subject matter as its core knowledge within the university setting [1]. Disciplinarycultures, such research argues, guides the pedagogical practices adopted by
variations are whether the course covers both continuous- anddiscrete-time systems, or only continuous-time, and whether the context of application is electriccircuitry. Despite these variations, a central theme that cuts across introductory signals andsystems courses is the study of continuous-time LTI systems, which constitutes the focus of thisresearch.It has been maintained in the science education literature that learners frequently expressconceptions that are in discord with expert understanding.1 Such conceptions could hinderstudent learning if not appropriately addressed and refined through instructional approaches.Research has shown that traditional modes of instruction which do not take into account students’initial knowledge state result
’ ability to meaningfully integrate these advancements into their curriculum and their classroom activities 2. The demands placed on teachers by new reform guidelines -- both state and national -- that call for less dependence on textbooks, lectures, and de-contextualized lab work and more emphasis on inquiry-based learning using a real-world context that combines science and mathematics “to solve a human problem, meet a societal need, or develop a product.” 51.1.1 PRISM as a Knowledge-Management ToolPRISM integrates the digital learning space for Indiana’s 6th - 8th grade teachers of science andmathematics. Essentially, our website merges a large, complex, and dispersed physical entityinto a virtual, web-delivered
the viewpoints of students and instructors followedby some concluding thoughts and future directions.Design Strategies to Integrate Engineering and HumanitiesThe authors explored various course formats as explicit design strategies (i.e., project-basedlearning and faculty-led trips) to incorporate societal factors in engineering designs viahumanities topics based on the notion that these learning environments were effective. However,these learning environments needed to be carefully planned and cultivated, and the instructorsneeded to be aware of the different groups of students for whom they would be applicable. Avisual representation of a process model with overlapping disciplinary considerations and therole of faculty coordination is
because its focus on real-world problems proved useful in the classroom.Keiona noted that her professor asked her to make a special presentation about the Nuclear Navyas her military experiences were connected to her nuclear engineering course.Military service also provided engagement experiences, which subsequently influenced academicpursuits. For example, as a result of being stationed in Japan, Keiona developed an interest inlearning the native language: “I enjoyed living in … Japan. And then [decided], I might as welllearn the language too.” As a result, she pursued a double major in nuclear engineering andJapanese. Aside from “wanting to communicate with people” while she was overseas, Keionafelt this double major, and ultimately learning to