Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Keith Johnson; Mark Rajai

documentteaching effectiveness. It is extremely important that we do not take this for granted. Frommy experience, I have discovered several methods to document my effectiveness as ateacher. They include the following: peer observers/evaluators, evaluate data fromprofessional teaching activities, awards and recognition, professional development,involvement in instructional development, document your classroom instructions, studentoutcomes, student testimonies, attend effective teaching workshops and utilizing constructivecriticism.Peer observers. Have a faculty member come observe and evaluate your classroominstructions, and write a summary of their evaluations. Request that your peer observerevaluate you on the following areas: knowledge, organization

Conference Session

WIED Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Silvia Carreno-Castillo, Universidad de las Américas, Puebla; Aurelio Lopez-Malo, Universidad de las Américas, Puebla; Enrique Palou, Universidad de las Américas, Puebla

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

AC 2011-1508: UNDERSTANDING MEXICAN FACULTY DESCRIPTORSOF ENGINEERING USING METAPHORS TO HELP EXPLAIN GENDEREDBOUNDARIESSilvia Carreno-Castillo, Universidad de las Amricas PueblaAurelio Lopez-Malo, Universidad de las Americas PueblaEnrique Palou, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Enrique Palou is Director, Center for Science, Engineering, and Technology Education; and Professor, Department of Chemical, Food, and Environmental Engineering at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. He teaches engineering design, food science, and education related courses. His research interests include emerging technologies for food processing, creating effective learning environments, and building rigorous research capacity in

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin M. Sevilla, Virginia Tech; Maura J. Borrego, Virginia Tech; Alexander Leonessa, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Engineers (PECASE) awards for her engineering education research. Dr. Borrego has developed and taught graduate level courses in engi- neering education research methods and assessment from 2005-2010. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, and her B.S. is from University of Wisconsin-Madison.Alexander Leonessa, Virginia Tech Page 22.499.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Differences between Student and Faculty Expectations for a Robotics Capstone Design

Collection

2005 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Stephanie G. Adams; Jeffrey W. Rieske

environment where they could also effectengineering innovation. The specific desired outcomes of the program were to: 1) improve students’ knowledgeof, as well as a demonstrate proficiency in, culturally competent research skills relevant to theirmajor field of study under the mentorship of a faculty member; 2) increase students’ level ofcomfort when working with people from different cultures through exposure to thetechnological, economic, and socio-political aspects of Venezuelan society; and 3) increasestudents’ awareness of cultural differences by considering their own culture from another’sperspective and thereby developing a global view of research.Research Program During the summer of 2005, industrial engineering students from

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - PBL with Control Theory, Writing, ABET, and Shaping Ethical Worldviews

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samuel Snyder, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

incorporate evidence-based instructional practices(EBIPs) in STEM, Fisher and colleagues (2019) found that the siloed nature of departments wasa major barrier to change. They noted that even within departments, faculty would not discusstheir teaching practices with others [4]. The lack of discussion about EBIPs might have been dueto a lack of time or buy-in from the faculty [5], [6]. Faculty may not have the adequate resourcesto develop the necessary course material or may not have been supported by their department inthe change initiative [7]. Current conventional methods for examining pedagogical change initiatives in highereducation include semi-structured interviews with change agents, analyzing pedagogicalartifacts, and surveys of

Conference Session

Best of the NEE

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Squire, Virginia Military Institute; Charles Bott, Virginia Military Institute; Matthew Hyre, Virginia Military Institute

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

productivity and university income5, andstates enact measures to encourage this.6 The past two decades have also seen a concomitantincrease in the desire from university administration through federal granting agencies forengineering faculty members to develop active learning strategies to teach undergraduates, apractice recommended by numerous recent studies. 7,8,9.Given a limited amount of time and pressure to actively involve undergraduates and conductresearch, it is commonly assumed that new faculty intuitively understand the need to combinethe teaching and research domains. While that is true, it is not obvious how do this effectively, Page

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa J. Cutright, University of Akron; Lakiesha N. Williams, Mississippi State University; Linda T Coats; Debora F Rodrigues, University of Houston (CoE); Judit Eva Puskas; Frank "Fritz" J Claydon, University of Houston (CoE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

minorities inengineering disciplines. However, very little has focused on the issues faced byunderrepresented minorities who pursue a graduate degree or the need for effective mentoring ofpost-docs and faculty in engineering to attract and retain them to pursue academic careers.Women and ethnic minorities usually do not persist in academia because they frequently receivelower salaries, heavier teaching loads, less research support, and serve on more committees thantheir male counterparts. Although these disparities are more pronounced at the faculty level, thisleads to higher attrition rates at every level of career their development, starting at theundergraduate level.This paper will present our approach and preliminary results of a National

Conference Session

MECH - Technical Session 14: Advanced Pedagogical Techniques

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd M. Fernandez, Georgia Institute of Technology; David Edward Torello, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

process where faculty are introduced to new teaching techniques and implement them.Studies that evaluate change by measuring the amount and type of concrete changes to teaching are thenorm [1], [2], [3]. However, two areas of alternative evaluation approaches have been called for, thosethat evaluate the fidelity of implementations [7] and those that evaluate the impact changes have onstudents [6], [8], [9]. Both shift away from solely measuring what faculty do. While measuring fidelityand learning are important improvements, they leave a gap in our understanding of course and curricularchange.Little work documents how faculty affect changes in their courses, especially change independent ofmajor faculty development efforts and structures. In

Collection

2022 ASEE - North Central Section Conference

Authors

Jason Berberich, Miami University; Gary Robert Rudemiller, The Paper Science & Engineering Foundation at Miami University; PATRICK JAMES DIXON PE, PMP, DPAS

expertise in continuous manufacturing, and an awareness that these skill sets are in very short supply.Mr. PATRICK JAMES DIXON PE, PMP, DPAS https://www.linkedin.com/in/dixonpatrick/ American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Faculty and Industry Led Workshop to Prepare Students for Successful Internships in Process Control and AutomationJason A. Berberich1, Douglas W. Coffin1, Gary R. Rudemiller1, Pat J. Dixon and Keith L. Hohn11 Department of Chemical, Paper and Biomedical Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, OH 450562 Dixon Process Automation Services Inc., Lago Vista, TX, 78645AbstractIndustry demand for engineers with skills in

Conference Session

Emerging Computing and Information Technologies I

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Damla Turgut, University of Central Florida; Lisa Massi, University of Central Florida; Salih Safa Bacanli, University of Central Florida; Neda Hajiakhoond Bidoki, University of Central Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing & Information Technology

students via their faculty mentors and graduate students. The careeropportunities seminar may be improved by recruiting a panelist with experience in researchand development jobs in industry and government. This can be challenging because weschedule the seminar in early to mid-July; which tends to be the most popular vacationmonth. However, July is the optimum timeframe to offer this seminar in terms of the flow ofthe REU which concludes at the end of July.Ethics in Research and the Profession. The program activities to expose students to ethics inresearch and in the profession are: (1) Data Management: Perils of Fabrication, Falsificationand Confidentiality seminar by UCF College of Graduate Studies, and (2) Big Data andEthics IoT faculty panel

Conference Session

Beyond Students: Issues of Underrepresentation among Parents and Professionals

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carlotta A. Berry, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is an Assistant

Conference Session

Sociotechnical Integration and Programmatic Reform

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lynne A Slivovsky, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Lizabeth L Thompson P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Silvana McCormick, Redwood Consulting Collective; Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

transformational change. We areengaging faculty, staff, and students in a substantial process of collaborative transformation thatinvolves rejecting binaries or dualisms commonly used to create hierarchies in engineeringthought and practice (rational-emotional, male-female, social-technical, mental-manual, hard-soft, concrete-abstract, etc.) and embracing a complex coexistence [11]; developing new skills inco-creation of holistic learning experiences and inclusive cultures; and evolving personal andprofessional identities that are constantly challenged and often in flux.Our transformation is guided by the following vision. Members of the Computer Engineeringdepartment at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo co-created this vision to guide our

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Coleen Carrigan, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Saejin Kwak Tanguay, University of Washington; Joyce Yen, University of Washington; Julie Simmons Ivy, North Carolina State University; Cara Margherio, University of Washington; Eve A. Riskin, University of Washington; Christine S. Grant, North Carolina State University; M. Claire Horner-Devine, University of Washington and Counterspace Consulting

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Kwak Tanguay is a Ph.D. Candidate in Multicultural Education at the University of Washington. Her research examines how educational policy & practice, curriculum, and instruction mediate cross- racial and cross-ethnic peer relations among students, and how these peer relations shape students of color’s educational experiences, trajectories, and access to opportunities.Dr. Joyce Yen, University of Washington Joyce Yen, Ph.D., is the Director of the ADVANCE Center for Institutional Change at the University of Washington where she focuses on advancing women and underrepresented minority faculty in STEM fields and leading faculty professional development programs. Her diversity and faculty work has received over

Conference Session

IED Technical Session: Preparing Students for the Future

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Kovalchuk, Montana State University; William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

Editor for both the Engineering Management Journal and Quality Approaches in Higher Education. Prior to his academic career, Schell spent 14 years in industry where he held leadership positions focused on process improvement and organizational development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Writing as a Method to Build Better Engineers: Examining Faculty Perceptions of Writing’s ImportanceAbstractWriting is a critical skill for professional communication, providing a way to develop and examineideas, and a method to test learning. When perceived as meaningful by the writer, writing isfundamental for identity formation in disciplines, such as engineering. The

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eileen Johnson, University of Michigan; Sara Rose Vohra, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Jeanne Sanders, University of Michigan; Joseph Francis Mirabelli, University of Michigan; Andrea J Kunze, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Karin Jensen, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

. He earned his PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a focus in Engineering Education. His interests are centered around mentorship, mental health, and retention in STEM students and faculty. Additionally, he helps support the development of new engineering education scholars and researches quality in mixed methods research methodologies.Dr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering education research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division (ARCHE) Technical Session 3

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alex Campbell P.E., Oklahoma State University; John J Phillips P.E., Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering Division (ARCHE)

of this type dedicated tointeracting with each student, which is commonly a result of the large class sizes and minimalcredit hours for these introductory courses. In a study by Morrow and Ackermann in 2012, theysuggest that faculty support has a small, but significant positive relationship with intention topersist at their university [2]. Other recent work also suggests that developing meaningfulrelations with instructors is associated with less students leaving STEM fields and that anunwelcoming atmosphere from faculty in STEM courses is one reason for their departure [1]. Sohow does a program increase the interaction of professors with expertise in specific majors ofstudy and ensure that they can interact and mentor beginning students in

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 6

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Darcie Christensen, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Lauren Singelmann, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Rob Sleezer, Virginia Tech; Emilie A. Siverling, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

Paper ID #38078A Self-Study of Faculty Methods, Attitudes, and Perceptions of OralEngineering ExamsDr. Darcie Christensen, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Darcie Christensen is a probationary Assistant Professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University Mankato. She teaches for Iron Range Engineering, which is located at the Minnesota North Campus in Virginia, MN. Dr. Christensen received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State University in the Summer of 2021. The title of her Dissertation is ”A Mixed-Method Approach to Explore Student Needs for Peer Mentoring in a College

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tony Lee Kerzmann, Robert Morris University; Casey James McAndrew; Kendra Slis; Maria Elisabeth French; Katelyn Maione P.E., Robert Morris University

Tagged Divisions

International

, where his research areas include, hybrid concentrating photovoltaic systems, energy systems, life cycle assessment, sustainable product development, engineering entrepreneurship, alternative energy systems, renewable energy education and active learning.Mr. Casey James McAndrewKendra SlisMaria Elisabeth FrenchMs. Katelyn Maione P.E., Robert Morris University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Educational Evaluation of a Faculty Led Education Abroad Program in Renewable EnergyAbstractIn recent years, there has been increasing demand and push for global experience through anacademic setting. For would-be engineers this is even more important in this

Conference Session

Track 6: Technical Session 3: Breaking Barriers: Unveiling the Journeys and Triumphs of Faculty Women of Color in STEM Academia

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Kemesha Gabbidon, University of South Florida; Saundra Johnson Austin, University of South Florida

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

; Phillips, M. (2022). Integrating the Entrepreneurial Mindset Into the Engineering Classroom. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(2), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3101360• Cooper, J. E., & Stevens, D. D. (2002). Tenure in the Sacred Grove: Issues and Strategies for Women and Minority Faculty. SUNY Press.• Davis, M. H., Hall, J. A., & Mayer, P. S. (2016). Developing a new measure of entrepreneurial mindset: reliability, validity, and implications for practitioners. Consulting Psychology Journal, 68(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000045 40References• Diggs, S. N., Bharath, D. M. N., Roberts-Lewis, K., & Bailey

Conference Session

ERM: Year of Impact on Racial Equity

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Jeremi London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kristen Billiar, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Jordan Jarrett, Colorado State University; David Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Linda Vanasupa, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering

Paper ID #37031WIP: ASEE Year of Impact on Racial Equity: Faculty andAdministrators EngagementElizabeth Litzler (Director) Elizabeth (Liz) Litzler, Ph.D., is the Director of the Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE) at the University of Washington (UW) and an Affiliate Assistant Professor in UW Sociology. She was the 2020-2021 Chair of the ASEE Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI). She is a former Board Member of Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN) and the recipient of the 2020 WEPAN Founders Award. She has led social science research projects such as the UW

Conference Session

Innovative, Engaging Pedagogies for Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Samuel Aaron Snyder, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

majorundergraduate curriculum shift at a US research university. As a part of the revised curriculum,faculty are required to include ethical reasoning and/or global awareness as a portion of theirprogram. However, a majority of the faculty involved in the program were not primarily trained inethics or global education. As a result, many faced institutional barriers and challenges whenattempting to incorporate practices and pedagogies into their classroom. With the outbreak ofCOVID-19 in the past year, students and faculty have had to adapt to online teaching formatswhich present an additional set of difficulties for faculty in developing ethics and global educationpedagogies. To better understand the barriers that faculty are facing, we conducted semi

Conference Session

K-12 Engineering Outreach Programs

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jorge Rodriguez, Western Michigan University; Tycho Fredericks, Western Michigan University; Steven Butt, Western Michigan University; Luis Rodriguez, University of Wisconsin - Waukesha

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

AC 2007-2738: STUDENTS AND FACULTY EXPERIENCES IN TECHNOLOGYAND ENGINEERING WORKSHOPS FOR MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOLSJorge Rodriguez, Western Michigan UniversityTycho Fredericks, Western Michigan UniversitySteven Butt, Western Michigan UniversityLuis Rodriguez, University of Wisconsin - Waukesha Page 12.1323.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Engineering and Technology Experiences in Workshops for High and Middle School StudentsAbstractActivities focusing on introducing engineering and technology to students in high and middleschool are taken place at our institutions. These activities have developed into one- or two-dayworkshops and

Conference Session

Meeting ABET Requirements

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bobby Crawford, USMA

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

achieving USMA’s Engineering and Technology outcomes. The author developed amethod to identify the graded events that supported each of the course’s objectives, determinehow well they supported those objectives, and then link objective achievement to the USMAlevel outcomes through a subjective pair-wise comparison of the course objectives. Positivefeedback from faculty in the ME program led to expansion of this process to capture the studentperformance data and faculty input from all ME program courses and feed this into a programlevel assessment. The resulting evaluation combines the strengths of objective evaluation (basedon graded events) and subjective evaluation (based on faculty experience).This paper describes the motivation for developing

Conference Session

Liberal Education and Leadership

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julia Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Richard House, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Anneliese Watt, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education

engineering faculty’s communication pedagogy in theengineering classroom. We have surveyed engineering faculty at a variety of institutions todetermine to what degree they incorporate communication into their technical classes. Theproject included the development of an electronic survey instrument that collected responsesfrom engineering faculty at programs and departments in the United States. In addition to thesurvey results, we conducted focus groups with small groups of faculty, both at our institutionand at the site of the 2008 Frontiers in Education Conference, in order to dig deeper into the datacollected. The conclusions we draw from analysis of the survey and focus group results indicatethat engineering faculty have incorporated

Conference Session

Influence of Race and Culture

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shonda Bernadin, Georgia Southern University; Frank Atuahene, Ph.D

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

that fueled these results. Appropriate data was collected,analyzed and used to identify contributing factors that lead to the attraction and retention ofminority more specifically, black Engineering and Technology faculty members at thisinstitution. Using several data analysis techniques, we show that there is a high correlationbetween diversity (in terms of students, faculty and the academic learning environment) and theattraction and retention of black engineering and technology faculty members. These dataindicate that the diversity model implemented at this university is successful in attracting andretaining minority faculty members. Consequently as a result of this work, similar facultydiversity models can be developed and used to increase

Conference Session

Tools for Teaching and Learning

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Kenneth Kline; Jerry Ku; Chin-An Tan; Trilochan Singh; Ronald Gibson

; Exposition Copyright ? 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”This paper describes what has emerged as the key element in our overall process-improvementstructure, how this element evolved, how it is woven into the core operations of our department,and how it is being used in efforts to improve our MS and PhD programs.Program SettingWayne State University is listed under the heading of Carnegie doctoral/research universities-extensive. It had a ranking of 68 in the National Science Foundation listing of research &development expenditures at universities and colleges overall for fiscal year 2000, and a rankingof 48 among public universities and colleges. This means our faculty members are expected tocarry out research programs and win

Conference Session

International Engineering Education II

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Waddah Akili

increase in oilrevenues during the 70s, and 80s, coupled with lack of skilled professionals in areas deemednecessary for growth and development of oil-related industries of the Region, has been pivotal inthe start-up of higher education in general and engineering in particular. There are today eightpublic colleges of engineering in the Region (Table 1) in addition to several, recently established,private and semi private colleges and/or universities that offer engineering degrees.These eight public colleges have, since their inception, been guided by advisory boards made uplargely from faculty members and administrators drawn from US colleges. Previously, theGrinters Report(9) and the Goals Report(10) have been used to guide the educational

Conference Session

Assessing Teaching and Learning

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

John Dantzler; Kevin Whitaker; Jim Richardson

Session Number 3530 Carry-Over Effects of a Freshman Engineering Program as Identified by Faculty Ratings John Dantzler, James Richardson, Kevin Whitaker The University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL 35487Abstract For seven years, The University of Alabama’s College of Engineering has presentedincoming freshmen with the opportunity to participate in a non-traditional first year programcalled TIDE (Teaming, Integration, and Design in Engineering). Components of TIDE thatdiffer from the traditional first year program are cohort

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

David Miller

Session 1475 Group homework: A new faculty member’s experiences in an introductory engineering course D. C. Miller Department of Chemical Engineering Michigan Technological UniversityIntroduction As described recently1, most new engineering educators teach in the manner they weretaught. Many recognize that more effective methods of instruction must exist; however, theyoften become overwhelmed with literature that is written in “a language that is foreign to them”and, lacking the time to decipher the jargon

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Curriculum and Programs

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kahina Lasfer, Stevens Institute of Technology; Arthur Pyster, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

AC 2012-3342: A REVIEW OF NON-TENURE-TRACK, FULL-TIME FAC-ULTY AT SYSTEMS CENTRIC SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (SCSE) PRO-GRAMSKahina Lasfer, Stevens Institute of Technology Kahina Lasfer is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Systems Engineering at Stevens Institute of Tech- nology. Her research area is based on analyzing and creating a systems-based approach for the graduate systems engineering education for the 21st century. She participated in many projects at the school of sys- tems and enterprises including a project to create a model curriculum in graduate software engineering. She has a master’s degree in computer engineering. She worked with Lucent Technologies as a Software Developer and Software Designer/Architect