examine the likelihood of mental health help-seeking behaviors among Asian Americans.Ms. Samantha N. Cruz, Arizona State University Samantha N. Cruz, M.A., is a Ph.D. student in Counseling Psychology at Arizona State University and previously earned her B.A. in Psychology and M.A. in Counseling Psychology. She has previously con- ducted research investigating the impact of diversity interventions on campus climate as well as the impact of racial discrimination on Latina/o adolescents’ academic outcomes. Her research interests center on ex- amining racial and ethnic disparities in education as well as resources to promote the academic success of students from marginalized backgrounds.Dr. Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State
performance design choices. This paper describes a current engineering problem, provides details of the activities, andpresents evidence for impacts on high school students. Students’ attitudes about mathematics and Page 15.961.2science are revealed, as are their confidence related to doing mathematics and science. Data alsoshows what students enjoyed, learned, and/or would change after participating in the lesson. Afull lesson plan, activity description, and implementation instructions, with lesson worksheets areavailable upon request.Introduction The CREAM (Culturally Relevant Engineering Applications in Mathematics) programwas
. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483. 6. Engle, R. A. (2011). The productive disciplinary engagement framework: Origins, key concepts and developments. Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning, 161-200. 7. Lising, L., & Elby, A. (2005). The impact of epistemology on learning: A case study from introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 73(4), 372-382. 8. Swenson, J. (in preparation) Examining the Effects of Students’ Epistemologies on
Developing Strategies to Improve Student Engagement, Learning and Enjoyment of Introductory Computer Science CoursesProfessor Heather Marriott – Computer, Electrical and Software Engineering DepartmentEmbry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityAbstract - Introductory computer science courses have traditionally been taught using a lecture-based style, and this is perpetuated by the computer science community continuing to teach inthe style in which they were taught. While educational research has proven the effectiveness ofactive learning in the classroom, many computer science professors find it difficult in incorporatethese techniques into their classrooms. Today’s generation of students get bored quickly with thetraditional
Paper ID #30195Role of Engagement in Predicting 6th - Grade Students’ Performance in anIntegrated STEM Life Sciences UnitSaira Anwar, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Saira Anwar is a Ph.D. candidate at the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. Her primary research focuses on studying the unique contribution of different instructional strategies on students’ learning and motivation in computing courses. Further, she is interested in designing interventions that help in understanding conceptually hard concepts in STEM courses especially programming and software
. Towards this end, weincorporated a set of three student projects to provide high impact learning opportunities. Thetasks for the three projects were - Design a power distribution system for an aircraft - Design a digital communication system for an aircraft - Design radar and satellite control systems for an aircraftEach of the projects required teams of 3 to 4 students to write a detailed technical report. Thethird project also included an oral briefing. These projects were unmistakably the highlight ofthe course, in terms of getting the students to actually do engineering. Using the definitionoffered at the beginning of this paper, these projects allowed the students to apply technicalprinciples to make decisions as to the best solution
pedagogical approach and assessment methodsA new interdisciplinary team-taught course was developed by the Departments of Earth Sciencesand Mechanical Engineering at the authors’ university employer that explored board gamedeconstruction and development as a pedagogical method to engage undergraduate honorsstudents. To this end, a one semester curriculum was devised and taught to students in the Fallacademic semester of 2019. Students were taught scientific content related to climate change andits potential impacts on a variety of former civilizations including the Maya, the Mongols, andthe Ancestral Puebloans. Students were asked to extrapolate lessons learned from these pastevents to consider how climate change may affect societies today. Board
experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data.(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs.(d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams.(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems.(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility.(g) an ability to communicate effectively.(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context.(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning.(j) a knowledge of contemporary issues.(k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.A new curriculum map
results were very positive in terms of student reactions. Most studentsstrongly preferred the flipped format. But from an impact standpoint the grades earned werereasonably similar between the flipped and standard delivery modes. The reason for that, in ouropinion, is that the level of student engagement outside the classroom did not materialize to thedegree necessary.IntroductionThe term “student engagement” is multifaceted and can take many different forms. Examplesinclude academic, cognitive, social, emotional, and institutional to name a few [1]. For this paper,we will focus on academic engagement and will use the following definition. Academicengagement is the “participation in the requirements for school success” [2].There are different
) at LSU and the CxC Engineering Communication Studio (now known as the Chevron Center for Engineering Education) and any impact it has had on your communication skills. I will ask you several open questions. If at any time, you do not understand the question, please ask me to clarify. Your personal opinions and views are very important for us. You’ve been selected to participate at random so your views are likely to represent those of other students who aren’t here. If your views differ from the other participants, please make them known. There are no right or wrong answers. Please feel welcome to express yourself freely
engineers to solve theseproblems (↑understanding the broader context). Reading, studying, and makinghandwritten copies of the National Society of Professional Engineer’s Creed(↑engagement/active learning) helped students solidify the concept that the engineeringprofession is one of service for the benefit of humanity. Students then completed a seriesof attitude and reflection exercises. The intent of the reflections was to engage them in anactivity (↑active learning) for the purpose of promoting moral and ethical developmentthat helped frame future learning experiences. Reflection activities helped students seethemselves as a part of the global community (↑understanding the broader context), aswell as provide an opportunity to develop communication
ethics by using a blended style of independent tasks and a peer-learning activity. Specifically, this paper investigates three main questions: 1. Does microlearning increase student engagement? 2. Does increased engagement result in higher performance on ethics assessments? 3. Is a blended approach of independent microlearning and an in-class team case study effective in bridging the lower order of memorizing ethical terms to applying ethical principles to a dilemma?The question on engagement was evaluated through an end of semester Likert style survey, andthe impact of the learning approach was assessed by comparing student participation in themicrolearning modules to performance in an end of semester ethics quiz. The Likert
of differential equations to problems in image processing. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Investigating Undergraduate Researchers’ Perceptions of Mentoring RelationshipsBackgroundAccording to the Council on Undergraduate Research, undergraduate research is defined as “aninquiry or investigation conducted by an undergraduate student that makes an originalintellectual or creative contribution to the discipline” [1]. Undergraduate research is a high-impact educational practice that has myriad benefits for students. Faculty mentors reportextensive learning gains by students who engage in undergraduate research in collecting data,collaborating with other
Writing Studies from San Diego State Univ., and a MA in English literature from UC Irvine. His current research centers on identifying mental and emotional states generated through human interaction with virtual reality and other virtual artifacts by analyzing physiological data and applying that research to create more effective virtual learning environments. Leveraging this work, he is currently creating a per- sistent and interactive virtual environment for hosting remote learning classes in the Dept. of Biomedical Engineering at UC Irvine. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Assessment of Student Engagement in Virtual Reality Clinical Immersion Environments
-based nature of the curriculum, takingCMSE 890 is one way that graduate students are able to fulfill these RCR training requirements.Course Description and Learning Goals“CMSE 890: Communications, Teamwork, Ethics and Leadership Training for MultidisciplinaryResearch Teams” is a highly interactive course that meets once a week for 110 minutes (earning2 credits in MSU’s semester-based system). The choice of one longer meeting, rather thanseveral shorter sessions, was purposeful: the topics and activities of this course encouragediscussion and engagement, and the longer class allows students to explore in more depth than atraditional 50-minute session would allow. The focus of the course is on in-class small and largegroup activities, with
learningexperiences [6], [7]. Studying and researching in a foreign institution could challenge the values,feelings, languages, and behaviors oriented and sustained by the different cultural backgroundsof international students, including language deficiency, lack of social and cultural knowledge,potential mismatch of communication between international students and others, and unfamiliarlearning styles [7].Although international engineering graduate students contribute much to boosting the U.S.economy and keeping it competitive, they are understudied in their circumstances. Scholarsfocusing on Engineering Education Research (EER) are part of the ecosystem to educateengineering students and prepare them for the workforce. Within the engineering
individual learner's journey. As this approach continues to evolve and gain traction, it has thepotential to fundamentally reshape the educational landscape, making learning more engaging,relevant, and impactful for each student. On the other hand, learning styles are diverse andmultifaceted, representing the unique ways individuals engage with and process information. Theintegration of advanced data analytics, machine learning, and deep learning in educationalsystems provides significant insights into these styles, enabling the creation of more adaptive andpersonalized learning experiences. These technological approaches help educators and learningplatforms to cater to individual wants and enhance the overall effectiveness of the learningprocess
purely lecture sessions have been transformed into lecture,discussion, demonstration, and hands-on activity periods.The addition of collected or recreated artifacts has expanded the students learning experiencefrom that of a passive observer to an engaged involved participant. They can now examine,handle, and pretend to use the artifacts whether they were technologies used as a tool, weapon,armor, or for a host of other purposes. Not only do the students understand how and why thedevices were used, but they also understand how they were made including the time and effortinvolved.The use of graphics, pictures, and videos, has made it easy for students to experience visuallyexactly how retro and ancient technologies were utilized. The uses of
the Educational and Academic Innovation Unit, UNIDA (for its acronym in Spanish), as an instructor in active learning methodologies. Her research interest topics involve university education in STEM areas, faculty and continuing professional development, research-based methodologies, community engagement projects, evaluation tools and technology, and gender issues in STEM education. https://orcid.org/0000- 0002-0383-0179 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Academic performance and factors that influence engineering students dropout: a gender perspective studyAbstractIn the last decade, the
in the Chicago area, 2) the Junior Research Scientists program funded by After School Matters of the city of Chicago, to promote STEM for high school students and 3) a collaboration with the Center for College Access and Success – Northeastern University to promote STEM learning in their Upward Bound Math & Science program, also oriented for high school students. More information regarding the mentioned programs can be find at www.scientistsfortomorrow.org American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Building Capacity to Promote STEAM in Communities The impact of Professional Development for teachers, instructors, and
performance or behavior. As will bediscussed in the warning signs section below, such students often can be classified by attitudinal,physical, or behavioral demonstrations that are outside the norm of the larger comparison group.The degree to which such issues pose a nuisance or risk to peers, professors, or others willnecessitate a range of interventions on the part of the institution1,2.Students who are troubled, emotionally-challenged, and difficult are important for severalreasons. First, the simple reality is that these students are members of the institution andfrequently interact with others. For this reason alone, the relationship-jeopardizing behaviorsthat troubled, emotionally-challenged, and difficult students engage in should give
the effect of its integration on theelectrical grid, and energy efficiency in systems engineering. Furthermore, the student-internswould demonstrate improvement in collaborative learning, project management, and engineeringdesign, in particular: communication, professional documentation, articulating milestones,reviewing and synthesizing relevant literature, analytic thinking, and iterative problem solvingusing “backwards design.” To accomplish this, the mentors planned to provide a combination ofparticipatory lectures introducing relevant STEM background and context with task-focusedexperiential activities that would engage multiple learning styles.Given the number of interns involved, a single project split into constituent and transitional
to promote student engagement and significantly impact student learning.The effectiveness of an active learning method varies from many methods that are often used inonline settings due to its focus on engaging learners through interactive and participatoryactivities. Active learning requires students to actively participate in the learning process byengaging in discussions, problem-solving activities, and collaborative projects, as opposed topassive learning methods where students passively receive information [6]. This hands-onapproach encourages deeper understanding, critical thinking, and retention of knowledge [7].Active learning approaches also promote interaction and collaboration among learners,cultivating a sense of community and
productive response to confusion for students.BackgroundStudent Confusion in the ClassroomMany STEM classes are taught using a traditional, passive, lecture-based structure, in which anexpert instructor presents material to students [17]-[19]. On homework and exams, students arethen asked to recreate an algorithmic problem-solving technique they have been taught, resultingin a single numerical answer [20]. There are a variety of criticisms of this teaching practice,including concerns related to equity [21] and student engagement [22]. In addition, by presentingknowledge to students instead of allowing them to work through a state of not-knowing toconstruct it themselves, lecture-based classes do not allow students to productively engage withthe
students. It grew into something much bigger, and each has been surprised at how Page 9.1215.1powerful such a simple and somewhat unplanned partnership can be.To date, the collaboration has focused on two main areas: encouraging entrepreneurshipthrough academic advising, and creating an entrepreneurial club to provide a visibleoutlet for student entrepreneurial activities.As advisors, Greg and Kathy realized the influence and impact they had on students.Infusing entrepreneurship into their advising consisted of identifying technology studentswho exhibited strengths in entrepreneurial areas. These students were encouraged, to at aminimum, enroll in some
MOM Belize programefforts, ensuring that the program continues to meet the needs of CJC and its community.Key Wordsneeds assessment; focus group; service-learning project; international partner; buildingcommunity partnershipsIntroductionDeveloping and participating in service-learning projects at the college level has the ability tofoster cross-cultural understanding, build capacity, and provide opportunities for faculty,students, and other participants to address real-world challenges through collaborative andeducational frameworks. Service-learning projects allow students and participants to engage inhands-on learning while working directly with communities to support locally-driven initiatives,often in areas such as infrastructure
discussions. Each group consisted of three participants to ensure active engagement andmeaningful interaction. For this study, a semi-structured interview protocol was developed toguide the discussions, incorporating open-ended questions to explore participants’ experiences,motivations, and challenges in pursuing a degree in CEM. The interviews took place in acomfortable and private setting to encourage open and honest communication, and field noteswere taken to capture contextual information. At the end of focus group interviews, a follow-upquestionnaire was distributed to quantitatively measure the gender disparities surrounding femalestudent’s enrollment in the author’s university program.Data Analysis and ResultsTo assess the extent of issue on
were collected fromparticipants, including gender, ethnicity, academic standing, parents’ education, and veteranstatus.Data CollectionThe survey was distributed during the summer of 2019 to REU, RET and YSP participantsacross all three participating ERCs and students (including undergraduate students, graduatestudents and postdoctoral scholars) who were engaged with yearlong research of one ERC in thepast year. (Note: The timing of each ERC’s annual site visit with NSF impacted the timing fordata collection of students engaged in ERC yearlong research.) All surveys were distributedonline through an online survey software platform and took approximately 20 to 25 minutes tocomplete. A total of 126 participants completed at least one set of
-solving skills from the very first semester, and by the time they graduate, they improvethis skill substantially by gradually building on it. On the contrary, the writing skills are usuallytaught during the first couple of semesters at the university-level which introduces students to theconcepts of how to write (i.e., Learning-to-Write). After that, this information is used as amedium to communicate information without realizing its importance as a tool to help studentsreflect on their thoughts and learn the content in the course throughout the process of writing(i.e., Writing-to-Learn)2.It is well-established that students in engineering engage in ample activities that require technicalwriting from writing lab reports, research reports, and
students’ transfer success in engineering and science?(2) Are there discernable profiles of non-traditional students enrolling in engineering and sciencemajors in community colleges that utilize these pedagogical practices? (3) How do students’creative and innovative problem solving approaches influence the choices that they make inusing pedagogical support practices? (4) What are the impacts of pedagogical practices anddifferences among pedagogical practices, on persistence toward students’ transfer to colleges anduniversities? (5) How do students’ creative and innovative problem solving approaches influencetheir persistence toward transfer to engineering and science programs at 4-year universities? This research studies an area and group