AC 2010-1451: DEVELOPMENT AND DISSEMINATION OF LEARNING SUITESFOR SUSTAINABILITY INTEGRATION IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONQiong Zhang, University of South FloridaLinda Vanasupa, California Polytechnic State UniversityJulie Zimmerman, Yale UniversityJames Mihelcic, University of South Florida Page 15.393.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Development and Dissemination of Learning Suites for Sustainability Integration in Engineering EducationAbstractAs pointed out in a key presentation in “Sustainability and Engineering Programs” within theEnvironmental Engineering division at the 2008 ASEE conference, one of main challenges
Leveraging the NASA Administrator’s Fellowship Program (NAFP) to Enhance Graduate Chemical Engineering Education at Howard University John Tharakan1 and Philip Chen2 1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Howard University, Washington, D.C. 20059 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771Abstract This paper addresses the enhancement of graduate education at Howard University’sDepartment of Chemical Engineering brought about through leveraging of the NationalAeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Administrator’s Fellowship
Engineering at Boise State University. Miller earned a B.S. in Civil Engineering and a M.S. in Envi- ronmental Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo, and a Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Iowa. Her educational research interests are focused on methods to attract and retain women and underrepresented minorities in STEM fields. Page 23.252.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Bridging the Valley of Death: Examining the Work Environment Influencing Adoption of Innovations in Engineering EducationAbstractThere is a
collaborator to do it with you. Sit silently in a class and observe behavior; videotape yourself and tally your responses; learn what messages you are subtly sending. 4. Share your observations. Talk to colleagues and students. Make these frameworks a part of the vocabulary of your department or school. Open discussion of these issues, letting those with privilege begin to see it and those who lack it attribute the dissonance to culture and not simply internalize it.One of the most pernicious practices in engineering education is to state that, as a discipline,engineering is gender- (or race- or color- or…) blind, that it is a genuine meritocracy. Bydenying the existence of schemas and the privileges they encode
engineering pedagogical research around stakeholder inclusion and empathy in engineering.Dr. Jennifer Howcroft, University of Waterloo Jennifer Howcroft is a Continuing Lecturer in the Department of Systems Design Engineering at the University of Waterloo. Her pedagogical research focuses on engineering design, holistic engineering education, stakeholder interactions, and empathy in engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Biomedical Stakeholder Café: A People-Centered Approach for the Future of Design Engineering EducationAbstractIn Fall 2023, a first-of-its-kind student-stakeholder interaction event called the BiomedicalStakeholder Café was run at
the ASEE and has earned several awards for excellence in teaching.Dr. Scott E. Grasman, Missouri University of Science & TechnologyDr. Ivan G. Guardiola, Missouri University of Science & Technology Page 22.628.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Enhancing Undergraduate Engineering Education of Lean Methods using Simulation Learning Modules within a Virtual EnvironmentAbstractThis paper highlights the use of an integrated user-centered virtual learning environment throughextensible simulation learning modules that is
Session 3230 Service Learning as a Strategy for Engineering Education for the 21ST Century Edmund Tsang, C. Dianne Martin, Rand Decker University of South Alabama /The George Washington University / University of Utah ABSTRACT Service learning is an effective strategy to enable engineering schools to attain the objectives outlined in recent reports on reforming the undergraduate engineering curriculum for the 21st Century. service learning is a method under which students learn and develop through active participation in thoughtfully
AC 2010-2389: COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING EDUCATION,RESEARCH AND TRAINING AT A HBCU - EXPERIENCES AND OUTCOMESRam Mohan, North Carolina A & T State UniversityAjit Kelkar, North Carolina A&T State UniversityNarayanaswamy Radhakrishnan, North Carolina A&T State University Page 15.301.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010Computational Science and Engineering Education, Research and Training at a HBCU – Experiences and OutcomesAbstractComputational science and engineering (CSE) and high performance computing (HPC) havenow become an integral part of several engineering and science disciplines. Still the number ofstudents from
Paper ID #7733The Design of Language for Engineering Education: Recycling IM and TextMessaging to Capture Engineering ProcessesTamecia R Jones, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamecia received a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering with a concentration in Electrical and Computer Engineering from The Johns Hopkins University, a M.A. in Learning, Design, and Technology from Stanford University, and a M.Div. from Boston University School of Theology. She taught middle school math and science for three years, consulted with pre-college programs, and nonprofits and museums. The focus of her doctoral research is assessment in K-12
routinely collaborate with AI co-workers to must proactively develop strategies to integrate these tools in aimprove efficiency and creativity in problem-solving. responsible, effective, and sustainable manner. Based on current research and trend analyses, several key strategies and Given these industry trends, engineering education is future directions emerge for stakeholders in engineeringtasked with preparing students for a workforce where AI education.literacy is a key competency. The current state of manyengineering curricula, however, does not yet fully reflect this A. Raising Awareness and Building AI Literacyshift. Johri
year. This collaboration was plannedbefore the quarter began by the two faculty members teaching the requirements course (one of Page 10.657.3them is the first author) and the faculty member advising the third year BE students. The BEfaculty member and one of the authors had worked together on a requirements projects earlier, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationthough in a different context. Both of them believed that such an experience would be beneficialto all the students and that is how the
charges that in common assessment practice, it is usually thecase that tests are performed in isolation even though real problem-solving in the 21st centuryis collaborative with teamwork and resources being available. The assessment challenges for the21st century are described in more detail in the following references [13] [14] [15].F. Contributions for this paperThe main contribution of our paper is that we review the rich literature on formative assessmentand effective feedback and synthesize insights that are relevant for engineering education. Apartfrom providing comprehensive theoretical coverage of the ideas of formative assessment andsurveying the views of their major proponents (including Paul Black, John Hattie, Jay McTighe,Grant
Paper ID #37452Ethiopian Women Students’ Recommendations for Enhancing Their Sense ofBelonging in Engineering EducationMr. Jemal Bedane Halkiyo, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Jemal Halkiyo is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education Systems and Design at Arizona State Univer- sity. Mr. Halkiyo has a Bachelor of Science from Hawassa University, and a Master of Science degree in Civil Engineering from Arba Minch University, both in Ethiopia. Mr. Halkiyo uses mixed methods to study his primary research interest: engineering education equity and inclusivity among diverse student groups: international and
Paper ID #37039Biologically Inspired Design for Engineering Education: AMultiple Year Evaluation of Teachers’ Professional LearningExperiences (Evaluation)Abeera P. Rehmat (Research Scientist, II) Abeera P. Rehmat is a Research Scientist II, at Georgia Institute of Technology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC). She has experience conducting research in engineering education that spans pre-college up to the collegiate level. Her research interest involves investigating how engineering and computer science education can foster students critical thinking and problem-solving
Disciplines,” presented at the 2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference, Crystal City, Virginia, 2018.[2] A. Danowitz and K. Beddoes, “A Snapshot of Mental Health and Wellness of Engineering Students Across the Western United States,” presented at the Frontiers in Education Annual Conference, Virtual Conference, 2020.[3] A. Danowitz and K. Beddoes, "Mental Health in Engineering Education: Identifying Population and Intersectional Variation," IEEE Transactions on Education, In press.[4] K. J. Jensen and K. J. Cross, “Engineering stress culture: Relationships among mental health, engineering identity, and sense of inclusion,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 2
Paper ID #37183The Influence of Disciplinary Background on PeerReviewers’ Evaluations of Engineering Education JournalManuscriptsKelsey Watts Kelsey Watts is a fifth-year graduate student at Clemson University. She is part of the Engineering Education Research Peer Review Training (EER PERT) team. She has also developed Systems Biology education modules to enhance computational thinking skills in high school students.Gary Lichtenstein (Founder & Principal, Quality Evaluation Designs) Gary Lichtenstein, Ed.D. is founder and principal of Quality Evaluation Designs, a firm specializing in education research and
higher education, it is urgent to attract multiple stakeholders to promotethe collaboration, participation and common interests of engineering education, andbuild accreditation agency with strong dynamic adjustment capabilities to respond tothe actual or potential needs of the new industrial revolution, generate new qualitystandards for engineering education [17].5.2 Shaping quality cultureThe lack of evidence culture is the lack of fairness and objectivity in the evaluation ofeducation quality, the lack of initiative in the face of public accountability, the lack ofcontinuity in improving education quality, and the lack of scientific educationmanagement and decision-making. For Chinese HEIs, it is necessary to take theopportunity of
Education (CONTIE) IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference Y 2 2 (EDUCON) Collaborative Network for Engineering and Y 3 1 Computing Diversity (CoNECD) Conference SEFI Annual Conference N 2 1 AAEE Annual Conference N 0 0 Total 71 49
University Karen Miel’s research focuses on elementary students’ reasoning and decision-making in collaborative engineering design and the ways educators facilitate engineering sense-making. Previously, she served as Director of Research and Innovation and Education Director at science centers and as an elementary and middle school teacher.Dr. Merredith D. Portsmore, Tufts University Dr. Merredith Portsmore is the Director for Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (www.ceeo.tufts.edu). Merredith received all four of her degrees from Tufts (B.A. English, B.S. Mechanical Engineering, M.A. Education, PhD in Engineering Education). Her research interests focus on how children engage in de- signing and
EngineeringProf. Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School. She is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of Integrated Engineering program at Minnesota State University, Mankato, home of the Iron Range, Twin Cities and Bell Engineering programs.Dr. Emilie A Siverling, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Emilie A. Siverling is an Assistant Professor of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato, and is also a faculty member in Iron Range Engineering’s Bell Program. She has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education and an M.S.Ed
Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engi- neering from West Point (2009), a Master of Business Administration from Oklahoma State University (2015), and a Master of Science degree in Underground Construction and Tunnel Engineering from Col- orado School of Mines (2018). He is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Texas. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Efficacy of Learning with Course-provided Equation Reference Sheets in Engineering Education Jeremy Paquin, Matthew
becomeincreasingly fragmented into independent parts. While the challenge is clear, the solutionhowever, has not as yet loomed on the horizon.Response to the ChallengeTo address the challenge, stakeholders have to come to grip with the realities and examine theentire framework of the undergraduate engineering education in their respective state, inparticular-and the Region in general. It is argued here that collaboration and exchange among thedifferent colleges of the Region is healthy, helps in ironing out differing views, leads to generalconsensus, and reduces waste of time and resources. Perhaps, as important will be the voice ofindustry - a major “customer” of academia in the Region. Unless, and until, the major industrialsectors make their views known
. S., McNeill, N. J., Douglas, E. P., Koro-Ljungberg, M. E., & Therriault, D. J. (2013). Indispensable resource? A phenomenological study of textbook use in engineering problem solving. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(2), 269-288. 4. Secules, S., Elby, A., and Gupta, A. “Turning away” from the Struggling Individual Student: An Account of the Cultural Construction of Engineering Ability in an Undergraduate Programming Class. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Proceedings 5. Walther, J., Sochacka, N., Benson, L., Bumbaco, A., Kellam, N., Pawley, A., & Phillips, C. (Forthcoming) Qualitative research quality: A collaborative inquiry across multiple
document here suggest that the engagement of STS scholars with engineering andengineering education has been a crucial part of developing applied STS and integrating iteffectively into engineering curricula. Individuals who are themselves integrative andinterdisciplinary, especially those who combine engineering backgrounds with STS orhumanities and social sciences advanced training, seem to have played a leading role in thedevelopment of applied STS. The increasing size and diversity of the collaborative teamsworking in STS seems to have accelerated the growth and rigor of applied STS.Although the impetus provided by EC2000 created an incentive for rethinking the role of generaleducation in engineering education, it appears that much of what
Senior Ashoka Fellow. He holds five honorary doctoral degrees (UMass Lowell; Carroll College; Clarkson, Drexel, and Worcester Polytechnic Institute). In 2013 and 2014, Dr. Amadei served as a Science Envoy to Pakistan and Nepal for the U.S. Department of State. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A Methodology to Model the Integrated Nature of the Sustainable Development Goals: Importance for Engineering EducationAbstractThere are 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), comprised of169 targets and measured by 230 indicators, that cover a myriad ofdevelopment areas including food, water, sanitation, energy,governance, and climate change, and more. Engineers interested
2006-1471: PARTNERS IN ENGINEERING: OUTREACH EFFORTS PROVIDEHOLISTIC ENGINEERING EDUCATION FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL GIRLSJan DeWaters, Clarkson University Jan DeWaters, PE is currently pursuing a PhD degree in Environmental Science and Engineering at Clarkson University, with a focus on energy and environmental education. She has several years of experience as the curriculum coordinator for Clarkson's Project-Based Learning Partnership Program and is director of the Partners in Engineering Program that provides mentoring and engineering activities for eighth grade girls.Susan Powers, Clarkson University Susan E. Powers, PhD, PE is a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Associate Dean in
AC 2012-3464: NAVY METROLOGY ENGINEERING EDUCATION OUT-REACH: INSPIRING AND EDUCATING STUDENTS ABOUT CAREERSIN METROLOGYMr. John V. Fishell, Science and Technology Education Partnership John V. Fishell retired from his position as Technical Director of NSWC, Corona Division, Corona, Calif., in 2008, after 36 years of service. He holds a Juris Doctorate in Law from California Southern Law School and a B.S.E.E. from the University of Texas, El Paso, along with two certificates in management from the University of Texas McCombs Business School. Fishell has been an active participant and supporter on the non-profit Science and Technology Education Partnership (STEP) since its inception 12 years ago and a member of the
Borrego.7) As the field began to change, more programs were developedaimed at producing graduates with Ph.D.s specifically in engineering education. According tothe Engineering Education Community Resource Wiki which was created by the ASEE StudentDivision (SD) in collaboration with the Center for Engineering Learning & Technology (CELT),just over 15 programs currently offer a graduate degree in engineering education or a closelyrelated field (for a up-to-date listing of these programs, visitengineeringeducationlist.pbworks.com).8 Paralleling this growth, is an increasing number ofengineering education positions. The Engineering Education Community Resource Wiki alsocontains a list of engineering education job postings, which currently lists
AC 2012-3853: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A HIGHPERFORMANCE COMPUTER (HPC) CLUSTER FOR ENGINEERINGEDUCATION SIMULATIONSDr. Kurt C. Gramoll, University of Oklahoma Kurt Gramoll is Hughes Professor of Engineering. Page 25.443.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Development and Implementation of a High Performance Computer (HPC) Cluster for Engineering Education SimulationsAbstractWith the advancements in high performance computer (HPC) computing, it is only natural thatengineering education also utilizes the massive computational capabilities of large server
systems, specifically neural regeneration. Staehle is also particularly interested in chemical, bio-, and biomedical engineering education.Dr. Kauser Jahan, Rowan University Page 25.1467.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Weaving Sustainability into Undergraduate Engineering Education through Innovative Pedagogical Methods: A Student’s PerspectiveAbstractEngineering educators are continually striving to develop teaching tools that engage students’imaginations, provide a platform for integrating modern technology into the