program, a hands-on experience is expected mostly through laboratory classes [4-6]. Theyusually enjoy laboratory classes and look forward to implementing what they had learnt in bookcourses. But most importantly, since project/lab-based learning is one of the most effective andbetter resonating methods of learning, and one that distinguishes between engineering programs[5, 6]; engineering students immediately feel that they are getting their money’s worth whenengaging in a laboratory environment. Different engineering schools struggled to convince their students with “emergency”remote laboratory classes as an alternative to in-person laboratory classes [7, 8]. As ABET has notrelaxed any accreditation requirements, it was mandated that
training. She teaches undergraduate courses related to environmental management, energy and fundamentals of industrial processes at the School of Engineering, UNAB. She currently is coordinating the Educational and Academic Innovation Unit at the School of Engineering (UNAB) that is engaged with the continuing teacher training in active learning methodologies at the three campuses of the School of Engineering (Santiago, Vi˜na del Mar and Con- cepci´on, Chile). She authored several manuscripts in the science education area, joined several research projects, participated in international conferences with oral presentations and key note lectures and serves as referee for journals, funding institutions and associations
Paper ID #23848The Benefit of Training Undergraduate Teaching AssistantsDr. Gianluca Guadagni, University of Virginia PhD in Mathematics University of Virginia Assistant Professor, Applied Mathematics, Department of Engineering and Society, School of Engineer- ing and Applied Sciences, University of Virginia.Dr. Hui Ma, University of Virginia Hui Ma received her Ph.D. in applied mathematics from the University of Alabama at Birmingham in 2012. Her current research focuses on the Errors-In-Variables (EIV) model and fitting geometric curves and surfaces to observed data points. Before joining the University of Virginia
AC 2010-890: ENGAGEMENT IN AN UNDERGRADUATE HEAT TRANSFERCOURSE OUTSIDE OF THE CLASSROOMSarah Parikh, Stanford University Sarah E. Parikh is a fourth year graduate student at Stanford University working on her PhD in mechanical engineering with a focus on engineering education. She received a BS in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2006 and received a MS in mechanical engineering with a focus on microscale heat transfer from Stanford University in 2008.Helen Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is Research Scientist at the Stanford Center for Innovations in Learning and Research Associate in the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. Her current
Paper ID #38873Inclusive Course Design Checklist: A Living Document for Faculty toCreate Inclusive ClassroomsDr. Swetha Nittala, Uber Technologies Swetha is currently a People Science Researcher at Uber. Prior to this she worked as a Lecturer and a Science and Engineering Education Fellow at the Mechanical Engineering Department, Stanford Univer- sity. She completed her PhD from the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University where she focused on identifying and developing leadership and other socio-technical capabilities among engineer- ing students and professionals. She is passionate about improving engineering
Daniel Raviv College of Engineering and Computer Science, Florida Atlantic University Emails: ravivd@fau.eduAbstract A growing number of students have difficulties connecting mathematical principles toreal life. In addition, as technology brings about a paradigm shift in the way people perceive andlearn new information, students become more sidetracked, as their attention span has becomeshorter. They also prefer more visual and intuitive explanations of the material. This suggest thatadditional teaching methods should be explored to adjust to students' new styles of learning. This paper describes several illustrative examples aimed at aiding in comprehension ofthe concept of limit. The
Paper ID #37857Work in Progress: Context Matters: A Comparative Study ofResults of Common Concept Questions in Statics at SeveralDiverse InstitutionsChristopher Papadopoulos (Professor) Professor of Engineering Sciences and Materials at UPR Mayagüez.Eric Davishahl (Professor and Program Coordinator) Whatcom CCCarisa H Ramming (Associate Professor)Jean Carlos Batista Abreu (Assistant Professor)William A Kitch (Dr.) Dr. Kitch is currently the Chair of the David L. Hirschfeld Engineering Department at Angelo State University. He has over 20 years of professional engineering practice in both the public and private
on engineering equations that intrinsicallyallow for precise engineering analysis and design.This partnership was facilitated by a National Science Foundation Small Business InnovationResearch Phase 1 award. The authors of this paper provided the domain expertise, technicalknowledge, curricular focus, and user testing; the company provided the process to design thevirtual case studies, the technical implementation of the virtual environments, and the back-endsystems to deliver the case studies to students via an online portal that could also collect/evaluatestudent responses. The following sections describe the two case studies that resulted, as well astheir evaluation in the engineering classroom over the course of several semesters
information science. Her research interests include engineering education and educational assessment and evaluation. Her K-12 outreach activities involve organizing a local science fair and a hands-on workshop in nanotechnology. Her other research interests include higher education administration and comparative and international education. Page 25.290.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 CCLI: Model Eliciting Activities: Experiments and Mixed Methods to Assess Student Learning IIIAbstractAs part of a seven university CCLI Type 3 collaborative
instrument to prove this concept for the project client. Over theperiod of one year, the students experienced the entire process of a real-world engineering project, wherethey met the client to learn about the problem and discuss his needs; translated these needs into technicalrequirements; identified, evaluated and selected potential solutions; and implemented and tested thesystem. The prototype system consisted of a syringe equipped with a force sensor, a displacement sensor,an amplification circuit, and a laptop computer with a LabVIEW program. The LabVIEW programaccomplishes data acquisition, converts force and displacement signals to pressure and flow rate, andcalculates the tissue flow impedance. After the system was built, two categories of
undergraduate research, 9 students strongly agreed and 2 agreed. • When asked if the REU impacted their future career plans, 9 students strongly agreed and 2 agreed.Student responses on how the REU impacted their career plans are shown below: • I’m very intent on going to grad school, whereas before it was a thought every once in a while. • Making me more heavily consider grad school as a post-undergrad path • Opened my eyes to more materials science research • I am thinking about grad school and changing my interests. • I am now considering graduate school. • Made my decision on going to graduate school easier • I was thinking of attending a graduate program other than Chemical Engineering. This has changed
, are the mainsubject of algebra and calculus courses. Continuous functions are needed to describe co-variantvariables, trends, time varying signals and control of one variable by another.The mathematician, Descartes, invented the rectangular coordinate system, which enabled thetrends contained in a discrete table of values for a function to be displayed as a set of dots or aconnected set of line segments. The two dimensional coordinate system enabled an equation intwo variables to be graphed as a continuous curve. The use of tables, curves and equations torepresent continuous functions has become conventional in modern science. Modern scientists,engineers and technicians must be able to recognize and use functional relationships, not only
were aware ofthe importance of DAQ in engineering, and demonstrated applications of collecting and post-processing temperature, flow, and pressure data from heat/mass transfer experiments.Purdue University, partnering with local industries, launched an innovative graduate course onIndustrial Internet of Things [9]. This course aims to equip engineering graduate students withskills of data acquisition from IoT sensors and machine connectivity, and then interpreting thesedata using AI-driven analytics. Lectures and ten (10) hands-on lab sessions were developed to helpstudents immerse in IoT and AI-related technologies, gaining practical experience and insights.Building on the knowledge acquired in the lectures and labs, students delivered
Paper ID #17530Comparison of Two Project-Based Learning Experiences in Panama City,PanamaDr. Aaron Richard Sakulich, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Aaron Sakulich is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. His research interests include the development of sustainable cementi- tious materials for infrastructure applications and international project-based learning. The recipient of a 2007 Fulbright award to Morocco, he is now the co-director of an off-campus project site in Panama City, Panama. c American Society for
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)programs have embraced concepts, such as “innovation”, “entrepreneurship”, “socialentrepreneurship”, and “humanitarian engineering.” Creative problem solving is about beinginsightful and recognizing connections among concepts; some of which may appear unrelated.Unlike analytical thinking, creative problem solving relies on flexible and dynamic mentalprocesses using the whole brain1. Therefore, creative problem solving demands divergence fromthe usual patterns of thinking, and it is accomplished most effectively within a team. The STEMdisciplines seek to solve the World’s problems with a well-rounded education and motivation byaddressing challenges through the brainstorming of solutions
the research community have reported on the disruptionstheir classrooms faced [1, 2, 3] and the strategies they adopted to improve the effectiveness ofonline learning [4, 5, 6]. A popular research avenue has been to investigate the impacts of ERLin the context of laboratory and project work—aspects of engineering education which havetraditionally involved hands-on experiences unique to the in-person setting. In [1], the authorsexplain that a key issue arising when conducting labs online is the lack of access to conventionallaboratory equipment, and therefore the reliance on simulation. Interestingly, the authors in [5]show that lab simulations can provide students with a novel "opportunity structure", offeringthem more ownership over the lab
. His educational background is in manufacturing with an emphasis on mechatronics. In addition to his many years of industrial experience, he has taught many different engineering and technology courses at undergraduate and graduate levels. His tremendous re- search experience in manufacturing includes environmentally conscious manufacturing, Internet based robotics, and Web based quality. In the past years, he has been involved in sustainable manufacturing for maximizing energy and material recovery while minimizing environmental impact.Prof. Lucian Ionel Cioca, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu Lucian Ionel CIOCA received the M.Sc. in Machine Tools (1993) and B.Sc. in Occupational Safety, Health and Work Relations
must takeownership of learning the material. If students were sliding by in-class, we would expect thefailure rate to increase compared to a lecture only course, however, the failure rate is notsignificantly different. As Table 6 shows, students are not failing fundamental courses in thethermal sciences at a higher rate when using Team-Based Learning (one term comparison). Table 6: Comparison of the failure rate in TBL taught courses and lecture taught courses. Course TBL Lecture Heat Transfer 1.7% (n=58) 2.7%(n=36) Thermodynamics 1 4.7% (n=63) 5.7%(n=70)In addition to the quantitative questions on the CATME peer
for collecting and analyzing the data obtained by faculty and howthis information is used to within the feedback loop is also illustrated.IntroductionThe EC 2000 accreditation criteria require that an institution have in place acomprehensive outcomes assessment program to ensure the quality and continuousimprovement of the educational process1. There have been many papers published in thelast few years on the topic of assessment as it relates to the new criteria. Assessment maytake place at the course level or at the program level2. Course level assessment attemptsto ensure that in a particular course the required material is sufficiently well taught andunderstood. Program level assessment addresses the program outcome indicators as wellas
the best results in terms of fastest response time and highesttemperature rise. The pressure drop was observed to increase approximately by 2-3% with eachadditional fin. Uncertainty analysis were conducted to check on the applicability of the resultsand was found between ±7-17%.Students experienced various ABET learning outcomes such as team work skills, problemsolving, communication, applying knowledge and technics to engineering technology andapplying math, science and engineering to engineering technology, as well. They also had thechance to work in teams which is another outcome of the ABET rubrics.IntroductionExtended surfaces are widely used with many engineering applications to enhance cooling andheating transfer rates. They are used
-directed and continuous learning [13].KEEN uses an online community and resource center for engineering educators, EngineeringUnleashed [7], which is designed to support the implementation of EML. The platform providesfaculty with a variety of resources and tools, including instructional materials, case studies,magazines, videos, and other materials. One way that the faculty shares instructional materials isthrough KEEN Cards [14]. A KEEN Card includes instructions and resources so that faculty andinstructors who use the Engineering Unleashed platform can adapt this activity for their owncourses [14]. It can also be used to network and connect with engineering educators not onlywithin the network, but anyone who has joined the
lecture addressing the faculty member’s emphasis of specific topicpoints, an applied case study, a hands-on laboratory exercise and a performanceassignment which allows the student to demonstrate mastery of the topics. Some facultyprefer to include short tests within each module while others, like me, wait to completeseveral modules before testing occurs.2. Text Review For a distance learning course, it is imperative that the instructor use atext which completely covers the material which makes up the foundation body ofknowledge for the course. Additionally, the text must be technically accurate, readable,concise and hopefully filled with graphics (to accommodate visual learners). Walk ing inthe shoes of the student, the faculty member must lay
on Robotics). VDE, 2010.6. X. Wang, D. Liu, Y. Tao and Y. Cui, "An Optimized Path Planning Method for Off-Line Programming of a Industrial Robot," 2012 International Conference on Computer Science and Electronics Engineering, Hangzhou, 2012, pp. 57-60.7. Sang Choi, W. Eakins, G. Rossano and T. Fuhlbrigge, "Lead-through robot teaching," 2013 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications (TePRA), Woburn, MA, 2013, pp. 1-4.8. Yusuke Maeda and Takahito Nakamura, View-based teaching/playback for robotic manipulation, ROBOMECH Journal 2 (2015), no. 1, 2.9. M. F. Zaeh and W. Vogl, "Interactive laser-projection for programming industrial robots," 2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented
Paper ID #36790Peer oral exams: A learner-centered authentic assessment approachscalable to large classesMarko V. Lubarda, University of California, San Diego Marko V. Lubarda is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of California, San Diego. He teaches mechanics, materials science, design, computational analysis, and engineering mathematics courses, and has co-authored the undergraduate textbook Intermediate Solid Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2020). He is dedicated to engi- neering pedagogy and enriching students’ learning experiences through
of the Preliminary Report and using a breadboard larger than the Arduino Starter Kit has.The creative metal detector product outcomes identified in Results Table 6 show the variety ofdirections student groups went to fulfill this requirement. Although the approaches typicallyinvolved knowledge outside the scope of the EMAG course, the instructor considered the varietya bonus as it built upon the objective of connecting with other course material, and made formore interesting oral presentations by groups to the rest of the class at the end of the semester.To recap, this paper has addressed an IMD project largely motivated by the need in an EMAGcourse to capture students’ attention in a practical creative hands-on way, and to
Science degree in Architecture from the Illinois Institute of Technology and her Bachelor’s of Architecture degree from Ball State University. Additionally, she continues to practice architecture through her own company, Muse Design. She enjoys the synergistic relationship between her role as a professor and her role as an architect, and believes that this hybrid provides real world practicality into the classroom on a daily basis.Ms. Kelsey Lee RekerMary Ann Frank, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Senior Lecturer, Interior Design c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 From Design Inception through Project Completion: Constructing a
mechatronics and its role in this research? Mechatronics is theapplication of electrical and computer principles to mechanical systems [1]. Oneexample is the application of sensor, actuator, and micro-controllers to automotiveengines. Mechatronics can be used in alternative energy conversions in respect tosensor selection, actuators, control methods, and the implementation of optimizationschemes where a system approach develops the dynamic models and constraints onthe optimization. Another component of the research is that the mechatronics laboratory worksin conjunction with a material science laboratory for a summer undergraduate re-search experience. The governing idea is to take the students through the processof writing a publishable research
Paper ID #35691From Social Distancing to Enhanced Learning in the LaboratoryDr. Alison Rose Kennicutt, York College of Pennsylvania Alison is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at York College of Pennsylvania. She received her B.S. in Civil Engineering and her M. Eng. and Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, NY. Her research interests are in drinking water treatment of emerging contaminants and the production of disinfection byproducts. At York College, Alison loves to use hands- on exploration, both in the field and the lab, to trigger curiosity and get students
Paper ID #16894Online Videos: What Every Instructor Should KnowMr. Petr Johanes, Stanford University Petr Johanes is currently a PhD student in Learning Sciences and Technology Design (LSTD) at the Stanford University Graduate School of Education. He holds a B.S. and M.S. from the Department of Materials Science at Stanford University and has experience teaching engineering courses as well as researching engineering education, especially in the context of online learning. Right now, Petr is looking to investigate the role of epistemological beliefs in learning.Dr. Larry Lagerstrom, Stanford Center for Professional
robotics course is a senior-level design-basedcourse dealing with robotic topics such as robotic kinematics, dynamics, robot controls andsensors. It is intended to enable students to design, control, and maintain robots and robotic-based systems. One of the course outcomes is to enable students to design and implement smallrobotics projects using laboratory robots, sensors and interfaces. This outcome is in line with theABET Criterion 3, student outcomes a, b, c, d, e, g, and k 14. The robotics laboratory curriculumincludes hands-on experiences where students design, build, and control various robots.Programming of industrial robots is accomplished with industrial grade robots extensively usedin automation for material handling applications. In