students’ abilities in some basic engineering skills, e.g. computing. An underlyingphilosophy of ENGR 101 is that engineers need to be as actively engaged in problem definition as theyare in problem solving. Most of engineering curricula focuses on problem solving so this course isdesigned to try to get students thinking about problem definition at this early stage of their academiccareers. In the fall semesters of 2014 and 2015 the decision was made to try engaging the students in a newexperience: the Engineers Without Borders Challenge (EWB Challenge). There were several reasons forchoosing this project approach for ENGR 101. First, this project provides opportunities for students tosee how a problem is defined. The challenge is poorly
a timely manner. Among the broader impacts that are expected fromthe program include:Recruitment and Retention of Underrepresented Groups. The CAM project also aims at theincrease and participation of women and students from other underrepresented groups inME/CIVE engineering, as well as ensuring their retention and graduation. It is hoped thatinterventions as proposed by the project will contribute significantly towards this end.Products. The CAM project ongoing findings and lessons learned will be annually presented atfuture conferences. The progress and impact of the program will be studied and disseminated tothe scholarly community. It is hoped that the lessons learned will provide insight on the best andevidence-based practices (as
for New College Students: A Summary of Research Findings of the Collaborative Learning Project. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment.19. Smith, B., & MacGregor, J. (2009). Learning Communities and the Quest for Quality, Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, v17 n2 p118-139.20. Barnes, R., & Piland, W. (2010). Impact of Learning Communities in Developmental English on Community College Student Retention and Persistence, Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, v12 n1 p7-24.21. Weiss, M., Visher, M., & Wathington, H. (2010). Learning Communities for Students in Developmental
more engaged and achieved higher learning outcomes thanstudents in the lecture-based section, adding to the literature on blended/flipped courses. Theyfound that the student-centered approach appeared to impact behaviors; participants valued thein-class, collaborative problem-solving activities. However, due to data limitations, they were notable to determine how the collaborative learning environment led to improved student learning. Thatis, although students discussed problems, asked questions of each other, and received help fromteaching assistants and instructor, the students’ roles (i.e., questioner and responder), the questions’nature, and the discourse that led to positive learning outcomes remained unclear. Gail Goldberg, a STEM
discuss the SSP in detail by outlining the many activities implemented andhighlighting lessons learned as the project moves into the second year of implementation.Preliminary data will be used to assess outcomes pertaining to retention and academicperformance. Initial results indicate a positive impact on the student population participating inthe project.BackgroundThe NSF-funded S-STEM program is designed to provide low–income academically talentedstudents with financial and academic support through scholarships and activities that promotetheir retention to graduation [1]. S-STEM programs differ from institution to institution.However, there are key elements like academic support, community engagement, and careerreadiness that are included in
social mobility.Program SummaryProgram NeedSouth Florida State College (SFSC) is located in a rural geographic region, serving a three-county service district in the center of Florida. The average per-capita income of the tri-countyarea is over 36% below the state average. Only 16% of residents (28% of whom areHispanic/Latino) have bachelor’s degrees or higher [1]. The region ranks as one of the higheststatewide for incidence of teenage pregnancy. These and other social factors combine to producea substantial percentage of non-traditional students seeking higher education, the impact ofwhich is seen disproportionately in the tri-county region’s Hispanic families, who along withlow-income students are experiencing significantly lower educational
including Galileo and Hypatia Living-Learning Communities and the CEED Peer Mentoring program. Previously, Dr. Katey served as the Assistant Director of Stu- dent Success and First-year Experience at Siena Heights University located in Adrian, Michigan, where she played a pivotal role in creating an environment of success for first-year students. Her professional interests and research focus on the retention of underrepresented and underserved students. Dr. Katey graduated from Clarion University of Pennsylvania (Clarion, PA) where she earned a Bachelor of Science in Education (2007) and a Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction (2010). In 2019, she grad- uated from Morgan State University’s Higher Education
professionalresponsibilities in engineering situations, and make informed judgments, which must considerthe impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contextsVIII. EE/COE 1195 Engineering Practice (Design) and Professional DevelopmentAssignment: One Laptop per Child Case Study.Description: Students are presented the One Laptop per Child (OLPC) initiative case study. Thegoal of this assessment is to have the students understand the contextual impact of engineeringinitiatives and solutions. Instructor leads a class discussion, introducing the National Academy ofEngineering (NAE) [4], discussing how NAE and the Engineering community foresee theworkplace requirements. NAE reports that the “Engineers of 2020” must not only be
byNewstetter and Svinicki [4]. 1. Students should have opportunities to participate in the social and material practice of the targeted community. Since learning occurs as students progressively participate in the community, instructional activities should reflect the real world problems. In this way, learning occurs when students “interact with the tools, people, and physical world” to better understand the impact (pros and cons) and culture considerations of tools around them. 2. Students are encouraged to try on the identity of the community members. 3. Students should have the ability to create their own learning path. Projects and problems should be designed to
communities and not at the central YMCA facility) wasplanned and offered twice a month, and for Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Illinois, an on-campus activity day (about three hours) was offered once per academic semester in which theLittles attended with their Bigs.In addition to several activities the team already developed, we engaged STEM undergraduatestudents to develop, pilot, and refine lesson plans and activities with the goal of having a libraryof ready to go material. With internal funding, we were able to hire three undergraduate studentsto work two to three hours per week to support the delivery of the program; these students weretrained8, 9 by CCIL staff (including best practices of outreach, working with diverse audiences,and
to consider and design with ethical, equity, andsocial justice implications in mind. Further, there is still a general lack of diversity ofstakeholder parameters in early engineering design classes. Introduction to systems engineeringcourses lack integration of current thinking on community engagement ethics and that absencecan be seen across the systems engineering curriculum, as well. We ask: How do we createlearning opportunities/engineering interventions that are technically sound, and also prioritizecommunity voice, cultural appropriateness, and contextual efficacy? In this paper, we reviewthree methods of stakeholder analysis taught in system engineering courses and identify whereand how one can integrate community voices through a
: • communication, conflict resolution, teamwork and leadership • an awareness of global markets/competition • an appreciation of other cultures and outlooks • a firm grounding in environmental, social, ethical and professional responsibility • an ability to solve problems and think critically • demonstrated business sense and management skills • the ability to learn continuously and use information effectively throughout their careersThis active and collaborative learning environment is one in which women and minorities tend tothrive. In addition, the process of developing leaders through teamwork and hands-onexploration creates a climate for strong peer-peer mentoring. Exposure to all facets ofengineering and business help students
perspective, listen, question, affirm and synthesize ideas. • use dialogic skills to engage in meaningful interactions that allow and invite students to explore perspectives, explain further, reflect on what others say and listen for understanding. • employ dialogic communication as action, community building and a way to affect change within systems and structures of power to address inequities and injustices. • explore and identify the identities and the lived experience of the self and others through shared narratives to better understand one’s intersectional identities, their positionality, and the placement of groups within systems
1987 to 1993, and has been at the University of South Carolina since 1994.Dr. Thomas T Peters, South Carolina’s Coalition for Mathematics & Science Dr. Peters serves as Executive Director of South Carolina’s Coalition for Mathematics & Science (SC- CMS) founded by BMW Manufacturing Co., DuPont, Michelin North America and Duke Energy and hosted by the College of Engineering, Computing, and Applied Science at Clemson University. Among the initiatives managed by SCCMS are the S2TEM Centers SC statewide support network for STEM education and two regional STEM Collaboratives focused on community engagement and out of school time learning. Dr. Peters is a recipient of the Outstanding Leader in Science
genetic algorithms) methodologies to several industrial processes including desalination, oil refineries, jet engines, and robot manipulators. Dr. Zilouchian’s awards include the distinguished FAU Presidential Leadership Service Award in 2017 for his contribution to research and community engagement, FAU College of Engineering Dean’s Awards twice, and Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching twice. He has published one book and more than 165 book chapters, scholarly journal papers, and refereed conference proceedings. He has supervised more than 20 Ph.D. and MS students to completion during his tenure and taught more than thirty (30) different courses related to computer and engineering technology. He is active in several
applied research and hands-on field experiences in the Northern Cheyenne community, enable students’ abilities to manage technological uncertainty in the context of the unfamiliar, while developing their critical inquiry skills; and 3) Further students’ collaborative research and design skills through participation in and understanding of interdisciplinary teams.These targeted and defined goals for the AIHI course series are intended to create a stable coreof annual activities from which to extend the collaborative model to complementary educationaland research units. From this beginning, AIHI will strive to engage additional courses andresearch programs that could bring the energy and ideas of talented faculty and students to
communication, 5. A contributing backbone organization. [15]To recruit, retain, and transition young women, and particularly women of color, into thecomputing workforce, MSAWC is modeled after similar, proven broadening participation incomputing (BPC) collective impact approaches. Specifically, four strategies with proven success,listed in Table 1 [16] provide a foundation for MSAWC activities.Table 1. BPC Collective Alliance Approaches [16] Proven Approach Description Reforming statewide Develop a common framework that focused on students and systems educational systems on various levels of the educational pathway. Provide introductory computing classes for students, with an Focusing on
appointment, she served for six years as OSU’s associate provost for academic success and eight years as Stanford’s associate vice provost for undergraduate education. She earned her bachelors’ degrees in French and Comparative History of Ideas from University of Washington, and master’s and doctoral degrees from Yale in French literature. She is interested in student perceptions of innovative pedagogies and course designs, and the impact of co-curricular engagement on student success.Dr. Ann Sitomer, Oregon State University Ann earned a PhD in mathematics education from Portland State University in 2014. Her dissertation examined the informal ways of reasoning about ratio, rate and proportion that adult returning students
Engineering (CoE) at SJSU proposed a new approach forrecruiting Hispanic students into computing studies and careers through the BroadeningParticipation in Computing—Hispanic Computer Brigade initiative. By forming HispanicComputing Brigades (HCB) in two local high schools, we intend to inspire and engage Hispanicstudents through IT service learning projects. The first segment of the HCB program was theSilicon Valley Computer Camp (SVCC). The SVCC was held on June 22-26, 2009, with a totalof 22 students from two local high schools. At the summer camp, students built their owncomputers and were taught a range of fundamental computing skills to equip them to createsocially-relevant projects for their local communities during the academic year
“plays” are working as desired, closing the loop between purpose and outcome …The playbook idea grew out of an independent study project conducted between the two authorsand is based on their extensive backgrounds in community-engaged learning, capstone, and otherdesign education experiences. The various portions of the playbook structure were created,refined, and iterated on through discussions, in parallel with a number of sample scenarios fromthe authors’ teaching experience, as outlined in the results section below. The first author hasover fifteen years of experience in community-engaged engineering and design leadership roles,including three years as a course instructor in this space for students from their first year
. Page 26.1763.2Second, class sizes tend to be larger, forty students or more being common. So it is difficult toarrange students in groups of 3–4 each and have each group engage in deep discussions withoutgroups disrupting each others’ discussions. Moreover, class meeting periods are an hour or lessand that may be insufficient for these groups to engage in deep discussions.Third, faculty, even those who buy in, at some level, to the value of cooperative learning1 , tend tobe concerned about devoting class time to such activities since they are concerned about possibleserious negative impact on topic coverage. Our work shows how we can exploit the affordancesof mobile and web technologies to address these challenges. As we discuss in the paper
collaboration such as development of shared team cognition, clarifying goals andexpectations, using communication and collaboration technologies and communicating withdiverse project stakeholders (internal and external customers). Instructional and proceduralscaffolds embedded with information and communication technologies have great potential assuitable mediums for enhancing these processes. They can also support the development ofcritical teamwork skills. This paper describes and evaluates an evidence-based interventionaimed at supporting team processes in distributed student teams. The platform and associatedactivities and tools were focused on developing key team processes identified in the teameffectiveness literature from industrial and
Yale Center for Engineering Innovation and DesignWhile the equipment and space are important, the programs and the supporting community areessential to the Center’s ability to make an impact on campus by increasing the visibility ofengineering, sparking creativity and accelerating collaboration. The Center hosts student designteams, academic courses and information workshops, as well as the modern tools and equipmentto support these programs. The Center is open to all members of the Yale community that areinterested in design and innovation. Its members range from theater majors that fabricate stageprops to forestry students who construct equipment for scientific field work.1,300 people became members of Yale’s Center for Engineering
showcase their best work, demonstrate their accomplishments to potential employers, andultimately provide them with better job opportunities.A student’s portfolio will be a record of his/her educational goals and accomplishments. It willinclude summaries of pertinent courses and projects and links to the full text records of someprojects, including work in engineering graphics, communication, and design. The concept ofrecording goals and accomplishments may well benefit students as they embark on their careersby giving them a record of their goals and their progress that they can reflect on as post-graduates. As Kolb suggests experiential learning is an integrated approach to education that hasfar-reaching effects for students. He anticipates the
GTAs did on all categories. On the importance ratings, GTAs placedsignificantly higher importance on all categories of GTA roles and responsibilities than facultyand students did. Both GTAs and faculty reported high discrepancy between importance andcompetence in the categories of „instructional practices‟ and „engagement with students‟. Facultyreported high discrepancy between importance and competence in the „TA Preparedness‟category while GTAs did not. The diverse needs, viewpoints, and perspectives of the threegroups that were captured by this survey provide interesting insight and valuable data fordesigning a GTA training program.IntroductionConcerns about recruitment and retention of students in engineering disciplines have resulted
writing instruction.AnalysisTo assess student improvement in technical writing skills within FA22, Hake’s gain (HG = (postscore – pre score)/(max score – pre score)) was computed between the initial draft and final labreport as a measure of normalized improvement on individual scientific writing sections [3].Following SP23, Hake’s Gain will be used to determine improvements in 1) student writingsection scores between initial draft and final lab report within SP23 and 2) between FA22 andSP23 final lab reports. Ultimately, an inter-group comparison of the first lab report in the FA23course will be used to assess the impact of the newly developed technical writing modules ontechnical writing proficiency.Initial ResultsTo date, we have 38 students
, communication, teamwork, leadership, andprofessional ethics. These competencies were consistently aligned with students' perspectives,program objectives, ABET criteria, and NACE competencies.2) Mechanism to integrate competenciesTo integrate the identified competencies, we used the ICAP Framework [18][19], which offers anuanced perspective on cognitive engagement and learning outcomes [20]. The frameworksuggests the use of four modes which are interactive, constructive, active, and passive [18] [19].Passive mode indicates that students show no physical activity of processing. Active modeindicates that students physically do some tasks while listening such as taking notes.Constructive mode indicates that students generate explicit outputs such as
assessment, to evaluate their corresponding Global Learning outcome, the appropriateECE program outcome and ABET objective(s). 1. Global Engagement (a) Contemporary issues and the impact of electrical engineering on global society: En- gineering Design (required course). Students present a slideshow as a group on team- Page 25.486.4 selected contemporary ethical topics in electrical engineering. Current assessment ef- forts in this course evaluate regional ethical concerns, with no mention on global ethics. (b) Historical perspective and biographical information on inventors and scientists: pre
, stimulate their curiosity, and engage them in hands-on activities that are notlimited to the laboratory 1. This paper proposes the integration of an activity-based learning approach in the EEcurriculum with the use of Analog Discovery Boards (ADB) by Digilent Inc. This enhancementallows students to build, analyze and visualize circuits using the USB-powered AnalogDiscovery platform, a personal computer, and a basic analog parts kit. This opens the door for avariety of learning activities that include in-class experimentation, take-home exercises, groupactivity sessions, and design-and-learn projects among many others. Our work aims to create anenvironment for a student that is conducive to innovation and creative thinking; while providingan
interest in STEAM by connecting participantswith positive learning experiences [9] and meaningful social interactions [10].As far as intervention goes, one early study suggests that college-going students who participatedin a college-run STEM club during high school had 1.49 times the odds of expressing STEMcareer aspirations relative to students who did not participate in a STEM club [8]. Incomparison, the following other interventions provided comparative results: Summer bridge - 2times more likely [11]; campus visits with a STEM college professor 1.3 times [12]; and STEMdual enrollment - 1.3 times [13].S-L relationships can ease this burden on teachersS-L encourages engagement in the community by involving participants to meet needs in