their own disciplines in the instructional design, while also experiencing new content,methods, and practices as a matter of faculty development in the process. (a) Consciously incorporating (b) Encountering (c) Co-leading faculty-led humanities into engineering in humanities naturally in with an engineering course on-campus courses faculty-led trips and a non-engineering course Figure 1. Strategies of integrating humanities in engineeringDemonstrating this proof-of-concept for the design strategy, this paper showcases a faculty-ledtrip to Japan with one engineering course and one history course from May 2023 as a case studyon the implementation of the
, guidance, and career opportunities, rendering any meaningful accountabilitynearly impossible [16 - 18]. Even if faculty desire to improve their mentoring relationships, thereare few structures in place at most universities to translate postdoctoral concerns to theirsupervisors in a meaningful way [19]. To this end, most articles on postdoctoral mentorshipconclude with calls for more robust mentorship, closer advisor relationships, focused careerdevelopment, and professional skills training (e.g., 15, 19, 20]. Considering that implementingthese recommendations or other improvements must either be provided by the mentor or have thementor’s support in the undertaking, without supervisors’ intentional efforts to improve theirmentoring, these calls are
and Web 2.0 as wellas gauge the perceptions of the appropriateness of these technologies for academic use. Resultsindicate that faculty perceptions of the effectiveness of Web 2.0/SNT use within the classroomwere more positive than students’. These results enable university faculty to make informeddecisions on how to engage their technology-savvy students and develop new teachingmethodologies to meet the needs of both faculty and students.Keywords: Social Networking Technology, Web 2.0, Classroom EffectivenessIntroductionAccording to Shaohua and Peilin1, Web 2.0 is the “second wave of the World Wide Web…thatallows individuals to publish, collaborate and share experiences with other like-mindedindividuals or groups”. These technologies allow
have not been well represented within the ranks ofdoctoral degree holders or faculty in STEM disciplines despite the increased attention in recentyears to this concern. URM students lag considerably behind White and Asian students in degreecompletion and faculty appointments. One intervention widely touted as effective in promotingpositive outcomes is mentoring however URM students often lack access to mentoring and justas importantly mentors lack culturally responsive knowledge, skills and dispositions required tobe effective mentors to URM students. A qualitative study was conducted to better understandhow the knowledge, skills and dispositions of STEM faculty align with culturally responsivementoring. Three themes were constructed from the
Paper ID #11158Increasing Student and Faculty Participation and Student Learning in an Un-dergraduate STEM Summer Research Program in a Government Institutionthrough a Higher Education PartnershipDr. Mary Yvonne Lanzerotti, Augsburg College Dr. Lanzerotti received her A.B. from Harvard College, M. Phil. from University of Cambridge (U.K.), and her Ph.D. from Cornell University, all in physics. She is an Assistant Professor of Physics at Augsburg College, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Previously she was a faculty member in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright
important initial step in alongitudinal process that aims to explore the true impacts of COVID-19 on education on a largerscale. As the pandemic continues to shape our world for years to come, finding effective andrigorous methods to examine the issue with depth and precision is vital. In this paper, we presentour pilot study's findings that provide insights into the immediate effects of COVID-19 onstudents' learning experiences. This study lays the groundwork for future research that shouldbuild on our findings and expand the scope of the investigation to better comprehend thepandemic's long-term implications for engineering education.A critical concern about engineering student retention is raised by these results. If a patternemerges in which
feedback cycle of student motivation and success(see Figure 1). Page 26.704.5Figure 1. Relationship among faculty attitudes and practices, and student attitudes and outcomes It is important to note that it is faculty practices that drive potential changes in studentmotivation and performance. Faculty attitudes help guide their practice, and are reinforced bysuccessful student outcomes, but attitudes per se are only indirectly responsible for studentachievement, persistence, and motivation. But sadly, Learner-centered practices are usedinfrequently by post-secondary faculty.7 Part of the problem concerns the fact that an
academicpreparedness and performance [1]. Soria and Horgas [2] found that, post pandemic, 39% ofcollege students are experiencing clinically significant anxiety and 35% of students areexperiencing clinically significant depression. At this time, post-pandemic, the ramifications toengineering education are still being discerned.This work attempts to begin to understand in what ways engineering faculty perceive theirteaching to have changed and to what extent course policies have evolved post-pandemic. Inparticular, given rising mental health concerns, have faculty instituted pedagogies and policiesthat are more compassionate? Compassionate pedagogy has been put forth as an approach foraddressing the challenges of the pandemic with practices such as providing
assist as policies and guidelines evolve.Background and Literature ReviewThe genesis of this study came from questioning whether engineering faculty may find openscience participation a challenge given that they may be filing for a patent or work with anindustry partner with intellectual property rights concerns. Given that more journals and fundingagencies require some form of data discovery whether it be open or not, researchers will benegotiating open science practices more and more. Unlike some disciplines such as ecology andgenomics where data sharing is necessary to move the field of research forward, similar practicesin engineering have not been widely adopted. Furthermore, disciplines that have a data sharinghistory have further
COACHE instrument, whichincludes assessment of “[s]upport for teaching, research and service, shared governance, andappreciation and recognition for work” [4]. Our study evaluates several data sets that measured theinstitutional culture of Mason, including Harvard COACHE, Quality of Work Life, and GallupFaculty and Staff Experience survey data sets.1.1.1 COACHE Faculty SatisfactionThe Harvard Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE) surveyprovided George Mason with a Faculty Job Satisfaction Report that summarizes the quantitativeresults across the COACHE themes, noting strengths and concerns. The COACHE themes includethe nature of work: research, teaching, and service; tenure and promotion; personal and familypolicies; and
Session 2109 Undergraduate Studies in Biomedical Engineering at the Faculty of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology Roman Z. Morawski, Zdzislaw Pawlowski, Krzysztof Zaremba Warsaw University of TechnologyAbstract: The current version of the undergraduate program of study in biomedical engineering– offered at the Faculty of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University ofTechnology, since 1951 – is presented. First, a general context of studies at the Faculty isoutlined, next the system of study is
implies that engineering educationshould not shy away from offering specific ethics courses so that faculty can help guide studentsin converging the diversity of ethics frameworks.LimitationsOur study faces three primary limitations concerning our sample, our methods, and our scope.Additionally, we offer suggestions for future research connected to each of our limitations.First, our findings come from a narrow sample. The interviewees came from two departments atone large university in the southern United States. Therefore, findings drawn from theirperspectives are limited in their generalizability. Despite these limitations, however, we didreach a level of data saturation with our current sample which gives us confidence in the findingswe did
ProgramsAbstractThis paper discusses the importance of an on-campus residency experience to the success of adistance education program. The benefits of such an experience are described and reinforcedwith survey data and anecdotal evidence.Norwich University’s School of Graduate Studies is home to 10 Internet-based graduateprograms, including a Master of Civil Engineering program. At the completion of 18 months ofdistance study (36 credits), all students are required to spend one week on the University’scampus in Vermont during the month of June. The week’s activities include a mix of academicand social events designed to bond the students to each other, to their faculty, and to the bricksand mortar University. Academic debates on professional issues, social
author first started working at Wichita State University (WSU), he attended a facultymeeting for one of the engineering departments. Faculty members requested help with aplagiarism problem. An offer to teach a bibliographic instruction session was accepted by one ofthe faculty, but others had needs that would not be met by the librarian coming into their classes.Most had concerns about giving up lecture time. One wanted all of their graduate assistants toreceive training. Offering training sessions in the library presented other problems includingaccurately reporting to each faculty member which students attended and which did not. By theend of the meeting the seeds for a video project had been planted in the author’s mind
and retreats that address the demands and opportunities of STEM practice and research - I am able to speak some of the language of engineers and engineering educators, and I can connect with them on common issues. In particular, I am aware of challenges for underrepresented groups for opportunity selection, advancement, and promotion.The co-author also discusses learning from others in engineering, and the influence of theinteractions on current advocacy and efficiency in a career that focuses on professionaldevelopment for faculty. My graduate accountability partner was a mechanical engineering student who shared a lot of my same struggles but also taught me about what she did as an engineer and how
professional engineering workplace discourses [16]. This was the result ofconclusions reached by the Institution of Engineers, Australia task force [17].A survey of employers, in Australia, clearly showed that employers wereconcerned with the lack of social literacies and knowledge concerned withhuman affairs in amongst engineering graduates. They placed high prioritiesthat these issues needed to be addresses through engineering curricula at eventhe expense of engineering elective subjects as well as some core engineeringand fundamental science subjects [18]. This is not surprising given that thedestination of graduate engineers is directed into areas that concernedthemselves with human affairs [19]. Engineering graduates needed skills andknowledge
private and painful experiences, they may reasonably assumethey would never share them with their professors, let alone the broader public. As we create theconduit for connecting student marginalizing experiences directly with professors, we soughtways to retain as much privacy and protection of the student participants as possible.The literature warns of similar issues in video or audio dissemination. Confidentiality andprivacy become major concerns when presenting individual stories through audio or audiovisualformats where a participant may not recognize the consequences or potential harm associatedwith having their own image, name, or story disseminated in a more accessible way (i.e., one thatcould “go viral”). Other issues include researcher
designed to address several key issues present wheninvolving freshmen, high school, and community college students in engineering researchand design. Among these: many students do not have a clear knowledge of whatengineers do or of the engineering problem solving approach; faculty tend to beoverwhelmed with the amount of time required to supervise very inexperienced studentswho have not amassed any technical knowledge or skills; and finally, students,particularly those from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, typically work and donot have the time to commit to summer or extended hour programs. These issues wereaddressed in various ways as the program was developed.Pedagogical Background The authors’ motivations in developing this
AC 2007-41: THE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE: A COLLABORATIVEGRADUATE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH PROGRAMCharles Farrar, Los Alamos National Laboratory Chuck Farrar has 25 years experience as a technical staff member, project leader, and team leader at Los Alamos National Laboratory. While at Los Alamos, he earned a Ph. D. in civil engineering from the University of New Mexico in 1988. He is currently working jointly with engineering faculty at University of California, San Diego to develop the Los Alamos/UCSD Engineering Institute with a research focus on Damage Prognosis. This initiative is also developing a formal, degree-granting educational program in the closely related areas of validated
active nanostructured interfaces, nanocatalytic conversion of biorenewables to commodity chemicals and fuels, and nanoscale production of hydrogen on demand.Robert B. Barat, New Jersey Institute of Technology Robert Barat is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at NJIT, where he has been a faculty member for over 20 years. He earned his PhD in Chemical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1990. His current research involves reaction catalysis by fluorinated phthalocyanines.Norman W. Loney, New Jersey Institute of Technology Norman W. Loney is Professor and Chair of the Otto H. York Department of Chemical, Biological and Pharmaceutical Engineering at New Jersey Institute of Technology. He has
skills, time management, and ability to exercise professional judgment. An issueraised with this work is whether these skills can be only acquired through experience andexperimental learning.Chang16 found that new entrants, who enter the construction industry, particularly those enteringthe construction management phase, are expected to have a strong academic background inmultiple disciplines. Knowledge of basic subjects included construction materials and methods,design, engineering principles, safety, environmental concerns, computer skills, personnelmanagement, construction law, business management, codes, labor relations, finance, and oraland written communication skills. Nevertheless, fragmentation of the construction industry,changes in
uses case studies to serve as a capstone for a course. Most importantly, studentsapply previously learned concepts and principles, and practice decision-making and problem-solving processes in a non-threatening but very real situation.Scaffolding is also provided for the course instructor in an area entitled Faculty Interface, in theevent that the instructor using the case study materials is not as knowledgeable about a particulartopic as the case study designer and/or developer. These notes, similar to the mentor notes, wererecorded during the pilot offering of the case study to assist subsequent instructors adjusting totheir new roles as a facilitator of learning and a manufacturing plant supervisor posing a variety
, and Czech Republic) uses a two-pronged approach. The first includes activepartner collaboration on identification of the learning objectives and outcomes, description of thecurriculum core and supporting units, development of guidelines on the implementation andassessment, identification of the technology infrastructure, and the description of faculty andstaff requirements, pedagogy and delivery concepts, accreditation issues and constraints, etc. On-site research by the project faculty and selected students is enhanced by frequentcommunications and dedicated working sessions at the partners’ sites. The second part of theapproach is a practical case study on how the proposed framework can be implemented by thepartner institutions. This will
littleopportunity for discussion and feedback from the instructors on the homework assignments. Thelatter also included concerns about: timely feedback on homework grades, availability ofsolutions, only getting graded assignments returned by less than half the instructors, andinsufficient opportunity to discuss the homework assignments after their completion. Clearly,this is one aspect that should be addressed in future courses. One solution to this problem couldbe a greater engagement of the local faculty in all homework assignments, so that they can serveas recitation instructor for additional clarification and comment when needed by the students.The schedule should include a block of time for students to discuss issues with their localinstructor or the
leveraging this Page 26.1601.12time of transformation to provide input into the redesign of traditional computer lab space intomulti-use, compute-intensive environments. Serendipitously, the opportunity to collaborate inthis space design exercise is also providing opportunities to resolve other problematic issues withcomputer resource allocation and capability. The faculty members are eagerly anticipating usingthe new instructional space as a key component of the polytechnic environment.- Undergraduate Student RecruitingAs the transformation gathers momentum, we have been placing emphasis on recruiting andinformation dissemination. One of the key
approach, faculty arerequired to monitor the specific outcomes and identify issues of concern using a course-outcomes tracking sheet. The proposed work in 6 addressed potential ECE limitations byenabling a novel assessment method, called X-File, to tighten the course adjustment cyclethrough the creation of a shared repository of course improvement tasks based on near real-timestudent performance data 5. We propose a novel infrastructure to extend the positive aspects ofthese approaches of open tutoring and tight loop adjustment while also accounting for thelimitations.The Spanish National University of Distance Education (Universidad Nacional de Educación aDistancia; UNED) affords learners with opportunities to share tasks, content, and
the only ones talking about and working forincreasing diversity. In this section, the authors talk about some of the beginning steps that canbe taken to open a dialogue about diversity issues with students from underrepresented groups.A majority of the examples given involve African-American students, the strategies outlined areapplicable to students from all underrepresented groups.Developing a Reputation for Being ApproachableInitial encounters between a new faculty member and the students reveal student curiosity andapprehension at the same time. The faculty member is an unknown quantity, different; studentscannot predict how the faculty member will test; what is expected of them, etc. In the experienceof the first author, students who
1999, respectively. Page 15.1067.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Single Synergistic Course vs. Modules in Multiple CoursesAbstractThe obvious possibility of future CE accreditation requirements associated with the Bodyof Knowledge (BOK Version I) during the fall 2008 accreditation visit cycle and thecorresponding development of a new Civil engineering program with its first ABET visitscheduled for fall 2008 motivated the new faculty team to initiate an effort to develop aBOK I compliant program for its first accreditation visit. The new Civil Engineeringprogram requirements surrounding leadership, public policy
Colleges (described later). Another mechanism is via thestatewide meetings that are formally arranged by the Wisconsin Technical College SystemBoard. Faculty from all of the WTCS districts that offer electronics programs meet on statewideissues and trends as they relate to AAS-level electronics programs. The +2 BS-EET faculty havebeen graciously invited to participate in these meetings since the late 1990s, which they have.Finally, the AAS-EET and +2 BS-EET faculty have called statewide EET-specific meetings,often annually, to address both macroscopic and detailed program and transfer issues. Weremark that we often look forward to these meetings because we not only have anotheropportunity to visit each other in person, but the generation of new
independently sought for an additional purpose of the existing network. The endresult was to expand the network to include all of the students, faculty, and alumni in thedepartment, thus addressing the concerns raised by the participants. During the Fall of 2008, the venue for the online social network was changed fromFacebook to Ning. There were several reasons which motivated this change. First of all,Facebook lacked the administrative control required to fully control the network. Morespecifically, the ability of inviting specific members and excluding problematic ones wasidentified, and foreseen to be a necessity. Second, Facebook groups have a fixed appearancewhich has little flexibility. One of the benefits of using Ning is that the site