that there are two basic approaches universities employ to surmount thisproblem, and the choice of this approach deeply impacts the manner in which the entire course istaught. Forty high-ranked electrical engineering schools were surveyed 1. Two-thirds of thoseprograms with undergraduate robotics-centric programs use commercially-available robotics kits.This approach permits a carefully-organized modularized method of teaching that prevents less-skilled students from lagging behind. It is possible to find kits with a variety of interesting sensorsthat can spark the imagination, and little supervision is required while building the kit. Becausethe mechanical engineering problems have been pre-solved, this approach also allowsconcentration on
in various manufacturing and inspection processes. ApplicableABET Outcomes are: 1, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 11. Applicable Track-Specific ABET Outcomes are: M1,M2 and M3.ABET Outcomes are: Engineering graduates have (1) an ability to apply knowledge ofmathematics, science and engineering, (2) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as wellas to analyze and interpret results, (3) an ability to design a system, component or process tomeet desired needs, (4) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams, (5) an ability toidentify, formulate and solve engineering problems, (6) an understanding of the professional andethical responsibilities, (7) an ability to communicate effectively, (8) the broad educationnecessary to understand the impact of
designprocess was the focus of this research, and upper class students had higher self-efficacy for communicating a designversus constructing a prototype. In contrast, one study conducted by Minear et al.[46] looked at individual andgender differences using three forms of engineering self-efficacy, Tinkering, Math, and Design, betweeninexperienced (less than 24 credits, or first year students) and experienced (more than 24 credits, or sophomorestanding) students, finding a strong positive correlation between spatial skills and Design self-efficacy only in thefirst year engineering students.DISCUSSIONIn the studies included in this review, there were many different measures of engineering self-efficacy relating toacademic, skill-specific, and general
processes that engineering is capable of bringing to the table. Thisis one of the most important initial messages that is a part of teaching engineering education forthe K-12 classroom.As an example, the use of a kit that allows students to assemble a pre-designed heart rate monitormay not impact critical thinking [14]. An activity that uses the monitor in the course of takingmeasurements is more of a pure science or mathematics activity than engineering. In fact, anypurely procedural activity runs the risk of losing its connection to engineering if it lacks problemsolving or design. This does not mean that the activity is somehow lesser, but it does mean that itdoesn’t meet learning objectives for engineering.This type of message is an example of
goals that primarily drive engineering education [1, 2] are 1) improving student-learning experience and 2) preparing the students for a successful future career. Recent researchon effective engineering education [1, 2] suggests multiple approaches for student success in theclassroom and beyond. These learning approaches focus on the engagement of students in theclassroom and outside by creating a teachable moment using inductive learning [3, 4, 5], activelearning via in-class activities [6, 7], experiential learning [8, 9, 10], visual learning [2, 11], andproject-based learning [12, 13], to name a few. All the proposed learning approaches augmentthe traditional learning methods. A common factor among all these approaches is studentinvolvement
material (i.e., mathematics, physics, chemistry, English) being taken byengineering students. Thus the SUCCEED Coalition embarked on a set of experiments in 1992 toexplore different approaches to integrate the freshman year.Coupling subject integration in the first year with an introduction to engineering was ideally suitedfor the Coalition’s program given the large resources required to conduct large-scale experiments,the availability of a multiple-campus laboratory to determine robustness, the extended period offunding, and the visibility of this NSF program. The approaches to integration studied by thecoalitions required building teams of faculty from multiple disciplines and assessment experts toevaluate the program impact and designing and
links to resources and opportunities in one document, although lengthy, providesone single source for up-to-date links that can be of used by parents, teachers, students,professors, academic administrators, and engineering professional wishing to motivate andprovide background resources to help guide minority or women during their studies or careers inengineering, e.g. • children to consider careers in the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics), • undergraduate and graduate students to select and pursue a major in an Engineering or STEM discipline, and find scholarships to fund their studies • faculty to survive the tenure process and thrive in an academic environment • academic administrators to get
that the course modifications have had on the university as a whole.Finally, the paper will present assessment results of pre- and post-course surveys of studentperceptions of the use of ACL and PBL to apply attributes of the entrepreneurial mindset. Thesurveys demonstrate a positive shift in perceptions.1. IntroductionLawrence Technological University has offered engineering students entrepreneurial educationprograms for many years. Recognizing that graduates entering industry will require business andentrepreneurial skills, the College of Engineering developed an entrepreneurial certificateprogram and founded the Lear Entrepreneurial Center. The entrepreneurial certificate programdevelops student skills in communication and business
Page 15.1046.2Page 15.1046.3the program: four Unified Robotics courses based on a “spiral curriculum” philosophy where thestudents are engaged in increasingly complex designs and various technical topics are introducedas needed. Each of these courses includes elements of CS, ECE and ME. To add cohesion withincourses, each course in the unified sequence has its own focus, such as locomotion, sensing,manipulation, and navigation. Students in the Robotics program also take other required andelective courses, selected from courses already offered by the various engineering departments.In addition, the program includes a component in social issues and another in entrepreneurship toprepare future “entrepreneurial engineers”7. Like all majors at WPI
flexible assembly of curricularand learning modules from component pieces cannot be realized without consideration of seriousintellectual property issues. But advances in digital rights management offer the potential oftracking usage in a way that reputation can accrue to creators. Certainly this has bearing on howthe engineering education community formally recognizes scholarship.Communication and collaboration capabilities accessible through and in some cases supportedby NSDL offer the engineering education community the opportunity to foster the creation ofteam learning environments that pervade the entire curriculum. These could certainly extendoutside of the formal campus confines to include students from other campuses, practicingengineers
-class experience prior to their first day in front of students. The experience also providesour new instructors a much higher maturity and experience level before the first semesterbegins and prevents on-the-job training from interfering with the students’ education. The Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering (CME) ensures that theirnew faculty are prepared to teach by administering an in-depth six-week trainingprogram. New faculty are so well prepared that students rarely can tell that they are brandnew faculty teaching their first semester. This paper will describe the CME facultytraining program that effectively prepares teachers to actively engage students in thelearning process to increase their success. We will present the
involve engineering design; care is taken to selectmeaningful projects from engineering areas of need. Projects have included creating soft tissuemodels for medical device development, automation of complex manufacturing processes, anddevelopment of prototype surgical tools. Other examples include tools design for a mechanicaldevelopment test effort or sustaining engineering on any of many projects in software, hardwareor research. Company engineers see the selection of a project topic as a real benefit, and strive todefine engaging projects that will be selected by students. Part of the project form defines theAbstract of the project. Project skill levels are specified by the project manager/mentor and it isclear to the student what level is
Physics & Astronomy at Siena College. In addition to teaching physics and electronics courses for the department, she’s also served as the director of informal STEM programs at Siena. She’s developing MARVLS (Manipulable Augmented Reality Models to Learn Spatially) for general physics, plasma physics, chemistry, and engineering. MARVLS Apps are available on the App and Google Play Store. In 2022, she received an NSF grant to develop and study the impact of using MARVLS in the physics classroom. She started a small business called MARVLS, LLC. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Embodied Learning with Gesture Representation in an Immersive Technology
create authentic design experiences.18,19 Moreover,computer animations can enhance student engagement, promote visual learning, and enhance theunderstanding of complex concepts.20The Contest FormatBased on these considerations, we decided to use information technology to facilitate broadparticipation in the contest, to reduce its cost, and to enhance the realism of the designexperience. The resulting contest format is illustrated in the following sequence of events: • Competing individually or in teams of two, contestants access a website to register for the contest. • They download the West Point Bridge Designer software and use it to design a bridge, based on specified criteria and constraints. • They upload the bridge
proposal acceptance, the student team andfaculty advisor are paired with a research-directed mentor. The teams then have an opportunityto engage in scientific research and hands-on design of space-related topics.Three mechanical engineering student teams from Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas had theirproject proposals accepted. The topics were: Team 1) Lunar Lander, Heat Pump for ThermalControl of Space Vehicles; Team 2) Multi-Environment Evaporative Heat Sink Design; andTeam 3) Unpressurized Manned Rover for Use on the Moon or Mars. A systematic managementmethod was developed to ensure that the TSGC projects met usual expectations for academiclevels or disciplines required by ABET. This paper surveys that TSGC-sponsored activity anddiscusses
projects examining implementation of hightechnology, telecommunications and international networking in the classroom. Dr. Irvine has trained preserviceand inservice teachers in the area of electronic communication and technology integration. She serves as consultantto schools and business on design, implementation, and analysis of technology-based solutions to instruction andapplication development. Through field-based research, she has successfully worked to integrate Internet-basedactivities into educational programs for urban, rural, and at-risk K-12 students. Dr. Irvine has taught numerouscourses and workshops devoted to evaluation and assessment of the impact of technology on education. She hasdeveloped and delivered courses and training
Bloom’s Taxonomy as they leverage the knowledge and comprehensiongained in the (IPD and entrepreneurship) process courses for their own projects, focusing onapplication, analysis, synthesis and evaluation in the (IPD and entrepreneurship) project courses.1Live case studies, class trips and hands-on workshops are crafted to help translate theory topractice.During the first week of the spring semester, the students engage in an intensive immersionexperience referred to as TE Week, an educational model that serves as a platform forcollaboration among TE graduate students and faculty, Lehigh’s Office of Technology Transfer(OTT), and innovative faculty researchers who have disclosed inventions to OTT.From the curriculum standpoint, graduate students
, and fault diagnosis. Furthermore, the students through the grant engage in summeroutreach activities. This enables them to mentor high school students, fostering an early interestin engineering and underscoring the importance of sustainable practices for future generations.This embodies the true spirit of pollution prevention, ensuring that the impact of this projectextends beyond the immediate scope of their academic and professional successes.References[1] R. Z. Sunagatullin, F. V. Timofeev, A. Kuznetsov, and Y. N. Oludina, “Relevant issues on quality evaluation of petroleum pipeline preparation for oil product transportation,” Oil &Amp; Gas Science and Technology – Revue D’IFP Energies Nouvelles, vol. 74, 2019, doi: 10.2516
increasingly been recognized as a mechanism for synthesizing real-world experience with academic course content. In recent years, it has been widelyacknowledged that classes designed by utilizing PBL Project - Based Learning are effective inenhancing the problem-solving ability of university students. [1] First coming to prominence inthe 1990’s, effectively structured project-based learning exercises provide a framework in whichstudents are required to draw on their prior coursework to develop solutions for “real world”problems. In a project based learning environment the learners are “actively engaged in workingat tasks and activities which are authentic to the environment in which they would be used” witha focus on “learners as constructors of their
, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.34. O'Neil, H. F., & Perez, R. S. (2006). Web-based learning: Theory, research, and practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.35. Prensky, M. (2004). Digital Game-based Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.36. Simons, K. D., & Klein, J. D. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem- based learning environment. Instructional Science, 35, 41–72.37. Christenson, S. & Reschly, A. (Editors) (2013) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, Springer. Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Conference Copyright © 2015, American
as exploring students’ conceptions of diversity and its importance within engineering fields.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of
department’s introductory course, and freeing up six credit-hour equivalents, oneand a half courses, in the curriculum. The paper discusses how the ABET process enabled thesediscussions to occur; how other curricular changes needed to enable the design thread to beimplemented were accomplished; and the methods used to enable the two degree programs toalign faculty motivation, distribute the workload, and understand the impact the curricularchanges had on student learning. This case study provides an in-depth analysis of a curricularchange process that could be informative for other programs hoping to make such changes.Introduction and Institutional ContextThis paper describes the ongoing evolution of a small electrical and computer engineering (ECE
make changes to building assemblies and components with an understanding ofoverall cost and schedule impact. Importantly, cross-discipline integration between design andconstruction dramatically decreased the time needed for cost estimating, planning andscheduling. It also facilitated reductions in consultant billings for specific civil, structural, andMEP design services.Through a case study approach, this paper validates the use of Building Information Modeling asan integrated format for construction education. It demonstrates the advantage which acomprehensive interface can provide to an engineering student; one which depicts the integrationbetween design and construction services. In such an environment, students are able tosimultaneously
to make at leastone presentation. The presentations are assessed by department faculty fortechnical content, use of effective visual presentations, delivery and style. The Page 12.1190.8students assess the presentation for clarity, technical mastery, and educationalvalue to them. Written comments from faculty and students are compiledseparately and shared with the teams and their faculty advisors. These commentsenable speakers to improve their oral communication skills. The audience alsocomments on technical clarifications needed to understand the project better, anyannoying mannerisms and how the team could improve their visuals for futurepresentations.Table
not yet on the web). The ProjectsThe ten projects conducted are:1. A civil engineering class that combines sophomores, juniors and seniors into teams that compete in apedestrian-bridge or environmental-cleanup competition In this project, groups of selected sophomore, junior, and senior students engage in a one credit hour,semester-long design competition developed and coordinated by a panel of faculty and practicing civilengineers. The class is offered each spring semester, and by taking the course three times, students earn threedesign credit hours which can be used to replace an appropriate course in the civil engineering curriculum
tours, tours of the EuropeanSpace Agency, Opal and John Deere manufacturing facilities, communications centers and energycompanies. Many social activities were also provided to allow students of both countries to interact andlearn from one another.Criteria for Promotion: The criteria for P&T do not exist in the form of a checklist. No one can tell youhow many publications are required or how much funding must be obtained or what levels of teachingevaluations are necessary. Infact, the goal of P&T is a moving target as organizations grow and adapt tochanging academic climates. For the purposes of this paper, the requirements for P&T will be discussedin general terms. The upper most tier is in which category the candidate will be put
. 6. ConclusionsThe impact of a multi-initiative effort on a complex problem as proper ethics teaching tool ina university or school is difficult to assess with firm casual approaches [7]. However, Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of New Mexico – Albuquerque Copyright © 2008, American Society for Engineering Educationqualitative connections can be identified for, before, within, or after undergraduate levelclasses in each subject and assessed. Newer student design competitions should be steadilygrown by industries. Newer research and development laboratories should be opened to bringmore hands on “real world” training from industries to
Solar Energy 2 Solar Energy Nuclear Energy 2 Biomass Energy Biomass Energy 1LecturesA standard approach has been used to cover each of the alternative energy technologies inlecture. An alternative energy is introduced to the class through an active learning experience inwhich the students identify the advantages and disadvantages of the technology. This activityimmediately engages the students and provides the instructor with feedback on the knowledgethe class has concerning the technology. Energetic issues of the power source are presented.Such as the source of wind energy or the use of E=mc2 for nuclear energy. Following
techniques to meet diverse learningand scheduling needs for those pursuing A2 careers is critical5,10,13-17. Although E-learningopportunities have expanded greatly at SC colleges, options providing contextual learning intechnology education are rare. E-learning in A2 that provides content in the context of real-worldapplications, including hands-on laboratory experiences, has yet to be developed. Technologyand software advances would make this possible if this resource is developed in a cost-effectively and collaboratively way and not college-by-college (as is done with E-learning ingeneral education). The primary target for CA2VES E-learning is two-year technical and community collegefaculty and their students in associate degree, A2 technician
stewardship in organizations. Additionally, GO GREENinnovates through experiential site visits, applied undergraduate research, and service learning.Finally, the course seeks to educate students from the disparate-yet-connected disciplines ofdesign, engineering, manufacturing, technology, and leadership. Now in its fifth year, GOGREEN relies heavily on industry-education partnerships. Such partnerships with business,industry, government, and academic enterprises help to bring the concepts of sustainability alivefor students in engineering education. Faculty from varying disciplines support the teaching,research, and service endeavors related to the course. Institutional support for travel, logistics,and program components is also essential to GO